Abstract
Separation discrimination thresholds are ordinarily measured with a pair of targets that are symmetrically placed with respect to the fovea, so that eccentricity increases as separation increases. In these conditions, the separation discrimination threshold (for separations larger than some minimum value) is a constant fraction of the target separation; i.e., localization obeys Weber’s law. However, this is not generally true. If the eccentricity of the features is kept constant, localization thresholds increase with separation at a rate slightly less than predicted by Weber’s law and then become constant, varying solely with eccentricity. [Flattening has also been reported for a bisection task by Levi et al. (Vision Res., in press).] Thus there appear to be two mechanisms involved, one which is sensitive to separation and relatively insensitive to eccentricity [Burbeck, Inv. Ophthalmol. Suppl. (1988)] and one which is primarily sensitive to eccentricity. The separation discrimination thresholds, as ordinarily measured across the fovea, measure sensitivity in the flat portions of the curves where eccentricity is the main factor (because a foveally centered target presents the maximum separation achievable at a given eccentricity). However, separation itself is the primary factor in many other stimulus conditions.
© 1988 Optical Society of America
PDF ArticleMore Like This
John Palmer and Nobuko Murakami
TUR4 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1988
J. Douglas Willen, Donald I. A. Macleod, and Michael J. Morgan
TUR6 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1988
John Palmer and Nobuko Murakami
MN5 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1987