Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Magnetic field-induced emissivity tuning of InSb-based metamaterials in the terahertz frequency regime

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

This work demonstrates the magnetic field-induced spectral properties of metamaterials incorporating both indium antimonide (InSb) and tungsten (W) in the terahertz (THz) frequency regime. Nanostructure materials, layer thicknesses and surface grating fill factors are modified, impacting light-matter interactions and consequently modifying thermal emission. We describe and validate a method for determining spectral properties of InSb under an applied direct current (DC) magnetic field, and employ this method to analyze how these properties can be tuned by modulating the field magnitude. Notably, an InSb-W metamaterial exhibiting unity narrowband emission is designed, suitable as an emitter for wavelengths around 55 µm (approximately 5.5 THz), which is magnetically tunable in bandwidth and peak wavelength.

© 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Within the fields of photonics and electromagnetism, metamaterials have received increasing attention over traditional bulk materials [1,2]. Metamaterials are specially designed photonic material structures engineered to exhibit specific thermal and optical properties that are unique from those of naturally occurring materials [3]. A typical metamaterial is composed of extremely thin material layers, often modulated with micro- or nano-scale surface patterns comparable to the wavelengths of the incoming light. These features can modify the behaviors of the inter-surface phonon polaritons (SPhPs) or surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) within a metamaterial. Because SPhPs and SPPs greatly impact the optical resonances of dielectrics and metals, respectively, the rich microstructures of the metamaterials yield diverse radiative responses in comparison to their bulk counterparts [1,48].

Metamaterials can be designed to exhibit many different spectral behaviors in various regions in the electromagnetic spectra, and as such have many practical applications [3,832]. For example, metamaterials throughout the UV, visible, and infrared (IR) regions are employed in the areas of solar energy harvesting, biochemical sensing, communications, defense, and medical treatments [1215,19,20]. In contrast, few metamaterial applications have materialized in the terahertz (THz) region, which covers 0.1 – 10 THz (3000 – 30 $\mu$m) [26]. However, scientists have illustrated the merit of the THz region in the areas of medical spectroscopy, security and communications [2730]. Terahertz spectroscopy is specifically well suited for the detection of biomolecules, nucleic acids, and proteins [33] as well. Metamaterials focused on the terahertz region have also been demonstrated, presenting merit as terahertz filters and environmental sensors [34,35], efficient logical processors [36,37], and biosensor components [35].

Besides simply creating metamaterials with desirable spectral properties for a given application, researchers have also had success in dynamically tuning the spectral properties of a given metamaterial, opening the door to further applications such as self-adaptive radiative cooling and thermophotovoltaics, as well as the potential for cost reduction [3840]. This active tuning can be induced using many techniques, including via thermal [3941], mechanical [4244], electrical [45,46], magnetic [4751], or optical [52,53] means. Some dynamic tuning techniques may be suitable for certain wavelength ranges and relatively ineffective in others [38,5456]. For example, the mechanical tuning of metamaterials has already been demonstrated in the visible [57], infrared [58] and THz [44] regions, while magnetic tuning has shown most promise in the THz region [47,59,60].

This letter involves the magnetic tunability of metamaterials in the THz region. The semiconductor material Indium Antimonide (InSb) is selected for this study due to its useful magneto-optical (MO) attributes. While many other materials, such as noble metals and ferromagnetic materials, display MO characteristics, InSb has a plasma frequency comparable to its cyclotron frequency. This allows useful optical traits, such as emissivity and transmissivity, to be modulated using magnetic fields on the order of several Tesla [61]. The doping level of semiconductors such as InSb can also be modified to adjust the plasma frequency if needed, offering further control over the field strengths needed to actively tune radiative responses [47].

As such, an analytical expression for the dielectric function of InSb is described. This expression takes into account the effect of an applied DC magnetic field, and as a result, the $n$ and $\kappa$ values of InSb are tuned when the magnetic field is present in the analysis. As InSb becomes non-reciprocal in the presence of the magnetic field, the introduction of the magnetic field also gives rise to quantum energy transport [62] and entanglement [63] phenomena, which can provide further avenues for applications of magnetically tunable optical devices. Various InSb metamaterials are theoretically and analytically demonstrated using the established dielectric functions of thin films, multilayer structures, and surface gratings. Several InSb thicknesses and grating designs are studied to understand the impact of structure geometry on selective emission. The addition of a Tungsten (W) substrate to the metamaterials is also investigated with respect to the normal emissivity of each structure, and electromagnetic fields are investigated to validate analyses and draw further conclusions.

Notably, an InSb metamaterial with unity narrowband emissivity at 55 $\mu$m (approximately 5.5 THz) has been demonstrated. Furthermore, the emissivity of this narrowband metamaterial is tuned via a magnetic field applied normal to the surface. The field modifies the peak wavelength and bandwidth of the metamaterial, and therefore allows both features to be actively tuned using an applied magnetic field. While other studies have explored magnetic tunability in the THz region with similar materials [47,48,59], this study stands out by examining the structural parameters which affect far-field resonant responses in great detail, validating analyses using EM field contours, and exemplifying a particularly useful narrowband behavior.

2. Methods

We have analytically evaluated a series of metamaterial structures consisting of InSb and W, one of which is illustrated schematically in Fig. 1(a). This grating structure is defined by a grating layer thickness of $t_g$, grating width $w$, and grating period $\Lambda$, and is built upon a W film of thickness $t_2$. Structures are assumed to be infinite in the $x$- and $y$-directions. An applied magnetic field with a variable strength of $0-6$ T is oriented perpendicular to the W film (along the $z$-axis).

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic of InSb grating on W thin film in the presence of an applied magnetic field. (b) Real and (c) imaginary components of the magnetic field-induced refractive index $\varepsilon _{1}(H)$ for an InSb grating with $t_g = 7.5\mu$m, $\Lambda = 2\mu$m, and $\phi = 0.05$.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

For a generic reciprocal thermal emitter, emissivity can be expressed as $e_{\theta ,\omega } = \frac {1}{2}\sum _{\mu =s,p}(1-|\tilde {R}_{\theta ,\omega }^{(\mu )}|^2-|\tilde {T}_{\theta ,\omega }^{(\mu )}|^2)$, where $\theta$ is the incident angle and $\omega$ is the angular frequency of the emitted wave. The polarization-dependent effective Fresnel reflection and transmission coefficients are given by $\tilde {R}_{\theta ,\omega }^{(\mu )}$ and $\tilde {T}_{\theta ,\omega }^{(\mu )}$, respectively [64]. The superscript $\mu = s$ (or $p$) denotes the transverse electric (or magnetic) polarization of the incident waves. The reflection and transmission coefficients can be calculated using recursive Fresnel relations at each interface [65]. For nonreciprocal emitters which have anisotropic permittivity tensors, such as those incorporating magneto-optical materials, Kirchhoff’s Law is violated [6669], and the absorptivity $\alpha _{\theta ,\omega }$ cannot be assumed to be equal to the emissivity. In this case, the aforementioned emissivity equation is only valid for cases of normal incidence ($\theta = 0^\circ$). For this reason, this work focuses on normal emissivities of the selected metamaterials.

The normal $z$-component of the wave vector for medium $i$ is given by $k_{i,z}=\sqrt {\omega ^2\varepsilon _{i}(\omega )/c^2-k_{\rho }^2}$, where $\varepsilon _{i}(\omega )$ is the relative permittivity of medium $i$ as a function of angular frequency $\omega$, $k_{\rho }$ is the magnitude of the in-plane wave vector ($k_{\rho }=0$ for normal incidence), and $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum [65]. The dielectric function is related to the real $(n)$ and imaginary $(\kappa )$ parts of the refractive index as $\sqrt {\varepsilon }=n+j\kappa$, where $j$ is the imaginary unit [64]. The dielectric functions for the grating layers are determined using the second order effective medium theory (EMT), which is used within a Rigorous Coupled Wave Analysis (RCWA) model [7072]. Other studies have also validated the use of the EMT with anisotropic magneto-optical materials, noting agreement with respect to both alternative numerical models and experimental data [7376]. To provide further validation and expand the applicability of the EMT, spectra are calculated using both the EMT and RCWA methods and compared within this work, where strong agreement is noted for nearly all cases. The RCWA package used to calculate spectra is also used to produce electromagnetic (EM) field contour plots [7072].

Using the EMT method, the effective transverse electric and transverse magnetic dielectric functions of the grating layers are given by [64]

$$\varepsilon_{TE,2}=\varepsilon_{TE,0}\bigg[1+\frac{\pi^2}{3}\bigg(\frac{\Lambda}{\lambda}\bigg)^2\phi^2(1-\phi)^2\frac{(\varepsilon_{A}-\varepsilon_{B})^2}{\varepsilon_{TE,0}}\bigg]$$
and
$$\varepsilon_{TM,2}=\varepsilon_{TM,0}\bigg[1+\frac{\pi^2}{3}\bigg(\frac{\Lambda}{\lambda}\bigg)^2\phi^2(1-\phi)^2(\varepsilon_{A}-\varepsilon_{B})^2\varepsilon_{TE,0}\bigg(\frac{\varepsilon_{TM,0}}{\varepsilon_{A}\varepsilon_{B}}\bigg)^2\bigg],$$
respectively, where $\Lambda$ is the grating period, $\lambda$ is the incident wavelength, and $\phi$ is the filling ratio of the grating defined as $w/\Lambda$. The relative permittivities of the two materials in the surface grating, InSb and air, are $\varepsilon _{A}$ and $\varepsilon _{B}$, respectively (with $\varepsilon _{B}=1$). $\varepsilon _{TE,0}$ and $\varepsilon _{TM,0}$ are the zeroth order transverse electric and transverse magnetic effective dielectric functions, which are given by $\varepsilon _{TE,0}=\phi \varepsilon _{A}+(1-\phi )\varepsilon _{B}$ and $\varepsilon _{TM,0}=(\phi /\varepsilon _{A}+(1-\phi )/{\varepsilon _{B}})^{-1}$, respectively [64].

In this work, the dielectric function of W is determined based on $n$ and $\kappa$ values from the literature [77]. In the absence of a magnetic field, the dielectric function for InSb is given by [78]

$$\varepsilon=\varepsilon_{\infty}\bigg(1+\frac{\omega_{L}^2-\omega_{T}^2}{\omega_{T}^2-\omega^2-j\Gamma\omega}-\frac{\omega_{p}^2}{\omega(\omega+j\gamma)}\bigg)$$
where $\varepsilon _{\infty }$ is the high-frequency dielectric constant, $\omega _{L}$ is the longitudinal optical phonon frequency, $\omega _{T}$ is the transverse optical phonon frequency, $\Gamma$ is the phonon damping constant, and $\gamma$ is the free-carrier damping constant. The plasma frequency $\omega _{p}$ of free carriers of density $N$ and effective mass $m^{*}$ is described by $\omega _{p}=Nq_{e}^2/m^{*}\varepsilon _{0}\varepsilon _{\infty }$, where $q_{e}$ and $\varepsilon _{0}$ are the elementary charge and vacuum permittivity, respectively, and values for the InSb-specific constants are taken from the literature [47,48].

Under a magnetic field $H$ applied along the $z$-direction, the permittivity tensor of InSb takes the following form [47,48]:

$$\hat{\varepsilon}(H)=\begin{pmatrix} \varepsilon_{1}(H) & -j\varepsilon_{2}(H) & 0\\ j\varepsilon_{2}(H) & \varepsilon_{1}(H) & 0\\ 0 & 0 & \varepsilon_{3} \end{pmatrix}$$
where
$$\varepsilon_{1}(H)=\varepsilon_{\infty}\bigg(1+\frac{\omega_{L}^2-\omega_{T}^2}{\omega_{T}^2-\omega^2-j\Gamma\omega}+\frac{\omega_{p}^2(\omega+j\gamma)}{\omega[\omega_{c}-(\omega+j\gamma)^2]}\bigg),$$
$$\varepsilon_{2}(H)=\frac{\varepsilon_{\infty}\omega_{p}^2\omega_c}{\omega[(\omega+j\gamma)^2-\omega_c^2]},$$
$$\varepsilon_{3}=\varepsilon_{\infty}\bigg(1+\frac{\omega_{L}^2-\omega_{T}^2}{\omega_{T}^2-\omega^2-j\Gamma\omega}-\frac{\omega_{p}^2}{\omega(\omega+j\gamma)}\bigg).$$

The magnetic field contributes to the permittivity components $\varepsilon _{1}(H)$ and $\varepsilon _{2}(H)$ via the the cyclotron frequency term, which is given by $\omega _c=q_{e}H/m^{*}$. For the analyses herein, $q_{e}=1.602\times 10^{-19}$ C, and $m^{*}=2.004\times 10^{-32}$ kg. Using this method, we have calculated the wavelength-dependent $n$ and $\kappa$ values of $\varepsilon _{1}(H)$ for an InSb grating structure ($t_g = 7.5\mu$m, $\Lambda = 2\mu$m, and $\phi = 0.05$) subjected to various magnetic field strengths, as shown in Fig. 1(b) and Fig. 1(c), respectively. It can be seen that the magnetic field has a dramatic effect on these optical functions.

With the anisotropy of the permittivity tensor as expressed in Eq. (4), the equation for the normal $z$-component of the wave vector can be re-written as $k_{o,z}(H)=\sqrt {\omega ^2\varepsilon _{1}(H)/c^2-k_{\rho }^2}$ for ordinary waves and $k_{e,z}(H)=\sqrt {\omega ^2\varepsilon _{1}(H)/c^2-k_{\rho }^2\varepsilon _{1}(H)/\varepsilon _{3}}$ for extraordinary waves [47]. For a case of normal incidence, $k_{\rho }=0$, leaving only $\varepsilon _{1}(H)$ to contribute to this dispersion relation. While this technique limits the study of other incidence angles, it offers a useful alternative that is far less computationally expensive and simplified, permitting increased availability to researchers interested in exploring magneto-optical materials.

In addition, for optical systems which consider magnetized media, the magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) may induce a modification in the polarization state of reflected light. This effect is brought on by the presence of off-diagonal components in the permittivity tensor. For the perpendicular magnetic field orientation considered within this work - a polar Kerr configuration - the tensor components $j\varepsilon _{2}(H)$ and $-j\varepsilon _{2}(H)$ are the main contributors to the MOKE [61,79]. However, for this specific case of magnetized InSb within Tesla-scale magnetic fields, previous works have verified that the thermal emission of comparable InSb-based metamaterials in the terahertz region is unaffected by the polarization conversion [47,48].

Combining these assumptions with the aforementioned equations, we have calculated the normal emissivity for a variety of metamaterials incorporating InSb as both a grating layer and a thin film layer under an applied magnetic field.

3. Results and discussion

In the absence of the magnetic field, the TE and TM emissivities as functions of wavelength are shown in Figs. 2(a) and 2(c) for selected InSb thin film and grating designs. An emission spike is present around 55 $\mu$m, which aligns with the major resonant wavelengths of $n$ and $\kappa$ in the zero-field case shown in Figs. 1(b) and 1(c). The emissivity is observed to scale with thickness. These trends are consistent for both TE and TM polarizations, though the TM emissivities are slightly lesser in magnitude for the grating structures. However, neither changes in thickness nor the geometric features of the grating modify the SPhP resonances of the InSb structures in these cases. The pure InSb structures have obvious resonances in the $20-100$ $\mu$m wavelength region, yet their potential application as an emitter is hampered by relatively low emissivities and a lack of focus on a specific wavelength.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. TE (a) and TM (c) emissivities of InSb thin film and grating structures; TE (b) and TM (d) emissivities of InSb-W thin film and grating structures. All gratings have $\Lambda =2{\mu }m$ and $\phi =0.05$. For (b) and (d), $t_2$ = 10 ${\mu }m$. EMT results are plotted using various lines, and associated RCWA results are plotted using markers, showing agreement between the two methods.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

In contrast to the pure InSb metamaterials, we calculate the emissivities of InSb thin film and grating layers atop W base layers in Fig. 2(b). The W base suppresses many of the smaller oscillations before and after the prominent 55 $\mu$m peak for the thin film cases, which we attribute to the introduction of SPPs from the W layer. The light-matter interactions are further modified when the InSb-W grating structures are introduced, as shown in Fig. 2(b). The chosen geometric factors suppress the pre-peak resonances, leaving only a pronounced narrowband at the major InSb resonance wavelength. While the thin film emissivities are again identical between the TE and TM cases, the InSb-W grating structures suppress the TM emissivity in favor of the TE emissivity. With a grating thickness of $t_g=7.5$ $\mu$m, the unity narrowband TE emission of the InSb-W grating structure represents an exemplary design for a THz emitter around 55 $\mu$m.

The effects of different structural parameters on emissivity via SPhPs and SPPs are supported by the EM field contours displayed in Fig. 3. Enhanced absorption at specific frequencies can be attributed to the excitation of EM field resonances [71,72]. By comparing the EM fields of different structures at the same resonance frequencies, the spectra results can be validated, and geometric and material factors crucial to the radiative properties can be identified.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Square of field magnitude for 3 $\mu$m InSb thin films with and without a 10 $\mu$m W substrate. (a) TE and (c) TM field contours for InSb thin film. (b) TE and (d) TM field contours for InSb thin film with W substrate. Fields are evaluated at their strongest resonant frequency to illustrate the effect of the W substrate.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

In Fig. 3, EM field differences are presented for 3 $\mu$m InSb thin films, both with and without a W substrate. Their fields are evaluated at slightly different wavelengths to accommodate the strongest resonance frequency of each structure. For both TE and TM waves, both structures with the W substrate show much stronger field strengths, most notably within their InSb layers. When the W is added, the InSb layer experiences field strengths approximately one order of magnitude larger in the TE case, and one-half order of magnitude larger in the TM case. This illustrates that the introduction of SPPs from the W layer help amplify the existing InSb major resonance that exists near wavelengths of 55 $\mu$m.

The analyses in Fig. 4 further detail the effects of grating parameters $t_g$, $\Lambda$ and $\phi$ on the normal emissivities of the InSb-W metamaterial. For larger values of $t_g$ in Fig. 4(a), the InSb thickness increases the surface resonance wavelengths, as well as the TE emissivity in most cases. When $t_g$ is scaled past a certain threshold ($7.5$ $\mu$m in this case), the resonance specific to the $t_g$ alterations moves past the major InSb resonance, the latter of which is still apparent. This indicates that the resonances corresponding to modifications in $t_g$ and the original zero-field InSb resonance identified in Figs. 1(b) and 1(c) are not entirely interdependent and can be aligned to achieve strong emitter performance. In contrast, the TM resonant wavelengths are unmodified by changes in grating thickness, while the magnitude of the emissivity is strongly correlated with grating thickness, as displayed in Fig. 4(d).

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. (a) TE and (d) TM emissivities of InSb-W grating structures of varying grating thickness $t_g$, with $\Lambda$ $=2$ $\mu$m and $\phi$ $=0.5$. (b) TE and (e) TM emissivities of InSb-W grating structures of varying grating period $\Lambda$, with $t_g$ $=7.5$ $\mu$m and $\phi$ $=0.5$. (c) TE and (f) TM emissivities of InSb-W grating structures of varying grating fill factor $\phi$, with $t_g$ $=7.5$ $\mu$m and $\Lambda$ $=2$ $\mu$m. For all cases, $t_2$ $=10$ $\mu$m. EMT results are plotted using various lines, and associated RCWA results are plotted using markers, showing agreement between the two methods.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

The emissivity of this metamaterial has a very weak dependence on the grating period $\Lambda$, as displayed in Figs. 4(b) and 4(e). Modifying the period does not change the grating thickness, though it does alter the amount of InSb in a given unit area. Therefore, the fact that there is an extremely minor effect aligns with previous analyses as well as Eqs. (1) and (2). For this reason, metamaterial design with InSb gratings can be performed with a large variety of periods without significant changes in performance, expanding the potential accessibility of this metamaterial. It should also be noted that only grating periods significantly smaller than the wavelengths of interest are considered here, in order to conform to the restrictions of the effective medium theory. It is possible that significantly larger grating periods may induce larger changes in the emissivity than those seen in Figs. 4(b) and 4(e).

Based on Eqs. (1) and (2), the relative permittivity of a grating is heavily dependent upon the fill factor $\phi$. This is exemplified in Figs. 4(c) and 4(f), where both resonant wavelength and emissivity are tuned by varying the fill factor. As the fill factor increases, the amount of InSb in the grating increases, while the amount of air in the grating is reduced. Hence, the gratings with reduced fill factors exhibit less apparent minor InSb resonances, although the major zero-field InSb resonance remains prominent. These effects are consistent between the TE and TM cases, although some TE and TM resonances do manifest at different wavelengths. This technique is applied to design the metamaterial exhibiting permanent narrowband TE emissivity in Fig. 4(c) ($\phi =0.05$), which has great potential for an InSb-based THz emitter. Though the small fill factor of this design does hamper the TM emissivity, it maximizes the focus of the emitter on one specific wavelength which enhances its usefulness and tunability. Larger fill factors may be useful for geometrically tuning peak location since the largest peak emissivity is not greatly reduced, but this approach adds many minor emissivity peaks which would reduce the efficiency of such an emitter.

The field contours of Figs. 5 and 6 further illustrate that grating parameters play a significant role in the magnitude and location of many emissivity resonances. Firstly, thicker gratings are observed to enhance off-peak resonances in both TE and TM cases, notably at wavelengths of 44 and 72 $\mu$m, respectively. This is corroborated by the field contours of Fig. 5, where gratings 7.5 $\mu$m thick show far higher field magnitudes when compared with gratings 2.5 $\mu$m thick.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Square of field magnitude for InSb grating structures of varying $t_g$ on 10 $\mu$m W substrates. TE field contours at 72 $\mu$m with (a) $t_g$ = 2.5 $\mu$m and (b) $t_g$ = 7.5 $\mu$m. TM field contours at 44 $\mu$m with (c) $t_g$ = 2.5 $\mu$m and (d) $t_g$ = 7.5 $\mu$m. The fill factor $\phi$ is equal to 0.50 for all cases.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. Difference in square of field magnitude between InSb grating structures of $\phi$ = 0.50 and $\phi$ = 0.05. (a) Difference in TE field contours at 44 $\mu$m. (b) Difference in TM field contours at 44 $\mu$m. Grating thickness $t_g$ is equal to 7.5 $\mu$m, and the W substrate is 10 $\mu$m for both cases. (c) Schematic depicting the section of structure at the InSb-W interface that is analyzed.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Additionally, Fig. 6 depicts how the fill factor has a similar effect on the EM field. The difference in field magnitude for fill factors of $\phi$ = 0.50 and $\phi$ = 0.05 is shown for a wavelength of 44 $\mu$m, revealing a pronounced effect specifically at the InSb-W interface. The larger grating produces stronger resonances both within the structure itself, as well as within the cavities between the gratings. This justifies the enhanced emissivity at off-peak wavelengths.

The analyses in these figures suggest that the chosen InSb-W structure is heavily impacted by resonances occurring within the InSb, which are significantly amplified by the W substrate. In all cases, field activity at non-major peak wavelengths is enhanced within the InSb when the amount of this material increases. This leads to emissivity enhancements at these wavelengths, as seen in the various spectra results. In addition, cavity resonances play an important role. Increasing either the grating thickness or the grating fill factor will lead to more pronounced cavities in the structure. Furthermore, both a larger grating thickness and a larger fill factor lead to very similar emissivity resonances in Fig. 4, which are comparable in both location and magnitude. The EM field contours also reveal increased activity within these cavity regions when these geometric parameters are increased (though they are secondary in strength to the enhancements within the materials themselves). Altogether, this indicates that these additional resonant modes are attributable to both the properties of InSb and the intensity of cavities within the structure. Fine-tuning the relative amount of this material and the cavity geometries can eliminate the non-major resonant modes, leaving a useful narrowband behavior near 55 $\mu$m.

Finally, we have studied the dramatic effect of the magnetic field on the narrowband emissivity of an InSb-W grating structure. Figure 7 shows the normal emissivity of a grating structure with $t_g=7.5$ ${\mu }m$, $\Lambda$ $=2$ $\mu$m, and $\phi$ $=0.05$ under applied fields of 0, 4, 5 and 6 T. The plotted curves represent the data obtained from the EMT implementation, while the corresponding square markers show the near-identical results from the RCWA approach. In Fig. 7(a), Tesla-scale magnetic fields significantly modify the TE light-matter interactions by widely broadening the resonant wavelengths over a range of 25 $\mu$m, while still maintaining the near-unity emissivity resonance peak. The emissivity initially red-shifts at lower magnetic field values, before being blue-shifted when the field intensity increases. The small value of fill factor $\phi$ was chosen to maximize the tunability of the structure, as discussed previously. While this results in minimal TM contributions (Fig. 7(b)), there is still an obvious shift in the TM resonance wavelengths in response to the induced magnetic field. This indicates that an external magnetic field can be applied to tune both the TE and TM emissivities of this metamaterial - consistent with the theory presented in Section 2. As noted earlier, the applied magnetic field affects only the cyclotron frequency term $\omega _c$ in Eq. (5a), which enables it to modify the emissivity of the metamaterial. The peak shift at these field values in both the TE and TM cases is attributed to the cyclotron resonance line carrying the free-carrier dispersion to different frequencies, which occurs when $\omega _c$ becomes comparable to $\omega _T$[78].

 figure: Fig. 7.

Fig. 7. (a) TE and (b) TM emissivities of InSb-W grating structure, with $t_g=7.5$ ${\mu }m$, $\Lambda$ $=2$ $\mu$m, $\phi$ $=0.05$ and $t_2=10$ ${\mu }m$ under external magnetic fields of varying magnitudes. Field-induced curves in (a) are color-filled to highlight the broadband red or blue emissivity shifts brought on by the magnetic field. Arrows denote the direction of the dominant resonance shift from the original narrowband peak to longer (red) or shorter (blue) wavelengths. EMT results are plotted using various lines, and associated RCWA results are plotted using markers, showing agreement between the two methods.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

For this InSb-W metamaterial, the applied magnetic field broadens the bandwidth and shifts the resonant wavelength of the emissivity. At large values of $H$, the magnetic field modifies the values of $\varepsilon _1(H)$ in Eq. (5a) such that the extraordinary wave dispersion becomes hyperbolic [47]. This effect generates new broadband modes similar to those of SPPs which can be tuned by modifying the magnitude of $H$, but does not affect the original major InSb narrowband resonance – results which are consistent with previous studies [47,78]. These behaviors open additional avenues for manipulating the optical emission properties of metamaterials, as well as remotely sensing magnetic fields in hard-to-reach spaces, such as inside high-energy particle detectors or electrical power systems. Additionally, the 55 ${\mu }m$ peak location corresponds to a thermal emitter of roughly 50 K [80], suggesting a suitable application as a sensor for materials at cryogenic temperatures and deep-space objects, as these objects would emit radiation near the strongest resonance peaks of this metamaterial.

