Abstract

To address the issue of whether the luminance-dependent (linear) and contrast-dependent (nonlinear) processes in stereo and motion have a common computational basis, we compare both carrier-dependent and envelope-dependent performance for these two modalities by using the same stimulus and task: two-flash apparent motion/depth for a wide range of displacements. We do this for different densities, bandwidths, contrasts, spatial frequencies, and exposure durations. The results suggest that there is concordance not only between the luminance-dependent (linear) processes of motion and stereo but also between the envelope-dependent (nonlinear) processes of both modalities. Only one exception was found, but we show this to be amenable to an explanation based on a different contrast dependence for the nonlinear mechanisms of stereo and motion. This suggests that the computational basis of linear and nonlinear processes may be similar for stereopsis and motion.

© 1999 Optical Society of America

Differences between stereopsis with isoluminant and isochromatic stimuli

David R. Simmons and Frederick A. A. Kingdom
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12(10) 2094-2104 (1995)

Size–disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold

Harvey S. Smallman and Donald I. A. MacLeod
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11(8) 2169-2183 (1994)

Second-order motion perception in peripheral vision: limits of early filtering

Yi-Zhong Wang, Robert F. Hess, and Curtis L. Baker
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14(12) 3145-3154 (1997)

Neural model of first-order and second-order motion perception and magnocellular dynamics

Aijaz A. Baloch, Stephen Grossberg, Ennio Mingolla, and C. A. M. Nogueira
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16(5) 953-978 (1999)

Luminance spatial scale facilitates stereoscopic depth segmentation

Frederick A. A. Kingdom, Lynn R. Ziegler, and Robert F. Hess
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18(5) 993-1002 (2001)