Abstract

The goal of this work was to contrast and compare the 2D and 3D flame topography of a turbulent flame. The 2D measurements were obtained using CH-based (methylidyne radical-based) planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF), and the 3D measurements were obtained through a tomographic chemiluminescence (TC) technique. Both PLIF and TC were performed simultaneously on a turbulent premixed Bunsen flame. The PLIF measurements were then compared to a cross section of the 3D TC measurements, both to provide a validation to the 3D measurements and also to illustrate the differences in flame structures inferred from the 2D and 3D measurements.

© 2016 Optical Society of America

3D flame topography obtained by tomographic chemiluminescence with direct comparison to planar Mie scattering measurements

Wenjiang Xu, A. J. Wickersham, Yue Wu, Fan He, and Lin Ma
Appl. Opt. 54(9) 2174-2182 (2015)

Instantaneous 3D imaging of highly turbulent flames using computed tomography of chemiluminescence

Khadijeh Mohri, Simon Görs, Jonathan Schöler, Andreas Rittler, Thomas Dreier, Christof Schulz, and Andreas Kempf
Appl. Opt. 56(26) 7385-7395 (2017)

Single-sensor filter-intensified fiber optic 4D tomographic CH* chemiluminesence flame measurements

Cal Rising, Jonathan Reyes, Darin Knaus, Danny Micka, Brynmor Davis, Vincent Belovich, and Kareem Ahmed
Appl. Opt. 60(22) 6337-6341 (2021)

Direct comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional laser-induced fluorescence measurements on highly turbulent flames

Lin Ma, Qingchun Lei, Tyler Capil, Stephen D. Hammack, and Campbell D. Carter
Opt. Lett. 42(2) 267-270 (2017)

CH and NO planar laser-induced fluorescence and Rayleigh-scattering in turbulent flames using a multimode optical parametric oscillator

Joseph D. Miller, Johannes W. Tröger, Sascha R. Engel, Thomas Seeger, Alfred Leipertz, and Terrence R. Meyer
Appl. Opt. 60(1) 98-108 (2021)