4. Conclusion

In summary, we have investigated the optical emissive properties of InSb-based metamaterial structures, both with and without a W substrate, under the influence of a variety of geometric factors. Electromagnetic contour plots validate these analyses and provide a more detailed explanation of the observed behaviors. We have also examined the same properties of InSb-W metamaterials under an applied magnetic field.

A method for analytically expressing the dielectric function of InSb has been combined with the effective medium theory to enable this study. The EMT results are also validated with respect to a pure RCWA approach, postulating that the EMT is valid for this magneto-optical system, thus further expanding its applicability. In the absence of the magnetic field, the volume fraction of the top InSb layer of the structure has the most prominent effect on the tunable normal emissivity. The inclusion of a W substrate suppresses many of the minor peaks while amplifying the most prominent resonance. This enhancement of the emissivity at a specific wavelength could be taken advantage of in many photonic applications. We attribute these behaviors to changes in surface polariton resonances arising from metamaterial structural variations. We demonstrate that an applied magnetic field has the capability to tune the emissivity of an InSb-W grating structure, which has demonstrated unity narrowband emissivity around 55 $\mu$m in a zero field case. Through its effect on the cyclotron resonances, the external field is highly effective in red- and blue-shifting the peak TE emissivity wavelength and widening the narrowband to a broadband, while still preserving its near-unity magnitude. These findings may benefit applications in the THz region, as well as magnetic sensing in electrical systems, non-destructive sensing and imaging [29], pharmaceuticals [81], cryogenic sensing and astronomical observation [27,82].

Funding

National Science Foundation (CBET-1941743).

Acknowledgments

This project is supported by the National Science Foundation through grant number CBET-1941743.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

1. D. Lin, P. Fan, E. Hasman, and M. L. Brongersma, “Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements,” Science 345(6194), 298–302 (2014). [CrossRef]  

2. C. M. Soukoulis and M. Wegener, “Optical metamaterials - more bulky and less lossy,” Science 330(6011), 1633–1634 (2010). [CrossRef]  

3. A. V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, and V. M. Shalaev, “Planar photonics with metasurfaces,” Science 339(6125), 1232009 (2013). [CrossRef]  

4. R. Hillenbrand, T. Taubner, and F. Keilmann, “Phonon-enhanced light-matter interaction at the nanometre scale,” Nature 418(6894), 159–162 (2002). [CrossRef]  

5. A. Huber, N. Ocelic, D. Kazantsev, and R. Hillenbrand, “Near-field imaging of mid-infrared surface phonon polariton propagation,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87(8), 081103 (2005). [CrossRef]  

6. W. L. Barnes, A. Dereux, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Surface plasmon subwavelength optics,” Nature 424(6950), 824–830 (2003). [CrossRef]  

7. J. D. Caldwell, L. Lindsay, V. Giannini, I. Vurgaftman, T. L. Reinecke, S. A. Maier, and O. J. Glembocki, “Low-loss, infrared and terahertz nanophotonics using surface phonon polaritons,” Nanophotonics 4(1), 44–68 (2015). [CrossRef]  

8. J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig, and D. R. Smith, “Controlling electromagnetic fields,” Science 312(5781), 1780–1782 (2006). [CrossRef]  

9. G. Oliveri, D. H. Werner, and A. Massa, “Reconfigurable electromagnetics through metamaterials - a review,” Proc. IEEE 103(7), 1034–1056 (2015). [CrossRef]  

10. C. L. Holloway, E. F. Kuester, J. O. J. A. Gordon, J. Booth, and D. R. Smith, “An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces: The two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 54(2), 10–35 (2012). [CrossRef]  

11. S. Sarkar, R. O. Behunin, and J. G. Gibbs, “Shape-dependent, chiro-optical response of uv-active, nanohelix metamaterials,” Nano Lett. 19(11), 8089–8096 (2019). [CrossRef]  

12. K. Liu, S. Jiang, D. Ji, X. Zeng, N. Zhang, H. Song, Y. Xu, and Q. Gan, “Super absorbing ultraviolet metasurface,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27(14), 1539–1542 (2015). [CrossRef]  

13. M. A. Baqir and P. K. Choudhury, “Hyperbolic metamaterial-based uv absorber,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 29(18), 1548–1551 (2017). [CrossRef]  

14. F. Dincer, O. Akgol, M. Karaaslan, E. Unal, and C. Sabah, “Polarization angle independent perfect metamaterial absorbers for solar cell applications in the microwave, infrared, and visible regime,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. 144, 93–101 (2014). [CrossRef]  

15. P. Rufangura and C. Sabah, “Wide-band polarization independent perfect metamaterial absorber based on concentric rings topology for solar cells application,” J. Alloys Compd. 680, 473–479 (2016). [CrossRef]  

16. W. Cai, U. K. Chettiar, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, “Optical cloaking with metamaterials,” Nat. Photonics 1(4), 224–227 (2007). [CrossRef]  

17. N. Liu, H. Guo, L. Fu, S. Kaiser, H. Schweizer, and H. Giessen, “Three-dimensional photonic metamaterials at optical frequencies,” Nat. Mater. 7(1), 31–37 (2008). [CrossRef]  

18. E. M. Carapezza, ed., Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 9456 (SPIE, Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 2015).

19. H. Wang, V. P. Sivan, A. Mitchell, G. Rosengarten, and P. Phelan, “Highly efficient selective metamaterial absorber for high-temperature solar thermal energy harvesting,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 137, 235–242 (2015). [CrossRef]  

20. K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006). [CrossRef]  

21. G. Bellisola and C. Sorio, “Infrared spectroscopy and microscopy in cancer research and diagnosis,” Am. J. Cancer Res. 2(1), 1–21 (2012).

22. J. A. Montoya, Z. Tian, S. Krishna, and W. J. Padilla, “Ultra-thin infrared metamaterial detector for multicolor imaging applications,” Opt. Express 25(19), 23343–23355 (2017). [CrossRef]  

23. S. Ogawa, K. Okada, N. Fukushima, and M. Kimata, “Wavelength selective uncooled infrared sensor by plasmonics,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 100(2), 021111 (2012). [CrossRef]  

24. R. Xu and Y. Lin, “Tunable infrared metamaterial emitter for gas sensing application,” Nanomaterials 10(8), 1442 (2020). [CrossRef]  

25. N. Liu, M. Mesch, T. Weiss, M. Hentschel, and H. Giessen, “Infrared perfect absorber and its application as plasmonic sensor,” Nano Lett. 10(7), 2342–2348 (2010). [CrossRef]  

26. W. Xu, L. Xie, and Y. Ying, “Mechanisms and applications of terahertz metamaterial sensing: a review,” Nanoscale 9(37), 13864–13878 (2017). [CrossRef]  

27. M. Tonouchi, “Cutting-edge terahertz technology,” Nat. Photonics 1(2), 97–105 (2007). [CrossRef]  

28. J. Son, S. J. Oh, and H. Cheon, “Potential clinical applications of terahertz radiation,” J. Appl. Phys. 125(19), 190901 (2019). [CrossRef]  

29. S. Galoda and G. Signh, “Fighting terrorism with terahertz,” IEEE Potentials 26(6), 24–29 (2007). [CrossRef]  

30. S. Zhong, “Progress in terahertz nondestructive testing: A review,” Front. Mech. Eng. 14(3), 273–281 (2019). [CrossRef]  

31. A. Ghanekar, J. Ji, and Y. Zheng, “High-rectification near-field thermal diode using phase change period nanostructure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 109(12), 123106 (2016). [CrossRef]  

32. A. Ghanekar, M. Ricci, Y. Tian, O. Gregory, and Y. Zheng, “Strain-induced modulation of near-field radiative transfer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 112(24), 241104 (2018). [CrossRef]  

33. H. Ou, F. Lu, Z. Xu, and Y. Lin, “Terahertz metamaterial with multiple resonances for biosensing application,” Nanomaterials 10(6), 1038 (2020). [CrossRef]  

34. P. Liu, Z. Liang, Z. Lin, Z. Xu, R. Xu, D. Yao, and Y. Lin, “Actively tunable terahertz chain-link metamaterial with bidirectional polarization-dependent characteristic,” Sci. Rep. 9(1), 9917 (2019). [CrossRef]  

35. Y. Liu, C. Fang, G. Han, Y. Shao, Y. Huang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Ultrathin corrugated metallic strips for ultrawideband surface wave trapping at terahertz frequencies,” IEEE Photonics J. 9(1), 1–8 (2017). [CrossRef]  

36. Z. Xu, Z. Lin, S. Cheng, and Y. Lin, “Reconfigurable and tunable terahertz wrenchshape metamaterial performing programmable characteristic,” Opt. Lett. 44(16), 3944–3947 (2019). [CrossRef]  

37. Z. Xu and Y. Lin, “A stretchable terahertz parabolic-shaped metamaterial,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 7(19), 1900379 (2019). [CrossRef]  

38. J. P. Turpin, J. A. Bossard, K. L. Morgan, D. H. Werner, and P. L. Werner, “Reconfigurable and tunable metamaterials: A review of the theory and applications,” Int. J. Antennas and Propagation 2014, 1–18 (2014). [CrossRef]  

39. T. Cao, X. Zhang, W. Dong, L. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Zhuang, J. Deng, X. Cheng, G. Li, and R. E. Simpson, “Tuneable thermal emission using chalcogenide metasurface,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(16), 1800169 (2018). [CrossRef]  

40. Y. Qu, Q. Li, K. Du, L. Cai, J. Lu, and M. Qiu, “Dynamic thermal emission control based on ultrathin plasmonic metamaterials including phase-changing material gst,” Laser Photonics Rev. 11(5), 1700091 (2017). [CrossRef]  

41. T. H. Nguyen, S. T. Biu, X. C. Nguyen, D. L. Vu, and X. K. Bui, “Tunable broadband-negative-permeability metamaterials by hybridization at thz frequencies,” RSC Adv. 10(47), 28343–28350 (2020). [CrossRef]  

42. R. Xu, J. Luo, J. Sha, J. Zhong, Z. Xu, Y. Tong, and Y. Lin, “Stretchable ir metamaterial with ultra-narrowband perfect absorption,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 113(10), 101907 (2018). [CrossRef]  

43. Z. Wang, P. Lv, M. Becton, J. Hong, L. Zhang, and X. Chen, “Mechanically tunable near-field radiative heat transfer between monolayer black phosphorus sheets,” Langmuir 36(40), 12038–12044 (2020). [CrossRef]  

44. X. Su, C. Feng, Y. Zeng, and H. Yu, “A dual-band tunable metamaterial absorber based on pneumatic actuation mechanism,” Opt. Commun. 459, 124885 (2020). [CrossRef]  

45. F. Chen, Y. Cheng, and H. Luo, “A broadband tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber based on single-layer complementary gammadion-shaped graphene,” Materials 13(4), 860 (2020). [CrossRef]  

46. Y. Qi, Y. Zhang, C. Liu, T. Zhang, B. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Deng, X. Wang, and Y. Yu, “A tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber composed of hourglass-shaped graphene arrays,” Nanomaterials 10(3), 533 (2020). [CrossRef]  

47. E. Moncada-Villa, V. Fernanandez-Hurtado, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, A. Garcia-Martin, and J. C. Cuevas, “Magnetic field control of near-field radiative heat transfer and the realization of highly tunable hyperbolic thermal emitters,” Phys. Rev. B 92(12), 125418 (2015). [CrossRef]  

48. E. Moncada-Villa and J. C. Cuevas, “Near-field radiative heat transfer between one-dimensional magnetophotonic crystals,” Phys. Rev. B 103(7), 075432 (2021). [CrossRef]  

49. B. Hu, Y. Zhang, and Q. J. Wang, “Surface magneto plasmons and their applications in the infrared frequencies,” Nanomaterials 4(4), 383–396 (2015). [CrossRef]  

50. V. I. Pipa, A. I. Liptunga, and V. Morozhenko, “Thermal emission of one-dimensional magnetophotonic crystals,” J. Opt. 15(7), 075104 (2013). [CrossRef]  

51. H. Wang, H. Wu, and Z. Shen, “Nonreciprocal optical properties of thermal radiation with sic grating magneto-optical materials,” Opt. Express 25(16), 19609–19618 (2017). [CrossRef]  

52. C. Lee, H. J. Choi, and H. Jeong, “Tunable metasurfaces for visible and swir applications,” Nano Convergence 7(1), 3 (2020). [CrossRef]  

53. M. J. Dicken, K. Aydin, I. M. Pryce, L. A. Sweatlock, E. M. Boyd, J. M. S. Walavalkar, and H. A. Atwater, “Frequency tunable near-infrared metamaterials based on vo2 phase transition,” Opt. Express 17(20), 18330–18339 (2009). [CrossRef]  

