Abstract

A quantitative multiple-channels model can account for changes in perceived spatial frequency between foveally and peripherally viewed patterns; these frequency shifts are as large as 0.47 octave (38.5%). Factors that change as a function of eccentricity and that can alter the appearance of visual patterns include (1) scaling of receptive-field sizes, (2) overall sensitivity, and (3) steepness and nonlinearity of contrast-transfer functions (CTF’s). Computations based on receptive-field size scaling, combined with fixed perceptual labels, predict higher perceived spatial frequency for peripheral patterns. Computations based on reduced sensitivity, however, predict the opposite result and thus partially offset the effect of receptive-field size scaling. The predicted perceived-frequency shifts based on changes in CTF’s are quite small and can be ignored. Both individual differences and visual-field-location differences in magnitudes of perceived-frequency shifts are predicted by the model. An alternative perceptual explanation based on size–distance invariance and size constancy is also evaluated.

© 1990 Optical Society of America

Comparison of perceived spatial frequency between the fovea and the periphery

Elizabeth Thorpe Davis, Dean Yager, and Barri J. Jones
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4(8) 1606-1611 (1987)

Perceived contrast in the fovea and periphery

Mark W. Cannon
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2(10) 1760-1768 (1985)

Shifts in perceived spatial frequency of low-contrast stimuli: data and theory

Elizabeth T. Davis, Patricia Kramer, and Dean Yager
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3(8) 1189-1202 (1986)

Suprathreshold temporal-frequency discrimination in the fovea and the periphery

Sarah J. Waugh and Robert F. Hess
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11(4) 1199-1212 (1994)

Contour interaction in fovea and periphery

Robert F. Hess, Steven C. Dakin, Neil Kapoor, and Marc Tewfik
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17(9) 1516-1524 (2000)