Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Physical properties of hydrogen bonded nematic liquid crystals and electro-optical properties in terahertz waves [Invited]

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

4-m-alkyl cyclohexane carboxylic acids and 4-n-alkylbenzoic acids were mixed to form hydrogen bonded liquid crystals (HBLCs), which exhibited a nematic phase at room temperature. Dielectric constants and three elastic constants of HBLC mixtures were investigated. Benzoic acid derivatives with some polar groups were added to the HBLC and the dielectric anisotropy was successfully enhanced. Considering the absorption loss of HBLCs in the terahertz wave region, the electro-optical properties of the homogeneous and twisted nematic cells were numerically evaluated using measured physical properties, and the transmitted polarization state was compared with that of conventional nematic LCs.

© 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

Corrections

10 July 2023: A minor correction was made to the title.

1. Introduction

A nematic liquid crystal (NLC) has been extensively and intensively studied due to its distinctive properties and the importance of technologies for electro-optical applications mainly in LC displays. A large number of rod-like molecules which can form LCs have been synthesized, and hydrogen bonded LCs (HBLCs) have been reported as a new binary type of LC by Kato et al. [15]. HBLCs have attracted attention for both their fundamental aspects and various technological applications. Other groups have also reported that alkyl or alkyloxy benzoic acids form complementary hydrogen bonds with other acids to exhibit the N phase [619].

HBLCs have been studied mainly in terms of their phase diagrams, and less attention has been paid to optical tuning and switching by applying voltage to the HBLC cell. Only a few studies have been reported, including transmittance variations in twisted nematic (TN) cells [5] and homogeneously oriented cells [9,20]. Especially in Ref. 20, Ito et al. applied HBLCs to the phase shifter of a terahertz (THz) frequency range. LC devices are strong candidates for THz wave control devices, as well as visible light control devices, because of their tunability at low driving voltages and low power consumption. However, conventional LC materials generally exhibit large absorption anisotropy [2128]. In contrast, the HBLC has been found to have almost no absorption anisotropy in the THz wave region [20,29,30].

To study the electro-optical properties of LC cells, numerical analyses of both the LC director distribution using continuum elasticity theory and the polarized light propagation using the Jones matrix method are powerful techniques. It is common to simulate the voltage-transmittance (V-T) curve in LC displays using these techniques. Physical properties of the LC material, elastic constants of splay (K11), twist (K22), and bend (K33), dielectric constants parallel and perpendicular to the director, and ordinary and extraordinary refractive indices are essential. However, there are only a few reports on these values for HBLC [13,14,18,31,32], and no data have been found for K22 and K33. In addition, those values were measured at around 100°C, as the nematic temperature range of those HBLCs is much higher than room temperature.

In this study, the physical properties of HBLCs necessary for the simulation of optical devices have been investigated at room temperature from the point of view of device application. Using the measured physical properties of the HBLCs, the electro-optical properties of the homogeneous and TN cells were numerically estimated in both the visible and THz wave ranges and compared with those of typical NLCs.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

Figure 1 shows chemical structures of (a) 4-m-alkyl Cyclohexane carboxylic acids (mCCA), (b) 4-n-alkylbenzoic acids (nBA), (c) 4-cyanobenzoic acid (4CNBA), (d) 3-cyanobenzoic acid (3CNBA) (e) 2-cyanobenzoic acid (2CNBA), (f) 4-fluorobenzoic acid (4FBA), (g) 3-fluorobenzoic acid (3FBA), (h) 2-fluorobenzoic acid (2FBA), (i) 4-chlorobenzoic acid (4ClBA), (j) 4-cyano-3-fluorobenzoic acid (4CN3FBA), (k) 4-chloro-3-fluorobenzoic acid (4Cl3FBA) used in this study. mCCA and nBA were purchased from LCC Co., Ltd. (Fujiyoshida, Japan) and benzoic acid derivatives attached to the polar groups were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry (Tokyo, Japan). The chemical structure of the HBLC dimer with 5BA and 4CNBA is shown in Fig. 1(l), which is similar to that of a typical positive dielectric NLC used in conventional LC devices. The mixture of 3CCA, 4CCA, and 5CCA (1:1:1 weight ratio) is available as CC-3 from LCC Co., Ltd. and it is in the N phase from 10 to 97°C. The other materials shown in Fig. 1(c) − 1(k) are in the crystal phase at room temperature.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Chemical structures of (a) mCCA, (b) nBA, (c)-(k) benzoic acid derivatives attached to polar groups, d (l) HBLC dimer.

