Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Computation speeds of different optical thin-film synthesis methods

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

There is a need to compare the computation times of, and the results obtained by commonly used thin film design methods. Clearly it is desirable, for a given problem, to employ a method which yields good solutions in a reasonable time. In particular, the solution should be based on the use of only a few materials because such systems are easier to produce in practice. An intercomparison of ten different refinement methods has been published recently.1 In this paper a similar study is performed for the following numerical thin film synthesis techniques: comprehensive search, gradual evolution, flip-flop, minus filter and inverse Fourier transform methods. For this purpose a common master program was written that provides for timing and for the input and output of data, and which can invoke each of the above methods in turn. Calculations were performed on several examples. The results are presented for each method in diagrams that show the spectral performance of the resulting multilayer, its refractive index profile, and the variation of the merit function with computation time.

© 1990 Optical Society of America

PDF Article
More Like This
Iterative correction process for optical thin film synthesis with the Fourier transform method

P. G. Verly and J. A. Dobrowolski
TUR4 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1989

A flip-flop thin-film design program with enhanced capabilities

J. A. Dobrowolski and R. A. Kemp
ThD1 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1990

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.