Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group
  • Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe
  • Technical Digest Series (Optica Publishing Group, 2000),
  • paper CWF112

Operation conditions of eyesafe lidar at 1.54 μm for detection of smoke plumes

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Detection of smoke was one of the first practical applications of lidar Smoke contains a large number of small particles, leading to a large backscattering efficiency. The first lidars used ruby or Nd:YAG lasers, which are dangerous to the eye However the modem tendency in lidar is to use lasers with eyesafe wavelengths at ~1 54 or ≈2 1 or ≈10.6 μm. In particular, lidars with a wavelength within the range ≈1 54 μm are increasingly being used [1]. In our study we will perform computations for a lidar with direct detection mode, at a wavelength at 1.54 μm which is intended for the detection of smoke plumes originating from burning wood or oil. It is assumed that the fuel (wood or oil) is situated at ground level and is in the form of a circle with diameter varying in the range 1 3-3.5 m and burning rate in the range 0.3-4 kg/s. To find parameters burning thermodynamic calculations was performed. The buoyant plume of burning products was described by slender flow equations. An approximate numerical solution of these equations was found on the assumption that the velocity and temperature profiles are Gaussian. The particle emission factor for the burning of wood is within the range 1% and the average density of ash is equal to 1.0 g/cm3. These values correspond to a concentration of ash in the gas products of burning Cpb≈0 3 g/m3 During the burning of oil the smoke yield is ≈12%. A proper soot concentration in this case in the gas products of burning is Cpb≈ 1 45g/m3. The particle size distribution of products of burning wood and oil from literature was used. The backscattering coefficient β is calculated taking into account backscattering cross section, complex refraction index, and particle size distribution. For further computations for burning wood and oil we will use the values 6 6*10−3 m−1sr−1 and 2.5* 10−2 m−1sr−1, respectively. The terms of postdetection electrical-signal power, thermal-noise power, power of electronic postdetection amplifier noise, detector dark-current-noise power, signal shot-noise power, end background illumination shot-noise power appear in the equation for the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Rearrangement of this equation gives the equation for the required laser energy E1.

© 2000 IEEE

PDF Article
More Like This
Development of a 1.54 μm Eyesafe Raman-Shifted Lidar

Edward M. Patterson, David W. Roberts, and Gary G. Gimmestad
TuD13 Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere (ORS) 1990

Lidar Measurement Techniques for Understanding Smoke Plume Dynamics in Sugarcane Production

April L. Hiscox
EM2A.1 Optical Instrumentation for Energy and Environmental Applications (ES) 2013

CELiS (Compact Eyesafe Lidar System): a portable 1.5 μm elastic lidar system for rapid aerosol concentration measurement

Michael D. Wojcik and Alan W. Bird
EM2D.3 Optical Instrumentation for Energy and Environmental Applications (ES) 2012

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.