Abstract

The effect of pattern adaptation on spatial frequency discrimination was examined in two experiments. In the first experiment Δf/f was measured (with and without adaptation) as a function of stimulus contrast; in the second experiment the contrast required to discriminate a fixed Δf/f was measured (with and without adaptation) as a function of the value of Δf/f. Maximum precision, as measured by the asymptotic value that Δf/f approaches at medium and high contrasts, was not altered by adaptation. Rather, the effect of adaptation was to translate the functions relating Δf/f and contrast along the log-contrast axis, i.e., to increase by a constant factor the contrast required to achieve a given precision of discrimination. This factor agreed closely with the factor by which adaptation raised the contrast threshold for detection of the test stimuli. The largest effects were observed when the reference and the adapting stimuli had the same spatial frequency (5 cycles/deg). Smaller or negligible effects were observed when reference and adapting frequencies differed by an octave.

© 1992 Optical Society of America

Spatial-frequency adaptation and grating discrimination: predictions of a line-element model

Hugh R. Wilson and David Regan
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1(11) 1091-1096 (1984)

Masking of spatial-frequency discrimination

D. Regan
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2(7) 1153-1159 (1985)

Simultaneous discrimination of the spatial frequency and contrast of periodic stimuli

Mark W. Greenlee and James P. Thomas
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10(3) 395-404 (1993)

Orientation and spatial-frequency discrimination for luminance and chromatic gratings

Michael A. Webster, Karen K. De Valois, and Eugene Switkes
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7(6) 1034-1049 (1990)

Spatial waveform discrimination following higher-harmonic adaptation

Mark W. Greenlee and Svein Magnussen
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5(10) 1744-1748 (1988)