Abstract

The first photometric measurements performed in the eighteenth century were based on brightness matching between two illuminated surfaces. In 1760, Bouguer and Lambert proposed the first methods to measure the angular reflectance of a flat surface, and Arago proposed a third one in the mid-nineteenth century. These pioneering experiments provided rather good estimates of the values we can predict or measure much more accurately today, considering that the human visual system was the only available light detector at that time. We show that the errors made in their measurements come not only from experimental uncertainties but also from incomplete knowledge of the physical properties of light, leading to incorrect assumptions in their models. The main errors are (i) the fact that light is totally reflected at grazing incidence, (ii) the glass plates they used were not perfectly clear, and (iii) light is partially polarized after transmission across the surface. By highlighting the impact of these three errors, we can better understand the state of knowledge in optics at that time and question our current practices in radiometric measurements and calculations.

© 2022 Optica Publishing Group

Open problems in color constancy: discussion

C. van Trigt
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 31(2) 338-347 (2014)

Historical revision of the differential Stokes–Mueller formalism: discussion

Oriol Arteaga
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 34(3) 410-414 (2017)

Visual adaptation—a reinterpretation: discussion

Donald Laming
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 30(10) 2066-2078 (2013)

Metal slab superlens—negative refractive index versus inclined illumination: discussion

Luis Grave de Peralta
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 32(9) 1729-1735 (2015)

Explaining the success of Kogelnik’s coupled-wave theory by means of perturbation analysis: discussion

Heinz-Jürgen Schmidt, Mirco Imlau, and Kay-Michael Voit
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 31(6) 1158-1166 (2014)