Abstract

The human constrast-discrimination function has a curious shape: In addition to rising for increasing contrasts, both positive and negative, it also rises for very low contrasts on either side of zero. It is shown that this rise near zero contrast is not much affected by procedures that increase or decrease the subject’s knowledge of the stimulus; this counts against uncertainty as the immediate cause of the elevation near zero contrast. The alternative explanation in terms of a genuine response threshold is shown to be promising when measurements of human contrast discrimination are compared with values calculated from records of neurons in monkey primary visual cortex. The comparison also suggests that the dynamic range of single neurons is lower than that shown psychophysically. It is suggested that having a cortical threshold may be the visual system’s way of preventing false positives when there is much stimulus uncertainty. This threshold may also help to explain why quantum efficiencies calculated from detection thresholds are so poor compared with those estimated from the visual system’s susceptibility to added noise.

© 1987 Optical Society of America

Contrast discrimination in peripheral vision

Gordon E. Legge and Daniel Kersten
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4(8) 1594-1598 (1987)

Contrast discrimination in noise

Gordon E. Legge, Daniel Kersten, and Arthur E. Burgess
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4(2) 391-404 (1987)

Contrast discrimination in images of natural scenes

John Jarvis, Sophie Triantaphillidou, and Gaurav Gupta
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 39(6) B50-B64 (2022)

Motion thresholds can be predicted from contrast discrimination

Bettina L. Beard, Stanley A. Klein, and Thom Carney
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14(9) 2449-2470 (1997)

Capabilities of monkey cortical cells in spatial-resolution tasks

Andrew Parker and Mike Hawken
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2(7) 1101-1114 (1985)