Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Optical study of back-contacted CIGS solar cells

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A novel back-contacted solar cell based on a submicron copper indium gallium (di)selenide (CIGS) absorber is proposed and optically investigated. First, charge carrier collection feasibility is studied by band diagram analysis. Then, two back-contacted configurations are suggested and optimized for maximum current production. The results are compared with a reference front/back-contacted CIGS solar cell with a 750-nm-thick absorber. Current density production of 38.84 mA/cm2 is predicted according to our simulations for a realistic front-side texturing. This shows more than 38% improvement in optical performance compared to the reference cell and only 7.7% deviation from the theoretical Green absorption benchmark.

© 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Quenching Mo optical losses in CIGS solar cells by a point contacted dual-layer dielectric spacer: a 3-D optical study

Nasim Rezaei, Olindo Isabella, Zeger Vroon, and Miro Zeman
Opt. Express 26(2) A39-A53 (2018)

Back-contacted BaSi2 solar cells: an optical study

Robin Vismara, Olindo Isabella, and Miro Zeman
Opt. Express 25(8) A402-A408 (2017)

A study on the optics of copper indium gallium (di)selenide (CIGS) solar cells with ultra-thin absorber layers

Man Xu, Arthur J. H. Wachters, Joop van Deelen, Maurice C. D. Mourad, and Pascal J. P. Buskens
Opt. Express 22(S2) A425-A437 (2014)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Visual rendering of the back-contacted CIGS solar cell with high aspect ratio features at the front. WTCO and HTCO indicate, respectively, width and height of the TCO.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Visual rendering of the back-contacted solar cell with natural CIGS morphology and optimized ARC. WTCO and HTCO indicate, respectively, width and height of the TCO.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 a) Simplified layer stack of the e- and h-contacts in the envisioned IBC solar cell. From top to bottom: MgF2, Al2O3, CIGS, GZO (e-contact on left-hand side) and Mo (h-contact on the right-hand side). Band diagrams in equilibrium b) and c) refer to e- and h-contact, respectively. EF, Ev and Ec are Fermi, valance band edge and conduction band edge energies, respectively.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 a) Implied photocurrent density in CIGS layer (Jph-CIGS) as a function of width and height of TCO. b) absorptance and 1-R spectra of the IBC solar cell when WTCO = 1000 nm and HTCO = 320 nm.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 a) Implied photocurrent density (Jph) as a function of width and height of TCO. b) absorptance and 1-R spectra of the IBC solar cell when WTCO = 1000 nm and HTCO = 320 nm.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 a) CIGS absorption for TM (blue line), TE (black line) and average of TM and TE (brown area) polarizations and average 1-R (yellow area) spectra. The graphs correspond to the optimized IBC solar cell with as-grown CIGS grains. b) – d) Electric field magnitude at wavelength b) 1020 nm, c) 1070 nm and d) 1110 nm for TM polarization corresponding to local maxima in CIGS absorption, also indicated with red arrows in a).

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1 The model parameters used for band diagram modelling in TCAD software. Density of states of electrons and holes are indicated with eDOS and hDOS, respectively. Subscripts A and D stand for acceptor and donor, respectively.

Equations (3)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

J phi =q 300 1200 A i (λ)Φ(λ) dλ
A Green = 1 e 4αd 1(11/ n 2 ) e 4αd
ΔGreen= J phCIGS J Green J Green %
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.