Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Four-wave mixing in 1.3 μm epitaxial quantum dot lasers directly grown on silicon

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

This work compares the four-wave mixing (FWM) effect in epitaxial quantum dot (QD) lasers grown on silicon with quantum well (QW) lasers. A comparison of theory and experiment results shows that the measured FWM coefficient is in good agreement with theoretical predictions. The gain in signal power is higher for p-doped QD lasers than for undoped lasers, despite the same FWM coefficient. Owing to the near-zero linewidth enhancement factor, QD lasers exhibit FWM coefficients and conversion efficiency that are more than one order of magnitude higher than those of QW lasers. Thus, this leads to self-mode locking in QD lasers. These findings are useful for developing on-chip sources for photonic integrated circuits on silicon.

© 2022 Chinese Laser Press

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Directly modulated 1.3 μm quantum dot lasers epitaxially grown on silicon

Daisuke Inoue, Daehwan Jung, Justin Norman, Yating Wan, Nobuhiko Nishiyama, Shigehisa Arai, Arthur C. Gossard, and John E. Bowers
Opt. Express 26(6) 7022-7033 (2018)

Dynamic and nonlinear properties of epitaxial quantum dot lasers on silicon for isolator-free integration

Jianan Duan, Heming Huang, Bozhang Dong, Justin C. Norman, Zeyu Zhang, John E. Bowers, and Frédéric Grillot
Photon. Res. 7(11) 1222-1228 (2019)

Low-noise 1.3  μm InAs/GaAs quantum dot laser monolithically grown on silicon

Mengya Liao, Siming Chen, Zhixin Liu, Yi Wang, Lalitha Ponnampalam, Zichuan Zhou, Jiang Wu, Mingchu Tang, Samuel Shutts, Zizhuo Liu, Peter M. Smowton, Siyuan Yu, Alwyn Seeds, and Huiyun Liu
Photon. Res. 6(11) 1062-1066 (2018)

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are available within the paper and its supplementary materials. Further source data will be made available upon reasonable request.

Code Availability.

The analysis codes will be made available upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Epitaxial structure of the QD laser on silicon.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Optical injection locking setup used for the four-wave mixing experiments.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Optical spectra from a four-wave mixing experiment for (a) undoped QD laser with upconversion frequency detuning of 114 GHz (probe–drive mode number difference Δ m = 3 ); (b) p-doped QD laser with upconversion frequency detuning of 89 GHz (probe–drive mode number difference Δ m = 3 ) and QW laser with upconversion frequency detuning of 110 GHz (probe–drive mode number difference Δ m = 1 ). The different colored lines indicate signal power increases with increasing probe power.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Conversion efficiency of four-wave mixing for p-doped QD, undoped QD, and QW lasers as a function of probe–drive frequency detuning.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Signal–drive ratio η sd as a function of probe–drive ratio η pd for p-doped QD, undoped QD, and QW lasers. The lasers are biased at twice threshold current. The data points are from the experiment with probe–drive injection frequency detuning Δ and probe–drive mode number difference Δ m as indicated. The dashed curves are calculated from multimode laser theory indicating the corresponding FWM coefficient.

Equations (2)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

η CE = P Signal P Probe ,
ξ = c 2 ν d n B ( P 2 γ ) 2 Γ ( k d , k p , k s ) | Λ ( 3 ) ( ν d , ν p , ν s ) | Re [ Λ ( 1 ) ( ν d ) ] ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.