Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group
  • Applied Spectroscopy
  • Vol. 44,
  • Issue 1,
  • pp. 96-100
  • (1990)

Comparison of Aerosol Sample Introduction Systems for a DCP

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

The results of a comparative study of the relative analytical performance of different nebulizer and spray-chamber designs with a direct-current plasma (DCP) are described. Concentric-glass, cross-flow, and Babington-type nebulizers were each evaluated with either a double-pass or an open spray-chamber geometry for the effect of each combination on the observed linear dynamic range and the magnitude of interferences arising from the presence of an easily ionizable element (sodium) and difficult-to-vaporize species (phosphate salts). The performance of each of these combinations was compared to that of the nebulizer/spray-chamber configuration provided by the manufacturer. For nearly all cases, the manufacturer's configuration provided, at worst, comparable signal intensities for all conditions investigated.

PDF Article
More Like This
Trapping solid aerosols with optical tweezers: A comparison between gas and liquid phase optical traps

M. D. Summers, D. R. Burnham, and D. McGloin
Opt. Express 16(11) 7739-7747 (2008)

Laminar Flow Burner System with Infrared Heated Spray Chamber and Condenser

A. Hell, W. F. Ulrich, N. Shifrin, and J. Ramírez-Muñoz
Appl. Opt. 7(7) 1317-1323 (1968)

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.