54. Y. Li, Y. Shen, S. Cao, X. Zhang, and Y. Meng, “Thermally triggered tunable vibration mitigation in hoberman spherical lattice metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 114(19), 191904 (2019). [CrossRef]  

55. X. Jia, X. Wang, C. Yuan, Q. Meng, and Z. Zhou, “Novel dynamic tuning of broadband visible metamaterial perfect absorber using graphene,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 120(3), 033101 (2016). [CrossRef]  

56. T. Driscoll, S. Palit, M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, F. Keilmann, B. Chae, S. Yun, H. Kim, S. Y. Cho, N. M. Jokerst, D. R. Smith, and D. N. Basov, “Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 024101 (2008). [CrossRef]  

57. P. Gutruf, C. Zou, W. Withayachumnankul, M. Bhaskaran, S. Sriram, and C. Fumeaux, “Mechanically tunable dielectric resonator metasurfaces at visible frequencies,” ACS Nano 10(1), 133–141 (2016). [CrossRef]  

58. X. Liu, Y. Tian, F. Chen, A. Ghanekar, M. Antezza, and Y. Zheng, “Continuously variable emission for mechanical deformation induced radiative cooling,” Commun. Mater. 1(1), 95 (2020). [CrossRef]  

59. G. Sharma, A. Lakhtakia, S. Bhattacharyya, and P. K. Jain, “Magnetically tunable metasurface comprising inas and insb pixels for absorbing terahertz radiation,” Appl. Opt. 59(31), 9673–9680 (2020). [CrossRef]  

60. K. Li, X. Ma, Z. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Hu, Y. Xu, and G. Song, “Highly tunable terahertz filter with magneto-optical bragg grating formed in semiconductor-insulator-semiconductor waveguides,” AIP Adv. 3(6), 062130 (2013). [CrossRef]  

61. G. Armelles, A. Cebollada, A. Garcia-Martin, and M. U. Gonzalez, “Magnetoplasmonics: Combining magnetic and plasmonic functionalities,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 1(1), 10–35 (2013). [CrossRef]  

62. P. Doyeux, S. A. H. Gangaraj, G. W. Hanson, and M. Antezza, “Giant interatomic energy-transport amplification with nonreciprocal photonic topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(17), 173901 (2017). [CrossRef]  

63. S. A. H. Gangaraj, G. W. Hanson, and M. Antezza, “Robust entanglement with three-dimensional nonreciprocal photonic topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. A 95(6), 063807 (2017). [CrossRef]  

64. A. Ghanekar, L. Lin, and Y. Zheng, “Novel and efficient mie-metamaterial thermal emitter for thermophotovoltaic systems,” Opt. Express 24(10), A868 (2016). [CrossRef]  

65. Y. Tian, X. Liu, A. Ghanekar, F. Chen, A. Caratenuto, and Y. Zheng, “Blackbody-cavity ideal absorbers for solar energy harvesting,” Sci. Rep. 10(1), 20304 (2020). [CrossRef]  

66. Z. M. Zhang, X. Wu, and C. Fu, “Validity of kirchhoff’s law for semitransparent films made of anisotropic materials,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 245, 106904 (2020). [CrossRef]  

67. L. Zhu and S. Fan, “Near-complete violation of detailed balance in thermal radiation,” Phys. Rev. B 90(22), 220301 (2014). [CrossRef]  

68. B. Zhao, Y. Shi, J. Wang, Z. Zhao, N. Zhao, and S. Fan, “Near-complete violation of kirchhoff’s law of thermal radiation with a 0.3 t magnetic field,” Opt. Lett. 44(17), 4203–4206 (2019). [CrossRef]  

69. D. A. B. Miller, L. Zhu, and S. Fan, “Universal modal radiation laws for all thermal emitters,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114(17), 4336–4341 (2017). [CrossRef]  

70. Z. M. Zhang, “Rigorous coupled-wave analysis (rcwa),” http://zhang-nano.gatech.edu/Rad_Pro.htm. Accessed: 2021-03-15.

71. L. Wang and Z. M. Zhang, “Effect of magnetic polaritons on the radiative properties of double-layer nanoslit arrays,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27(12), 2595–2604 (2010). [CrossRef]  

72. B. J. Lee, Y. B. Chen, and Z. M. Zhang, “Transmission enhancement through nanoscale metallic slit arrays from the visible to mid-infrared,” J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 5(2), 201–213 (2008). [CrossRef]  

73. M. Foldyna, K. Postava, D. Ciprian, and J. Pistora, “Modeling of magneto-optical properties of lamellar nanogratings,” J. Alloys Compd. 434-435, 581–583 (2007). [CrossRef]  

74. X. Luo, M. Zhou, J. Liu, T. Qiu, and Z. Yu, “Magneto-optical metamaterials with extraordinarily strong magneto-optical effect,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 108(13), 131104 (2016). [CrossRef]  

75. V. V. Temnov, I. Razdolski, T. Pezeril, D. Makarov, D. Seletskiy, A. Melnikov, and K. A. Nelson, “Towards the nonlinear acousto-magnetoplasmonics,” J. Opt. 18(9), 093002 (2016). [CrossRef]  

76. B. Sepulveda, J. B. Gonzalez-Diaz, A. Garcia-Martin, L. M. Lechuga, and G. Armelles, “Plasmon-induced magneto-optical activity in nanosized gold disks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(14), 147401 (2010). [CrossRef]  

77. M. A. Ordal, R. J. Bell, R. W. Alexander, L. A. Newquist, and M. R. Querry, “Optical properties of al, fe, ti, ta, w, and mo at submillimeter wavelengths,” Appl. Opt. 27(6), 1203–1209 (1988). [CrossRef]  

78. E. D. Palik, R. Kaplan, R. W. Gammon, H. Kaplan, R. F. Wallis, and J. J. Quinn, “Coupled surface magnetoplasmon-optic-phonon polariton modes on insb,” Phys. Rev. B 13(6), 2497–2506 (1976). [CrossRef]  

79. Z. Q. Qiu and S. D. Bader, “Surface magneto-optic kerr effect,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71(3), 1243–1255 (2000). [CrossRef]  

80. D. W. Ball, “Wien’s displacement law as a function of frequency,” J. Chem. Educ. 90(9), 1250–1252 (2013). [CrossRef]  

81. A. P. Ayala, “Polymorphism in drugs investigated by low wavenumber raman scattering,” Vib. Spectrosc. 45(2), 112–116 (2007). [CrossRef]  

82. A Practical Schottky Mixer for 5 THz (Part II) (Seventh International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology, Charlottesville, 1996).

References

  • View by:

  1. D. Lin, P. Fan, E. Hasman, and M. L. Brongersma, “Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements,” Science 345(6194), 298–302 (2014).
    [Crossref]
  2. C. M. Soukoulis and M. Wegener, “Optical metamaterials - more bulky and less lossy,” Science 330(6011), 1633–1634 (2010).
    [Crossref]
  3. A. V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, and V. M. Shalaev, “Planar photonics with metasurfaces,” Science 339(6125), 1232009 (2013).
    [Crossref]
  4. R. Hillenbrand, T. Taubner, and F. Keilmann, “Phonon-enhanced light-matter interaction at the nanometre scale,” Nature 418(6894), 159–162 (2002).
    [Crossref]
  5. A. Huber, N. Ocelic, D. Kazantsev, and R. Hillenbrand, “Near-field imaging of mid-infrared surface phonon polariton propagation,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87(8), 081103 (2005).
    [Crossref]
  6. W. L. Barnes, A. Dereux, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Surface plasmon subwavelength optics,” Nature 424(6950), 824–830 (2003).
    [Crossref]
  7. J. D. Caldwell, L. Lindsay, V. Giannini, I. Vurgaftman, T. L. Reinecke, S. A. Maier, and O. J. Glembocki, “Low-loss, infrared and terahertz nanophotonics using surface phonon polaritons,” Nanophotonics 4(1), 44–68 (2015).
    [Crossref]
  8. J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig, and D. R. Smith, “Controlling electromagnetic fields,” Science 312(5781), 1780–1782 (2006).
    [Crossref]
  9. G. Oliveri, D. H. Werner, and A. Massa, “Reconfigurable electromagnetics through metamaterials - a review,” Proc. IEEE 103(7), 1034–1056 (2015).
    [Crossref]
  10. C. L. Holloway, E. F. Kuester, J. O. J. A. Gordon, J. Booth, and D. R. Smith, “An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces: The two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 54(2), 10–35 (2012).
    [Crossref]
  11. S. Sarkar, R. O. Behunin, and J. G. Gibbs, “Shape-dependent, chiro-optical response of uv-active, nanohelix metamaterials,” Nano Lett. 19(11), 8089–8096 (2019).
    [Crossref]
  12. K. Liu, S. Jiang, D. Ji, X. Zeng, N. Zhang, H. Song, Y. Xu, and Q. Gan, “Super absorbing ultraviolet metasurface,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27(14), 1539–1542 (2015).
    [Crossref]
  13. M. A. Baqir and P. K. Choudhury, “Hyperbolic metamaterial-based uv absorber,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 29(18), 1548–1551 (2017).
    [Crossref]
  14. F. Dincer, O. Akgol, M. Karaaslan, E. Unal, and C. Sabah, “Polarization angle independent perfect metamaterial absorbers for solar cell applications in the microwave, infrared, and visible regime,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. 144, 93–101 (2014).
    [Crossref]
  15. P. Rufangura and C. Sabah, “Wide-band polarization independent perfect metamaterial absorber based on concentric rings topology for solar cells application,” J. Alloys Compd. 680, 473–479 (2016).
    [Crossref]
  16. W. Cai, U. K. Chettiar, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, “Optical cloaking with metamaterials,” Nat. Photonics 1(4), 224–227 (2007).
    [Crossref]
  17. N. Liu, H. Guo, L. Fu, S. Kaiser, H. Schweizer, and H. Giessen, “Three-dimensional photonic metamaterials at optical frequencies,” Nat. Mater. 7(1), 31–37 (2008).
    [Crossref]
  18. E. M. Carapezza, ed., Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 9456 (SPIE, Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 2015).
  19. H. Wang, V. P. Sivan, A. Mitchell, G. Rosengarten, and P. Phelan, “Highly efficient selective metamaterial absorber for high-temperature solar thermal energy harvesting,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 137, 235–242 (2015).
    [Crossref]
  20. K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
    [Crossref]
  21. G. Bellisola and C. Sorio, “Infrared spectroscopy and microscopy in cancer research and diagnosis,” Am. J. Cancer Res. 2(1), 1–21 (2012).
  22. J. A. Montoya, Z. Tian, S. Krishna, and W. J. Padilla, “Ultra-thin infrared metamaterial detector for multicolor imaging applications,” Opt. Express 25(19), 23343–23355 (2017).
    [Crossref]
  23. S. Ogawa, K. Okada, N. Fukushima, and M. Kimata, “Wavelength selective uncooled infrared sensor by plasmonics,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 100(2), 021111 (2012).
    [Crossref]
  24. R. Xu and Y. Lin, “Tunable infrared metamaterial emitter for gas sensing application,” Nanomaterials 10(8), 1442 (2020).
    [Crossref]
  25. N. Liu, M. Mesch, T. Weiss, M. Hentschel, and H. Giessen, “Infrared perfect absorber and its application as plasmonic sensor,” Nano Lett. 10(7), 2342–2348 (2010).
    [Crossref]
  26. W. Xu, L. Xie, and Y. Ying, “Mechanisms and applications of terahertz metamaterial sensing: a review,” Nanoscale 9(37), 13864–13878 (2017).
    [Crossref]
  27. M. Tonouchi, “Cutting-edge terahertz technology,” Nat. Photonics 1(2), 97–105 (2007).
    [Crossref]
  28. J. Son, S. J. Oh, and H. Cheon, “Potential clinical applications of terahertz radiation,” J. Appl. Phys. 125(19), 190901 (2019).
    [Crossref]
  29. S. Galoda and G. Signh, “Fighting terrorism with terahertz,” IEEE Potentials 26(6), 24–29 (2007).
    [Crossref]
  30. S. Zhong, “Progress in terahertz nondestructive testing: A review,” Front. Mech. Eng. 14(3), 273–281 (2019).
    [Crossref]
  31. A. Ghanekar, J. Ji, and Y. Zheng, “High-rectification near-field thermal diode using phase change period nanostructure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 109(12), 123106 (2016).
    [Crossref]
  32. A. Ghanekar, M. Ricci, Y. Tian, O. Gregory, and Y. Zheng, “Strain-induced modulation of near-field radiative transfer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 112(24), 241104 (2018).
    [Crossref]
  33. H. Ou, F. Lu, Z. Xu, and Y. Lin, “Terahertz metamaterial with multiple resonances for biosensing application,” Nanomaterials 10(6), 1038 (2020).
    [Crossref]
  34. P. Liu, Z. Liang, Z. Lin, Z. Xu, R. Xu, D. Yao, and Y. Lin, “Actively tunable terahertz chain-link metamaterial with bidirectional polarization-dependent characteristic,” Sci. Rep. 9(1), 9917 (2019).
    [Crossref]
  35. Y. Liu, C. Fang, G. Han, Y. Shao, Y. Huang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Ultrathin corrugated metallic strips for ultrawideband surface wave trapping at terahertz frequencies,” IEEE Photonics J. 9(1), 1–8 (2017).
    [Crossref]
  36. Z. Xu, Z. Lin, S. Cheng, and Y. Lin, “Reconfigurable and tunable terahertz wrenchshape metamaterial performing programmable characteristic,” Opt. Lett. 44(16), 3944–3947 (2019).
    [Crossref]
  37. Z. Xu and Y. Lin, “A stretchable terahertz parabolic-shaped metamaterial,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 7(19), 1900379 (2019).
    [Crossref]
  38. J. P. Turpin, J. A. Bossard, K. L. Morgan, D. H. Werner, and P. L. Werner, “Reconfigurable and tunable metamaterials: A review of the theory and applications,” Int. J. Antennas and Propagation 2014, 1–18 (2014).
    [Crossref]
  39. T. Cao, X. Zhang, W. Dong, L. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Zhuang, J. Deng, X. Cheng, G. Li, and R. E. Simpson, “Tuneable thermal emission using chalcogenide metasurface,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(16), 1800169 (2018).
    [Crossref]
  40. Y. Qu, Q. Li, K. Du, L. Cai, J. Lu, and M. Qiu, “Dynamic thermal emission control based on ultrathin plasmonic metamaterials including phase-changing material gst,” Laser Photonics Rev. 11(5), 1700091 (2017).
    [Crossref]
  41. T. H. Nguyen, S. T. Biu, X. C. Nguyen, D. L. Vu, and X. K. Bui, “Tunable broadband-negative-permeability metamaterials by hybridization at thz frequencies,” RSC Adv. 10(47), 28343–28350 (2020).
    [Crossref]
  42. R. Xu, J. Luo, J. Sha, J. Zhong, Z. Xu, Y. Tong, and Y. Lin, “Stretchable ir metamaterial with ultra-narrowband perfect absorption,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 113(10), 101907 (2018).
    [Crossref]
  43. Z. Wang, P. Lv, M. Becton, J. Hong, L. Zhang, and X. Chen, “Mechanically tunable near-field radiative heat transfer between monolayer black phosphorus sheets,” Langmuir 36(40), 12038–12044 (2020).
    [Crossref]
  44. X. Su, C. Feng, Y. Zeng, and H. Yu, “A dual-band tunable metamaterial absorber based on pneumatic actuation mechanism,” Opt. Commun. 459, 124885 (2020).
    [Crossref]
  45. F. Chen, Y. Cheng, and H. Luo, “A broadband tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber based on single-layer complementary gammadion-shaped graphene,” Materials 13(4), 860 (2020).
    [Crossref]
  46. Y. Qi, Y. Zhang, C. Liu, T. Zhang, B. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Deng, X. Wang, and Y. Yu, “A tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber composed of hourglass-shaped graphene arrays,” Nanomaterials 10(3), 533 (2020).
    [Crossref]
  47. E. Moncada-Villa, V. Fernanandez-Hurtado, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, A. Garcia-Martin, and J. C. Cuevas, “Magnetic field control of near-field radiative heat transfer and the realization of highly tunable hyperbolic thermal emitters,” Phys. Rev. B 92(12), 125418 (2015).
    [Crossref]
  48. E. Moncada-Villa and J. C. Cuevas, “Near-field radiative heat transfer between one-dimensional magnetophotonic crystals,” Phys. Rev. B 103(7), 075432 (2021).
    [Crossref]
  49. B. Hu, Y. Zhang, and Q. J. Wang, “Surface magneto plasmons and their applications in the infrared frequencies,” Nanomaterials 4(4), 383–396 (2015).
    [Crossref]
  50. V. I. Pipa, A. I. Liptunga, and V. Morozhenko, “Thermal emission of one-dimensional magnetophotonic crystals,” J. Opt. 15(7), 075104 (2013).
    [Crossref]
  51. H. Wang, H. Wu, and Z. Shen, “Nonreciprocal optical properties of thermal radiation with sic grating magneto-optical materials,” Opt. Express 25(16), 19609–19618 (2017).
    [Crossref]
  52. C. Lee, H. J. Choi, and H. Jeong, “Tunable metasurfaces for visible and swir applications,” Nano Convergence 7(1), 3 (2020).
    [Crossref]
  53. M. J. Dicken, K. Aydin, I. M. Pryce, L. A. Sweatlock, E. M. Boyd, J. M. S. Walavalkar, and H. A. Atwater, “Frequency tunable near-infrared metamaterials based on vo2 phase transition,” Opt. Express 17(20), 18330–18339 (2009).
    [Crossref]
  54. Y. Li, Y. Shen, S. Cao, X. Zhang, and Y. Meng, “Thermally triggered tunable vibration mitigation in hoberman spherical lattice metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 114(19), 191904 (2019).
    [Crossref]
  55. X. Jia, X. Wang, C. Yuan, Q. Meng, and Z. Zhou, “Novel dynamic tuning of broadband visible metamaterial perfect absorber using graphene,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 120(3), 033101 (2016).
    [Crossref]
  56. T. Driscoll, S. Palit, M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, F. Keilmann, B. Chae, S. Yun, H. Kim, S. Y. Cho, N. M. Jokerst, D. R. Smith, and D. N. Basov, “Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 024101 (2008).
    [Crossref]
  57. P. Gutruf, C. Zou, W. Withayachumnankul, M. Bhaskaran, S. Sriram, and C. Fumeaux, “Mechanically tunable dielectric resonator metasurfaces at visible frequencies,” ACS Nano 10(1), 133–141 (2016).
    [Crossref]
  58. X. Liu, Y. Tian, F. Chen, A. Ghanekar, M. Antezza, and Y. Zheng, “Continuously variable emission for mechanical deformation induced radiative cooling,” Commun. Mater. 1(1), 95 (2020).
    [Crossref]
  59. G. Sharma, A. Lakhtakia, S. Bhattacharyya, and P. K. Jain, “Magnetically tunable metasurface comprising inas and insb pixels for absorbing terahertz radiation,” Appl. Opt. 59(31), 9673–9680 (2020).
    [Crossref]
  60. K. Li, X. Ma, Z. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Hu, Y. Xu, and G. Song, “Highly tunable terahertz filter with magneto-optical bragg grating formed in semiconductor-insulator-semiconductor waveguides,” AIP Adv. 3(6), 062130 (2013).
    [Crossref]
  61. G. Armelles, A. Cebollada, A. Garcia-Martin, and M. U. Gonzalez, “Magnetoplasmonics: Combining magnetic and plasmonic functionalities,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 1(1), 10–35 (2013).
    [Crossref]
  62. P. Doyeux, S. A. H. Gangaraj, G. W. Hanson, and M. Antezza, “Giant interatomic energy-transport amplification with nonreciprocal photonic topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(17), 173901 (2017).
    [Crossref]
  63. S. A. H. Gangaraj, G. W. Hanson, and M. Antezza, “Robust entanglement with three-dimensional nonreciprocal photonic topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. A 95(6), 063807 (2017).
    [Crossref]
  64. A. Ghanekar, L. Lin, and Y. Zheng, “Novel and efficient mie-metamaterial thermal emitter for thermophotovoltaic systems,” Opt. Express 24(10), A868 (2016).
    [Crossref]
  65. Y. Tian, X. Liu, A. Ghanekar, F. Chen, A. Caratenuto, and Y. Zheng, “Blackbody-cavity ideal absorbers for solar energy harvesting,” Sci. Rep. 10(1), 20304 (2020).
    [Crossref]
  66. Z. M. Zhang, X. Wu, and C. Fu, “Validity of kirchhoff’s law for semitransparent films made of anisotropic materials,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 245, 106904 (2020).
    [Crossref]
  67. L. Zhu and S. Fan, “Near-complete violation of detailed balance in thermal radiation,” Phys. Rev. B 90(22), 220301 (2014).
    [Crossref]
  68. B. Zhao, Y. Shi, J. Wang, Z. Zhao, N. Zhao, and S. Fan, “Near-complete violation of kirchhoff’s law of thermal radiation with a 0.3 t magnetic field,” Opt. Lett. 44(17), 4203–4206 (2019).
    [Crossref]
  69. D. A. B. Miller, L. Zhu, and S. Fan, “Universal modal radiation laws for all thermal emitters,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114(17), 4336–4341 (2017).
    [Crossref]
  70. Z. M. Zhang, “Rigorous coupled-wave analysis (rcwa),” http://zhang-nano.gatech.edu/Rad_Pro.htm . Accessed: 2021-03-15.
  71. L. Wang and Z. M. Zhang, “Effect of magnetic polaritons on the radiative properties of double-layer nanoslit arrays,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27(12), 2595–2604 (2010).
    [Crossref]
  72. B. J. Lee, Y. B. Chen, and Z. M. Zhang, “Transmission enhancement through nanoscale metallic slit arrays from the visible to mid-infrared,” J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 5(2), 201–213 (2008).
    [Crossref]
  73. M. Foldyna, K. Postava, D. Ciprian, and J. Pistora, “Modeling of magneto-optical properties of lamellar nanogratings,” J. Alloys Compd. 434-435, 581–583 (2007).
    [Crossref]
  74. X. Luo, M. Zhou, J. Liu, T. Qiu, and Z. Yu, “Magneto-optical metamaterials with extraordinarily strong magneto-optical effect,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 108(13), 131104 (2016).
    [Crossref]
  75. V. V. Temnov, I. Razdolski, T. Pezeril, D. Makarov, D. Seletskiy, A. Melnikov, and K. A. Nelson, “Towards the nonlinear acousto-magnetoplasmonics,” J. Opt. 18(9), 093002 (2016).
    [Crossref]
  76. B. Sepulveda, J. B. Gonzalez-Diaz, A. Garcia-Martin, L. M. Lechuga, and G. Armelles, “Plasmon-induced magneto-optical activity in nanosized gold disks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(14), 147401 (2010).
    [Crossref]
  77. M. A. Ordal, R. J. Bell, R. W. Alexander, L. A. Newquist, and M. R. Querry, “Optical properties of al, fe, ti, ta, w, and mo at submillimeter wavelengths,” Appl. Opt. 27(6), 1203–1209 (1988).
    [Crossref]
  78. E. D. Palik, R. Kaplan, R. W. Gammon, H. Kaplan, R. F. Wallis, and J. J. Quinn, “Coupled surface magnetoplasmon-optic-phonon polariton modes on insb,” Phys. Rev. B 13(6), 2497–2506 (1976).
    [Crossref]
  79. Z. Q. Qiu and S. D. Bader, “Surface magneto-optic kerr effect,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71(3), 1243–1255 (2000).
    [Crossref]
  80. D. W. Ball, “Wien’s displacement law as a function of frequency,” J. Chem. Educ. 90(9), 1250–1252 (2013).
    [Crossref]
  81. A. P. Ayala, “Polymorphism in drugs investigated by low wavenumber raman scattering,” Vib. Spectrosc. 45(2), 112–116 (2007).
    [Crossref]
  82. A Practical Schottky Mixer for 5 THz (Part II) (Seventh International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology, Charlottesville, 1996).

2021 (1)

E. Moncada-Villa and J. C. Cuevas, “Near-field radiative heat transfer between one-dimensional magnetophotonic crystals,” Phys. Rev. B 103(7), 075432 (2021).
[Crossref]

2020 (12)

T. H. Nguyen, S. T. Biu, X. C. Nguyen, D. L. Vu, and X. K. Bui, “Tunable broadband-negative-permeability metamaterials by hybridization at thz frequencies,” RSC Adv. 10(47), 28343–28350 (2020).
[Crossref]

C. Lee, H. J. Choi, and H. Jeong, “Tunable metasurfaces for visible and swir applications,” Nano Convergence 7(1), 3 (2020).
[Crossref]

Z. Wang, P. Lv, M. Becton, J. Hong, L. Zhang, and X. Chen, “Mechanically tunable near-field radiative heat transfer between monolayer black phosphorus sheets,” Langmuir 36(40), 12038–12044 (2020).
[Crossref]

X. Su, C. Feng, Y. Zeng, and H. Yu, “A dual-band tunable metamaterial absorber based on pneumatic actuation mechanism,” Opt. Commun. 459, 124885 (2020).
[Crossref]

F. Chen, Y. Cheng, and H. Luo, “A broadband tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber based on single-layer complementary gammadion-shaped graphene,” Materials 13(4), 860 (2020).
[Crossref]

Y. Qi, Y. Zhang, C. Liu, T. Zhang, B. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Deng, X. Wang, and Y. Yu, “A tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber composed of hourglass-shaped graphene arrays,” Nanomaterials 10(3), 533 (2020).
[Crossref]

X. Liu, Y. Tian, F. Chen, A. Ghanekar, M. Antezza, and Y. Zheng, “Continuously variable emission for mechanical deformation induced radiative cooling,” Commun. Mater. 1(1), 95 (2020).
[Crossref]

G. Sharma, A. Lakhtakia, S. Bhattacharyya, and P. K. Jain, “Magnetically tunable metasurface comprising inas and insb pixels for absorbing terahertz radiation,” Appl. Opt. 59(31), 9673–9680 (2020).
[Crossref]

