Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Comparison of various numerical methods for ridge waveguides

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

The four modeling techniques compared for the eigenmode analysis of optical ridge guides are effective-index, finite-difference semivectorial, finite-element semivectorial, and vector-H formulation methods. We have written software for the effective-index and finite-difference semivectorial and Rahman and Davies’ finite-element vector-H formulation techniques. Comparison of these methods are made by applying them to a single three-layer ridge guide with variable ridge height and outer slab thickness. The eigenvalue solutions from these methods yield the propagating modes and the normalized refractive indices for the various waveguide structures. Our results compare quite favorably with those of Stem and of Rahman and Davies.

© 1990 Optical Society of America

PDF Article
More Like This
Comparison of Numerical Studies on Active Rectangular Waveguide Couplers by Vector, Scalar Finite Element, and Effective Refractive Index Methods

Kyohei Sakuda and Koichi Hayakawa
SC2 Numerical Simulation and Analysis in Guided-Wave Optics and Opto-Electronics (GWOE) 1989

INVESTIGATION OF SINGLE-MODE STRUCTURES IN HETEROSTRUCTURE AlGaAs/GaAs RIDGE WAVEGUIDES

M. Nisa Khan and Anand Gopinath
IMB13 Integrated Photonics Research (IPR) 1993

Numerical analysis of a Ti:LiNbO3 polarization splitter: comparison of FEM and BPM results

E. Strake, L. Bersiner, and U. Hempelmann
MG2 Integrated Photonics Research (IPR) 1990

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.