Abstract

Four different methods of injecting control signals into photonic switches are compared. A control injection model based on time-division-multiplexed switching is developed, and the analysis studies the effects of the different control injection schemes on network performance, system complexity, and system packaging. Serious system-level limitations are identified for all the control injection schemes in switching networks with high reconfiguration rates.

© 1992 Optical Society of America

Free-space photonic switching architectures based on extended generalized shuffle networks

Thomas J. Cloonan, Gaylord W. Richards, Anthony L. Lentine, Frederick B. McCormick, and John R. Erickson
Appl. Opt. 31(35) 7471-7492 (1992)

Design and analysis of a bidirectional free-space photonic switch based on the aloha scheme

N. Mehravari and T. J. Cloonan
Appl. Opt. 31(14) 2576-2586 (1992)

Self-routing crossbar packet switch employing free-space optics for chip-to-chip interconnections

Thomas J. Cloonan and Anthony L. Lentine
Appl. Opt. 30(26) 3721-3733 (1991)

Six-stage digital free-space optical switching network using symmetric self-electro-optic-effect devices

F. B. McCormick, T. J. Cloonan, F. A. P. Tooley, A. L. Lentine, J. M. Sasian, J. L. Brubaker, R. L. Morrison, S. L. Walker, R. J. Crisci, R. A. Novotny, S. J. Hinterlong, H. S. Hinton, and E. Kerbis
Appl. Opt. 32(26) 5153-5171 (1993)

All-optical 100-gbit/s word packet time-division-multiplexed access node in a looped-back configuration: enabling technologies for sequential add–drop functionality

Janet W. Lou, Yi Liang, Ozdal Boyraz, and Mohammed N. Islam
Appl. Opt. 39(29) 5280-5294 (2000)