A four-lens corrector system to remove residual aberrations in a Ritchey-Chrétien telescope was selected as the means of studying the relative effectiveness of two design methods: a ray deviation error function and third order aberration theory. At several stages in the design, very significant improvements were made by switching from ray deviation results to aberration theory and then back to ray deviation design. The goal, a 300-cm focal length, f/10 diffraction-limited 1.2° flat field telescope for white light, was achieved. Lens data and system performance, including computed spot diagrams, are given for eight versions.
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Eccentricity = 1.050839. System focal length = 305.04 cm.
Eccentricity = 2.257537.
Table VI
Individual Surface Contributions of Surfaces 8 and 9 to Third Order Coma, Astigmatism, and Distortion
System version
Coma
Astigmatism
Distortion
8
9
8
9
8
9
0
−0.0038
0.0040
−0.0020
0.0024
−0.0012
0.0016
1
−0.0030
0.0031
−0.0015
0.0017
−0.0009
0.0011
2
−0.0030
0.0031
−0.0015
0.0017
−0.0009
0.0011
3
−0.0037
0.0039
−0.0021
0.0024
−0.0014
0.0017
4
−0.0012
0.0019
−0.0005
0.0011
−0.0003
0.0007
5
−0.0008
0.0008
−0.0005
0.0005
−0.0004
0.0004
6
−0.0006
0.0007
−0.0003
0.0004
−0.0002
0.0003
7
−0.0005
0.0005
−0.0003
0.0003
−0.0003
0.0003
8
−0.0002
0.0003
−0.0001
0.0002
−0.0001
0.0002
Table VII
Third Order System Aberrations
System version
Spherical
Coma
Astigmatism
Distortion
Petzval
TAch
TAch
0
3.07–3
2.03–4
−3.21–5
2.81–4
−3.47–4
5.72–4
2.02–4
1
−2.47–5
3.31–5
−3.83–5
3.82–4
−4.19–2
−4.15–4
−7.23–4
2
−9.70–6
−5.48–6
−1.54–5
4.07–4
−3.35–4
−3.00–4
−6.11–4
3
−1.43–6
2.20–5
−1.28–5
3.08–4
−3.53–4
4.24–4
−7.21–4
4
−3.64–6
−2.30–6
−5.83–6
3.82–4
−2.96–3
2.62–4
−8.04–4
5
−9.58–5
−1.91–4
−2.48–4
1.69–4
−1.08–2
1.22–4
−3.14–5
6
−2.04–5
−6.21–6
1.35–6
4.60–4
−1.14–2
6.37–5
5.63–5
7
−1.89–5
−1.59–4
−2.89–4
1.35–4
−8.03–3
9.17–5
−5.31–5
8
−2.23–5
−1.86–6
7.51–6
5.40–4
−1.04–2
−1.02–4
1.87–4
Note: The negative integers following the numbers in the table are exponents of a base 10 multiplier. System stop is considered at the secondary mirror.
Table VIII
SPADE Design on Radii of Lenses, Following Bending of Air Space Between Third and Fourth Lens to Reduce Individual Surface Contributions to Coma, Astigmatism, and Distortion Third Order Aberrations of Version 3.
Version 4
Radius (cm)
(cm)
Thickness nC
nd
nF
The mirrors are the same Ritchey-Chrétien solution for Versions 2–8.
42.1035
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
541599
−20.4192
0.7812
1.53833
1.541
1.54736
30.3551
2.032
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
611588
33.1423
2.032
1.60793
1.611
1.61832
−18.7342
1.2700
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
611588
54.8782
1.1696
1.60793
1.611
1.61832
−36.1149
1.5971
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
541599
−18.3410
0.3048
1.53833
1.541
1.54736
24.5453
33.4874
1.0
1.0
1.0
(back focus)
Focal length = 304.23 cm.
Table IX
ACCOS Aberration Design Following SPADE Design on Glasses and Selection of Real Glasses. Design Variables: Radii, Thicknesses, and Spacing of Correction Lenses.
Version 5
Radius (cm)
Thickness (cm)
nc
nd
nF
47.9003
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
PKS 1
−29.6444
0.2565
1.51499
1.51728
1.52242
22.7488
2.6252
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
KZFS 4
28.3401
1.2966
1.60922
1.6134
1.62319
−27.0372
1.8193
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
KZFS 4
90.2616
0.6893
1.60922
1.6134
1.62319
−29.2256
0.5990
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
F 1
−27.0728
0.3603
1.62072
1.62588
1.63828
27.5103
27.7795
1.0
1.0
1.0
(back focus)
Focal length = 304.80 cm.
