Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Psychophysical and Computational Tests Comparing the Sign-Correlation and Zero-Crossing Models of Human Stereo Vision

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Prazdny[5] introduced a clever wrinkle into the debate on binocular stereo models suggesting that transparent random-dot stereograms would be difficult to solve using just coarse-scale information as would be the case for Marr and Poggio’s zero-crossing theory[1]. These transparent stereograms are, however, relatively easy for human subjects to see. Prazdny proposed an alternate approach which operated on the fine structure in the images.

© 1989 Optical Society of America

PDF Article
More Like This
Predictions from a computational model of texture perception compared with psychophysical data

Jitendra Malik and Pietro Perona
MD2 Image Understanding and Machine Vision (IUMV) 1989

Direct measurement of volume of arbitrarily shaped piles from binocular stereo images

Neil Hunt and H. K. Nishihara
WD2 Image Understanding and Machine Vision (IUMV) 1989

A Closer Look at the Contribution of a Third Camera Towards Accuracy in Stereo Correspondence2

Umesh R. Dhond and J. K. Aggarwal
TuC1 Image Understanding and Machine Vision (IUMV) 1989

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.