Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Sensitivity to spatial variations in image motion

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Extending a method of van Doorn and Koenderink,1 I have examined visibility of spatial modulations of image motion. The stimulus was the sum to two moving bandpass noise images with different velocities. Over the vertical extend of the stimulus, the two noise images were contrast modulated in antiphase by the square root of a stationary sinusoid. For large modulation amplitude, the typical appearance is alternating horizontal stripes of differing velocity. At smaller amplitudes, the stripes disappear. The experimental task was forced-choice discrimination between zero and some nonzero modulation amplitude. A staircase measured the threshold amplitude for various modulation frequencies to determine a velocity-modulation sensitivity function. Data were collected for several noise spatial frequencies and velocities. For each noise frequency tested, modulation sensitivity falls off steeply about one octave below the noise frequency. In certain conditions, sensitivity also declines at low modulation frequencies, consistent with differentiation of motion estimates, as might be employed in a motion-edge sensor.

© 1991 Optical Society of America

PDF Article
More Like This
Motion-Defined Letter Reading Test

D. Regan and X.H. Hong
WE2 Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System (NAVS) 1991

What’s constant in contrast constancy?

Nuala Brady and David J. Field
ThAA1 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1991

Color information improves motion detection and velocity discrimination

Brent R. Beutter, Tribhawn Kumar, and Donald A. Glaser
FW4 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1991

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.