Interpixel crosstalk in Teledyne Imaging Sensors H4RG-10 detectors

Rachel P. Dudik; Margaret E. Jordan; Bryan N. Dorland; Daniel Veillette; Augustyn Waczynski; Benjamin F. Lane; Markus Loose; Emily Kan; James Waterman; Chris Rollins; Steve Pravdo

doi:10.1364/AO.51.002877

Applied Optics
Vol. 51,
Issue 15,
pp. 2877-2887
(2012)
•https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.51.002877

Interpixel crosstalk in Teledyne Imaging Sensors H4RG-10 detectors

Rachel P. Dudik, Margaret E. Jordan, Bryan N. Dorland, Daniel Veillette, Augustyn Waczynski, Benjamin F. Lane, Markus Loose, Emily Kan, James Waterman, Chris Rollins, and Steve Pravdo

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Get PDF
Email
Share
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Rachel P. Dudik, Margaret E. Jordan, Bryan N. Dorland, Daniel Veillette, Augustyn Waczynski, Benjamin F. Lane, Markus Loose, Emily Kan, James Waterman, Chris Rollins, and Steve Pravdo, "Interpixel crosstalk in Teledyne Imaging Sensors H4RG-10 detectors," Appl. Opt. 51, 2877-2887 (2012)

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Citation alert
Save article

Abstract

Complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS)-hybrid arrays have become competitive optical detectors for use in ground- and space-based astronomy. Interpixel capacitance (IPC) is one source of error that appears in most CMOS arrays. In this paper, we use a single-pixel-reset method to model IPC. We combine this IPC model with a model for charge diffusion to estimate the total crosstalk on H4RG-10 arrays. Finally, we compare our model results to ⁵⁵Fe data obtained using an astrometric camera built to test the H4RG-10 B0 generation detectors.

Full Article | PDF Article

More Like This

Electrical crosstalk analysis in a pinned photodiode CMOS image sensor array

Mehdi Khabir, Hamzeh Alaibakhsh, and Mohammad Azim Karami
Appl. Opt. 60(31) 9640-9650 (2021)

Crosstalk quantification, analysis, and trends in CMOS image sensors

Lior Blockstein and Orly Yadid-Pecht
Appl. Opt. 49(24) 4483-4488 (2010)

Simulation and experimental characterization of the point spread function, pixel saturation, and blooming of a mercury cadmium telluride focal plane array

Grant Soehnel and Anthony Tanbakuchi
Appl. Opt. 51(33) 7987-7993 (2012)

Previous Article Next Article

References

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Figures (16)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Tables (3)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Equations (16)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Parameter	Symbol	Voltage (V)
Bias voltage	VSUB	10–40
Digital positive power supply	VDD	3.12
Analog positive power supply	VDDA	3.12
Drain node of pixel SF	CELLDRAIN	0.00
Drain node of output SF	DRA	0.00
Source node of internal current for SF	VBIASPOWER	3.00
Detector substrate voltage	DSUB	0.50
Detector reset voltage	VRESET	0.32
Bias voltage for current source of SF	VBIASGATE	2.00

Vsub^a (V)	Vreset^b (V)	$x_{e}$ ^c	$x_{o}$ ^d	$x_{error}$ ^e	$y_{e}$ ^f	$y_{o}$ ^g	$y_{error}$ ^h
10.00	0.30	1.08	0.93	$- 0.23 %$	0.94	0.94	6.01%
10.00	0.20	1.07	0.94	$- 0.29 %$	0.97	0.97	3.27%
10.00	0.10	1.06	0.94	$- 0.28$	0.97	0.97	3.34%
10.00	0.00	1.05	0.96	$- 0.39 %$	0.96	0.96	3.52%
20.00	0.30	1.08	0.93	$- 0.29 %$	0.97	0.97	2.87%
20.00	0.20	1.07	0.94	$- 0.28 %$	0.97	0.97	3.16%
20.00	0.10	1.06	0.94	$- 0.27 %$	0.97	0.97	3.32%
20.00	0.00	1.05	0.96	$- 0.42 %$	0.97	0.97	3.39%
30.00	0.30	1.08	0.93	$- 0.33 %$	0.97	0.97	2.96%
30.00	0.20	1.07	0.94	$- 0.26 %$	0.97	0.97	3.27%
30.00	0.10	1.06	0.94	$- 0.26 %$	0.97	0.97	3.38%
30.00	0.00	1.05	0.95	$- 0.34 %$	0.97	0.97	3.43%
40.00	0.30	1.08	0.92	$- 0.28 %$	0.97	0.97	3.07%
40.00	0.20	1.07	0.93	$- 0.21 %$	0.97	0.97	3.32%
40.00	0.10	1.06	0.94	$- 0.24 %$	0.96	0.97	3.49%
40.00	0.00	1.05	0.95	$- 0.30 %$	0.96	0.96	3.53%
Averages				$- 0.29 %$			3.46%

Model and data comparison for 10–40 V ${}^{55}{Fe}$
			Central pixel
Vsub (V)	Kernel size	Model	Data	Std dev
10	$15 \times 15$	32.24%	29.16%	2.61%
20	$13 \times 13$	47.63%	46.85%	2.79%
30	$11 \times 11$	55.57%	54.65%	1.65%
40	$9 \times 9$	60.51%	60.43%	1.58%
			X-right pixel
10	$15 \times 15$	9.52%	8.88%	0.57%
20	$13 \times 13$	7.79%	7.65%	0.38%
30	$11 \times 11$	6.48%	6.63%	0.27%
40	$9 \times 9$	5.72%	5.92%	0.17%
			X-left pixel
10	$15 \times 15$	9.50%	8.88%	0.25%
20	$13 \times 13$	7.77%	7.67%	0.41%
30	$11 \times 11$	6.48%	6.57%	0.36%
40	$9 \times 9$	5.71%	5.94%	0.16%

Parameter	Symbol	Voltage (V)
Bias voltage	VSUB	10–40
Digital positive power supply	VDD	3.12
Analog positive power supply	VDDA	3.12
Drain node of pixel SF	CELLDRAIN	0.00
Drain node of output SF	DRA	0.00
Source node of internal current for SF	VBIASPOWER	3.00
Detector substrate voltage	DSUB	0.50
Detector reset voltage	VRESET	0.32
Bias voltage for current source of SF	VBIASGATE	2.00

Vsub^a (V)	Vreset^b (V)	$x_{e}$ ^c	$x_{o}$ ^d	$x_{error}$ ^e	$y_{e}$ ^f	$y_{o}$ ^g	$y_{error}$ ^h
10.00	0.30	1.08	0.93	$- 0.23 %$	0.94	0.94	6.01%
10.00	0.20	1.07	0.94	$- 0.29 %$	0.97	0.97	3.27%
10.00	0.10	1.06	0.94	$- 0.28$	0.97	0.97	3.34%
10.00	0.00	1.05	0.96	$- 0.39 %$	0.96	0.96	3.52%
20.00	0.30	1.08	0.93	$- 0.29 %$	0.97	0.97	2.87%
20.00	0.20	1.07	0.94	$- 0.28 %$	0.97	0.97	3.16%
20.00	0.10	1.06	0.94	$- 0.27 %$	0.97	0.97	3.32%
20.00	0.00	1.05	0.96	$- 0.42 %$	0.97	0.97	3.39%
30.00	0.30	1.08	0.93	$- 0.33 %$	0.97	0.97	2.96%
30.00	0.20	1.07	0.94	$- 0.26 %$	0.97	0.97	3.27%
30.00	0.10	1.06	0.94	$- 0.26 %$	0.97	0.97	3.38%
30.00	0.00	1.05	0.95	$- 0.34 %$	0.97	0.97	3.43%
40.00	0.30	1.08	0.92	$- 0.28 %$	0.97	0.97	3.07%
40.00	0.20	1.07	0.93	$- 0.21 %$	0.97	0.97	3.32%
40.00	0.10	1.06	0.94	$- 0.24 %$	0.96	0.97	3.49%
40.00	0.00	1.05	0.95	$- 0.30 %$	0.96	0.96	3.53%
Averages				$- 0.29 %$			3.46%

Abstract

References

Cited By

Figures (16)

Tables (3)

Equations (16)

Metrics

Applied Optics

Login or Create Account