Abstract

Simulations of the Huygens, Fresnel, and Rayleigh–Sommerfeld I approximations in the case of free-space propagation of a Gaussian beam are compared with analytical solutions. The most accurate results were obtained by the Rayleigh–Sommerfeld I approximation. The study reveals that the approximations are not uniform throughout the propagation region. While the accuracies of the Huygens and Fresnel methods generally increase as the propagation distance increases, the accuracy of the Rayleigh–Sommerfeld I approximation at first starts to diminish and later recovers as the propagation distance is further increased.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

Huygens–Fresnel–Kirchhoff wave-front diffraction formulation: paraxial and exact Gaussian laser beams

Hal G. Kraus
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7(1) 47-65 (1990)

On the usual approximation used in the Rayleigh–Sommerfeld diffraction theory

Arvind S. Marathay and John F. McCalmont
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21(4) 510-516 (2004)

Exact and approximate solutions for focusing of two-dimensional waves. III. Numerical comparisons between exact and Rayleigh–Sommerfeld theories

Hans A. Eide and Jakob J. Stamnes
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15(5) 1308-1319 (1998)

Huygens–Fresnel–Kirchhoff wave-front diffraction formulation: spherical waves

Hal G. Kraus
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6(8) 1196-1205 (1989)

Beyond the Fresnel approximation for focused waves

M. A. Alonso, A. A. Asatryan, and G. W. Forbes
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16(8) 1958-1969 (1999)