Table X
SPADE Design Following Version 5 ACCOS Design. Design Variables: Radii, Thicknesses, and Spacing of Correction Lenses.
Version 6
Radius (cm)
Thickness (cm)
nc
nd
nF
47.1528
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
PKS 1
−32.0766
0.2286
1.51499
1.51728
1.52242
21.7638
1.9923
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
KZFS 4
37.2154
0.6212
1.60922
1.6134
1.62319
−24.8122
1.9529
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
KZFS 4
75.1381
0.3932
1.60922
1.6134
1.62319
−33.0210
0.5405
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
F 1
−27.0188
2.2860
1.62072
1.62588
1.63828
33.9565
27.7800
(back focus)
Focal length = 303.51 cm.
Table XI
ACCOS Aberration Design Using Slightly Different Real Glasses, Same Configuration as Version 5 at Beginning. Design Variables: Radii, Thicknesses, and Spacing of Correction Lenses, and Glass of Third Lens
Version 7
Radius (cm)
Thickness (cm)
nC
nd
nF
50.5216
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
PK 50
−25.4134
0.2565
1.51824
1.52054
1.52571
25.7392
2.4068
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
KZFSN 4
31.5027
1.2799
1.60924
1.6134
1.62309
−24.4095
1.6488
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
KZFSN 4 (modified)
148.0131
0.6335
1.622266
1.626614
1.636867
−32.8015
0.8339
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
F 1
−29.2288
0.6415
1.62074
1.62588
1.63827
29.2610
23.8684
1.0
1.0
1.0
(back focus)
Focal length = 304.75 cm.
Table XII
SPADE Design Following Version 7 ACCOS Design. All Glass Real. Design Variables: Radii, Thicknesses, and Spacing of Correction Lenses
Version 8
Radius (cm)
Thickness (cm)
nC
nd
nF
49.6497
1.0
1.0
1.0
PK 50
−33.5072
0.2286
1.51824
1.52054
1.52571
22.7743
1.7184
1.0
1.0
1.0
KZFSN 4
60.2867
0.7700
1.60924
1.6134
1.62309
−24.5215
1.7038
1.0
1.0
1.0
KZFSN 4
146.6803
2.5400
1.60924
1.6134
1.62309
−37.0401
1.2059
1.0
1.0
1.0
F 1
−29.2794
0.4276
1.62074
1.62588
1.63827
59.6079
23.8684
1.0
1.0
1.0
(back focus)
Focal length = 303.31 cm.
Tables (12)
Table I
Comparison of Ray Deviation and Third Order Designs of Ritchey-Chrétien Mirror System
Eccentricity = 1.050839. System focal length = 305.04 cm.
Eccentricity = 2.257537.
Table VI
Individual Surface Contributions of Surfaces 8 and 9 to Third Order Coma, Astigmatism, and Distortion
System version
Coma
Astigmatism
Distortion
8
9
8
9
8
9
0
−0.0038
0.0040
−0.0020
0.0024
−0.0012
0.0016
1
−0.0030
0.0031
−0.0015
0.0017
−0.0009
0.0011
2
−0.0030
0.0031
−0.0015
0.0017
−0.0009
0.0011
3
−0.0037
0.0039
−0.0021
0.0024
−0.0014
0.0017
4
−0.0012
0.0019
−0.0005
0.0011
−0.0003
0.0007
5
−0.0008
0.0008
−0.0005
0.0005
−0.0004
0.0004
6
−0.0006
0.0007
−0.0003
0.0004
−0.0002
0.0003
7
−0.0005
0.0005
−0.0003
0.0003
−0.0003
0.0003
8
−0.0002
0.0003
−0.0001
0.0002
−0.0001
0.0002
Table VII
Third Order System Aberrations
System version
Spherical
Coma
Astigmatism
Distortion
Petzval
TAch
TAch
0
3.07–3
2.03–4
−3.21–5
2.81–4
−3.47–4
5.72–4
2.02–4
1
−2.47–5
3.31–5
−3.83–5
3.82–4
−4.19–2
−4.15–4
−7.23–4
2
−9.70–6
−5.48–6
−1.54–5
4.07–4
−3.35–4
−3.00–4
−6.11–4
3
−1.43–6
2.20–5
−1.28–5
3.08–4
−3.53–4
4.24–4
−7.21–4
4
−3.64–6
−2.30–6
−5.83–6
3.82–4
−2.96–3
2.62–4
−8.04–4
5
−9.58–5
−1.91–4
−2.48–4
1.69–4
−1.08–2
1.22–4
−3.14–5
6
−2.04–5
−6.21–6
1.35–6
4.60–4
−1.14–2
6.37–5
5.63–5
7
−1.89–5
−1.59–4
−2.89–4
1.35–4
−8.03–3
9.17–5
−5.31–5
8
−2.23–5
−1.86–6
7.51–6
5.40–4
−1.04–2
−1.02–4
1.87–4
Note: The negative integers following the numbers in the table are exponents of a base 10 multiplier. System stop is considered at the secondary mirror.
Table VIII
SPADE Design on Radii of Lenses, Following Bending of Air Space Between Third and Fourth Lens to Reduce Individual Surface Contributions to Coma, Astigmatism, and Distortion Third Order Aberrations of Version 3.
Version 4
Radius (cm)
(cm)
Thickness nC
nd
nF
The mirrors are the same Ritchey-Chrétien solution for Versions 2–8.
42.1035
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
541599
−20.4192
0.7812
1.53833
1.541
1.54736
30.3551
2.032
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
611588
33.1423
2.032
1.60793
1.611
1.61832
−18.7342
1.2700
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
611588
54.8782
1.1696
1.60793
1.611
1.61832
−36.1149
1.5971
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
541599
−18.3410
0.3048
1.53833
1.541
1.54736
24.5453
33.4874
1.0
1.0
1.0
(back focus)
Focal length = 304.23 cm.
Table IX
ACCOS Aberration Design Following SPADE Design on Glasses and Selection of Real Glasses. Design Variables: Radii, Thicknesses, and Spacing of Correction Lenses.
Version 5
Radius (cm)
Thickness (cm)
nc
nd
nF
47.9003
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
PKS 1
−29.6444
0.2565
1.51499
1.51728
1.52242
22.7488
2.6252
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
KZFS 4
28.3401
1.2966
1.60922
1.6134
1.62319
−27.0372
1.8193
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
KZFS 4
90.2616
0.6893
1.60922
1.6134
1.62319
−29.2256
0.5990
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
F 1
−27.0728
0.3603
1.62072
1.62588
1.63828
27.5103
27.7795
1.0
1.0
1.0
(back focus)
Focal length = 304.80 cm.
Table X
SPADE Design Following Version 5 ACCOS Design. Design Variables: Radii, Thicknesses, and Spacing of Correction Lenses.
Version 6
Radius (cm)
Thickness (cm)
nc
nd
nF
47.1528
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
PKS 1
−32.0766
0.2286
1.51499
1.51728
1.52242
21.7638
1.9923
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
KZFS 4
37.2154
0.6212
1.60922
1.6134
1.62319
−24.8122
1.9529
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
KZFS 4
75.1381
0.3932
1.60922
1.6134
1.62319
−33.0210
0.5405
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
F 1
−27.0188
2.2860
1.62072
1.62588
1.63828
33.9565
27.7800
(back focus)
Focal length = 303.51 cm.
Table XI
ACCOS Aberration Design Using Slightly Different Real Glasses, Same Configuration as Version 5 at Beginning. Design Variables: Radii, Thicknesses, and Spacing of Correction Lenses, and Glass of Third Lens
Version 7
Radius (cm)
Thickness (cm)
nC
nd
nF
50.5216
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
PK 50
−25.4134
0.2565
1.51824
1.52054
1.52571
25.7392
2.4068
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
KZFSN 4
31.5027
1.2799
1.60924
1.6134
1.62309
−24.4095
1.6488
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
KZFSN 4 (modified)
148.0131
0.6335
1.622266
1.626614
1.636867
−32.8015
0.8339
1.0
1.0
1.0
glass
F 1
−29.2288
0.6415
1.62074
1.62588
1.63827
29.2610
23.8684
1.0
1.0
1.0
(back focus)
Focal length = 304.75 cm.
Table XII
SPADE Design Following Version 7 ACCOS Design. All Glass Real. Design Variables: Radii, Thicknesses, and Spacing of Correction Lenses