Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group
  • Applied Spectroscopy
  • Vol. 72,
  • Issue 3,
  • pp. 340-365
  • (2018)

A Review of Calibration Transfer Practices and Instrument Differences in Spectroscopy

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Calibration transfer for use with spectroscopic instruments, particularly for near-infrared, infrared, and Raman analysis, has been the subject of multiple articles, research papers, book chapters, and technical reviews. There has been a myriad of approaches published and claims made for resolving the problems associated with transferring calibrations; however, the capability of attaining identical results over time from two or more instruments using an identical calibration still eludes technologists. Calibration transfer, in a precise definition, refers to a series of analytical approaches or chemometric techniques used to attempt to apply a single spectral database, and the calibration model developed using that database, for two or more instruments, with statistically retained accuracy and precision. Ideally, one would develop a single calibration for any particular application, and move it indiscriminately across instruments and achieve identical analysis or prediction results. There are many technical aspects involved in such precision calibration transfer, related to the measuring instrument reproducibility and repeatability, the reference chemical values used for the calibration, the multivariate mathematics used for calibration, and sample presentation repeatability and reproducibility. Ideally, a multivariate model developed on a single instrument would provide a statistically identical analysis when used on other instruments following transfer. This paper reviews common calibration transfer techniques, mostly related to instrument differences, and the mathematics of the uncertainty between instruments when making spectroscopic measurements of identical samples. It does not specifically address calibration maintenance or reference laboratory differences.

© 2017 The Author(s)

PDF Article
More Like This
Model transfer method based on piecewise direct standardization in laser-induced-breakdown spectroscopy

Ge Xie, Lanxiang Sun, Dong Shang, Yuan Gao, Xin Ling, and Xiuye Liu
Appl. Opt. 61(30) 9069-9077 (2022)

Calibrating the ChemCam laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy instrument for carbonate minerals on Mars

Nina L. Lanza, Roger C. Wiens, Samuel M. Clegg, Ann M. Ollila, Seth D. Humphries, Horton E. Newsom, and James E. Barefield
Appl. Opt. 49(13) C211-C217 (2010)

Practical wavelength calibration considerations for UV–visible Fourier-transform spectroscopy

Marc L. Salit, John C. Travis, and Michael R. Winchester
Appl. Opt. 35(16) 2960-2970 (1996)

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.