Abstract
Liquid crystals have attractive properties since they exhibit a large birefringence change at low applied voltages and a good optical transparency in the IR. A parallel alignment LC cell compared with twisted or perpendicular alignment in the IR is employed for three reasons: the dark state is insensitive to wavelength; highly stable LC mixtures can be formulated with large positive εo large Δn and low viscosity; and a relatively thinner LC layer that does not seriously weaken the modulation efficiency is usable. The cell made with a pair of BaF AR-coated windows (coating In1O1 infrared conductive film) is in the polarizer-LC cell-analyzer configuration. An extended beam of a 10.6-µm Co2 laser with a few tens of µW cm2 transmitted a 10-µm LC layer of E1 driven by 2.4-3.2 V (1 kHz). An optical response time of 75 ms is achieved from this modulator utilizing the controlled birefringence effect. This time is smaller than that calculated from τ = r1d2/k11π2, because of the difference between the reorientation time and optical response time, varying by a factor of 2–4. Using the same cell with E10, the 65-ms optical response time is achieved. The smaller time is due to its better parameter of r1/k11 although Δn is a little large. The choice of LC is discussed by calculating the two important parameters of response time (τ = r1d2/k11π2) and dynamic range (δ = 2 π dΔn/λ) with r1k11 and Δn.
© 1991 Optical Society of America
PDF ArticleMore Like This
Kristina M. Johnson
ThT1 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1991
D. ARMITAGE and M. E. STEFANOV
TUG1 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO:S&I) 1985
David A. Jared, Richard Turner, and Kristina M. Johnson
MD2 Optical Computing (IP) 1991