Comparative study of learning tomography and conventional diffraction tomography

JooWon Lim; Alexandre Goy; Demetri Psaltis

doi:10.1364/DH.2017.Th3A.7

Digital Holography and Three-Dimensional Imaging
OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optica Publishing Group, 2017),
paper Th3A.7
•https://doi.org/10.1364/DH.2017.Th3A.7

Comparative study of learning tomography and conventional diffraction tomography

JooWon Lim, Alexandre Goy, and Demetri Psaltis

Digital Holography and Three-Dimensional Imaging 2017

JeJu Island Republic of Korea
29 May–1 June 2017
ISBN: 978-1-943580-28-6

From the session
3D Imaging and Display Systems III (Th3A)

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Get PDF
Email
Share
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
J. Lim, A. Goy, and D. Psaltis, "Comparative study of learning tomography and conventional diffraction tomography," in Digital Holography and Three-Dimensional Imaging, OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optica Publishing Group, 2017), paper Th3A.7.

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Citation alert
Save article

Abstract

We compare learning tomography with conventional linear diffraction tomography. These two models are assessed using Mie theory while using the same regularization. There are clear advantages of learning tomography against the linear model.

PDF Article

More Like This

Assessment of the advantages of learning tomography over conventional linear optical tomography

JooWon Lim, Alexandre Goy, and Demetri Psaltis
JSII_1_4 European Quantum Electronics Conference (EQEC) 2017

Learning tomography plus for highly scattering samples

Joowon Lim, Ahmed B. Ayoub, Elizabeth E. Antoine, and Demetri Psaltis
CTh1A.2 Computational Optical Sensing and Imaging (COSI) 2019

Physics-Embedded Deep Learning for Intensity Diffraction Tomography

Alex Matlock and Lei Tian
FTu2B.1 Frontiers in Optics (FiO) 2020

Previous Article Next Article