Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Sign of coma

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

The oblique focusing defect of spherical lenses, known as coma, is described by Seidel as the second of five correction terms (third order) to the Gauss theory. The concept is clear for a refracting surface that is free of spherical aberration; however, the impossibility of eliminating spherical aberration from a single lens with spherical surfaces can confuse the understanding of the second aberration, coma. A way of understanding the comatic effect even in the presence of spherical aberration is described. Confusion over the sign of coma, as indicated by mistakes in optics textbooks, is addressed. This paper suggests corrections to some interpretations of coma found in the literature.

© 1988 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Testing the coma of decentration with a confocal Fabry-Perot interferometer

Maciej Rafalowski
Appl. Opt. 27(14) 3046-3050 (1988)

Variations of spherical aberration and central coma of conceptual thin lenses

Chaohsien Chen
Appl. Opt. 55(36) 10363-10369 (2016)

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Figures (9)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved