Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group
Conferences > pcAOP > 2022 > PTu4D > PTu4D.3

Comparison between Turbulence Measurements from Anemometry, Optical, and Gradient Techniques

Jack McCrae, Santasri Bose-Pillai, Benjamin Wilson, Kevin Keefer, and Steven Fiorino

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

In this paper we compare results between three different turbulence measurement or estimation techniques. These approaches are: sonic anemometry; the MZA Path Resolved Optical Profiling System (PROPS); and a gradient technique using temperature and wind.

© 2022 The Author(s)

PDF Article
More Like This
Comparison between different measurement techniques investigating optical turbulence along a slant path in the atmospheric surface layer

Detlev Sprung, Erik Sucher, Ari Ramilkowan, and Derek Griffith
PT3C.4 Propagation through and Characterization of Distributed Volume Turbulence and Atmospheric Phenomena (pcAOP) 2015

Sonic Anemometry for Calibrating SMASH Inner Scale Measurements

Denis W. Oesch, Shyheim N. Afanador, Melissa K. Beason, Mike S. Sexauer, and David M. Kirby
PTu5F.4 Propagation Through and Characterization of Atmospheric and Oceanic Phenomena (pcAOP) 2023

Comparison of Turbulence Estimates over Water Derived from a Time-Lapse Imaging Technique and from Numerical Weather Prediction with Observation Data

Benjamin Wilson, Jaclyn Schmidt, Santasri Bose-Pillai, and Steven Fiorino
PTu3D.2 Propagation Through and Characterization of Atmospheric and Oceanic Phenomena (pcAOP) 2022

View More...
Select as filters
Select Topics Cancel
Top
       
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.
Privacy | Terms of Use