Add to BibSonomy
Abstract
We compare different aspects of the robustness to environmental conditions of two different types of piezo-actuated fluid-membrane lenses: a silicone membrane lens, where the piezo actuator indirectly deforms the flexible membrane through fluid displacement, and a glass membrane lens, where the piezo actuator directly deforms the stiff membrane. While both lenses operated reliably over the temperature range of 0°–75°C, there was a significant effect on their actuation characteristics, which can be well described through a simple model. The silicone lens in particular showed a variation in focal power of up to $0.1\;{{\text{m}}^{- 1}}^\circ {{\text{C}}^{- 1}}$. We demonstrated that integrated pressure and temperature sensors can provide feedback for focal power, however, limited by the response time of the elastomers in the lenses, with polyurethane in the support structures of the glass membrane lens being more critical than the silicone. Studying the mechanical effects, the silicone membrane lens showed a gravity-induced coma and tilt, and a reduced imaging quality with the Strehl ratio decreasing from 0.89 to 0.31 at a vibration frequency of 100 Hz and an acceleration of $3\;{\text{g}}$. The glass membrane lens was unaffected by gravity, and the Strehl ratio decreased from 0.92 to 0.73 at a vibration of 100 Hz, $3\;{\text{g}}$. Overall, the stiffer glass membrane lens is more robust against environmental influences.
© 2023 Optica Publishing Group
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
Hitesh G. B. Gowda, Ulrike Wallrabe, and Matthias C. Wapler
Opt. Express 31(14) 23393-23405 (2023)
Hitesh G. B. Gowda, Matthias C. Wapler, and Ulrike Wallrabe
Opt. Express 30(26) 46528-46540 (2022)
Matthias C. Wapler
Opt. Express 28(4) 4973-4987 (2020)