Abstract

A procedure for predicting the error rates of a computer-generated holographic memory with general transform domain quantization error is developed. The kinoform, ROACH, detour phase binary hologram, and generalized detour phase binary hologram are compared on the basis of error rates and encoding efficiency. Error rates predicted by the analysis are compared with those obtained by computer simulation.

© 1975 Optical Society of America

Reconstruction errors in computer generated binary holograms: a comparative study

Robert A. Gabel
Appl. Opt. 14(9) 2252-2255 (1975)

Computer-generated holography for optical memory using sparse data words: capacity and error tolerance

Mark A. Neifeld
Appl. Opt. 32(26) 5125-5134 (1993)

Comprehensive error models and a comparative study of some detour-phase holograms

James Bucklew and Neal C. Gallagher
Appl. Opt. 18(16) 2861-2869 (1979)

Holographic memory optical system based on computer-generated Fourier holograms

A. Yu. Betin, V. I. Bobrinev, S. B. Odinokov, N. N. Evtikhiev, R. S. Starikov, S. N. Starikov, and E. Yu. Zlokazov
Appl. Opt. 52(33) 8142-8145 (2013)

Minimization of Reconstruction Errors with Computer Generated Binary Holograms

R. A. Gabel and B. Liu
Appl. Opt. 9(5) 1180-1191 (1970)