Download Full Size | PDF

2.2 LC physical property measurement

Two types of LC cells with homogeneous and 90° TN orientations were prepared by injecting the N phase HBLC into an empty cell purchased from EHC Co. Ltd (Hachioji, Japan). The precise cell gap d was measured by calculating the interference spectrum. The capacitance-voltage (C-V) curve of the cell was measured at 1 kHz using HP 4284 LCR meter. The conductivity of the investigated HBLCs was less than 10−11 S/cm. The real part of the dielectric constant was calculated from the ratio of the capacitance of the sample cell to that of the empty cell. The dielectric constant of the LC perpendicular to the molecular axis (${\varepsilon _ \bot }$) was measured by applying a voltage below the threshold, and that parallel to the axis (${\varepsilon _{/{/}}}$) was obtained by linear extrapolation to an infinite voltage as a function of 1/V. [33,34]. The voltage-transmittance (V-T) curve was measured using a laser diode (640 nm) between crossed polarizers. The polarizer axis was set at 45° to the LC director in the homogeneous cell and parallel to the LC director on either substrate in the TN cell. The frequency of the applied voltage was 1 kHz.

Figure 2 shows a definition of the LC director with tilt angle θ and twist angle $\phi $ in the LC cell. Wp_0 and Wp_d are the polar anchoring strengths and Wa_0 and Wa_d are the azimuthal anchoring strengths of each substrate. A total free energy per unit area F in the LC cell [35] is represented

$$F = {F_{\textrm{bulk}}} + {F_{\textrm{electric}}} + {F_{\textrm{surface}}}$$
$$\begin{aligned}{F_{\textrm{bulk}}} + {F_{\textrm{electric}}} &= \mathop \int \nolimits_0^d \frac{1}{2}\left\{ ({{K_{11}}\textrm{co}{\textrm{s}^2}\theta (z )+ {K_{33}}\textrm{si}{\textrm{n}^2}\theta (z )} ){{\left( {\frac{{d\theta (z )}}{{dz}}} \right)}^2}\,\right.\\ &\quad + ({{K_{22}}\textrm{co}{\textrm{s}^2}\theta (z )+ {K_{33}}\textrm{si}{\textrm{n}^2}\theta (z )} )\textrm{co}{\textrm{s}^2}\theta (z ){{\left( {\frac{{d\phi (z )}}{{dz}}} \right)}^2}\\ &\quad \left. { - {\varepsilon_0}({{\varepsilon_ \bot } + \varDelta \varepsilon si{n^2}\theta (z )} ){{\left( {\frac{{dV(z )}}{{dz}}} \right)}^2}} \right\}\end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}{F_{\textrm{surface}}} &= \frac{1}{2}{W_{\textrm{p}\_0}}\textrm{si}{\textrm{n}^2}({{\theta_0} - \theta (0 )} )+ \frac{1}{2}{W_{\textrm{p}\_\textrm{d}}}\textrm{si}{\textrm{n}^2}({{\theta_\textrm{d}} - \theta (d )} )\\&\quad + \frac{1}{2}{W_{\textrm{a}\_0}}\textrm{si}{\textrm{n}^2}({{\phi_0} - \phi (0 )} )+ \frac{1}{2}{W_{\textrm{a}\_\textrm{d}}}\textrm{si}{\textrm{n}^2}({{\phi_d} - \phi (d )} ),\end{aligned}$$
where $\varDelta \varepsilon $ is the dielectric anisotropy and V(z) is the voltage potential. ${\theta _0}$ and ${\phi _0}$ are the polar and azimuthal easy axis angles on the lower side of the substrate, respectively. ${\theta _\textrm{d}}$ and ${\phi _\textrm{d}}$ are angles of the easy axis on the upper side of the substrate. ${\theta _0}$ and ${\theta _\textrm{d}}$ are the pretilt angles of the LC on the substrates.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Definition of the LC director, n, and surface alignment conditions of the substrate in the LC cell.

Download Full Size | PDF

The LC distributions of θ(z) and ϕ(z) in the cell were obtained by solving a set of Euler–Lagrange equations to minimize the total free energy of Eq. (1). The finite difference method was used to estimate θ(z) and ϕ(z). The LC layer was divided into d/1000 near the substrate and d/50 around the center of the cell to account for the anchoring strength in the difference method. The transmittance was calculated using the Jones matrix corresponding to each divided LC thin layer which can be approximated by a homogeneous medium [36]. In the homogeneous cell, K11 was first chosen to match the measured threshold voltage, and then K33, pretilt angle, polar anchoring strength, and refractive index anisotropy $\Delta n$ were adjusted to fit the theoretical C-V and V-T curves. K22 was further adjusted to fit the theoretical curves of the TN cell.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 physical properties of HBLCs

It is known that $\Delta n$ and $\Delta \varepsilon$ of bicyclohexane NLC are generally lower than those of biphenyl NLCs [37]. In fact, $\Delta n$ and $\Delta\varepsilon $ of CC-3 are respectively 0.052 and 0.16 (provided by LCC Co., Ltd.), and are too small to be applied to electro-optical devices. Therefore, nBA was mixed with CC-3 to increase anisotropy. Table 1 shows the HBLC homologous series with CC-3 and nBA (1:1 weight ratio). The HBLC mixture containing only CC-3 and 2BA exhibited the N phase at 25°C. Subsequently, 2BA (20 wt%) and nBA (30 wt%) were mixed with CC-3. In the series of mixtures, the HBLCs exhibited the N phase at 25°C except for 3BA.

