Abstract
Because of the difficulty in resolving optical pulses on a femtosecond scale with electronic detectors, many techniques to indirectly obtain pulse shapes have been developed. Frequency-resolved optical gating is one of the most commonly used measurement methods.1 It provides a two-dimensional dataset known to suffice for uniquely determining both amplitude and phase of a pulse. Nonetheless, aiming at less complex experimental setups and faster convergence of retrieval algorithms, some researchers have invented pulse-retrieval methods using one-dimensional datasets generated from conventional measurements, such as electric-field and interferometric autocorrelations.2–4 These approaches, however, may raise nontrivial ambiguity problems unless sufficient data are involved.
© 2001 Optical Society of America
PDF ArticleMore Like This
Andrius Baltuška, Audrius Pugšlys, Maxim S. Pshenichnikov, and Douwe A. Wiersma
CWF22 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO:S&I) 1999
I. G. Cormack, W. Sibbett, and D. T. Reid
MB1 International Conference on Ultrafast Phenomena (UP) 2000
Tzu-Ming Liu, Yin-Chieh Huang, Gia-Wei Chern, Chih-Jie Lee, Yu-Chueh Hung, and Chi-Kuang Sun
CMP1 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO:S&I) 2001