Abstract

The perception of suprathreshold luminance contrast was investigated by forced-choice psychophysical procedures that were designed to define contrast equivalence relations. Observers compared the perceived contrast of rectangular bars that were presented for 500 msec at 3.9 deg on opposite sides of the fovea. The results show a nearly symmetrical relation between the perception of negative and positive contrast that is largely invariant over four decades of background luminance. Thus, for any fixed background luminance, equal absolute contrasts evoke approximately equal perceived contrasts. Symmetry also held with variations in the width, the eccentricity, and the focus of the bars. Symmetry was investigated further by determining equivalent contrast relations for negative contrasts as a function of background luminance and by contrast scaling. These results show evidence for nearly perfect contrast constancy for targets of low to moderate contrast and departures from constancy for high-contrast targets. These new findings on negative contrast, symmetry, and contrast constancy are discussed in relation to underlying mechanisms for contrast perception and classic experiments on brightness and lightness constancy.

© 1984 Optical Society of America

Effect of luminance on suprathreshold contrast perception

Eli Peli, Jian Yang, Robert Goldstein, and Adam Reeves
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8(8) 1352-1359 (1991)

Sensory latency and reaction time: dependence on contrast polarity and early linearity in human vision

Dwight A. Burkhardt, Jon Gottesman, and Robert M. Keenan
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4(3) 530-539 (1987)

Contrast perception across changes in luminance and spatial frequency

Eli Peli, Lawrence Arend, and Angela T. Labianca
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13(10) 1953-1959 (1996)

Stimulus determinants of achromatic constancy

Laura Sewall and B. R. Wooten
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8(11) 1794-1809 (1991)

Suprathreshold contrast perception across differences in mean luminance: effects of stimulus size, dichoptic presentation, and length of adaptation

Eli Peli
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12(5) 817-823 (1995)