Tables Icon

Table 1. HBLC mixtures with CC-3 (mCCA) and nBA

Figure 3 shows the measured transmittance by applying a voltage to the homogeneous and TN cells using the HBLC mixture of CC-3 (50 wt%) and 2BA (50 wt%). Calculated curves were approximately fitted to the measured results by the appropriate selection of K11, K22, K33, $\Delta n$, pretilt angle, and polar anchoring strength. The estimated uncertainties of elastic constants, dielectric constants, and $\Delta n$ were ±1, ± 0.1, and ±0.002, respectively. Physical properties obtained in the homogeneous cell were almost the same as those obtained in the TN cell, as shown in Fig. 4. The pretilt angles were 0.5 − 1.0° and the polar anchoring strengths in each cell were 0.8 − 2.0 × 10−3 N/m, which are almost the same as those values using usual NLCs on the rubbed polyimide alignment surface (AL-1254 from JSR Corp. Japan). When the azimuthal anchoring strength was adjusted between 1 × 10−4 and 1 × 10−3 N/m in the TN cell, the changes in the calculated V-T curves were very small and did not affect the fitting results. Therefore, the azimuthal anchoring strength of 5 × 10−4 N/m was used to fit the measured V-T curve.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Theoretical V-T curve fitted to measurement result in (a) homogeneous and (b) TN cell using HBLC mixture with CC-3 and 2BA.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Add-even effects of alkyl carbon number on (a) elastic constant, (b) dielectric anisotropy, and (c) refractive index anisotropy in mCCA and nBA mixtures.

Download Full Size | PDF

K11 and K33 clearly showed the odd-even effect of the alkyl carbon number n and K33/K11 decreased with n. Similar add-even effects have been reported for the n-cyanobipheny and n-phenylcyclohexane NLCs [38,39]. K22 slightly increased with n and the odd-even effect was not clearly observed. K22/K11 was about 0.3 − 0.5, which was small compared to the typical LCs of about 0.5 − 0.8. $\Delta\varepsilon $ was successfully increased about 4 − 5 times by the addition of nBA. $\Delta n$ was also increased by a factor of about 1.8.

To further increase the dielectric anisotropy, BA derivatives attached to the polar groups shown in Fig. 1(c) − 1(k) were added to the mixture of mCCA and nBA in which six acids were mixed in equal amounts (m = 3, 4, 5, n = 2, 4, 5, available as PC-29 from LCC). Table 2 shows the physical properties of the HBLC mixtures at 25°C. The concentration of BA derivatives in PC-29 was 5 wt%. All HBLC mixtures exhibited the N phase except for 2CNBA at 25°C. The ${\varepsilon _{/{/}}}$ of HBLC mixtures with the BA derivative whose polar group was at the para-position of the carboxylate group was higher than that of PC-29. On the other hand, no significant changes in the ${\varepsilon _ \bot }$ were observed. When 4CN3FBA was added, the largest $\Delta\varepsilon $, approximately 4 times higher than that of PC-29, was obtained. The effect of BA derivatives on the elastic constant and $\Delta n$ was small due to the low mixing concentration. For reference, the data of the typical NLCs of 5CB (4-cyano-4'-pentylbiphenyl) and 5PCH(4-(trans-4-pentylcyclohexyl)benzonitrile) are also shown in Table 2. Elastic constants of HBLC mixtures were higher than those of 5CB and 5PCH, resulting in a higher driving voltage in electro-optical devices.

Tables Icon

Table 2. Physical properties of HBLC mixtures.

Figure 5(a) shows the dielectric anisotropy as a function of fluorobenzoic acid concentration. $\Delta\varepsilon $ increased with the concentration of 4FBA. Assuming that $\Delta\varepsilon $ increases proportionally to the concentration, $\Delta\varepsilon $ of the binary LC with fluorine polar and non-polar side-chain terminal groups is estimated to be about 3, which is a reasonable value compared to the fluorine-end type LCs [41]. In contrast, $\Delta\varepsilon $ decreased by adding 2FBA. 3FBA did not affect $\Delta\varepsilon $. Figure 5(b) shows the refractive index anisotropy as a function of fluorobenzoic acid concentration. When the mixture concentration was increased to 10 wt%, $\Delta n$ was about 0.11 and did not depend on the amount of fluorobenzoic acid. The $\Delta n$ value of fluorine-end-type LCs for display devices has been reported to be around 0.1. The addition of 15 wt% fluorobenzoic acid was attempted; however, the mixture exhibited a smectic phase at 25°C.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. (a) Dielectric anisotropy and (b) refractive index anisotropy as a function of fluorobenzoic acids concentration.

