Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Tunable light trapping and absorption enhancement with graphene-based complementary metasurfaces

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Plasmonics has been extensively exploited to trap the incident light and enhance the absorption in optoelectronic devices. The availability of graphene as a plasmonic material with a continuously tunable surface conductivity makes it promising to modulate the absorption enhancement with graphene surface plasmon resonance dynamically. In this contribution, we numerically demonstrate that tunable light trapping and absorption enhancement can be realized with graphene-based complementary metasurfaces. Furthermore, we also explore the polarization sensitivity in the proposed device, in which case either a TM or TE plane wave at the specific wavelength can be efficiently absorbed by simply manipulating the Fermi level of graphene. Therefore, this work can find potential applications in the next generation of photodetectors with tunable spectral and polarization selectivity in the mid-infrared and terahertz regions.

© 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

In recent decades, semiconductors have been employed in a variety of optoelectronic devices such as solar cells, sensors, modulators, photodetectors [1–7]. However, it has been always a dilemma in choosing the thickness of semiconductors, since the high integrability and fast response require thin film semiconductors while the sufficient light absorption can be only guaranteed by bulk. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR), the collective electronic excitation at metal/dielectric interface, provides an effective route to manipulate light-matter interaction beyond the diffraction limit [8–11]. The unprecedented ability of SPR to trap the incident light at the subwavelength scale and lead to the local field enhancement has been extensively exploited to enhance the absorption in the semiconductors, addressing the above concern to a great extent. Based on this, a range of metal-based plasmonic metasurfaces, such as ribbon, disk, ring, cross and other shapes have been presented to load with thin film semicondctors to improve their absorption performance from the ultraviolet to terahertz (THz) regions [12–21]. Unfortunately, the resonant responses of metal-based plasmonic metasurfaces are dependent on the structure parameters, and therefore the operating wavelength of these hybrid optoelectronic devices are fixed in case they are fabricated, which inevitably hinders flexible applications requiring tunable spectral selectivity.

Graphene is a two-dimensional (2D) atomically-thin material with exceptional optical and electrical properties and serves as a promising building block for modern optoelectronics [22, 23]. In the mid-infrared and THz regions, graphene exhibits strong half-metallicity when coupling with the incident light and supports SPR for plasmonic applications [24, 25]. Moreover, the resonant responses of graphene-based metasurfaces can be dynamically modulated by the continuously tunable surface conductivity of graphene with manipulating its Fermi level, which therefore can be considered as serious rivals to the metal-based counterparts [26–34]. Till now, tunable single-, dual- and even multi-wavelength absorption enhancement with graphene-based plasmonic metasurfaces has been investigated, and perfect absorption has further been realized using salisbury screen configuration [35–43]. Most of these works have been concerned with the absorption in graphene itself while the usage of tunable graphene SPR to enhance the light absorption in the semiconductors is yet to be explored. Very recently, the pioneering works have demonstrated the possibility for lighttrapping and absorption engineering with high efficiency and tunable spectral selectivity by loading graphene-based plasmonic metasurfaces with thin film or even 2D semiconductors [44–47].Nevertheless, the graphene resonators in these designs exist in the isolated fashion, which may not be expediently tuned in practice. In addition, the tunable polarization selectivity in this kind of devices also remains to be further explored.

In this contribution, we numerically demonstrate light trapping and absorption enhancement can be realized with graphene-based complementary metasurfaces. The hybrid device consists of a monolayer graphene perforated with a periodic array of nanoholes on the top of a thin film semiconductor separated by an insulator layer. The simulation results show that the excitation of SPR in the monolayer graphene can effectively trap the incident light at the subwavelength scale and enhance the absorption in the surrounding semiconductor by more than one order of magnitude. Furthermore, we explore the polarization sensitivity in the proposed device when transforming the shape of the unit cell from square to rectangle. With manipulating the Fermi level of graphene, the polarization-sensitive absorption here can be dynamically modulated over a broad spectral region, which can find potential applications in the next generation of photodetectors with tunable spectral and polarization selectivity in the mid-infrared and THz regions.

2. The geometric structure and numerical model

Figure 1 schematically depicts the graphene-based complementary metasurfaces. In the proposed hybrid device, the unit cell is arranged in a periodical array with the lattice constant P=400 nm and consists of a monolayer graphene perforated with a circular nanohole on the top of a thin film semiconductor separated by an insulator layer. The radius of the circular nanohole is R=120 nm, and the effective thickness of the monolayer graphene is set as tg = 1 nm. The thicknesses of the insulator layer and the semiconductor are ti = 20 nm and ta = 100 nm, respectively, and the substrate is assumed to be semi-infinite. The insulator layer and the substrate are treated as lossless dielectrics with a real permittivity of εd=1.96. The semiconductor is modeled using a complex permittivity of εa=ε +iε ′′, where ε =10.9 and ε ′′ is related to the absorption coefficient α=(2π/λ)Im(ε +iε ′′) accounting for losses. The absorption coefficient α=0.05 μm−1 is considered, comparable to the typical semiconductor Hg 1xCdxTe ternary alloy exploited for photodetection in the mid-infrared and THz regions [48, 49].

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 The schematic geometry of our proposed graphene-based complementary metasurfaces. The unit cell consists of a monolayer graphene perforated with a circular nanohole on the top of a thin film semiconductor separated by an insulator layer.

Download Full Size | PDF

The surface conductivity of graphene can be described with the random-phase approximation (RPA) in the local limit, including both the intraband and interband processes [50, 51]

σg=σintra+σinter=2e2kBTπ2iω+iτ1ln [2cosh (EF2kBT)]+e24[12+1πarctan (ω2EF2kBT)i2πln (ω+2EF)2(ω2EF)2+4(kBT)2],
where e is the electron charge, kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is the operation temperature, ℏ is the reduced Planck’s constant, ω is the angular frequency of the incident light, τ is the carrier relaxation time and EF is the Fermi level. In the lower frequency region, the contribution originated from the interband process can be ignored due to the Pauli exclusion principle and the surface conductivity is reduced to a Drude-like model [52–54]
σg=e2EFπ2iω+iτ1,
where the carrier relaxation time τ=(μEF)/(evF2) is dependent on the carrier mobility μ = 10000 cm2/Vs, the Fermi level EF and the Fermi velocity vF=106 m/s. The anisotropic permittivity of graphene can be described in a diagonal tensor form, with isotropic dispersive components in the plane and non-dispersive component out of the plane [55, 56]
εxx=εyy=2.5+iσgε0ωtg,εzz=2.5,
where ε0 is the permittivity of vacuum.

The finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method is exploited for full-wave numerical simulations (FDTD Solutions, Lumerical Inc., Canada). In the calculations, to balance the simulation time and accuracy, the uniform meshgrid inside the monolayer grapheneis 0.25 nm while the auto non-uniform meshgrid is adopted to the other regions. The periodical boundary conditions are employed in the x and y directions and perfectly matched layers are utilized in the z direction along the propagation of the incident plane wave.

The potential fabrication and tuning of the monolayer graphene are suggested as follows [39, 40]. Firstly, the monolayer graphene is grown on a copper (Cu) foil with a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method. Secondly, the CVD-grown graphene is transferred onto the insulator layer using a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) layer which is then dissolved in the acetone solution. Thirdly, the periodical array of nanohole is patterned via a large area nanoimprint lithography with reactive ion etching (RIE) technique to perforate the monolayer graphene. Finally, a high-capacitance low-loss ion gel layer is drop casted to manipulate the Fermi level of graphene by electric gating. Besides, an optical means to tune graphene SPR hasrecently been demonstrated by ultraviolet illuminations in a dynamical and reversible way, which could further simplify the tuning process [57].

3. Simulation results and discussions

With the electric field of the incident light oriented along the x axis, (x-polarized, i.e., transverse-magnetic (TM) plane wave), SPR in the monolayer graphene is excited in the spectral region of interest. Figure 2(a) illustrates the numerically simulated spectra with an initial Fermi level of graphene EF=0.6 eV. The resonance occurs at 12.0 μm, arising a strong transmission suppression and absorption enhancement. The total absorption is A=31% at the resonance and the absorption in the semiconductor is A =16.9%. Note that the semiconductor is assumed to be an ultrathin film (100 nm) with the absorption coefficient α=0.05 μm−1, corresponding to an ultralow absorption of about 1% in the impedance matched media, an enhancement factor of 16.9 can be achieved at the resonance. Here the absorption enhancement should be attributed to the excitation of SPR in the monolayer graphene. The simulated x-y plane electric field distribution (|Ez|) at the resonance in Fig. 2(b) shows a strong enhancement of around the circular nanohole, which is symmetric to the y-axis. This is a characteristic behavior of the lowest excitation mode [1,0] of SPR under the Bragg’s condition, which results from the accumulated charges around the circular nanohole due to the TM plane wave [58]. Therefore, SPR effectively trap the incident light and enhance the absorption in the surrounding semiconductor.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 (a) The simulated spectra of the transmission T, the reflection R, the total absorption A and the absorption in the semiconductor A  with the absorption coefficient α=0.05 μm−1 and the Fermi level of graphene EF=0.6 eV. The enhancement factor of the absorption in the semiconductor is also shown compared to that in the impedance matched media. (b) The simulated electric field distribution in the x-y plane (|Ez|) at the resonance.

Download Full Size | PDF

It is well known that the SPR is dependent on the structure parameters, and the light trapping and absorption enhancement can thus be tuned with the geometric variation in the graphene-based complementary metasurface. Here we investigate the dependence of the absorption in the semiconductor on the radius of the circular nanohole and the lattice constant of the unit cell, as shown in Figs. 3(a) and (b), respectively. When the radius R starts at 40 nm, the resonance locates at 11.6 μm and the absorption in the semiconductor is 4.5%. As R increases to 60 nm, the resonance redshifts to 12.1 μm and the absorption goes up to A =9.5%. Finally, when R comes to 120 nm, the absorption reaches the maximum at 12.0 μm as the default. In the interval of R=80 to 120 nm, the absorption remains above 13.8% with more than one order enhancement and the resonance stays quite stable at around 12 μm. In contrast, the resonance wavelength is sensitive to the change in the lattice constant P. As P increases to 600 nm, the resonance redshifts to 16.0 μm and the absorption goes down to A =14.3%. Finally, when P comes to 1200 nm, the absorption reaches the minimum of 4.6% at 21.8 μm. These phenomena are quite different from those in the graphene-based metasurfaces consisting of isolated resonators, such as ribbon, disk, ring, etc., where the SPR is due to the excitation of cavity mode. The SPR in the complementary metasurface is due to the dressed mode under the Bragg’s condition [58], and thus sensitive to the lattice constant of the unit cell rather than the radius of the circular nanohole, providing much better fabrication tolerance.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 The simulated spectra of the absorption in the semiconductor A  with different (a) radii of the circular nanohole R and (b) lattice constants of the unit cell P. The enhancement factor of the absorption in the semiconductor is also shown compared to that in the impedance matched media.

Download Full Size | PDF

The optical responses of graphene are also highly dependent on its Fermi level, which is the origin of the dynamical tunability of SPR in the graphene-based metasurfaces. To demonstrate the spectral tunability of our proposed hybrid device, Fig. 4 illustrates the absorption in the semiconductor with different Fermi levels of graphene. When the Fermi level EF starts at 0.4 eV, the resonance locates at 14.7 μm and the absorption in the semiconductor is 10.5%. As EF increases to 0.7 eV, the resonance blue shifts to 11.1 μm and the absorption goes up to 19.1%. Finally, when EF comes to 0.8 eV, the absorption reaches 21.3% at 10.4 μm with an enhancement as high as 21 times. It can be seen that with the increase of Fermi level, the resonance wavelength becomes shorter and absorption enhancement increases simultaneously. The physics mechanism lies in that as the Fermi level of graphene increases, the wavelength of SPR grows longer (for a fixed frequency or vacuum wavelength) and the nanohole-shaped resonator looks relatively smaller for the incident light, hence the resonance experiences an obvious blue shift. Meanwhile, the increase of Fermi level also leads to the larger surface conductivity of graphene and SPR becomes less lossy, thus the number of charge carriers contributing to the resonance increases. Therefore, the local field enhancement with higher EF are stronger than that with lower EF, which results in a higher absorption enhancement in the semiconductor. Therefore, the tunable light trapping and absorption enhancement can be achieved by manipulating the Fermi level of graphene, without altering the structure parameters of the complementary metasurfaces. Here, we would like to highlight that the graphene nanohole-shaped resonators exploited in our proposed hybrid device is in the monolayer morphology rather than the isolated fashion, which is much easier to fabricate and manipulate than previous investigations.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 The simulated spectra of the absorption in the semiconductor A  with different Fermi levels of graphene EF. The enhancement factor of the absorption in the semiconductor is also shown compared to that in the impedance matched media.

Download Full Size | PDF

To further explore the polarization sensitivity in the proposed device, we transform the shape of the unit cell from square to rectangle, and complementary resonators from circular nanohole to elliptical nanohole to avoid the mode hybridization. As shown in Fig. 5, the monolayer graphene is perforated with a periodical array of elliptical nanoholes, where the lattice constants are Px = 300 nm and Py = 400 nm. The long axis and short axis of the elliptical nanoholes are Rx = 80 nm and Ry = 120 nm accordingly. The thicknesses of the insulator layer and the semiconductor, as well as their optical properties, keep the same as previous settings. The numerically simulated spectra with an initial Fermi level of graphene EF=0.6 eV are depicted in Fig. 6(a) and (c) for TM and TE plane wave at normal incidence, respectively. For TM plane wave, the resonance happens at around 10.2 μm and the absorption in the semiconductor is 16.8%. For TE plane wave, the resonance at 11.9μm shows the maximum absorption in the semiconductor as 14.4%. The x-y plane electric field distribution (|Ez|) at the resonances are plotted in Fig. 6(b) and (d), where the plasmon-excited local field enhancement around the elloptical nanoholes are symmetric to the y-axis under TM incident plane wave and symmetric to the x-axis under the TE incident plane wave, respectively. Like mentioned above, these are the characteristic behaviors of the lowest excitation mode [1,0] of SPR under the Bragg’s condition. Hence, the excitation of SPR in the monolayer graphene induce the local field confinement and the absorption enhancement in the semiconductor for both the TM and TE plane wave. The different resonance wavelengths for TM and TE modes arise from the different values of the lattice constant of the anisotropic unit cell in the x and y directions.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 The schematic geometry of our proposed anisotropic graphene-based complementary metasurfaces. In the unit cell, the monolayer graphene is perforated with a elliptical nanohole, and the rest keep the same as previous settings in Fig. 1.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 The simulated spectra of the transmission T, the reflection R, the total absorption A and the absorption in the semiconductor A  with the absorption coefficient α=0.05 μm−1 and the Fermi level of graphene EF=0.6 eV for (a) TM and (c) TE plane wave. The enhancement factor of the absorption in the semiconductor is also shown compared to that in the impedance matched media. The simulated electric field distribution in the x-y plane (|Ez|) at the resonance for (b) TM and (d) TE plane wave.

Download Full Size | PDF

With manipulating the Fermi level of graphene, the tunable light trapping and absorption enhancement can be realized for these anisotropic graphene-based complementary metasurfaces as well. Figures 7(a) and (b) show the spectra of absorption in the semiconductor for TM and TE plane wave with different Fermi levels of graphene. Similar with the variations in the square unit cell case, the resonance blue shifts to shorter wavelength and the absorption enhancement increases simultaneously as the Fermi level increases. Note that an interesting phenomenon can be observed by comparing these two figures: the resonance for TM plane wave with the Fermi level EF=0.6 eV and for TE plane wave with the Fermi level EF=0.81 eV share the exact same resonance wavelength at 10.2 μm, which means either TM or TE plane wave at the specific wavelength can be efficiently absorbed by simply manipulating the Fermi level of graphene. Here we introduce the polarization absorption ratio defined by 20*log (ATM /ATE ), where ATM  and ATE  are the absorption in the semiconductor for TM and TE plane wave, respectively. The dependence of the polarization absorption ratio on the Fermi level of graphene is explored at the specific wavelength of 10.2 μm. As displayed in Fig. 7(c), the polarization absorption ratio shows continuous variations as the Fermi level of graphene increases. In particular, the ratios with the Fermi level EF=0.6 eV and EF=0.81 eV are calculated as 18.1 dB and -19.0 dB. Therefore, the polarization-sensitive absorption of the incident light at the specific wavelength can be dynamically modulated with manipulating the Fermi level of graphene, which can find potential applications in the next generation of photodetectors with tunable spectral and polarization selectivity in the mid-infrared and THz regimes.

 figure: Fig. 7

Fig. 7 The simulated spectra of the absorption in the semiconductor A  with different Fermi levels of graphene EF for (a) TM and (b) TE plane wave. The enhancement of the optical absorption in the semiconductor is also shown. The enhancement factor of the absorption in the semiconductor is also shown compared to that in the impedance matched media. (c) The dependence of the polarization absorption ratio on the variation of Fermi level of graphene at the specific wavelength of 10.2μm.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusions

In conclusions, we numerically investigate the tunable light trapping and absorption enhancement in graphene-based complementary metasurfaces. The excitation of SPR under the Bragg’s condition in the monolayer graphene perforated with a periodic array of nanoholes traps the incident light at the subwavelength scale and leads to absorption enhancement in the thin film semiconductor by more than one order of magnitude. Furthermore, polarization-sensitive absorption enhancement can be realized by transforming the shape of the unit cell from square to rectangle. The tunability of graphene makes it possible to dynamically modulate the absorption enhancement in the semiconductor over a broad spectral regime. In particular, either TM or TE plane wave at the specific wavelength can be efficiently absorbed by simply manipulating the Fermi level of graphene, which is promising for potential applications in the mid-infrared and THz photodetection with spectral and polarization selectivity. Although SPR in the graphene-based metasurfaces has mainly been observed in the mid-infrared and THz regimes, it has recently been experimentally demonstrated at much shorter wavelengths (2 μm) [59], therefore our proposed hybrid device together with its design principle can be also applied to the near-IR regime.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61775064, 11847100 and 11847132); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (HUST: 2016YXMS024); Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (No. 2015CFB398 and 2015CFB502).

References

1. M. D. Kelzenberg, S. W. Boettcher, J. A. Petykiewicz, D. B. Turner-Evans, M. C. Putnam, E. L. Warren, J. M. Spurgeon, R. M. Briggs, N. S. Lewis, and H. A. Atwater, “Enhanced absorption and carrier collection in si wire arrays for photovoltaic applications,” Nat. Mater. 9, 239 (2010). [CrossRef]  

2. Q. Bai, C. Liu, J. Chen, C. Cheng, M. Kang, and H.-T. Wang, “Tunable slow light in semiconductor metamaterial in a broad terahertz regime,” J. Appl. Phys. 107, 093104 (2010). [CrossRef]  

3. G. V. Naik and A. Boltasseva, “Semiconductors for plasmonics and metamaterials,” Phys. Status solidi-R 4, 295–297 (2010). [CrossRef]  

4. H. Liu, G. Ren, Y. Gao, Y. Lian, Y. Qi, and S. Jian, “Tunable subwavelength terahertz plasmon-induced transparency in the insb slot waveguide side-coupled with two stub resonators,” Appl. Opt. 54, 3918–3924 (2015). [CrossRef]  

5. B. Vaseghi, M. Mousavi, S. Khorshidian, and Z. Vafapour, “Spin-orbit interaction effects on the electronic structure of spherical quantum dot with different confinement potentials,” Superlattice Microst. 111, 671–677 (2017). [CrossRef]  

6. Z. Vafapour and H. Ghahraloud, “Semiconductor-based far-infrared biosensor by optical control of light propagation using thz metamaterial,” JOSA B 35, 1192–1199 (2018). [CrossRef]  

7. A. Keshavarz and Z. Vafapour, “Water-based terahertz metamaterial for skin cancer detection application,” IEEE Sensors J. 99, 1 (2018). [CrossRef]  

8. W. L. Barnes, A. Dereux, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Surface plasmon subwavelength optics,” Nature 424, 824 (2003). [CrossRef]  

9. K. A. Willets and R. P. Van Duyne, “Localized surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy and sensing,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 58, 267–297 (2007). [CrossRef]  

10. Z. Vafapour, “Large group delay in a microwave metamaterial analog of electromagnetically induced reflectance,” JOSA A 35, 417–422 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. A. Alipour, A. Farmani, and A. Mir, “High sensitivity and tunable nanoscale sensor based on plasmon-induced transparency in plasmonic metasurface,” IEEE Sensors J. 18, 7047–7054 (2018). [CrossRef]  

12. J. Le Perchec, Y. Desieres, and R. Espiau de Lamaestre, “Plasmon-based photosensors comprising a very thin semiconducting region,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 181104 (2009). [CrossRef]  

13. N. Liu, M. Mesch, T. Weiss, M. Hentschel, and H. Giessen, “Infrared perfect absorber and its application as plasmonic sensor,” Nano Lett. 10, 2342–2348 (2010). [CrossRef]  

14. V. V. Khardikov, E. O. Iarko, and S. L. Prosvirnin, “Trapping of light by metal arrays,” J. Opt. 12, 045102 (2010). [CrossRef]  

15. F. Xiong, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, X. Yuan, and S. Qin, “Ultrabroadband, more than one order absorption enhancement in graphene with plasmonic light trapping,” Sci. Rep. 5, 16998 (2015). [CrossRef]  

16. Y. Cai, J. Zhu, Q. H. Liu, T. Lin, J. Zhou, L. Ye, and Z. Cai, “Enhanced spatial near-infrared modulation of graphene-loaded perfect absorbers using plasmonic nanoslits,” Opt. Express 23, 32318–32328 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. B.-X. Wang, G.-Z. Wang, and T. Sang, “Simple design of novel triple-band terahertz metamaterial absorber for sensing application,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49, 165307 (2016). [CrossRef]  

18. H. Lu, X. Gan, B. Jia, D. Mao, and J. Zhao, “Tunable high-efficiency light absorption of monolayer graphene via tamm plasmon polaritons,” Opt. Lett. 41, 4743–4746 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. H. Lu, X. Gan, D. Mao, Y. Fan, D. Yang, and J. Zhao, “Nearly perfect absorption of light in monolayer molybdenum disulfide supported by multilayer structures,” Opt. Express 25, 21630–21636 (2017). [CrossRef]  

20. W. Zhao, S. Xiao, Y. Zhang, D. Pan, J. Wen, X. Qian, D. Wang, H. Cao, W. He, M. Quan, et al.,“Binary "island" shaped arrays with high-density hot spots for surface-enhanced raman scattering substrates,” Nanoscale 10, 14220–14229 (2018). [CrossRef]  

21. Y. Cai, Z. Wang, S. Yan, L. Ye, and J. Zhu, “Ultraviolet absorption band engineering of graphene by integrated plasmonic structures,” Opt. Mater. Express 8, 3295–3306 (2018). [CrossRef]  

22. K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, “Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films,” Science 306, 666–669 (2004). [CrossRef]  

23. F. Bonaccorso, Z. Sun, T. Hasan, and A. Ferrari, “Graphene photonics and optoelectronics,” Nat. Photonics 4, 611–622 (2010). [CrossRef]  

24. A. Grigorenko, M. Polini, and K. Novoselov, “Graphene plasmonics,” Nat. Photonics 6, 749–758 (2012). [CrossRef]  

25. X. He, P. Gao, and W. Shi, “A further comparison of graphene and thin metal layers for plasmonics,” Nanoscale 8, 10388–10397 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

26. L. Ju, B. Geng, J. Horng, C. Girit, M. Martin, Z. Hao, H. A. Bechtel, X. Liang, A. Zettl, Y. R. Shen, et al., “Graphene plasmonics for tunable terahertz metamaterials,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 630–634 (2011). [CrossRef]  

27. X. He, “Tunable terahertz graphene metamaterials,” Carbon 82, 229–237 (2015). [CrossRef]  

28. Q. Lin, X. Zhai, L. Wang, B. Wang, G. Liu, and S. Xia, “Combined theoretical analysis for plasmon-induced transparency in integrated graphene waveguides with direct and indirect couplings,” EPL (Europhysics Letters) 111, 34004 (2015). [CrossRef]  

29. S.-X. Xia, X. Zhai, L.-L. Wang, B. Sun, J.-Q. Liu, and S.-C. Wen, “Dynamically tunable plasmonically induced transparency in sinusoidally curved and planar graphene layers,” Opt. Express 24, 17886–17899 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

30. S.-X. Xia, X. Zhai, Y. Huang, J.-Q. Liu, L.-L. Wang, and S.-C. Wen, “Graphene surface plasmons with dielectric metasurfaces,” J. Lightwave Technol. 35, 4553–4558 (2017). [CrossRef]  

31. G.-D. Liu, X. Zhai, S.-X. Xia, Q. Lin, C.-J. Zhao, and L.-L. Wang, “Toroidal resonance based optical modulator employing hybrid graphene-dielectric metasurface,” Opt. Express 25, 26045–26054 (2017). [CrossRef]  

32. J. Chen, Z. Yi, S. Xiao, and X. Xu, “Absorption enhancement in double-layer cross-shaped graphene arrays,” Mater. Res. Express 5, 015605 (2018). [CrossRef]  

33. J. Chen, Y. Zeng, X. Xu, X. Chen, Z. Zhou, P. Shi, Z. Yi, X. Ye, S. Xiao, and Y. Yi, “Plasmonic absorption enhancement in elliptical graphene arrays,” Nanomaterials 8, 175 (2018). [CrossRef]  

34. H. Lu, D. Mao, C. Zeng, F. Xiao, D. Yang, T. Mei, and J. Zhao, “Plasmonic fano spectral response from graphene metasurfaces in the mir region,” Opt. Mater. Express 8, 1058–1068 (2018). [CrossRef]  

35. Z. Fang, Y. Wang, A. E. Schlather, Z. Liu, P. M. Ajayan, F. J. García de Abajo, P. Nordlander, X. Zhu, and N. J. Halas, “Active tunable absorption enhancement with graphene nanodisk arrays,” Nano Lett. 14, 299–304 (2013). [CrossRef]  

36. S. Ke, B. Wang, H. Huang, H. Long, K. Wang, and P. Lu, “Plasmonic absorption enhancement in periodic cross-shaped graphene arrays,” Opt. Express 23, 8888–8900 (2015). [CrossRef]  

37. G. Yao, F. Ling, J. Yue, C. Luo, J. Ji, and J. Yao, “Dual-band tunable perfect metamaterial absorber in the thz range,” Opt. Express 24, 1518–1527 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

38. S.-X. Xia, X. Zhai, Y. Huang, J.-Q. Liu, L.-L. Wang, and S.-C. Wen, “Multi-band perfect plasmonic absorptions using rectangular graphene gratings,” Opt. Lett. 42, 3052–3055 (2017). [CrossRef]  

39. A. Safaei, S. Chandra, A. Vázquez-Guardado, J. Calderon, D. Franklin, L. Tetard, L. Zhai, M. N. Leuenberger, and D. Chanda, “Dynamically tunable extraordinary light absorption in monolayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 96, 165431 (2017). [CrossRef]  

40. A. Safaei, S. Chandra, M. N. Leuenberger, and D. Chanda, “Tunable enhanced mid-infrared light absorption in graphene,” in CLEO Applications and Technology, (Optical Society of America, 2017), pp. ATh3B–3.

41. S. Kim, M. S. Jang, V. W. Brar, K. W. Mauser, L. Kim, and H. A. Atwater, “Electronically tunable perfect absorption in graphene,” Nano Lett. 18, 971–979 (2018). [CrossRef]  

42. M. Huang, Y. Cheng, Z. Cheng, H. Chen, X. Mao, and R. Gong, “Based on graphene tunable dual-band terahertz metamaterial absorber with wide-angle,” Opt. Commun. 415, 194–201 (2018). [CrossRef]  

43. H. Meng, X. Xue, Q. Lin, G. Liu, X. Zhai, and L. Wang, “Tunable and multi-channel perfect absorber based on graphene at mid-infrared region,” Appl. Phys. Express 11, 052002 (2018). [CrossRef]  

44. J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, W. Liu, X. Yuan, and S. Qin, “Towards photodetection with high efficiency and tunable spectral selectivity: graphene plasmonics for light trapping and absorption engineering,” Nanoscale 7, 13530–13536 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

45. S. Xiao, T. Wang, Y. Liu, C. Xu, X. Han, and X. Yan, “Tunable light trapping and absorption enhancement with graphene ring arrays,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 26661–26669 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

46. S. Xiao, T. Wang, X. Jiang, B. Wang, and C. Xu, “Tunable light trapping and absorption engineering with graphene in the infrared regime,” in POEM Advanced Spectroscopy and Applications, (Optical Society of America, 2017), pp. 3–10.

47. S. Xiao, T. Wang, X. Jiang, B. Wang, and C. Xu, “A spectrally tunable plasmonic photosensor with an ultrathin semiconductor region,” Plasmonics 13, 897–902 (2018). [CrossRef]  

48. E. D. Palik, Handbook of optical constants of solids, vol. 3 (Academic press, 1998).

49. A. Rogalski, “Hgcdte infrared detector material: history, status and outlook,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 2267 (2005). [CrossRef]  

50. J. Zhang, C. Guo, K. Liu, Z. Zhu, W. Ye, X. Yuan, and S. Qin, “Coherent perfect absorption and transparency in a nanostructured graphene film,” Opt. Express 22, 12524–12532 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

51. J. Zhang, W. Liu, Z. Zhu, X. Yuan, and S. Qin, “Towards nano-optical tweezers with graphene plasmons: Numerical investigation of trapping 10-nm particles with mid-infrared light,” Sci. Rep. 6, 38086 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

52. S. Xiao, T. Wang, X. Jiang, X. Yan, L. Cheng, B. Wang, and C. Xu, “Strong interaction between graphene layer and fano resonance in terahertz metamaterials,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50, 195101 (2017). [CrossRef]  

53. S. Xiao, T. Wang, T. Liu, X. Yan, Z. Li, and C. Xu, “Active modulation of electromagnetically induced transparency analogue in terahertz hybrid metal-graphene metamaterials,” Carbon 126, 271–278 (2018). [CrossRef]  

54. T. Liu, H. Wang, Y. Liu, L. Xiao, C. Zhou, Y. Liu, C. Xu, and S. Xiao, “Independently tunable dual-spectral electromagnetically induced transparency in a terahertz metal–graphene metamaterial,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51, 415105 (2018). [CrossRef]  

55. C. Zeng, J. Guo, and X. Liu, “High-contrast electro-optic modulation of spatial light induced by graphene-integrated fabry-pérot microcavity,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 121103 (2014). [CrossRef]  

56. S.-X. Xia, X. Zhai, L.-L. Wang, and S.-C. Wen, “Plasmonically induced transparency in double-layered graphene nanoribbons,” Photonics Res. 6, 692–702 (2018). [CrossRef]  

57. Y. Dai, Y. Xia, T. Jiang, A. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. Bai, G. Du, F. Guan, S. Wu, X. Liu, et al., “Dynamical tuning of graphene plasmonic resonances by ultraviolet illuminations,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6, 1701081 (2018). [CrossRef]  

58. A. Y. Nikitin, F. Guinea, and L. Martín-Moreno, “Resonant plasmonic effects in periodic graphene antidot arrays,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 151119 (2012). [CrossRef]  

59. Z. Wang, T. Li, K. Almdal, N. A. Mortensen, S. Xiao, and S. Ndoni, “Experimental demonstration of graphene plasmons working close to the near-infrared window,” Opt. Lett. 41, 5345–5348 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (7)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 The schematic geometry of our proposed graphene-based complementary metasurfaces. The unit cell consists of a monolayer graphene perforated with a circular nanohole on the top of a thin film semiconductor separated by an insulator layer.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) The simulated spectra of the transmission T, the reflection R, the total absorption A and the absorption in the semiconductor A   with the absorption coefficient α = 0.05   μ m−1 and the Fermi level of graphene E F = 0.6 eV. The enhancement factor of the absorption in the semiconductor is also shown compared to that in the impedance matched media. (b) The simulated electric field distribution in the x-y plane ( | E z | ) at the resonance.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 The simulated spectra of the absorption in the semiconductor A   with different (a) radii of the circular nanohole R and (b) lattice constants of the unit cell P. The enhancement factor of the absorption in the semiconductor is also shown compared to that in the impedance matched media.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 The simulated spectra of the absorption in the semiconductor A   with different Fermi levels of graphene EF. The enhancement factor of the absorption in the semiconductor is also shown compared to that in the impedance matched media.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 The schematic geometry of our proposed anisotropic graphene-based complementary metasurfaces. In the unit cell, the monolayer graphene is perforated with a elliptical nanohole, and the rest keep the same as previous settings in Fig. 1.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 The simulated spectra of the transmission T, the reflection R, the total absorption A and the absorption in the semiconductor A   with the absorption coefficient α = 0.05   μ m−1 and the Fermi level of graphene E F = 0.6 eV for (a) TM and (c) TE plane wave. The enhancement factor of the absorption in the semiconductor is also shown compared to that in the impedance matched media. The simulated electric field distribution in the x-y plane ( | E z | ) at the resonance for (b) TM and (d) TE plane wave.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7 The simulated spectra of the absorption in the semiconductor A   with different Fermi levels of graphene EF for (a) TM and (b) TE plane wave. The enhancement of the optical absorption in the semiconductor is also shown. The enhancement factor of the absorption in the semiconductor is also shown compared to that in the impedance matched media. (c) The dependence of the polarization absorption ratio on the variation of Fermi level of graphene at the specific wavelength of 10.2μm.

Equations (3)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

σ g = σ i n t r a + σ i n t e r = 2 e 2 k B T π 2 i ω + i τ 1 ln   [ 2 cosh   ( E F 2 k B T ) ] + e 2 4 [ 1 2 + 1 π arctan   ( ω 2 E F 2 k B T ) i 2 π ln   ( ω + 2 E F ) 2 ( ω 2 E F ) 2 + 4 ( k B T ) 2 ] ,
σ g = e 2 E F π 2 i ω + i τ 1 ,
ε x x = ε y y = 2.5 + i σ g ε 0 ω t g , ε z z = 2.5 ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.