Abstract

Estimation of the Stokes vector from $N>4$ intensity measurements is usually performed with the pseudo-inverse (PI) estimator, which is optimal when the noise that corrupts the measurements is additive and Gaussian. In the presence of Poisson shot noise, the maximum-likelihood (ML) estimator is different from the PI estimator, but is more complex to implement since it is not closed-form. We compare in this Letter the precisions obtained with the ML and the PI estimators in the presence of Poisson noise when using measurement structures based on spherical designs. We show that, in this case, the gain in precision brought by the ML estimator is real but modest, so that in applications where processing speed is an issue, the PI estimator can be considered sufficient. This result is important in the choice of the inversion strategy for Stokes polarimetry.

© 2017 Optical Society of America

Equalized estimation of Stokes parameters in the presence of Poisson noise for any number of polarization analysis states

François Goudail
Opt. Lett. 41(24) 5772-5775 (2016)

Optimal Mueller matrix estimation in the presence of additive and Poisson noise for any number of illumination and analysis states

François Goudail
Opt. Lett. 42(11) 2153-2156 (2017)

Estimation precision of full polarimetric parameters in the presence of additive and Poisson noise

Jun Dai, François Goudail, Matthieu Boffety, and Jun Gao
Opt. Express 26(26) 34081-34093 (2018)

Precision analysis of arbitrary full-Stokes polarimeters in the presence of additive and Poisson noise

Jun Dai and François Goudail
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 36(7) 1229-1240 (2019)

On the optimal ways to perform full Stokes measurements with a linear division-of-focal-plane polarimetric imager and a retarder

Stéphane Roussel, Matthieu Boffety, and François Goudail
Opt. Lett. 44(11) 2927-2930 (2019)