Download Full Size | PDF

3.2 Electro-optical properties

Figure 6(a) shows V-T curves calculated in homogeneous cells between crossed polarizers using the parameters shown in Table 2. The wavelength was 640 nm. The cell thickness was determined so that the phase retardation $\Delta\varGamma \; ({ = 2\mathrm{\pi}\Delta nd/\lambda } )$ was 2π. The threshold voltage of PC-29 was 5.1 V, which was approximately 6 times higher than that of 5CB. It was reduced to 2.7 V by adding 4CN3FBA at 5 wt%. The $\Delta\varGamma $ decreased from 2π to nearly 0 by the LC reorientation with voltage. Therefore, the transmittance reaches 100% at $\Delta\varGamma $ of π where the LC cell acts as a λ/2 plate. Figure 6(b) shows calculated V-T curves in 90° TN cells between crossed polarizers. The cell thickness was set to satisfy the 1st Mauguin minimum condition, that is $d = \sqrt 3 \lambda /\Delta n$. In the visible light range, the LCs exhibit no absorption loss, therefore the polarization of the incident light rotates perfectly at 90° and the transmittance is 100% in the absence of the applied voltage. The transmittance decreased with the applied voltage and became less than 0.1% at 7 V when the HBLC of PC-29 + 4CN3FBA was used.

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. V-T curves in (a) homogeneous cells and (b) TN cells between crossed polarizers. The wavelength is 640 nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

In the THz range, the LC exhibits absorption loss. Common NLCs have a negative dichroism [26,4244], while the HBLC of PC-29 has been reported to have no dichroism [20]. When the incident light is normal to the substrate, the absorption coefficient α and $\Delta n $ of the LC are represented as a function of tilt angle θ

$$\alpha (\theta )= {\alpha _\textrm{o}}\textrm{si}{\textrm{n}^2}\theta + {\alpha _\textrm{e}}\textrm{co}{\textrm{s}^2}\theta ,$$
$$\varDelta n(\theta )= \frac{{{n_e}{n_\textrm{o}}}}{{\sqrt {{n_e}^2\textrm{si}{\textrm{n}^2}\theta + {n_\textrm{o}}^2\textrm{co}{\textrm{s}^2}\theta } }} - {n_\textrm{o}},$$
where ${\alpha _\textrm{o}}\; \textrm{and}\; {\alpha _\textrm{e}}$ are ordinary and extraordinary absorption coefficients, and ${n_\textrm{o}}\; \textrm{and}\; {n_\textrm{e}}$ are ordinary and extraordinary refractive indices, respectively. The transmittance was determined using the Jones matrix calculus using the complex refractive index [29,45,46].

Figure 7 shows V-T curves of the homogeneous cell in the THz range. The transmittance was calculated using the absorption coefficients shown in Table 3 and the other physical properties shown in Table 2. The incident light was polarized parallel to the LC director. At THz frequencies, the cell thickness must be larger than 100 µm to obtain suitable cell performance. When the cell thickness was 500 µm, the transmittances of 5CB and 5PCH cells without voltage were 58.0% and 51.9%, respectively, and decreased with voltage, as shown in Fig. 7(a). On the other hand, the transmittance of PC-29 cell was constant at 15.7%.

 figure: Fig. 7.

Fig. 7. V-T curves of the extraordinary THz wave in homogeneous cells. The cell thickness is (a) 500 µm and (b) is set to be the retardation of 2π.

Download Full Size | PDF

Tables Icon

Table 3. Refractive index and absorption coefficient of LCs in THz wave.

Figure 7(b) shows the calculated V-T curves when each cell thickness is set to be the $\Delta\varGamma $ of 2π. Each cell thickness used was 1250 µm at 2 THz for 5CB, 1875µm at 2 THz for 5PCH, and 706 µm at 2.5 THz for PC-29. Nose and coworkers have reported that $\Delta n$ of usual NLCs at millimeter-wave and THz regions was smaller than that at the visible light [47]; 5CB and 5PCH as well (see Tables 1 and 3). On the other hand, it has been reported that $\Delta n$ of HBLCs at 50 GHz was larger than that at the visible light [48]. Therefore, the absorption loss was suppressed in the PC-29 cell and the transmittance was higher than those of the 5CB and 5PCH cells under the high voltage application due to the thinner cell thickness and no dichroism.

Figure 8(a) shows calculated V-T curves in homogeneous between crossed polarizers. Since the transmittance was dominated by the value of $\Delta n$, here the unmeasured ${n_\textrm{o}}\; \textrm{and}\; {n_\textrm{e}}$ were set to 1.5 and 1.67, respectively. The cell thickness was determined so that the $\Delta\varGamma$ became 2π. The transmittance was 0% in the PC29 cell in the absence of voltage, because the output light was linearly polarized at 45° as shown in Fig. 8(c). The maximum transmittance was 7.3% at 8.2 V where the $\Delta\varGamma$ was reduced to π, and the output light was linearly polarized at −45°, as shown in Fig. 8(d). When the voltage of 13.7 V was applied, the $\Delta\varGamma$ became π/2 and the output light was right-handed circularly polarized, as shown in Fig. 8(e). At a voltage of 6.4 V, the $\Delta\varGamma$ was 3π/4, resulting in left-handed circular polarization. Assuming that the absorption coefficient of PC-29 + 4CN3FBA is the same as that of PC-29 due to the low concentration of 4CN3FBA, the polarization control is performed at about half the applied voltage.

 figure: Fig. 8.

Fig. 8. (a) V-T curves of THz wave in the homogeneous cell between crossed polarizers (ϕp = 45°, ϕA = −45°). (b) The polarization state of the incident terahertz wave. (c)−(e) Polarization state variation of the transmitted terahertz wave in homogeneous cells by applying a voltage.

Download Full Size | PDF

In the 5CB cell, the transmittance was 1.8% at a voltage of 0 V, because the polarization angle is 21.6°, even when the output light was linearly polarized, as shown in Fig. 8(a) and 8(f). The peak transmittance of 5.5% was obtained at 1.3 V. Here, the $\Delta\varGamma$ was 1.13π and the output wave was elliptically polarized as shown in Fig. 8(g). Output polarization states at the $\Delta\varGamma$ of π and π/2 are shown in Fig. 8(h) and 8(i). In the 5PCH cell, the absorption loss of the ordinary wave was so large that the transmittance decreased monotonically with voltage.

Figure 9 shows calculated V-T curves in 90° TN cells between crossed polarizers. Each cell thickness used in the calculation was 1083 µm at 2 THz for 5CB, 1624 µm at 2 THz for 5PCH, and 611 µm at 2.5 THz for PC-29 to satisfy the 1st Mauguin minimum condition. In the PC-29 cell, the polarization direction of the incident light was completely rotated at 90° and the transmittance was 10.4% whether the polarization direction was parallel (ϕp = 0°) or perpendicular (ϕp = 90°) to the LC direction of the entrance side of the substrate. At a voltage above 13 V, the optical rotation function was lost and the transmittance was close to 0%. When the cell was placed between parallel polarizers, the transmittance changed from 0% to 10.4% by applying a voltage.

 figure: Fig. 9.

Fig. 9. (a) V-T curves of THz wave in the TN cell between crossed polarizers. (b)−(e) Polarization states of the transmitted wave in the TN cell at 0 V.

Download Full Size | PDF

In the 5CB and 5PCH TN cells, the transmittance and the polarization state depended on the polarization direction of the incident light due to the dichroism of the LCs. The output wave showed elliptical polarization as shown in Fig. 8(d) − 8(g) without applied voltage. The transmission of the incident wave at ϕp = 90° was less than half of that at ϕp = 0° due to the larger absorption loss of the ordinary wave. When 2.2 V was applied to the 5CB cell, the optical rotation function was lost and the transmittance after passing through the analyzer was almost 0%. Without analyzer, the transmittances of the incident light of ϕp = 0° and 90° were 20.8% and 6.2% at 0 V, and both transmittances decreased to about 5.2% at 5 V.

The thick LC layer results in poor orientation uniformity, long decay time, and light scattering. In the homogeneous LC cell, C.-F. Hsieh and R.-P. Pan have reported 858 and 570 thick cells as a phase shifter [49]. R. Ito, et al. have also controlled the phase of the 800 µm thick HBLC cell [20,29,30]. A good agreement between calculated and experimental results have been obtained in those studies. For decay time and light scattering, some methods using composite systems with polymers have been proposed to solve these the problems [5052]. Considering the light scattering effect, it might be possible to incorporate the turbidity of LCs into transmission simulations [34,53] as well as the absorption coefficient, which is an issue for the future.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the physical properties of the HBLCs in the N phase have been investigated at room temperature. The odd-even effect of the alkyl carbon number of nBA on the elastic constants was similar to that of n-cyanobipheny and n-phenylcyclohexane NLCs. The addition of BA derivatives attached to polar groups increased the dielectric anisotropy of the mCCA and nBA mixture, which reduced the driving voltage. Using measured physical properties, the electro-optical properties of the homogeneous and TN cells with HBLCs were calculated. The potential of dichroism-free HBLC as an optical material for terahertz devices was demonstrated in comparison to those using dichroic LC materials.

Acknowledgments

The author likes to thank Hikari Kaneko, Minami Shibata, Kanta Saga, and Yukiya Suga for their support in the experiments.

Disclosures

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

1. T. Kato and J. M. J. Fréchet, “A new approach to mesophase stabilization through hydrogen bonding molecular interactions in binary mixtures,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111(22), 8533–8534 (1989). [CrossRef]  

2. T. Kato and J. M. J. Fréchet, “Stabilization of a liquid-crystalline phase through noncovalent interaction with a polymer side chain,” Macromolecules 22(9), 3818–3819 (1989). [CrossRef]  

3. T. Kato, J. M. J. Fréchet, P.G. Wilson, T. Saito, T. Uryu, A. Fujishima, C. Jin, and F. Kaneuchi, “Hydrogen-bonded liquid crystals. Novel mesogens incorporating nonmesogenic bipyridyl compounds through complexation between hydrogen-bond donor and acceptor moieties,” Chem. Lett. 5(8), 1094–1100 (1993). [CrossRef]  

4. M. Fukumasa, T. Kato, T. Uryu, and J. M. J. Fréchet, “The simplest structure of the hydrogen-bonded mesogen built from 4-alkoxybenzoic acid and 4-alkylpyridine,” Chem. Lett. 22(1), 65–68 (1993). [CrossRef]  

