Abstract

In any automated algorithm for interpreting photoelastic fringe patterns it is necessary to understand and quantify sources of error in the measurement system. We have been considering how the various components of the coating affect the photoelastic measurement, because this source of error has received fairly little attention in the literature. Because the reflective backing is not a perfect retroreflector, it does not preserve the polarization of light and thereby introduces noise into the measurement that depends on the angle of obliqueness and roughness of the reflective surface. This is of particular concern in resolving the stress tensor through the combination of thermoelasticity and photoelasticity where the components are sensitive to errors in the principal angle and difference of the principal stresses. We have developed a physical model that accounts for this and other sources of measurement error to be introduced in a systematic way so that the individual effects on the fringe patterns can be quantified. Simulations show altered photoelastic fringes when backing roughness and oblique incident angles are incorporated into the model.

© 2000 Optical Society of America

Robust approach to regularize an isochromatic fringe map

Philip Siegmann, Francisco Díaz-Garrido, and Eann A. Patterson
Appl. Opt. 48(22) E24-E34 (2009)

Multiple-reflection effects in photoelastic stress analysis

Achintya K. Bhowmik
Appl. Opt. 40(16) 2687-2691 (2001)

Separation of isoclinics and isochromatics from photoelastic data with a regularized phase-tracking technique

J. A. Quiroga and A. González-Cano
Appl. Opt. 39(17) 2931-2940 (2000)

Phase measuring algorithm for extraction of isochromatics of photoelastic fringe patterns

J. A. Quiroga and A. González-Cano
Appl. Opt. 36(32) 8397-8402 (1997)

Isochromatic fringes in photoelasticity

Hillar Aben and Leo Ainola
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17(4) 750-755 (2000)