Performance and Complexity Comparison of CPE Algorithms for 256-QAM Optical Signals

S. M. Bilal; G. Bosco; J. Cheng; J. Cheng; Alan Pak Tao Lau; Chao Lu

doi:10.1364/OFC.2015.W1E.6

Optical Fiber Communication Conference
OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optica Publishing Group, 2015),
paper W1E.6
•https://doi.org/10.1364/OFC.2015.W1E.6

Performance and Complexity Comparison of CPE Algorithms for 256-QAM Optical Signals

S. M. Bilal, G. Bosco, J. Cheng, Alan Pak Tao Lau, and Chao Lu

Optical Fiber Communication Conference 2015

Los Angeles, California United States
22–26 March 2015
ISBN: 978-1-55752-937-4

From the session
Carrier Phase Recovery (W1E)

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Get PDF
Email
Share
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
S. M. Bilal, G. Bosco, J. Cheng, A. P. T. Lau, and C. Lu, "Performance and Complexity Comparison of CPE Algorithms for 256-QAM Optical Signals," in Optical Fiber Communication Conference, OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optica Publishing Group, 2015), paper W1E.6.

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Citation alert
Save article

Abstract

A detailed analysis of different CPE schemes for 256- QAM signals is presented. Viterbi&Viterbi algorithms demonstrate very poor performance, while the best compromise between complexity and performance is achieved using the BPS+MLE algorithm.

PDF Article

More Like This

Multi-Stage CPE Algorithms for 64-QAM Constellations

S. M. Bilal, C. R. S. Fludger, and G. Bosco
M2A.8 Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2014

Modulation Format Independent and Low Complexity CPE Algorithm for Elastic Optical Networks

Tao Yang, Xue Chen, and Huan Chen
STu3M.1 CLEO: Science and Innovations (CLEO:S&I) 2017

A Novel Optical Carrier Phase Estimation Technique Based on Viterbi-Viterbi and QPSK Partitioning for 16-QAM

Heba M. Shehata and Ziad A. El-Sahn
AM3F.4 Asia Communications and Photonics Conference (ACP) 2015

Previous Article Next Article