5. T. Kato, M. Fukumasa, and J. M. J. Fréchet, “Supramolecular liquid-crystalline complexes exhibiting room-temperature mesophases and electrooptic effects. hydrogen-bonded mesogens derived from alkylpyridines and benzoic acids,” Chem. Mater. 7(2), 368–372 (1995). [CrossRef]  

6. M. J. S. Monte, A. R. R. P. Almeida, and M. A. V. Ribeiro da Silva, “Thermodynamic study of the sublimation of eight 4-n-alkylbenzoic acids,” J. Chem. Thermodyn. 36(5), 385–392 (2004). [CrossRef]  

7. T. V. Krishna and S. S. Sastry, “Dielectric and thermodynamic studies on the hydrogen bonded binary system of isopropyl alcohol and aniline,” J. Solution Chem. 39(9), 1377–1393 (2010). [CrossRef]  

8. N. Pongali Sathya Prabu, V. N. Vijayakumar, and M. L. N. Madhu Mohan, “Influence of terminal groups on the mesogenic properties of self-assembly systems,” Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 548(1), 142–154 (2011). [CrossRef]  

9. N. Pongali Sathya Prabu and M. L. N. Madhu Mohan, “Optical shuttering action in nematic phase of SMHBLC: observation of a ribbon-like texture,” Phase Transitions 85(7), 592–607 (2012). [CrossRef]  

10. N. Pongali Sathya Prabu and M. L. N. Madhu Mohan, “Analysis of hydrogen-bonded liquid crystals formed between nitro-substituted benzoic acid and p-n-alkyloxy benzoic acids,” Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 631(1), 47–63 (2016). [CrossRef]  

11. R. Rajanandkumar, N. Pongali Sathya Prabu, and M. L. N. Madhu Mohan, “Analysis of optical and thermal properties of double hydrogen bonded liquid crystal binary mixtures,” Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 652, 1–15 (2017). [CrossRef]  

12. P. Rohini, N. Pongali Sathya Prabu, and M. L. N. Madhu Mohan, “Studies on thermotropic hydrogen bonded binary mixtures,” Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 690(1), 23–42 (2019). [CrossRef]  

13. S. Patari and A. Nath, “Tunable dielectric and conductivity properties of two 4-n alkoxy benzoic acid,” Opto-Electron. Rev. 26(1), 35–43 (2018). [CrossRef]  

14. M. Fouzai, R. Hamdi, S. Ghrab, T. Soltani, A. Ionescu, and T. Othman, “Properties of binary mixtures derived from hydrogen bonded liquid crystals,” J. Mol. Liq. 249, 1279–1286 (2018). [CrossRef]  

15. Y. Arakawa, Y. Sasaki, and H. Tsuji, “Supramolecular hydrogen-bonded liquid crystals based on 4-n-alkylthiobenzoic acids and 4,4’-bipyridine: Their mesomorphic behavior with comparative study including alkyl and alkoxy counterparts,” J. Mol. Liq. 280, 153–159 (2019). [CrossRef]  

16. T. Missaoui, I. B. Amor, T. Soltani, H. B. Ouada, E. Jeanneau, and Y. Chevalier, “Dielectric and electro-optic properties of cybotactic nematic phase in hydrogen-bonded liquid crystals,” J. Mol. Liq. 304, 112726 (2020). [CrossRef]  

17. J. R. Wolf and D. J. Dyer, “Hydrogen bonded liquid crystalline heterodimers incorporating alkoxystilbazoles and alkoxy-4-pyridones,” Liq. Cryst. Today 24(2), 47–55 (2015). [CrossRef]  

18. M. Derbali, T. Soltani, A. Guesmi, N. B. Hamadi, E. Jeanneau, and Y. Chevalier, “Synthesis, thermal, dielectric and electro-optic properties of new series of fluorinated hydrogen-bonded liquid crystals,” J. Mol. Liq. 367, 120510 (2022). [CrossRef]  

19. M. Fouzai, A. Guesmi, N. B. Hamadi, and T. Soltani, “Fluoro-substitution in hydrogen bonding liquid crystal benzoic acid: dielectric, electro-optic and optical proprieties and inducing polar nematic phase,” Liq. Cryst. 47(5), 777–784 (2020). [CrossRef]  

20. R. Ito, M. Honma, and T. Nose, “Electrically tunable hydrogen-bonded liquid crystal phase control device,” Appl. Sci. 8(12), 2478 (2018). [CrossRef]  

21. T. R. Tsai, C. Y. Chen, C. L. Pan, R. P. Pan, and X. C. Zhang, “Terahertz time-domain spectroscopy studies of the optical constants of the nematic liquid crystal 5CB,” Appl. Opt. 42(13), 2372–2376 (2003). [CrossRef]  

22. R. P. Pan, T. R. Tsai, C. Y. Chen, and C. L. Pan, “Optical constants of two typical liquid crystals 5CB and PCH5 in the THz frequency range,” J. Biol. Phys. 29(2/3), 335–338 (2003). [CrossRef]  

23. J. Nishizawa, T. Yamada, T. Sasaki, T. Tanabe, T. Wadayama, T. Tanno, and K. Suto, “Terahertz dichroism of MBBA liquid crystal on rubbed substrate,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 252(12), 4226–4229 (2006). [CrossRef]  

24. R. Wilk, N. Vieweg, O. Kopschinski, T. Hasek, and M. Koch, “THz Spectroscopy of Liquid crystals from the CB Family,” J. Infrared, Millimeter, Terahertz Waves 30(11), 1139–1147 (2009). [CrossRef]  

25. N. Vieweg, M. K. Shakfa, B. Scherger, M. Mikulics, and M. Koch, “THz properties of nematic liquid crystals,” J. Infrared, Millimeter, Terahertz Waves 31(11), 1312–1320 (2010). [CrossRef]  

26. C.-S. Yang, C.-J. Lin, R.-P. Pan, C.T. Que, K. Yamamoto, M. Tani, and C.-L. Pan, “The complex refractive indices of the liquid crystal mixture E7 in the terahertz frequency range,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27(9), 1866–1873 (2010). [CrossRef]  

27. N. Vieweg, C. Jansen, M. K. Shakfa, M. Scheller, N. Krumbholz, R. Wilk, M. Mikulics, and M. Koch, “Molecular properties of liquid crystals in the terahertz frequency range,” Opt. Express 18(6), 6097–6107 (2010). [CrossRef]  

28. Z. Chen, L. Jiang, and H. Ma, “Calculation on frequency and temperature properties of birefringence of nematic liquid crystal 5CB in terahertz band,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 645, 205–209 (2016). [CrossRef]  

29. R. Ito, M. Honma, and T. Nose, “Continuous wave terahertz common path phase shifting interference using a liquid crystal phase shifter,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 60(7), 072007 (2021). [CrossRef]  

30. R. Ito, H. Sekiya, M. Honma, and T. Nose, “Estimating the birefringence and absorption losses of hydrogen-bonded liquid crystals with alkoxy chains at 2.5 THz,” IEICE Trans. Electron E105-C(2), 68–71 (2022). [CrossRef]  

31. M. Valisko, J. Liszi, and I. Szalai, “Relative permittivity of a few H-bonded liquid crystals,” J. Mol. Liq. 109(1), 39–43 (2004). [CrossRef]  

32. C. Kavitha, N. Pongali Sathya Prabu, and M. L. N. Madhu Mohan, “Birefringence study in hydrogen bonded complexes,” Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 592(1), 163–180 (2014). [CrossRef]  

33. M. G. Clark, E. P. Raynes, R. A. Smith, and R. J. A. Tough, “Measurement of the permittivity of nematic liquid crystals in magnetic and electric fields using extrapolation procedures,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 13(11), 2151–2162 (1980). [CrossRef]  

34. R. Yamaguchi and K. Inoue, “Electrical and optical model of reverse mode liquid crystal cells with low driving voltage,” J. Photopolym. Sci. Technol. 34(3), 315–320 (2021). [CrossRef]  

35. P. G. de Gennes, The Physics of Liquid Crystals (Clarendon Press, 1974), Chap. 3.

36. C. Gu and P. Yeh, “Extended Jones matrix method and its application in the analysis of compensators for liquid crystal displays,” Displays 20(5), 237–257 (1999). [CrossRef]  

37. M. K. Das, P. Dasgupta, B. Adhikari, and S. K. Sarkar, “Mesomorphic and structural properties of some liquid crystals possessing a bicyclohexane core,” Int. J. Adv. Res. 3(3), 967–981 (2015).

38. P. P. Karat and N. V. Madhusudana, “Elastic and optical properties of some 4’-n-alkyl-4cyanobiphenyls,” Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 36(1-2), 51–64 (1976). [CrossRef]  

39. R. Buchecker and M. Schadt, “Synthesis, physical properties and structural relationships of new, end-chain substituted nematic liquid crystals,” Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 149(1), 359–373 (1987). [CrossRef]  

40. S. M. Kelly and M. O’NeillB, “Liquid crystal for electro-optical applications,” in Handbook of Advanced Electronic and Photonic Materials and Devices (Academic Press, 2001), p.8.

41. H. Takatsu, K. Takeuchi, M. Sasaki, H. Ohnishi, and M. Schadt, “Physical properties of novel fluorinated ethers and ether mixtures for actively-addressed, twisted nematic liquid crystal displays,” Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 206(1), 159–177 (1991). [CrossRef]  

42. N. Vieweg, B. M. Fischer, M. Reuter, P. Kula, R. Dabrowski, M. A. Celik, G. Frenking, M. Koch, and P. U. Jepsen, “Ultrabroadband terahertz spectroscopy of a liquid crystal,” Opt. Express 20(27), 28249–28256 (2012). [CrossRef]  

43. L. Wang, X. Lin, X. Liang, J. Wu, W. Hu, Z. Zheng, B. Jin, Y. Qin, and Y. Lu, “Large birefringence liquid crystal material in terahertz range,” Opt. Mater. Express 2(10), 1314–1319 (2012). [CrossRef]  