R. Xu and Y. Lin, “Tunable infrared metamaterial emitter for gas sensing application,” Nanomaterials 10(8), 1442 (2020).
[Crossref]

H. Ou, F. Lu, Z. Xu, and Y. Lin, “Terahertz metamaterial with multiple resonances for biosensing application,” Nanomaterials 10(6), 1038 (2020).
[Crossref]

Y. Tian, X. Liu, A. Ghanekar, F. Chen, A. Caratenuto, and Y. Zheng, “Blackbody-cavity ideal absorbers for solar energy harvesting,” Sci. Rep. 10(1), 20304 (2020).
[Crossref]

Z. M. Zhang, X. Wu, and C. Fu, “Validity of kirchhoff’s law for semitransparent films made of anisotropic materials,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 245, 106904 (2020).
[Crossref]

2019 (8)

P. Liu, Z. Liang, Z. Lin, Z. Xu, R. Xu, D. Yao, and Y. Lin, “Actively tunable terahertz chain-link metamaterial with bidirectional polarization-dependent characteristic,” Sci. Rep. 9(1), 9917 (2019).
[Crossref]

S. Zhong, “Progress in terahertz nondestructive testing: A review,” Front. Mech. Eng. 14(3), 273–281 (2019).
[Crossref]

J. Son, S. J. Oh, and H. Cheon, “Potential clinical applications of terahertz radiation,” J. Appl. Phys. 125(19), 190901 (2019).
[Crossref]

S. Sarkar, R. O. Behunin, and J. G. Gibbs, “Shape-dependent, chiro-optical response of uv-active, nanohelix metamaterials,” Nano Lett. 19(11), 8089–8096 (2019).
[Crossref]

Y. Li, Y. Shen, S. Cao, X. Zhang, and Y. Meng, “Thermally triggered tunable vibration mitigation in hoberman spherical lattice metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 114(19), 191904 (2019).
[Crossref]

B. Zhao, Y. Shi, J. Wang, Z. Zhao, N. Zhao, and S. Fan, “Near-complete violation of kirchhoff’s law of thermal radiation with a 0.3 t magnetic field,” Opt. Lett. 44(17), 4203–4206 (2019).
[Crossref]

Z. Xu, Z. Lin, S. Cheng, and Y. Lin, “Reconfigurable and tunable terahertz wrenchshape metamaterial performing programmable characteristic,” Opt. Lett. 44(16), 3944–3947 (2019).
[Crossref]

Z. Xu and Y. Lin, “A stretchable terahertz parabolic-shaped metamaterial,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 7(19), 1900379 (2019).
[Crossref]

2018 (3)

T. Cao, X. Zhang, W. Dong, L. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Zhuang, J. Deng, X. Cheng, G. Li, and R. E. Simpson, “Tuneable thermal emission using chalcogenide metasurface,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(16), 1800169 (2018).
[Crossref]

A. Ghanekar, M. Ricci, Y. Tian, O. Gregory, and Y. Zheng, “Strain-induced modulation of near-field radiative transfer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 112(24), 241104 (2018).
[Crossref]

R. Xu, J. Luo, J. Sha, J. Zhong, Z. Xu, Y. Tong, and Y. Lin, “Stretchable ir metamaterial with ultra-narrowband perfect absorption,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 113(10), 101907 (2018).
[Crossref]

2017 (9)

H. Wang, H. Wu, and Z. Shen, “Nonreciprocal optical properties of thermal radiation with sic grating magneto-optical materials,” Opt. Express 25(16), 19609–19618 (2017).
[Crossref]

Y. Qu, Q. Li, K. Du, L. Cai, J. Lu, and M. Qiu, “Dynamic thermal emission control based on ultrathin plasmonic metamaterials including phase-changing material gst,” Laser Photonics Rev. 11(5), 1700091 (2017).
[Crossref]

D. A. B. Miller, L. Zhu, and S. Fan, “Universal modal radiation laws for all thermal emitters,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114(17), 4336–4341 (2017).
[Crossref]

P. Doyeux, S. A. H. Gangaraj, G. W. Hanson, and M. Antezza, “Giant interatomic energy-transport amplification with nonreciprocal photonic topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(17), 173901 (2017).
[Crossref]

S. A. H. Gangaraj, G. W. Hanson, and M. Antezza, “Robust entanglement with three-dimensional nonreciprocal photonic topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. A 95(6), 063807 (2017).
[Crossref]

M. A. Baqir and P. K. Choudhury, “Hyperbolic metamaterial-based uv absorber,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 29(18), 1548–1551 (2017).
[Crossref]

W. Xu, L. Xie, and Y. Ying, “Mechanisms and applications of terahertz metamaterial sensing: a review,” Nanoscale 9(37), 13864–13878 (2017).
[Crossref]

Y. Liu, C. Fang, G. Han, Y. Shao, Y. Huang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Ultrathin corrugated metallic strips for ultrawideband surface wave trapping at terahertz frequencies,” IEEE Photonics J. 9(1), 1–8 (2017).
[Crossref]

J. A. Montoya, Z. Tian, S. Krishna, and W. J. Padilla, “Ultra-thin infrared metamaterial detector for multicolor imaging applications,” Opt. Express 25(19), 23343–23355 (2017).
[Crossref]

2016 (7)

A. Ghanekar, J. Ji, and Y. Zheng, “High-rectification near-field thermal diode using phase change period nanostructure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 109(12), 123106 (2016).
[Crossref]

P. Rufangura and C. Sabah, “Wide-band polarization independent perfect metamaterial absorber based on concentric rings topology for solar cells application,” J. Alloys Compd. 680, 473–479 (2016).
[Crossref]

A. Ghanekar, L. Lin, and Y. Zheng, “Novel and efficient mie-metamaterial thermal emitter for thermophotovoltaic systems,” Opt. Express 24(10), A868 (2016).
[Crossref]

X. Jia, X. Wang, C. Yuan, Q. Meng, and Z. Zhou, “Novel dynamic tuning of broadband visible metamaterial perfect absorber using graphene,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 120(3), 033101 (2016).
[Crossref]

X. Luo, M. Zhou, J. Liu, T. Qiu, and Z. Yu, “Magneto-optical metamaterials with extraordinarily strong magneto-optical effect,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 108(13), 131104 (2016).
[Crossref]

V. V. Temnov, I. Razdolski, T. Pezeril, D. Makarov, D. Seletskiy, A. Melnikov, and K. A. Nelson, “Towards the nonlinear acousto-magnetoplasmonics,” J. Opt. 18(9), 093002 (2016).
[Crossref]

P. Gutruf, C. Zou, W. Withayachumnankul, M. Bhaskaran, S. Sriram, and C. Fumeaux, “Mechanically tunable dielectric resonator metasurfaces at visible frequencies,” ACS Nano 10(1), 133–141 (2016).
[Crossref]

2015 (6)

E. Moncada-Villa, V. Fernanandez-Hurtado, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, A. Garcia-Martin, and J. C. Cuevas, “Magnetic field control of near-field radiative heat transfer and the realization of highly tunable hyperbolic thermal emitters,” Phys. Rev. B 92(12), 125418 (2015).
[Crossref]

B. Hu, Y. Zhang, and Q. J. Wang, “Surface magneto plasmons and their applications in the infrared frequencies,” Nanomaterials 4(4), 383–396 (2015).
[Crossref]

K. Liu, S. Jiang, D. Ji, X. Zeng, N. Zhang, H. Song, Y. Xu, and Q. Gan, “Super absorbing ultraviolet metasurface,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27(14), 1539–1542 (2015).
[Crossref]

G. Oliveri, D. H. Werner, and A. Massa, “Reconfigurable electromagnetics through metamaterials - a review,” Proc. IEEE 103(7), 1034–1056 (2015).
[Crossref]

J. D. Caldwell, L. Lindsay, V. Giannini, I. Vurgaftman, T. L. Reinecke, S. A. Maier, and O. J. Glembocki, “Low-loss, infrared and terahertz nanophotonics using surface phonon polaritons,” Nanophotonics 4(1), 44–68 (2015).
[Crossref]

H. Wang, V. P. Sivan, A. Mitchell, G. Rosengarten, and P. Phelan, “Highly efficient selective metamaterial absorber for high-temperature solar thermal energy harvesting,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 137, 235–242 (2015).
[Crossref]

2014 (4)

D. Lin, P. Fan, E. Hasman, and M. L. Brongersma, “Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements,” Science 345(6194), 298–302 (2014).
[Crossref]

F. Dincer, O. Akgol, M. Karaaslan, E. Unal, and C. Sabah, “Polarization angle independent perfect metamaterial absorbers for solar cell applications in the microwave, infrared, and visible regime,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. 144, 93–101 (2014).
[Crossref]

J. P. Turpin, J. A. Bossard, K. L. Morgan, D. H. Werner, and P. L. Werner, “Reconfigurable and tunable metamaterials: A review of the theory and applications,” Int. J. Antennas and Propagation 2014, 1–18 (2014).
[Crossref]

L. Zhu and S. Fan, “Near-complete violation of detailed balance in thermal radiation,” Phys. Rev. B 90(22), 220301 (2014).
[Crossref]

2013 (5)

D. W. Ball, “Wien’s displacement law as a function of frequency,” J. Chem. Educ. 90(9), 1250–1252 (2013).
[Crossref]

V. I. Pipa, A. I. Liptunga, and V. Morozhenko, “Thermal emission of one-dimensional magnetophotonic crystals,” J. Opt. 15(7), 075104 (2013).
[Crossref]

K. Li, X. Ma, Z. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Hu, Y. Xu, and G. Song, “Highly tunable terahertz filter with magneto-optical bragg grating formed in semiconductor-insulator-semiconductor waveguides,” AIP Adv. 3(6), 062130 (2013).
[Crossref]

G. Armelles, A. Cebollada, A. Garcia-Martin, and M. U. Gonzalez, “Magnetoplasmonics: Combining magnetic and plasmonic functionalities,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 1(1), 10–35 (2013).
[Crossref]

A. V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, and V. M. Shalaev, “Planar photonics with metasurfaces,” Science 339(6125), 1232009 (2013).
[Crossref]

2012 (3)

C. L. Holloway, E. F. Kuester, J. O. J. A. Gordon, J. Booth, and D. R. Smith, “An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces: The two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 54(2), 10–35 (2012).
[Crossref]

G. Bellisola and C. Sorio, “Infrared spectroscopy and microscopy in cancer research and diagnosis,” Am. J. Cancer Res. 2(1), 1–21 (2012).

S. Ogawa, K. Okada, N. Fukushima, and M. Kimata, “Wavelength selective uncooled infrared sensor by plasmonics,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 100(2), 021111 (2012).
[Crossref]

2010 (4)

N. Liu, M. Mesch, T. Weiss, M. Hentschel, and H. Giessen, “Infrared perfect absorber and its application as plasmonic sensor,” Nano Lett. 10(7), 2342–2348 (2010).
[Crossref]

C. M. Soukoulis and M. Wegener, “Optical metamaterials - more bulky and less lossy,” Science 330(6011), 1633–1634 (2010).
[Crossref]

B. Sepulveda, J. B. Gonzalez-Diaz, A. Garcia-Martin, L. M. Lechuga, and G. Armelles, “Plasmon-induced magneto-optical activity in nanosized gold disks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(14), 147401 (2010).
[Crossref]

L. Wang and Z. M. Zhang, “Effect of magnetic polaritons on the radiative properties of double-layer nanoslit arrays,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27(12), 2595–2604 (2010).
[Crossref]

2009 (1)

2008 (3)

B. J. Lee, Y. B. Chen, and Z. M. Zhang, “Transmission enhancement through nanoscale metallic slit arrays from the visible to mid-infrared,” J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 5(2), 201–213 (2008).
[Crossref]

T. Driscoll, S. Palit, M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, F. Keilmann, B. Chae, S. Yun, H. Kim, S. Y. Cho, N. M. Jokerst, D. R. Smith, and D. N. Basov, “Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 024101 (2008).
[Crossref]

N. Liu, H. Guo, L. Fu, S. Kaiser, H. Schweizer, and H. Giessen, “Three-dimensional photonic metamaterials at optical frequencies,” Nat. Mater. 7(1), 31–37 (2008).
[Crossref]

2007 (5)

M. Tonouchi, “Cutting-edge terahertz technology,” Nat. Photonics 1(2), 97–105 (2007).
[Crossref]

S. Galoda and G. Signh, “Fighting terrorism with terahertz,” IEEE Potentials 26(6), 24–29 (2007).
[Crossref]

W. Cai, U. K. Chettiar, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, “Optical cloaking with metamaterials,” Nat. Photonics 1(4), 224–227 (2007).
[Crossref]

M. Foldyna, K. Postava, D. Ciprian, and J. Pistora, “Modeling of magneto-optical properties of lamellar nanogratings,” J. Alloys Compd. 434-435, 581–583 (2007).
[Crossref]

A. P. Ayala, “Polymorphism in drugs investigated by low wavenumber raman scattering,” Vib. Spectrosc. 45(2), 112–116 (2007).
[Crossref]

2006 (2)

J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig, and D. R. Smith, “Controlling electromagnetic fields,” Science 312(5781), 1780–1782 (2006).
[Crossref]

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

2005 (1)

A. Huber, N. Ocelic, D. Kazantsev, and R. Hillenbrand, “Near-field imaging of mid-infrared surface phonon polariton propagation,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87(8), 081103 (2005).
[Crossref]

2003 (1)

W. L. Barnes, A. Dereux, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Surface plasmon subwavelength optics,” Nature 424(6950), 824–830 (2003).
[Crossref]

2002 (1)

R. Hillenbrand, T. Taubner, and F. Keilmann, “Phonon-enhanced light-matter interaction at the nanometre scale,” Nature 418(6894), 159–162 (2002).
[Crossref]

2000 (1)

Z. Q. Qiu and S. D. Bader, “Surface magneto-optic kerr effect,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71(3), 1243–1255 (2000).
[Crossref]

1988 (1)

1976 (1)

E. D. Palik, R. Kaplan, R. W. Gammon, H. Kaplan, R. F. Wallis, and J. J. Quinn, “Coupled surface magnetoplasmon-optic-phonon polariton modes on insb,” Phys. Rev. B 13(6), 2497–2506 (1976).
[Crossref]

A. Gordon, J. O. J.

C. L. Holloway, E. F. Kuester, J. O. J. A. Gordon, J. Booth, and D. R. Smith, “An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces: The two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 54(2), 10–35 (2012).
[Crossref]

Akgol, O.

F. Dincer, O. Akgol, M. Karaaslan, E. Unal, and C. Sabah, “Polarization angle independent perfect metamaterial absorbers for solar cell applications in the microwave, infrared, and visible regime,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. 144, 93–101 (2014).
[Crossref]

Alexander, R. W.

Antezza, M.

X. Liu, Y. Tian, F. Chen, A. Ghanekar, M. Antezza, and Y. Zheng, “Continuously variable emission for mechanical deformation induced radiative cooling,” Commun. Mater. 1(1), 95 (2020).
[Crossref]

S. A. H. Gangaraj, G. W. Hanson, and M. Antezza, “Robust entanglement with three-dimensional nonreciprocal photonic topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. A 95(6), 063807 (2017).
[Crossref]

P. Doyeux, S. A. H. Gangaraj, G. W. Hanson, and M. Antezza, “Giant interatomic energy-transport amplification with nonreciprocal photonic topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(17), 173901 (2017).
[Crossref]

Armelles, G.

G. Armelles, A. Cebollada, A. Garcia-Martin, and M. U. Gonzalez, “Magnetoplasmonics: Combining magnetic and plasmonic functionalities,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 1(1), 10–35 (2013).
[Crossref]

B. Sepulveda, J. B. Gonzalez-Diaz, A. Garcia-Martin, L. M. Lechuga, and G. Armelles, “Plasmon-induced magneto-optical activity in nanosized gold disks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(14), 147401 (2010).
[Crossref]

Atwater, H. A.

Ayala, A. P.

A. P. Ayala, “Polymorphism in drugs investigated by low wavenumber raman scattering,” Vib. Spectrosc. 45(2), 112–116 (2007).
[Crossref]

Aydin, K.

Bader, S. D.

Z. Q. Qiu and S. D. Bader, “Surface magneto-optic kerr effect,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71(3), 1243–1255 (2000).
[Crossref]

Ball, D. W.

D. W. Ball, “Wien’s displacement law as a function of frequency,” J. Chem. Educ. 90(9), 1250–1252 (2013).
[Crossref]

Baqir, M. A.

M. A. Baqir and P. K. Choudhury, “Hyperbolic metamaterial-based uv absorber,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 29(18), 1548–1551 (2017).
[Crossref]

Barnes, W. L.

W. L. Barnes, A. Dereux, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Surface plasmon subwavelength optics,” Nature 424(6950), 824–830 (2003).
[Crossref]

Basov, D. N.

T. Driscoll, S. Palit, M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, F. Keilmann, B. Chae, S. Yun, H. Kim, S. Y. Cho, N. M. Jokerst, D. R. Smith, and D. N. Basov, “Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 024101 (2008).
[Crossref]

Becton, M.

Z. Wang, P. Lv, M. Becton, J. Hong, L. Zhang, and X. Chen, “Mechanically tunable near-field radiative heat transfer between monolayer black phosphorus sheets,” Langmuir 36(40), 12038–12044 (2020).
[Crossref]

Behunin, R. O.

S. Sarkar, R. O. Behunin, and J. G. Gibbs, “Shape-dependent, chiro-optical response of uv-active, nanohelix metamaterials,” Nano Lett. 19(11), 8089–8096 (2019).
[Crossref]

Bell, R. J.

Bellisola, G.

G. Bellisola and C. Sorio, “Infrared spectroscopy and microscopy in cancer research and diagnosis,” Am. J. Cancer Res. 2(1), 1–21 (2012).

Bhaskaran, M.

P. Gutruf, C. Zou, W. Withayachumnankul, M. Bhaskaran, S. Sriram, and C. Fumeaux, “Mechanically tunable dielectric resonator metasurfaces at visible frequencies,” ACS Nano 10(1), 133–141 (2016).
[Crossref]

Bhattacharyya, S.

Biu, S. T.

T. H. Nguyen, S. T. Biu, X. C. Nguyen, D. L. Vu, and X. K. Bui, “Tunable broadband-negative-permeability metamaterials by hybridization at thz frequencies,” RSC Adv. 10(47), 28343–28350 (2020).
[Crossref]

Boltasseva, A.

A. V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, and V. M. Shalaev, “Planar photonics with metasurfaces,” Science 339(6125), 1232009 (2013).
[Crossref]

Booth, J.

C. L. Holloway, E. F. Kuester, J. O. J. A. Gordon, J. Booth, and D. R. Smith, “An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces: The two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 54(2), 10–35 (2012).
[Crossref]

Bossard, J. A.

J. P. Turpin, J. A. Bossard, K. L. Morgan, D. H. Werner, and P. L. Werner, “Reconfigurable and tunable metamaterials: A review of the theory and applications,” Int. J. Antennas and Propagation 2014, 1–18 (2014).
[Crossref]

Boyd, E. M.

Brehm, M.

T. Driscoll, S. Palit, M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, F. Keilmann, B. Chae, S. Yun, H. Kim, S. Y. Cho, N. M. Jokerst, D. R. Smith, and D. N. Basov, “Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 024101 (2008).
[Crossref]

Brongersma, M. L.

D. Lin, P. Fan, E. Hasman, and M. L. Brongersma, “Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements,” Science 345(6194), 298–302 (2014).
[Crossref]

Buchmann, E. V.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Bui, X. K.

T. H. Nguyen, S. T. Biu, X. C. Nguyen, D. L. Vu, and X. K. Bui, “Tunable broadband-negative-permeability metamaterials by hybridization at thz frequencies,” RSC Adv. 10(47), 28343–28350 (2020).
[Crossref]

Cai, L.

Y. Qu, Q. Li, K. Du, L. Cai, J. Lu, and M. Qiu, “Dynamic thermal emission control based on ultrathin plasmonic metamaterials including phase-changing material gst,” Laser Photonics Rev. 11(5), 1700091 (2017).
[Crossref]

Cai, W.

W. Cai, U. K. Chettiar, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, “Optical cloaking with metamaterials,” Nat. Photonics 1(4), 224–227 (2007).
[Crossref]

Caldwell, J. D.

J. D. Caldwell, L. Lindsay, V. Giannini, I. Vurgaftman, T. L. Reinecke, S. A. Maier, and O. J. Glembocki, “Low-loss, infrared and terahertz nanophotonics using surface phonon polaritons,” Nanophotonics 4(1), 44–68 (2015).
[Crossref]

Cao, S.

Y. Li, Y. Shen, S. Cao, X. Zhang, and Y. Meng, “Thermally triggered tunable vibration mitigation in hoberman spherical lattice metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 114(19), 191904 (2019).
[Crossref]

Cao, T.

T. Cao, X. Zhang, W. Dong, L. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Zhuang, J. Deng, X. Cheng, G. Li, and R. E. Simpson, “Tuneable thermal emission using chalcogenide metasurface,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(16), 1800169 (2018).
[Crossref]

Caratenuto, A.

Y. Tian, X. Liu, A. Ghanekar, F. Chen, A. Caratenuto, and Y. Zheng, “Blackbody-cavity ideal absorbers for solar energy harvesting,” Sci. Rep. 10(1), 20304 (2020).
[Crossref]

Cebollada, A.

G. Armelles, A. Cebollada, A. Garcia-Martin, and M. U. Gonzalez, “Magnetoplasmonics: Combining magnetic and plasmonic functionalities,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 1(1), 10–35 (2013).
[Crossref]

Chae, B.

T. Driscoll, S. Palit, M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, F. Keilmann, B. Chae, S. Yun, H. Kim, S. Y. Cho, N. M. Jokerst, D. R. Smith, and D. N. Basov, “Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 024101 (2008).
[Crossref]

Chen, F.

X. Liu, Y. Tian, F. Chen, A. Ghanekar, M. Antezza, and Y. Zheng, “Continuously variable emission for mechanical deformation induced radiative cooling,” Commun. Mater. 1(1), 95 (2020).
[Crossref]

F. Chen, Y. Cheng, and H. Luo, “A broadband tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber based on single-layer complementary gammadion-shaped graphene,” Materials 13(4), 860 (2020).
[Crossref]

Y. Tian, X. Liu, A. Ghanekar, F. Chen, A. Caratenuto, and Y. Zheng, “Blackbody-cavity ideal absorbers for solar energy harvesting,” Sci. Rep. 10(1), 20304 (2020).
[Crossref]

Chen, X.

Z. Wang, P. Lv, M. Becton, J. Hong, L. Zhang, and X. Chen, “Mechanically tunable near-field radiative heat transfer between monolayer black phosphorus sheets,” Langmuir 36(40), 12038–12044 (2020).
[Crossref]

Chen, Y. B.

B. J. Lee, Y. B. Chen, and Z. M. Zhang, “Transmission enhancement through nanoscale metallic slit arrays from the visible to mid-infrared,” J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 5(2), 201–213 (2008).
[Crossref]

Cheng, S.

Cheng, X.

T. Cao, X. Zhang, W. Dong, L. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Zhuang, J. Deng, X. Cheng, G. Li, and R. E. Simpson, “Tuneable thermal emission using chalcogenide metasurface,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(16), 1800169 (2018).
[Crossref]

Cheng, Y.

F. Chen, Y. Cheng, and H. Luo, “A broadband tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber based on single-layer complementary gammadion-shaped graphene,” Materials 13(4), 860 (2020).
[Crossref]

Cheon, H.

J. Son, S. J. Oh, and H. Cheon, “Potential clinical applications of terahertz radiation,” J. Appl. Phys. 125(19), 190901 (2019).
[Crossref]

Chettiar, U. K.

W. Cai, U. K. Chettiar, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, “Optical cloaking with metamaterials,” Nat. Photonics 1(4), 224–227 (2007).
[Crossref]

Cho, S. Y.

T. Driscoll, S. Palit, M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, F. Keilmann, B. Chae, S. Yun, H. Kim, S. Y. Cho, N. M. Jokerst, D. R. Smith, and D. N. Basov, “Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 024101 (2008).
[Crossref]

Choi, H. J.

C. Lee, H. J. Choi, and H. Jeong, “Tunable metasurfaces for visible and swir applications,” Nano Convergence 7(1), 3 (2020).
[Crossref]

Choudhury, P. K.

M. A. Baqir and P. K. Choudhury, “Hyperbolic metamaterial-based uv absorber,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 29(18), 1548–1551 (2017).
[Crossref]

Ciprian, D.

M. Foldyna, K. Postava, D. Ciprian, and J. Pistora, “Modeling of magneto-optical properties of lamellar nanogratings,” J. Alloys Compd. 434-435, 581–583 (2007).
[Crossref]

Connelly, M. P.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Corry, J. J.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Cuevas, J. C.

E. Moncada-Villa and J. C. Cuevas, “Near-field radiative heat transfer between one-dimensional magnetophotonic crystals,” Phys. Rev. B 103(7), 075432 (2021).
[Crossref]

E. Moncada-Villa, V. Fernanandez-Hurtado, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, A. Garcia-Martin, and J. C. Cuevas, “Magnetic field control of near-field radiative heat transfer and the realization of highly tunable hyperbolic thermal emitters,” Phys. Rev. B 92(12), 125418 (2015).
[Crossref]

Das, R.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Deng, J.

T. Cao, X. Zhang, W. Dong, L. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Zhuang, J. Deng, X. Cheng, G. Li, and R. E. Simpson, “Tuneable thermal emission using chalcogenide metasurface,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(16), 1800169 (2018).
[Crossref]

Deng, X.

Y. Qi, Y. Zhang, C. Liu, T. Zhang, B. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Deng, X. Wang, and Y. Yu, “A tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber composed of hourglass-shaped graphene arrays,” Nanomaterials 10(3), 533 (2020).
[Crossref]

Dereux, A.

W. L. Barnes, A. Dereux, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Surface plasmon subwavelength optics,” Nature 424(6950), 824–830 (2003).
[Crossref]

Desmet, K. D.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Dicken, M. J.

Dincer, F.

F. Dincer, O. Akgol, M. Karaaslan, E. Unal, and C. Sabah, “Polarization angle independent perfect metamaterial absorbers for solar cell applications in the microwave, infrared, and visible regime,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. 144, 93–101 (2014).
[Crossref]

Dong, W.

