This erratum corrects Eq. (13a) in Appl. Opt. 55, 3104
(2016) [CrossRef] and shows its effect
on the proposed dip estimate functions Eqs. (21a)–(21d2). The differences are
small, maximal up to a few percent and well within the original error
limits. A new figure shows how the variability of the terrestrial
refraction of the dip—as estimated with the proposed estimate
functions—decreases with increasing observer heights.
© 2018 Optical Society of
Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.
Alert me when this article is cited.
Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.