Abstract

A critical analysis is given of the applicability of six-beam models to radiative transfer in particulate materials. The method of introducing transverse scattering in these models is shown to cause fundamental difficulties in the case of physically plausible phase functions; in particular, the effective absorptivity is abnormally large and thus results in incorrect reflectances and transmittances. Six-beam calculations for several media are compared with accurate solutions, with Chu-Churchill two-beam results, and with a simple modification to the Eddington approximation, the last being generally superior over a wide range of conditions.

© 1976 Optical Society of America

Generalized four-flux radiative transfer model

William E. Vargas
Appl. Opt. 37(13) 2615-2623 (1998)

Radiative transfer: a technique for simulating the ocean in satellite remote sensing calculations

Howard R. Gordon
Appl. Opt. 15(8) 1974-1979 (1976)

Diffusion approximation for large absorption in radiative transfer

W. E. Meador and W. R. Weaver
Appl. Opt. 18(8) 1204-1208 (1979)

Radiative transfer model for aerosols in infrared wavelengths for passive remote sensing applications

Avishai Ben-David, Janon F. Embury, and Charles E. Davidson
Appl. Opt. 45(26) 6860-6875 (2006)

Matrix Operator Theory of Radiative Transfer. 1: Rayleigh Scattering

Gilbert N. Plass, George W. Kattawar, and Frances E. Catchings
Appl. Opt. 12(2) 314-329 (1973)