Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Flicker-photometric electroretinogram estimates of L:M cone photoreceptor ratio in men with photopigment spectra derived from genetics

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Relative proportions of long-wavelength-sensitive (L) to middle-wavelength-sensitive (M) cones were estimated by use of the flicker-photometric electroretinogram (ERG). It has been demonstrated that a major source of error in estimates of cone proportions from spectral luminosity functions is the known variation in the λmax of the photopigments [Vision Res. 38, 1961 (1998)]. To correct for these errors, estimates of cone proportions were derived by use of individualized L-cone spectral sensitivity curves deduced from photopigment gene sequences from each subject. For some individuals this correction made a large difference in the estimated cone proportions compared with the value obtained when a fixed standard L cone was assumed. The largest discrepancy occurred in a man estimated to have 62% L cones (L:M ratio 1.6:1) when a standard L pigment was assumed but a value of 80% L cones (L:M ratio 4:1) when his individualized L-cone spectrum was used. From repeated measurements made with the ERG, it was determined that individual estimates of the relative L-to-M cone contributions, expressed as %L cones, are usually reliable within ∼2%. The average L:M ratio for 15 male subjects was estimated at 2:1 (67% L cones). Previously, a large range of individual variability was reported for L:M ratios obtained from photometry. An unresolved issue concerns how much of the range might be attributed to error. Here efforts have been taken to markedly reduce measurement error. Nonetheless, a large range of individual differences persists. Estimated L:M ratios for individuals ranged from 0.6:1 to 12:1 (40% L to 92% L).

© 2000 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Functional consequences of the relative numbers of L and M cones

David H. Brainard, Austin Roorda, Yasuki Yamauchi, Jack B. Calderone, Andrew Metha, Maureen Neitz, Jay Neitz, David R. Williams, and Gerald H. Jacobs
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17(3) 607-614 (2000)

Interindividual and topographical variation of L:M cone ratios in monkey retinas

Samir S. Deeb, Lisa C. Diller, David R. Williams, and Dennis M. Dacey
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17(3) 538-544 (2000)

L/M cone ratios in human trichromats assessed by psychophysics, electroretinography, and retinal densitometry

Jan Kremers, Hendrik P. N. Scholl, Holger Knau, Tos T. J. M. Berendschot, Tomoaki Usui, and Lindsay T. Sharpe
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17(3) 517-526 (2000)

References

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Figures (7)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Tables (1)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Metrics

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2022 | Optica Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved