Abstract

The limit of detection (LOD) of a trace analytical method is often used as a gauge of the sensitivity of the method. Improvements and comparisons of similar methods usually involve comparisons of the LODs. However, the calculated LOD value is sensitive to a number of factors such as the method of calculation used, the choice of calibration standards, and the number background (blank) measurements. In this paper, the calculated LOD of a particular analytical method is viewed as an estimate of the true, unknown LOD. Factors which affect the variability of the estimate are investigated. Knowledge of the variability of the estimated LOD can help when analytical methods are being compared on the basis of LOD values. In addition, by knowing which experimental factors contribute to the uncertainty in the calculated LOD, it is possible to determine the analytical protocol which estimates the true LOD most efficiently with no loss in precision.

Analysis and design of prisms using the derivatives of a ray. Part I: derivatives of a ray with respect to boundary variable vector

Psang Dain Lin
Appl. Opt. 52(18) 4137-4150 (2013)

Characteristics of Pulsed Arcs in Spectrochemical Analysis. Part I: Zinc Alloys

D. A. Sinclair
J. Opt. Soc. Am. 39(11) 958-966 (1949)

High-sensitivity detection of cardiac troponin I with UV LED excitation for use in point-of-care immunoassay

Olga Rodenko, Susann Eriksson, Peter Tidemand-Lichtenberg, Carl Peder Troldborg, Henrik Fodgaard, Sylvana van Os, and Christian Pedersen
Biomed. Opt. Express 8(8) 3749-3762 (2017)

Improving the detection limit of conformational analysis by utilizing a dual polarization Vernier cascade

J-W. Hoste, P. Soetaert, and P. Bienstman
Opt. Express 24(1) 67-81 (2016)

Analysis and design of prisms using the derivatives of a ray. Part II: the derivatives of boundary variable vector with respect to system variable vector

Psang Dain Lin
Appl. Opt. 52(18) 4151-4162 (2013)