44. M. Reuter, N. Vieweg, B. M. Fischer, M. Mikulicz, M. Koch, K. Garbat, and R. Dąbrowski, “Highly birefringent, low-loss liquid crystals for terahertz applications,” APL Mater. 1(1), 012107 (2013). [CrossRef]  

45. F. Gharadjedaghi and R. Voumard, “Mathematical simulation of a positive contrast guest-host display using nematic-cholesteric phase change,” J. Appl. Phys. 53(11), 7306–7313 (1982). [CrossRef]  

46. F. Gharadjedaghi, “Computer simulation of a nematic guest-host display,” J. Appl. Phys. 54(9), 4989–4993 (1983). [CrossRef]  

47. T. Nose, M. Honma, T. Nozokido, and K. Mizuno, “Simple method for the determination of refractive indices and loss parameters for liquid-crystal materials in the millimeter-wave region,” Appl. Opt. 44(7), 1150–1155 (2005). [CrossRef]  

48. T. Nose, R. Ito, and M. Honma, “Characterization of hydrogen-bonded liquid crystal materials,” IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett. 31(5), 453–456 (2021). [CrossRef]  

49. C.-F. Hsieh and R.-P. Pan, “Voltage-controlled liquid-crystal terahertz phase shifter and quarter-wave plate shifter and quarter-wave plate,” Opt. Lett. 31(8), 1112–1114 (2006). [CrossRef]  

50. K. Altmann, M. Reuter, K. Garbat, M. Koch, R. Dabrowski, and I. Dierking, “Polymer stabilized liquid crystal phase shifter for terahertz waves,” Opt. Express 21(10), 12395–12400 (2013). [CrossRef]  

51. T. N. Lang, V. B. Bui, Y. Inoue, and H. Moritake, “Response improvement of liquid crystal-loaded NRD waveguide type terahertz variable phase shifter,” Crystals 10(4), 307 (2020). [CrossRef]  

52. A. K. Sahoo, Y.-H. Lin, C.-S. Yang, O. Wada, C.-L. Yen, and C.-L. Pan, “Electrically tunable dual-layer twisted nematic liquid crystal THz phase shifters with intermediate composite polymer thin film,” Opt. Mater. Express 12(12), 4733–4754 (2022). [CrossRef]  

53. A. Lorenz, R. Schuhmann, and H.-S. Kitzerow, “Infiltrated photonic crystal fiber: experiments and liquid crystal scattering model,” Opt. Express 18(4), 3519–3530 (2010). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (9)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Chemical structures of (a) mCCA, (b) nBA, (c)-(k) benzoic acid derivatives attached to polar groups, d (l) HBLC dimer.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Definition of the LC director, n, and surface alignment conditions of the substrate in the LC cell.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Theoretical V-T curve fitted to measurement result in (a) homogeneous and (b) TN cell using HBLC mixture with CC-3 and 2BA.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Add-even effects of alkyl carbon number on (a) elastic constant, (b) dielectric anisotropy, and (c) refractive index anisotropy in mCCA and nBA mixtures.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. (a) Dielectric anisotropy and (b) refractive index anisotropy as a function of fluorobenzoic acids concentration.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. V-T curves in (a) homogeneous cells and (b) TN cells between crossed polarizers. The wavelength is 640 nm.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. V-T curves of the extraordinary THz wave in homogeneous cells. The cell thickness is (a) 500 µm and (b) is set to be the retardation of 2π.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. (a) V-T curves of THz wave in the homogeneous cell between crossed polarizers (ϕp = 45°, ϕA = −45°). (b) The polarization state of the incident terahertz wave. (c)−(e) Polarization state variation of the transmitted terahertz wave in homogeneous cells by applying a voltage.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9. (a) V-T curves of THz wave in the TN cell between crossed polarizers. (b)−(e) Polarization states of the transmitted wave in the TN cell at 0 V.

Tables (3)

Tables Icon

Table 1. HBLC mixtures with CC-3 (mCCA) and nBA

Tables Icon

Table 2. Physical properties of HBLC mixtures.

Tables Icon

Table 3. Refractive index and absorption coefficient of LCs in THz wave.

Equations (5)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

F = F bulk + F electric + F surface
F bulk + F electric = 0 d 1 2 { ( K 11 co s 2 θ ( z ) + K 33 si n 2 θ ( z ) ) ( d θ ( z ) d z ) 2 + ( K 22 co s 2 θ ( z ) + K 33 si n 2 θ ( z ) ) co s 2 θ ( z ) ( d ϕ ( z ) d z ) 2 ε 0 ( ε + Δ ε s i n 2 θ ( z ) ) ( d V ( z ) d z ) 2 }
F surface = 1 2 W p _ 0 si n 2 ( θ 0 θ ( 0 ) ) + 1 2 W p _ d si n 2 ( θ d θ ( d ) ) + 1 2 W a _ 0 si n 2 ( ϕ 0 ϕ ( 0 ) ) + 1 2 W a _ d si n 2 ( ϕ d ϕ ( d ) ) ,
α ( θ ) = α o si n 2 θ + α e co s 2 θ ,
Δ n ( θ ) = n e n o n e 2 si n 2 θ + n o 2 co s 2 θ n o ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.