Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Tradeoffs in binary and nonbinary optical recording

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

We consider tradeoffs and storage density limitations in both binary and M-ary optical recording systems that use runlength limited coding. The intention of M-ary recording is to increase the storage density and/or data transfer rate of the disc. However, for a given increase in channel signal-to-noise ratio, it is not clear whether binary coding methods or M-ary coding methods achieve the largest density. In this paper we give fundamental insight to this problem. Particular emphasis is given to the best choice of M, the number of recording levels, and the runlength parameters d and k for a given channel signal-to noise ratio to maximize storage density. The storage channel is assumed to be noisy with an additive white Gaussian noise. The Shannon capacity (and maximum storage density) is discussed and computed for various signal to noise ratios and recording parameters.

© 1998 Optical Society of America

PDF Article
More Like This
Full Digital Video Read Write Disk Drive Using M-ary Coding

Steven W. McLaughlin, John M. Gerpheide, and Allen M. Earman
WD4 Optical Data Storage (ODS) 1994

A Multilevel, Runlength Limited Encoding Scheme for Optical Recording

Estuardo Licona and Steven W. McLaughlin
TuP9 International Symposium on Optical Memory and Optical Data Storage (ODS) 2005

Modulation Codes for Multi-wavelength and Multi-level Photochromic Optical Recording Channel

Hua Hu, Duanyi Xu, and Guosheng Qi
TuP11 International Symposium on Optical Memory and Optical Data Storage (ODS) 2005

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.