Abstract
The comment by Macke and Ségard [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28, 450–452 (2011)] of our recently published paper [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, 1664–1670 (2010)] is shown here to be primarily due to a misunderstanding of the raison d’être of our paper.
© 2011 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
Bruno Macke and Bernard Ségard
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28(3) 450-452 (2011)
Kurt E. Oughstun, Natalie A. Cartwright, Daniel J. Gauthier, and Heejeong Jeong
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27(8) 1664-1670 (2010)
Boris Sturman, Pierre Mathey, and Hans-Rudolf Jauslin
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28(2) 347-351 (2011)