T. Cao, X. Zhang, W. Dong, L. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Zhuang, J. Deng, X. Cheng, G. Li, and R. E. Simpson, “Tuneable thermal emission using chalcogenide metasurface,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(16), 1800169 (2018).
[Crossref]

Dovi, J. V.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Doyeux, P.

P. Doyeux, S. A. H. Gangaraj, G. W. Hanson, and M. Antezza, “Giant interatomic energy-transport amplification with nonreciprocal photonic topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(17), 173901 (2017).
[Crossref]

Driscoll, T.

T. Driscoll, S. Palit, M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, F. Keilmann, B. Chae, S. Yun, H. Kim, S. Y. Cho, N. M. Jokerst, D. R. Smith, and D. N. Basov, “Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 024101 (2008).
[Crossref]

Du, K.

Y. Qu, Q. Li, K. Du, L. Cai, J. Lu, and M. Qiu, “Dynamic thermal emission control based on ultrathin plasmonic metamaterials including phase-changing material gst,” Laser Photonics Rev. 11(5), 1700091 (2017).
[Crossref]

Ebbesen, T. W.

W. L. Barnes, A. Dereux, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Surface plasmon subwavelength optics,” Nature 424(6950), 824–830 (2003).
[Crossref]

Eells, J. T.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Fan, P.

D. Lin, P. Fan, E. Hasman, and M. L. Brongersma, “Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements,” Science 345(6194), 298–302 (2014).
[Crossref]

Fan, S.

B. Zhao, Y. Shi, J. Wang, Z. Zhao, N. Zhao, and S. Fan, “Near-complete violation of kirchhoff’s law of thermal radiation with a 0.3 t magnetic field,” Opt. Lett. 44(17), 4203–4206 (2019).
[Crossref]

D. A. B. Miller, L. Zhu, and S. Fan, “Universal modal radiation laws for all thermal emitters,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114(17), 4336–4341 (2017).
[Crossref]

L. Zhu and S. Fan, “Near-complete violation of detailed balance in thermal radiation,” Phys. Rev. B 90(22), 220301 (2014).
[Crossref]

Fang, C.

Y. Liu, C. Fang, G. Han, Y. Shao, Y. Huang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Ultrathin corrugated metallic strips for ultrawideband surface wave trapping at terahertz frequencies,” IEEE Photonics J. 9(1), 1–8 (2017).
[Crossref]

Feng, C.

X. Su, C. Feng, Y. Zeng, and H. Yu, “A dual-band tunable metamaterial absorber based on pneumatic actuation mechanism,” Opt. Commun. 459, 124885 (2020).
[Crossref]

Fernanandez-Hurtado, V.

E. Moncada-Villa, V. Fernanandez-Hurtado, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, A. Garcia-Martin, and J. C. Cuevas, “Magnetic field control of near-field radiative heat transfer and the realization of highly tunable hyperbolic thermal emitters,” Phys. Rev. B 92(12), 125418 (2015).
[Crossref]

Foldyna, M.

M. Foldyna, K. Postava, D. Ciprian, and J. Pistora, “Modeling of magneto-optical properties of lamellar nanogratings,” J. Alloys Compd. 434-435, 581–583 (2007).
[Crossref]

Fu, C.

Z. M. Zhang, X. Wu, and C. Fu, “Validity of kirchhoff’s law for semitransparent films made of anisotropic materials,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 245, 106904 (2020).
[Crossref]

Fu, L.

N. Liu, H. Guo, L. Fu, S. Kaiser, H. Schweizer, and H. Giessen, “Three-dimensional photonic metamaterials at optical frequencies,” Nat. Mater. 7(1), 31–37 (2008).
[Crossref]

Fukushima, N.

S. Ogawa, K. Okada, N. Fukushima, and M. Kimata, “Wavelength selective uncooled infrared sensor by plasmonics,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 100(2), 021111 (2012).
[Crossref]

Fumeaux, C.

P. Gutruf, C. Zou, W. Withayachumnankul, M. Bhaskaran, S. Sriram, and C. Fumeaux, “Mechanically tunable dielectric resonator metasurfaces at visible frequencies,” ACS Nano 10(1), 133–141 (2016).
[Crossref]

Galoda, S.

S. Galoda and G. Signh, “Fighting terrorism with terahertz,” IEEE Potentials 26(6), 24–29 (2007).
[Crossref]

Gammon, R. W.

E. D. Palik, R. Kaplan, R. W. Gammon, H. Kaplan, R. F. Wallis, and J. J. Quinn, “Coupled surface magnetoplasmon-optic-phonon polariton modes on insb,” Phys. Rev. B 13(6), 2497–2506 (1976).
[Crossref]

Gan, Q.

K. Liu, S. Jiang, D. Ji, X. Zeng, N. Zhang, H. Song, Y. Xu, and Q. Gan, “Super absorbing ultraviolet metasurface,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27(14), 1539–1542 (2015).
[Crossref]

Gangaraj, S. A. H.

P. Doyeux, S. A. H. Gangaraj, G. W. Hanson, and M. Antezza, “Giant interatomic energy-transport amplification with nonreciprocal photonic topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(17), 173901 (2017).
[Crossref]

S. A. H. Gangaraj, G. W. Hanson, and M. Antezza, “Robust entanglement with three-dimensional nonreciprocal photonic topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. A 95(6), 063807 (2017).
[Crossref]

Garcia-Martin, A.

E. Moncada-Villa, V. Fernanandez-Hurtado, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, A. Garcia-Martin, and J. C. Cuevas, “Magnetic field control of near-field radiative heat transfer and the realization of highly tunable hyperbolic thermal emitters,” Phys. Rev. B 92(12), 125418 (2015).
[Crossref]

G. Armelles, A. Cebollada, A. Garcia-Martin, and M. U. Gonzalez, “Magnetoplasmonics: Combining magnetic and plasmonic functionalities,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 1(1), 10–35 (2013).
[Crossref]

B. Sepulveda, J. B. Gonzalez-Diaz, A. Garcia-Martin, L. M. Lechuga, and G. Armelles, “Plasmon-induced magneto-optical activity in nanosized gold disks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(14), 147401 (2010).
[Crossref]

Garcia-Vidal, F. J.

E. Moncada-Villa, V. Fernanandez-Hurtado, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, A. Garcia-Martin, and J. C. Cuevas, “Magnetic field control of near-field radiative heat transfer and the realization of highly tunable hyperbolic thermal emitters,” Phys. Rev. B 92(12), 125418 (2015).
[Crossref]

Ghanekar, A.

X. Liu, Y. Tian, F. Chen, A. Ghanekar, M. Antezza, and Y. Zheng, “Continuously variable emission for mechanical deformation induced radiative cooling,” Commun. Mater. 1(1), 95 (2020).
[Crossref]

Y. Tian, X. Liu, A. Ghanekar, F. Chen, A. Caratenuto, and Y. Zheng, “Blackbody-cavity ideal absorbers for solar energy harvesting,” Sci. Rep. 10(1), 20304 (2020).
[Crossref]

A. Ghanekar, M. Ricci, Y. Tian, O. Gregory, and Y. Zheng, “Strain-induced modulation of near-field radiative transfer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 112(24), 241104 (2018).
[Crossref]

A. Ghanekar, J. Ji, and Y. Zheng, “High-rectification near-field thermal diode using phase change period nanostructure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 109(12), 123106 (2016).
[Crossref]

A. Ghanekar, L. Lin, and Y. Zheng, “Novel and efficient mie-metamaterial thermal emitter for thermophotovoltaic systems,” Opt. Express 24(10), A868 (2016).
[Crossref]

Giannini, V.

J. D. Caldwell, L. Lindsay, V. Giannini, I. Vurgaftman, T. L. Reinecke, S. A. Maier, and O. J. Glembocki, “Low-loss, infrared and terahertz nanophotonics using surface phonon polaritons,” Nanophotonics 4(1), 44–68 (2015).
[Crossref]

Gibbs, J. G.

S. Sarkar, R. O. Behunin, and J. G. Gibbs, “Shape-dependent, chiro-optical response of uv-active, nanohelix metamaterials,” Nano Lett. 19(11), 8089–8096 (2019).
[Crossref]

Giessen, H.

N. Liu, M. Mesch, T. Weiss, M. Hentschel, and H. Giessen, “Infrared perfect absorber and its application as plasmonic sensor,” Nano Lett. 10(7), 2342–2348 (2010).
[Crossref]

N. Liu, H. Guo, L. Fu, S. Kaiser, H. Schweizer, and H. Giessen, “Three-dimensional photonic metamaterials at optical frequencies,” Nat. Mater. 7(1), 31–37 (2008).
[Crossref]

Glembocki, O. J.

J. D. Caldwell, L. Lindsay, V. Giannini, I. Vurgaftman, T. L. Reinecke, S. A. Maier, and O. J. Glembocki, “Low-loss, infrared and terahertz nanophotonics using surface phonon polaritons,” Nanophotonics 4(1), 44–68 (2015).
[Crossref]

Gonzalez, M. U.

G. Armelles, A. Cebollada, A. Garcia-Martin, and M. U. Gonzalez, “Magnetoplasmonics: Combining magnetic and plasmonic functionalities,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 1(1), 10–35 (2013).
[Crossref]

Gonzalez-Diaz, J. B.

B. Sepulveda, J. B. Gonzalez-Diaz, A. Garcia-Martin, L. M. Lechuga, and G. Armelles, “Plasmon-induced magneto-optical activity in nanosized gold disks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(14), 147401 (2010).
[Crossref]

Gould, L. J.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Gregory, O.

A. Ghanekar, M. Ricci, Y. Tian, O. Gregory, and Y. Zheng, “Strain-induced modulation of near-field radiative transfer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 112(24), 241104 (2018).
[Crossref]

Guo, H.

N. Liu, H. Guo, L. Fu, S. Kaiser, H. Schweizer, and H. Giessen, “Three-dimensional photonic metamaterials at optical frequencies,” Nat. Mater. 7(1), 31–37 (2008).
[Crossref]

Gutruf, P.

P. Gutruf, C. Zou, W. Withayachumnankul, M. Bhaskaran, S. Sriram, and C. Fumeaux, “Mechanically tunable dielectric resonator metasurfaces at visible frequencies,” ACS Nano 10(1), 133–141 (2016).
[Crossref]

Han, G.

Y. Liu, C. Fang, G. Han, Y. Shao, Y. Huang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Ultrathin corrugated metallic strips for ultrawideband surface wave trapping at terahertz frequencies,” IEEE Photonics J. 9(1), 1–8 (2017).
[Crossref]

Hanson, G. W.

P. Doyeux, S. A. H. Gangaraj, G. W. Hanson, and M. Antezza, “Giant interatomic energy-transport amplification with nonreciprocal photonic topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(17), 173901 (2017).
[Crossref]

S. A. H. Gangaraj, G. W. Hanson, and M. Antezza, “Robust entanglement with three-dimensional nonreciprocal photonic topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. A 95(6), 063807 (2017).
[Crossref]

Hao, Y.

Y. Liu, C. Fang, G. Han, Y. Shao, Y. Huang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Ultrathin corrugated metallic strips for ultrawideband surface wave trapping at terahertz frequencies,” IEEE Photonics J. 9(1), 1–8 (2017).
[Crossref]

Hasman, E.

D. Lin, P. Fan, E. Hasman, and M. L. Brongersma, “Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements,” Science 345(6194), 298–302 (2014).
[Crossref]

Henry, M. M.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Henshel, D. S.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Hentschel, M.

N. Liu, M. Mesch, T. Weiss, M. Hentschel, and H. Giessen, “Infrared perfect absorber and its application as plasmonic sensor,” Nano Lett. 10(7), 2342–2348 (2010).
[Crossref]

Hillenbrand, R.

A. Huber, N. Ocelic, D. Kazantsev, and R. Hillenbrand, “Near-field imaging of mid-infrared surface phonon polariton propagation,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87(8), 081103 (2005).
[Crossref]

R. Hillenbrand, T. Taubner, and F. Keilmann, “Phonon-enhanced light-matter interaction at the nanometre scale,” Nature 418(6894), 159–162 (2002).
[Crossref]

Hodgson, B. D.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Holloway, C. L.

C. L. Holloway, E. F. Kuester, J. O. J. A. Gordon, J. Booth, and D. R. Smith, “An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces: The two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 54(2), 10–35 (2012).
[Crossref]

Hong, J.

Z. Wang, P. Lv, M. Becton, J. Hong, L. Zhang, and X. Chen, “Mechanically tunable near-field radiative heat transfer between monolayer black phosphorus sheets,” Langmuir 36(40), 12038–12044 (2020).
[Crossref]

Hu, B.

B. Hu, Y. Zhang, and Q. J. Wang, “Surface magneto plasmons and their applications in the infrared frequencies,” Nanomaterials 4(4), 383–396 (2015).
[Crossref]

Hu, H.

K. Li, X. Ma, Z. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Hu, Y. Xu, and G. Song, “Highly tunable terahertz filter with magneto-optical bragg grating formed in semiconductor-insulator-semiconductor waveguides,” AIP Adv. 3(6), 062130 (2013).
[Crossref]

Huang, