Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Superexchange interaction contribution to the Zeeman splitting of the intra-4f-shell luminescence band in Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We study Zeeman splitting of the intra-4f-shell luminescence band (4I13/24I15/2) and f-f superexchange interaction of Er3+ in Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+ in high magnetic fields. We find that the Zeeman splitting increases with increasing f-f superexchange interaction parameters based on density-functional theory, and the intensity of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition depends on the magnetic field, in conflict with the Judd-Ofelt theory. This behavior is a consequence of spd-f hybridizations between the occupied Er 4f orbitals and the valence states of Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+. The results of this study reveal the potential applicability of these materials in, for example, magnetic sensors.

© 2018 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Progress in pulsed magnetic field techniques has enabled the study of a rich diversity of phenomena in rare-earth-doped magnetic ceramic materials that exhibit photoluminescence (PL) [1–5]. Generally, 4f electron wave functions play an important role in such systems in the presence of a magnetic field, and Zeeman splitting [6,7] dominates the physics of these materials. It has been shown, for example, that there is Zeeman splitting of the higher 5D0 energy level in Eu3+-doped NaGdF4 nanocrystals in a magnetic field, which results in a blueshift of intra-4f-shell PL (the 5D07F0 transition) in Eu3+ [8]. This blueshift can be used to modulate color by controlling the magnetic field. In addition, the intra-4f-shell PL intensities (both the 5D07F0 and 4S3/24I15/2 transitions) in Er3+-doped PL crystals depend on the magnetic field, and these crystals can be used to detect magnetic fields [8–11]. Most of these results are in conflict with Judd-Ofelt theory (J-O theory) [12,13], according to which the magnetic field should have no effect on the intensity of the intra-4f-shell luminescence bands of rare-earth ions. Previous studies [14,9,11] have investigated the magnetic-field-dependent shifts of PL peaks, but have not provided specific explanations for the mechanism of Zeeman splitting or for the magnetic-field dependence of the intra-4f-shell PL intensities. Therefore, further study of 4f-electron wave functions is of great importance. The perturbation Hamiltonian for the 4fn configuration of a rare-earth ion in an external magnetic field can be written in the form [15].

H^=H^cf+H^ex+H^e,
where H^cf is the crystal-field Hamiltonian, H^ex is surperexchange interaction Hamiltonian, and H^e is Zeeman effect Hamiltonian. This leads us to conclude that the superexchange interaction plays a crucial role in 4f-electron wave functions, and its contribution to Zeeman splitting needs to be studied. However, the superexchange interaction of rare-earth ions is obscure and its direct experimental study poses great difficulties. Fortunately, density functional theory (DFT) is well suited for investigation of this interaction [16–18]. Here, we present an approach to the investigation of the f-f superexchange interaction and Zeeman splitting of rare-earth ions that combines experiment and DFT calculation.

Gd3Ga4FeO12 is a well-known wide-gap magnetic ceramic [19]. Er3+ and Yb3+ are widely used dopants that are known to activate PL and to act as efficient luminescence centers (for the intra-4f-shell transition) [20,21]. Consequently, replacement of the Gd3+ ion by Er3+ and Yb3+ ions give rise to important changes in the Zeeman splitting and superexchange interaction of Er3+ in Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+ ceramic oxides.

In this work, the Zeeman splitting of the intra-4f-shell luminescence band (4I13/24I15/2) of Er3+ is studied experimentally in Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+ in external magnetic fields up to 38 T, and the f-f superexchange interaction of Er3+ is calculated by using the DFT. It is found that Zeeman splitting increases with increasing f-f superexchange interaction parameters obtained using DFT and that the intensity of the 4I13/24I15/2 emission band depends strongly on the magnetic field, which disagrees with the predictions of J-O theory. The spd-f hybridization between the occupied Er 4f orbitals and the valence states can induce changes in the 4I13/24I15/2 luminescence intensities in a magnetic field, which is a likely explanation for the conflict with J-O theory. The work described here provides further understanding of the f-f superexchange interaction and Zeeman splitting of the 4fn configuration. In addition, the materials under study exhibit high intra-4f-shell PL sensitivity to magnetic fields, and therefore have potential applications in magnetic field sensors and magnetic guidance systems in aircraft, for example.

2. Experimental and computational details

A series of Gd3-xGa4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, xEr3+ (x = 0.021, 0.042, 0.084, and 0.126) samples were synthesized using the sol-gel method [20]. X-ray diffraction (XRD) data confirmed that the preparations were successful. Temperature-dependent magnetization (M-T) studies were carried out in a magnetic measuring system (Quantum Design) with a magnetic field intensity of 0.5 T. Magneto-photoluminescence (MPL) measurements were carried out in a pulsed magnet with a peak magnetic field intensity of 38 T and a pulse duration of 100 ms. The samples were excited by a solid state laser with a wavelength of 532 nm, and the MPL spectra were analyzed by a spectrometer (S500i, Andor) equipped with a charge-coupled device (Du970P, Newton).

The many-body problem for the electrons around the nuclei was solved based on DFT. The electronic states of Gd3-xGa4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, xEr3+ (x = 0.021, 0.042, 0.084, and 0.126) were obtained from the projector augmented wave method as implemented in the VASP code [22]. The calculations were conducted using the supercell method. A 160-atom supercell for Gd3Ga4FeO12 was used for the study of the Yb3+ and Er3+ co-doped material. Geometry optimization of Gd3Ga4FeO12 was performed with eight Fe ions replacing eight Ga ions at different positions (octahedral and tetrahedral sites). One Er atom replaced one Gd atom in the 160-atom supercell of Gd3Ga4FeO12 to give Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Er3+. Two Yb atoms and one Er atom replaced three Gd atoms in the 320-atom supercell of Gd3Ga4FeO12 to give Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.021Er3+. One Yb atom and one Er atom replaced two Gd atoms in the 160-atom supercell of Gd3Ga4FeO12 to give Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.042Er3+. One Yb atom and two Er atoms replaced three Gd atoms in the 160-atom supercell of Gd3Ga4FeO12 to give Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.084Er3+. One Yb atom and three Er atoms replaced four Gd atoms in the 160-atom supercell of Gd3Ga4FeO12 to give Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.084Er3+. To account for the f-f hybridization, the 4f spin orbitals of the Er impurities were included in the calculations. In our application of DFT, we dealt with exchange correlation on the basis of the generalized-gradient approximation (GGA) [23,24]. However, the interactions among the 3d electrons of Fe and the 4f electrons of Er, Yb, and Gd in the GGA approximation are described only partially, owing to their strong localization. Thus, we used the so-called GGA + U scheme [25] and introduced into the calculations two common correction parameters U and J to correct the Coulomb and exchange interactions, respectively, among the 3d electrons at Fe sites and the 4f electrons at Er, Yb, and Gd sites. We chose the U and J values by comparison with experimentally determined band structures. For the Fe and Gd atoms in Gd3Fe5O12, we took UFe = 2, 4, 6, 8 eV and UGd = 2, 4, 6, 8 eV, respectively, together with J = 0.5 eV, in order to obtain a more accurate electronic structure. The cutoff energy in the plane-wave basis set was taken as 450 eV.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Magnetism

Figure 1 shows the temperature dependence of magnetization (M-T) for Gd3Ga5O12 (GGG) and Gd3-xGa4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, xEr3+ (x = 0.021, 0.042, 0.084, and 0.126) in a field of 0.5 T. It can clearly be seen that there is a sudden increase in magnetization below 30 K for all the compositions compared with that of GGG. This increase is related to magnetic ordering of rare-earth ions. The M-T curves show increased magnetization for all the Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+ samples, resulting from magnetized Fe3+ and Er3+, which is in agreement with the results of a previous study [19]. The magnetization increases with increasing Er3+ concentration between 0 and 0.042, and then decreases above 0.084, because Yb3+ is a nonmagnetic ion and Er3+ a magnetic ion.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Temperature dependence of magnetization in a field of 0.5 T for GGG and Gd3-xGa4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, xEr3+ (x = 0.021, 0.042, 0.084, and 0.126). Inset (a) shows the Curie-Weiss law fit of the dc susceptibility data.

Download Full Size | PDF

The magnetic moment increases with increasing Er3+ concentration between 0 and 0.042, and then decreases above 0.084 because the magnetic moment of Fe3+ (∼4.33 µB) is higher than that of Ga3+ (0 µB) and the magnetic moment of Gd3+ (∼7.9 µB) is higher than those of Yb3+ (0 µB) and Er3+ (6.6 µB) [26]. The maximum magnetic moment is obtained when the Er concentration reaches 0.042. The inverse susceptibilities of GGG and Gd3-xGa4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, xEr3+ were calculated from the M-T data, and their temperature dependence is plotted in inset (b) of Fig. 1. The Curie temperature θ and the effective magnetic moment µeff were extracted from the Curie-Weiss fit in the temperature region 0-300 K and are given in Table 1. The negative value of the paramagnetic Curie temperature (−3.8 K) for GGG suggests the presence of low-temperature antiferromagnetic interactions in GGG, while the negative value of the Weiss constant can be assigned to the crystal field effect of the rare earth without the need to invoke the onset of any antiferromagnetic interactions [27]. In addition, the Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+ system shows ferromagnetic behavior below 7.76 K for all the other samples (Table 1).

Tables Icon

Table 1. Paramagnetic Curie temperatures θ and effective magnetic moments µeff calculated from the Curie-Weiss law fit for GGG and Gd3-xGa4FeO12: Yb3+, xEr3+ [x = 0.021 (I), 0.042 (II), 0.084 (III), and 0.126 (IV)] in the temperature region 0-300 K. The theoretical magnetic moments µtheo were calculated from Eq. (2).

For comparison, Table 1 also shows the theoretical values of the magnetic moment, calculated from the formula [28]

μtheo=g[J(J+1)]1/2μB,
The experimental effective magnetic moments are in good agreement with the value of 11.57 µB given byμGd3+2+μFe3+2+μEr3+2, using the Gd3+, Er3+, and Fe3+ contributions calculated from Eq. (2). As can be seen from Table 1, the effective magnetic moment shows a systematic increase with increasing Er3+ concentration between 0 and 0.042, and then decreases above 0.084 because of the zero magnetic moment of Yb3+ and the lower magnetic moment of Er3+. Above all, the added Er concentration can influence the magnetic behavior and thereby affect the Zeeman splittings.

3.2 Temperature dependence of zero-magnetic-field and high-magnetic-field photoluminescence

To better understand the behavior of the PL intensity of the Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+ system in a magnetic field, we first measured its temperature dependence in zero magnetic field. Figures 2(a)-(d) show the zero-magnetic-field spectra of the 4I13/24I15/2 luminescence bands of Gd3-xGa4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, xEr3+ (x = 0.021, 0.042, 0.084, and 0.126) at three different temperatures. It can be noted that at a temperature of 5 K, there are are three, two, three, and four Stark levels of the 4I13/24I15/2 luminescence bands for Er3+ concentrations x = 0.021, 0.042, 0.084 and 0.126, respectively, while at 80 K, there are three, four, three, and three peaks, respectively, for these concentrations. At room temperature, eight Stark components are observed for all samples. These results indicate that the spin-orbit ground state 4I15/2 splits into two to five main Stark levels at low temperature (below 80 K), whereas it splits into eight main Stark levels at room temperature. Therefore, there is a high-symmetry pseudocubic Er3+ site at low temperature and a low-symmetry pseudo-cubic site at room temperature. The irreducible representations for pseudo-cubic symmetries are Γ6 + Γ7 + 3Γ8. The ground state 4I15/2 is (2J + 1)-fold degenerate. In high crystal-field symmetry, the lowest Kramers doublet is Γ6 or Γ7 of 4I13/2 and 4I15/2. In low crystal-field symmetry, the quartets Γ8 additionally split, giving rise to a total of eight Stark levels, which are Kramers doublets. The lowest Stark levels for both the 4I13/2 and 4I15/2 states are simple Kramers doublets, permitting only the simplest doublet splitting of these Stark levels in an external magnetic field.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 (a)-(d) Zero-magnetic-field spectra of the 4I13/24I15/2 luminescence bands of Gd3-xGa4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, xEr3+ at different temperatures for (a) x = 0.021, (b) x = 0.042, (c) x = 0.084, and (d) x = 0.126. (e)-(l) Photoluminescence spectra at magnetic fields 0-38 T at 5 K and 80 K, showing different splitting behaviors of Gd3-xGa4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, xEr3+; (e) x = 0.021 at 5 K; (f) x = 0.042 at 5 K; (g) x = 0.084 at 5 K; (h) x = 0.126 at 5 K; (i) x = 0.021 at 80 K; (j) x = 0.042 at 80 K; (k) x = 0.084 at 80 K; (l) x = 0.126 at 80 K.

Download Full Size | PDF

The purple arrows at the 4I13/24I15/2 bands (the highest peak at 1533 nm) in Figs. 2(a), 2(b), and 2(d) indicate the 0-0 transition between the lowest Stark levels of the 4I13/2 and 4I15/2 states of Er3+. This transition does not involve the absorption or emission of phonons; rather it is a so-called zero-phonon transition or pure electronic transition. The intensities of all other transitions (include small peaks at the left and right and highest middle peak) in Figs. 2(a), 2(b), and 2(d) greatly decrease with decreasing temperature, indicating that these transitions are induced by emission from the thermally populated Stark levels of the 4I13/2 state (or lattice thermal vibrations). The intensities at 1533 nm in Fig. 2(c) also decrease with decreasing temperature, indicating that the transition between the 4I13/2 and 4I15/2 states at 1533 nm results not only from the 0-0 transition, but also from the emission of the thermally populated Stark levels of the 4I13/2 state. These observations indicate that the transition mechanism at 1533 nm depends on the concentration of Er3+.

Figures 2(e) - 2(l) show the 5 K (below the Curie temperature) and 80 K PL spectra of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition as a function of magnetic field, which are all in high crystal-field symmetry. The 0-0 phonon lines (the highest peak) for all Gd3Ga4FeO12:Yb3+, Er3+ samples split into two weaker peaks when a high external magnetic field (≥ 20 T at 5 K, and ≥ 25 T at 80K, respectively) is applied. It is also clear that these splitting peaks are redshifted with increasing field, indicating that the peaks of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition are split into Zeeman doublets in high external magnetic fields both for ferromagnetic and for paramagnetic Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+. Er3+ has the electronic configuration [Xe] 4f116s2, and therefore the electronic state must be at least doubly degenerate in the absence of a magnetic field. All these doublets can be split in the presence of an external magnetic field. 4I13/2 and 4I15/2 split into 14 and 16 MJ sublevels, respectively, in an external magnetic field.

The small peaks at the left (1515 nm) and right (1610 nm) are only shifting and the highest middle peaks (1544 nm) are splitting into 2 weaker peaks for all Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+, which has a very similar behavior with Zeeman effect in photoluminescence of Er3+ ion imbedded in crystalline silicon [35]. Moreover, with increasing field (30-38 T), the highest middle peaks intensities of the Zeeman splitting at 1544 nm become higher at 80 K but weaker at 5 K. This indicates that these peaks at 1544 nm may be influenced by the large Er-Er bond length, which results in lattice thermal vibrations [20].

It is noteworthy that the intensities of the 0-0 phonon lines of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition (the highest peak and the highest middle peak) decrease with increasing magnetic field (≥ 10 T). This indicates the intensities of 4I13/24I15/2 transition depend on magnetic field, which is in conflict with the J-O theory [38]. While, the smaller peak (1515 nm) on the left suddenly disappear in an external magnetic field for Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.042Er3+ (Fig. 2(f)). There is a redshift with increasing magnetic field for the 0-0 zero phonon line of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition. Moreover, the Zeeman splittings of this transition (the highest peak at 1533 nm) for different Er concentrations depend on magnetic field as shown in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b). It can be seen that the Zeeman splittings increase with increasing magnetic field and that Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.042Er3+ exhibits the maximum Zeeman splitting. This indicates that a particular choice of Er concentration can change the Zeeman splitting of the 0-0 phonon line of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition, which agrees with the results for the magnetic properties of Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+. The magnetic field dependence of the redshift of the 0-0 phonon line of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition is shown in the insets in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b). The dependence changes to a linear one at high magnetic fields, with crossovers at about 25 and 20 T at 5 and 80 K, respectively. This linear dependence at high fields is typical of magnetic confinement (compression) [14] of electron wave functions in a variety of materials. The dE/dB ratio about 0.32 cm−1/T, 1.57 cm−1/T, 1.43 cm−1/T, and 0.996 cm−1/T for the highest peaks in Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.021Er3+, Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.042Er3+, Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.084Er3+, and Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.126Er3+, respectively. There is the biggest dE/dB ratio in Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.042Er3+, indicating there is the biggest Zeeman splitting in Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.042Er3+. Comparing with the Er3+ in other crystal, such as Er3+-doped nano-glass-ceramics (dE/dB~0.66 cm−1/T) [14], the dE/dB ratio is also bigger in Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+ (except Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.021Er3+), which indicates these materials are better for magnetic sensors. Besides, both Zeeman splitting and redshifting of the 0-0 phonon line need a lower magnetic field at 5K than at 80 K, indicating that splitting in the presence of a magnetic field is easier for Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+ at lower temperature. In addition, Table 2 lists the Lande g factors estimated from the highest peaks positions of the Zeeman components for Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+ at 5 K, which is closed to theoretical value (6/5) very well. The magnetic moments μ are calculated from g factors (Table 2), which is also in agreement with the data given in Table 1 and Eq. (2). The Lande gJ-tensor about 19 for the Er3+ ion in orthorhombic garnet type structure [37].

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Zeeman splittings of 0-0 zero phonon line of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition (the highest peak at 1533 nm) for different Er concentrations depend on magnetic field at (a) 5 K and (b) 80 K. The insets are the magnetic field dependence of the redshift of the 0-0 phonon line of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition at 5 K and 80 K.

Download Full Size | PDF

Tables Icon

Table 2. Lande g factors and μ estimated from the highest peaks positions of the Zeeman components for Gd3-xGa4FeO12: Yb3+, xEr3+ [x = 0.021 (I), 0.042 (II), 0.084 (III), and 0.126 (IV)] at 5 K.

The Zeeman splittings of the highest middle peak at 1544 nm for different Er concentrations depend on magnetic field as shown in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b). It can be seen that the Zeeman splittings decrease with increasing magnetic field and that Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.042Er3+ exhibits the maximum Zeeman splitting. This indicates that a particular choice of Er concentration can change the Zeeman splitting of the 0-0 phonon line of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition, which agrees with the results for the magnetic properties of Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+. In addition, we obtained the Zeeman components of the highest peak and middle highest peak as function of magnetic field for Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.042Er3+ as shown in Fig. 5 There is a nonlinear dependency of the Zeeman components on the magnetic field, which resulted from the Er f-f spin-orbit coupling and the Jahn-Teller displacement of the impurity Er 4f orbit [36]. The others Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+ system have similar behavious to Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.042Er3+. Therefore, to explain the f-f spin-orbit coupling, these relationships between the Zeeman splitting of the 0-0 phonon line and the Er concentration and between the emission intensity and the magnetic field, the electronic structures of Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+ are now analyzed.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Zeeman splittings of the highest middle peak at 1544 nm for different Er concentrations depend on magnetic field at (a) 5 K and (b) 80 K.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 Zeeman components of the highest peak and middle highest peak as function of magnetic field for Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.042Er3+ at 5 K and 80 K.

Download Full Size | PDF

3.3 Electronic structure

To obtain the optimal electronic structures of Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+, the various effective Hubbard U parameters are used for the Fe d orbitals and Gd f orbitals for Gd3Fe5O12. Figure 6 shows the spin-up and spin-down band structures of Gd3Fe5O12 along the high-symmetry direction of the Brillouin zone modified by adding the U values of the d orbitals of Fe (UFe = 2, 4, 6, 8 eV) and the f orbitals of Gd (UGd = 2, 4, 6, 8 eV). The valence-band maximum (VBM) and conduction-band minimum (CBM) occur at the G point (one of the high-symmetry points). Gd3Fe5O12 is predicted to be a direct band gap material with energy gaps of 1.819, 1.995, 2.172, 2.287, 1.996, 1.974, and 1.984 eV in Figs. 6(a) - 6(g), respectively. It is found that for Gd3Fe5O12, an energy gap of 1.996 eV (UFe = 4 eV and UGd = 2 eV) gives the best agreement between theory and optical experiments [Fig. 6(h)].

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 (a)-(g) Band structures of Gd3Fe5O12 along the high-symmetry direction of the Brillouin zone modified by adding the U values of the d orbitals of Fe (UFe = 2, 4, 6, 8 eV) and the f orbitals of Gd (UGd = 2, 4, 6, 8 eV). (h) Calculated energy gap of Gd3Fe5O12 from optical absorption experiments.

Download Full Size | PDF

In Fig. 7, we display the projected spin-up and spin-down densities of states (DOS) of Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+. All of the Fermi energies are superimposed on the conduction band and valence band, and the band edges of all samples are lower than Ef. It is possible that these complexes can act as donors. While the VBM and CBM of GGG did not cross the Fermi energy in our previous study [20], the conduction band edge of Gd3Ga4FeO12 [Fig. 7(a)] is lower than that of GGG, indicating that Fe acts as a donor. The conduction band edge energy above Ef of Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Er3+ [Fig. 7(b)] is lower than that of Gd3Ga4FeO12, indicating that Er acts as a donor, while the conduction band edge energy of Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.042Er3+ [Fig. 7(d)] above Ef is higher than that of Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Er3+, indicating that Yb acts as a acceptor. However, when the concentration of Er is lower or higher than 0.042, the conduction band edge energy [Figs. 7(c), 7(e), and 7(f)] is lower than that of Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.042Er3+, indicating that Er acts as a acceptor at low concentrations (below 0.042) but as a donor at high concentrations. The gap properties can also be tuned by doping with Fe, Er, and Yb, which is in agreement with what is found for doping of semiconductor nanocrystals. The replacement of Ga by the magnetic Fe induces s-p hybridization between the occupied Fe 3d orbitals and the valence states of Gd3Ga4FeO12. In addition, there is s-p hybridization between the occupied Er 4f orbitals and the valence states of Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+, which results from the addition of the magnetic Er. These hybridizations can enhance the Zeeman splitting in the presence of an external magnetic field. In addition, the Fe 3d, Gd 5d, and Gd 4f orbitals mix with the Er 4f orbitals for all Yb3+ and Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+, as a consequence of which the Er 4f become sensitive to an external magnetic field owing to the presence of the magnetic Fe 3d and Gd 5d.

 figure: Fig. 7

Fig. 7 Projected spin-up and spin-down DOS Gd3Ga4FeO12 with a complex formed by substitutional Yb and Er at the dodecahedral sites: (a) Gd3Ga4FeO12; (b) Gd3Ga4FeO12 Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Er3+; (c) Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.021Er3+; (d) Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.042Er3+; (e) Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.084Er3+; (f) Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.126Er3+. The zero of the energy (the vertical yellow line) denotes the Fermi energy Ef.

Download Full Size | PDF

The main peaks of the Fe d states and Er f states appear at the valence band and the conduction band. Owing to the dodecahedral symmetry in GGG [29,30], the Fe and Er electrons are split. We are interested in the magnetic coupling between Er and GGG states equivalent to the band edge states. The projected DOS around valence and conduction edge states indicate that the conduction edge of the host compound hybridizes with the 4f orbitals of Er in all Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+. Hence, the superexchange interaction arises from Coulomb repulsion, the Pauli exclusion principle, and spin splitting of these states. Meanwhile, the valence-band edge states of the host compound hybridize fully with the Er 4f orbitals except in the case of Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Er3+. This hybridization yields an effective exchange mechanism of interaction between Er atoms. Therefore, the f-f interaction for Gd3-xGa4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, xEr3+ (x = 0.021, 0.042, 0.084, and 0.126) leads not only to spin splitting of the valence-band edge, but also to spin splitting of the conduction-band edge. In this paper, to describe the f-f exchange mechanism of interaction between Er f orbits, we define the Er f-f spin-orbit coupling interaction as f-f superexchange interaction, which is used to study the Yb spin-orbit coupling interaction [17].

3.4 Dependence of Zeeman splitting on superexchange interaction

We calculated the f-f superexchange interaction parameters of Er using the DOS from Fig. 7, together with the bulk expressions, which are given in standard mean-field theory as [31–34]

N0α=ΔEcxSZ,,N0β=ΔEvxSZ,,
where N0 is the cation per unit volume, The differences ΔEc,v = Ec,v(spin down) - Ec,v (spin up) are the spin splittings of the conduction (c) and valence (v) band edges. The x value is the fractional dopant concentration and Sz = 5/2 is the average z component of Er spins. The total exchange interaction parameters can be obtained as:

N0(α-β)=ΔEcΔEνxSZ,

Using Eqs. (3)–(4), we calculate N0(αβ) as a function of the concentration of Er, with the results shown in Fig. 8(a). It can be seen that the superexchange interaction parameter is greatest when x = 0.042, because the band edge is located at the conduction band above Ef. Figure 8(b) shows the effect of N0(αβ) on Zeeman splitting of the 0-0 phonon line of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition in the presence of a 38 T magnetic field at 5 K and 80 K. It is clear that the Zeeman splitting increases with increasing f-f superexchange interaction of Er. This explains the maximum Zeeman splittings in Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.042Er3+ in an external magnetic field. Furthermore, the f-f superexchange interaction parameters reveal the magnetic coupling between Er and the band edges of Gd3Ga4FeO12, which enhances the sensitivity of the intensity of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition in a magnetic field. There is thus a very clear explanation for the dependence of the intensity of the 0-0 phonon line of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition on an external magnetic field, in contrast to the prediction of the J-O theory.

 figure: Fig. 8

Fig. 8 (a) Calculated N0(α − β) as a function of the concentration of Er. (b) Zeeman splitting of the highest peaks as functions of N0(α − β) in the presence of a 38 T magnetic field at 5 K and 8 K.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

Zeeman splitting of the intra-4f-shell luminescence band (4I13/24I15/2) and f-f superexchange interactions of Er3+ have been studied in high magnetic fields up to 38 T. There is redshifting and Zeeman splitting of the 4I13/24I15/2 luminescence band of Er3+, and the Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+ is easier splits at lower magnetic fields in the lower temperature. Additionally, the superexchange interaction contribution to Zeeman splitting and the magnetic-field-dependent intensity of the 4I13/24I15/2 luminescence band have been discussed based on results obtained using DFT. It is found that Zeeman splitting increases with increasing f-f superexchange interaction parameters, and the intensity of the 4I13/24I15/2 luminescence band depends on the magnetic field, in conflict with the predictions of J-O theory. This is a new phenomenon and results from spd-f hybridization between the occupied Er 4f orbital and the valence states of Gd3Ga4FeO12: Yb3+, Er3+. The approach adopted here can provide further understanding of the f-f superexchange interaction and Zeeman splitting of the 4fn configuration. In addition, the high sensitivity of intra-4f-shell PL to a magnetic field means that these materials are potentially applicable in remote magnetic sensing, magnetic field detection, and magnetic guidance systems.

Funding

National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (51425203); Program of Shanghai Subject Chief Scientist (15XD1501900).

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge financial support from the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (No.51425203) and the Program of Shanghai Subject Chief Scientist (No.15XD1501900).

References

1. G. Bai, Y. Zhang, and J. Hao, “Tuning of near-infrared luminescence of SrTiO3:Ni2+ thin films grown on piezoelectric PMN-PT via strain engineering,” Sci. Rep. 4(1), 5724 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. J. Hao, Y. Zhang, and X. Wei, “Electric-induced enhancement and modulation of upconversion photoluminescence in epitaxial BaTiO3:Yb/Er thin films,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 50(30), 6876–6880 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. R. Chen, Q. L. Ye, T. C. He, T. Wu, and H. D. Sun, “Uniaxial tensile strain and exciton-phonon coupling in bent ZnO nanowires,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98(24), 241916 (2011). [CrossRef]  

4. P. Chen, J. Zhang, B. Xu, X. Sang, W. Chen, X. Liu, J. Han, and J. Qiu, “Lanthanide doped nanoparticles as remote sensors for magnetic fields,” Nanoscale 6(19), 11002–11006 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. Y. Liu, D. Wang, J. Shi, Q. Peng, and Y. Li, “Magnetic tuning of upconversion luminescence in lanthanide-doped bifunctional nanocrystals,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 52(16), 4366–4369 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. J. H. Yu, X. Liu, K. E. Kweon, J. Joo, J. Park, K. T. Ko, D. W. Lee, S. Shen, K. Tivakornsasithorn, J. S. Son, J. H. Park, Y. W. Kim, G. S. Hwang, M. Dobrowolska, J. K. Furdyna, and T. Hyeon, “Giant Zeeman splitting in nucleation-controlled doped CdSe:Mn2+ quantum nanoribbons,” Nat. Mater. 9(1), 47–53 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. G. F. Koster and H. Statz, “Method of treating Zeeman splittings of paramagnetic ions in crystalline fields,” Phys. Rev. 113(2), 445–454 (1959). [CrossRef]  

8. Y. Zhang, Q. Xiao, H. He, J. Zhang, G. Dong, J. Han, and J. Qiu, “Simultaneous luminescence modulation and magnetic field detection via magneto-optical response of Eu3+-doped NaGdF4 nanocrystals,” J. Mater. Chem. C Mater. Opt. Electron. Devices 3(39), 10140–10145 (2015). [CrossRef]  

9. J. Zhang, X. Wang, Z. Zhong, Z. Ma, S. Wang, Y. Han, J. Han, L. Li, and C. Tang, “Magnetic field induced extraordinary photoluminescence enhancement in Er3+: YVO4 single crystal,” J. Appl. Phys. 118(8), 083101 (2015). [CrossRef]  

10. L. F. Chibotaru, V. K. Tikhomirov, D. Saurel, and V. V. Moshchalkov, “Extraordinary magnetic field induced suppression of luminescence in Er3+-doped nano-glass-ceramics,” J. Appl. Phys. 106(5), 053502 (2009). [CrossRef]  

11. Y. Wang, J. Zhang, J. Han, Z. Hao, and Q. Wang, “High magnetic field and temperature tuning of up-conversion luminescence in Mn2+-doped (Er3+/Yb3+), NaYF4,” J. Appl. Phys. 117(8), 083903 (2015). [CrossRef]  

12. B. R. Judd, “Optical absorption intensities of rare-earth ions,” Phys. Rev. 127(3), 750–761 (1962). [CrossRef]  

13. G. S. Ofelt, “Intensities of crystal spectra of rare-earth ions,” J. Chem. Phys. 37(3), 511–520 (1962). [CrossRef]  

14. D. Saurel, V. K. Tikhomirov, V. V. Moshchalkov, C. Görller-Walrand, and K. Driesen, “Zeeman splitting and confinement effects in Er3+-doped nano-glass-ceramics in magnetic fields up to 50 T,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(17), 171101 (2008). [CrossRef]  

15. W. Wang, Y. Yue, and D. Li, “Anisotropy of magnetic properties in ferrimagnetic ytterbium iron garnet under high magnetic fields,” J. Appl. Phys. 105(8), 083909 (2009). [CrossRef]  

16. A. K. Bhattacharjee, “Nanocrystals of diluted magnetic semiconductors: Model for magnetic polaron,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 51(15), 9912–9916 (1995). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. R. F. Pearson, “Magnetocrystalline anisotropy of ytterbium iron garnet Yb3Fe5O12,” Proc. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86(5), 1055–1066 (1965). [CrossRef]  

18. L. Pawlak, M. Duczmal, S. Pokrzywnicki, and A. Czopnik, “Magnetic susceptibility and crystal field parameters of ytterbium sesquiselenide,” Solid State Commun. 34(3), 195–197 (1980). [CrossRef]  

19. R. D. McMichael, J. J. Ritter, and R. D. Shull, “Enhanced magnetocaloric effect in Gd3Ga5-xFexO12,” J. Appl. Phys. 73(10), 6946–6948 (1993). [CrossRef]  

20. L. Tong, K. Satio, Q. Guo, H. Zhou, T. Fan, and D. Zhang, “Defect induced visible-light-activated near-infrared emissions in Gd3-x-y-zYbxBiyErzGa5O12,” J. Appl. Phys. 122(17), 173103 (2017). [CrossRef]  

21. L. Tong, K. Saito, Q. Guo, H. Zhou, X. Guo, T. Fan, and D. Zhang, “Local Bi-O bonds correlated with infrared emission properties in triply doped Gd2.95Yb0.02Bi0.02Er0.01Ga5O12 via temperature-dependent Raman spectra and x-ray absorption fine structure analysis,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 30(12), 125901 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

22. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, “From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 59(3), 1758–1775 (1999). [CrossRef]  

23. P. Dufek, P. Blaha, V. Sliwko, and K. Schwarz, “Generalized-gradient-approximation description of band splittings in transition-metal oxides and fluorides,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 49(15), 10170–10175 (1994). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

24. D. J. Singh and J. Ashkenazi, “Magnetism with generalized-gradient-approximation density functionals,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 46(18), 11570–11577 (1992). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

25. V. I. Anisimov, J. Zaanen, and O. K. Andersen, “Band theory and Mott insulators: Hubbard U instead of Stoner I,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 44(3), 943–954 (1991). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

26. R. Faulhaber, S. Hufner, E. Oplich, and H. Schuchert, “Optical investigation of ErFeO3,” Z. Physik. Bd 204(2), 101–113 (1967). [CrossRef]  

27. R. S. Puche, E. Climent, and J. R. de Paz, “Crystal field splitting and magnetic behavior of Nd2BaCuO5 single crystals,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 71(2), 024403 (2005). [CrossRef]  

28. V. K. Tikhomirov, L. F. Chibotaru, D. Saurel, P. Gredin, M. Mortier, and V. V. Moshchalkov, “Er3+-doped nanoparticles for optical detection of magnetic field,” Nano Lett. 9(2), 721–724 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

29. J. M. Ogiegło, A. Katelnikovas, A. Zych, T. Jüstel, A. Meijerink, and C. R. Ronda, “Luminescence and luminescence quenching in Gd3(Ga,Al)5O12 scintillators doped with Ce3+.,” J. Phys. Chem. A 117(12), 2479–2484 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

30. I. Venevtsev, V. Khanin, P. Rodnyi, H. Wieczorek, and C. Ronda, “Temperature Quenching of Radio-and Photoluminescence of Y3(Ga, Al)5O12: Ce3+ and Gd3(Ga, Al)5O12: Ce3+ Garnet Ceramics,” IEEE T. Nucl. Sci. 99, 1–7 (2018).

31. H. Raebiger, A. Ayuela, and J. von Boehm, “Electronic and magnetic properties of substitutional Mn clusters in (Ga, Mn) As,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 72(1), 014465 (2005). [CrossRef]  

32. A. E. Merad, M. B. Kanoun, and S. Goumri-Said, “Ab initio study of electronic structures and magnetism in ZnMnTe and CdMnTe diluted magnetic semiconductors,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 302(2), 536–542 (2006). [CrossRef]  

33. B. E. Larson, K. C. Hass, H. Ehrenreich, and A. E. Carlsson, “Theory of exchange interactions and chemical trends in diluted magnetic semiconductors,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 37(8), 4137–4154 (1988). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

34. A. Gaj, R. Planel, and G. Fishman, “Relation of magneto-optical properties of free excitons to spin alignment of Mn2+ ions in Cd1-xMnxTe,” Solid State Commun. 29(5), 435–438 (1979). [CrossRef]  

35. N. Q. Vinha, H. Przybylińska, Z. F. Krasil’nik, B. A. Andreevc, and T. Gregorkiewicz, “Observation of Zeeman effect in photoluminescence of Er3+ ion imbedded in crystalline silicon,” Physica B 308, 308–310 (2001). [CrossRef]  

36. T. Telahun, U. Scherz, P. Thurian, R. Heitz, A. Hoffmann, and I. Broser, “Nonlinear Zeeman behavior of Cu2+ centers in ZnS and CdS explained by a Jahn-Teller effect,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 53(3), 1274–1286 (1996). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

37. C. A. J. Ammerlaan and I. de Maat-Gersdorf, “Zeeman splitting factor of the Er3+ ion in a crystal field,” Appl. Magn. Reson. 21(1), 13–33 (2001). [CrossRef]  

38. G. Du, P. Liu, W. Guo, Y. Han, J. Zhang, Z. Ma, J. Han, Z. Liu, and K. Yao, “The influence of high magnetic field on electric-dipole emission spectra of Eu3+ in different single crystals,” J. Mater. Chem. C Mater. Opt. Electron. Devices 1(45), 7608–7613 (2013). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (8)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Temperature dependence of magnetization in a field of 0.5 T for GGG and Gd3-xGa4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, xEr3+ (x = 0.021, 0.042, 0.084, and 0.126). Inset (a) shows the Curie-Weiss law fit of the dc susceptibility data.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a)-(d) Zero-magnetic-field spectra of the 4I13/24I15/2 luminescence bands of Gd3-xGa4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, xEr3+ at different temperatures for (a) x = 0.021, (b) x = 0.042, (c) x = 0.084, and (d) x = 0.126. (e)-(l) Photoluminescence spectra at magnetic fields 0-38 T at 5 K and 80 K, showing different splitting behaviors of Gd3-xGa4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, xEr3+; (e) x = 0.021 at 5 K; (f) x = 0.042 at 5 K; (g) x = 0.084 at 5 K; (h) x = 0.126 at 5 K; (i) x = 0.021 at 80 K; (j) x = 0.042 at 80 K; (k) x = 0.084 at 80 K; (l) x = 0.126 at 80 K.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Zeeman splittings of 0-0 zero phonon line of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition (the highest peak at 1533 nm) for different Er concentrations depend on magnetic field at (a) 5 K and (b) 80 K. The insets are the magnetic field dependence of the redshift of the 0-0 phonon line of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition at 5 K and 80 K.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Zeeman splittings of the highest middle peak at 1544 nm for different Er concentrations depend on magnetic field at (a) 5 K and (b) 80 K.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Zeeman components of the highest peak and middle highest peak as function of magnetic field for Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.042Er3+ at 5 K and 80 K.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 (a)-(g) Band structures of Gd3Fe5O12 along the high-symmetry direction of the Brillouin zone modified by adding the U values of the d orbitals of Fe (UFe = 2, 4, 6, 8 eV) and the f orbitals of Gd (UGd = 2, 4, 6, 8 eV). (h) Calculated energy gap of Gd3Fe5O12 from optical absorption experiments.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Projected spin-up and spin-down DOS Gd3Ga4FeO12 with a complex formed by substitutional Yb and Er at the dodecahedral sites: (a) Gd3Ga4FeO12; (b) Gd3Ga4FeO12 Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Er3+; (c) Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.021Er3+; (d) Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.042Er3+; (e) Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.084Er3+; (f) Gd3Ga4FeO12: 0.042Yb3+, 0.126Er3+. The zero of the energy (the vertical yellow line) denotes the Fermi energy Ef.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8 (a) Calculated N0(α − β) as a function of the concentration of Er. (b) Zeeman splitting of the highest peaks as functions of N0(α − β) in the presence of a 38 T magnetic field at 5 K and 8 K.

Tables (2)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Paramagnetic Curie temperatures θ and effective magnetic moments µeff calculated from the Curie-Weiss law fit for GGG and Gd3-xGa4FeO12: Yb3+, xEr3+ [x = 0.021 (I), 0.042 (II), 0.084 (III), and 0.126 (IV)] in the temperature region 0-300 K. The theoretical magnetic moments µtheo were calculated from Eq. (2).

Tables Icon

Table 2 Lande g factors and μ estimated from the highest peaks positions of the Zeeman components for Gd3-xGa4FeO12: Yb3+, xEr3+ [x = 0.021 (I), 0.042 (II), 0.084 (III), and 0.126 (IV)] at 5 K.

Equations (4)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

H ^ = H ^ cf + H ^ e x + H ^ e ,
μ theo = g [ J ( J + 1 ) ] 1 / 2 μ B ,
N 0 α = Δ E c x S Z , , N 0 β = Δ E v x S Z , ,
N 0 ( α - β ) = Δ E c Δ E ν x S Z ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.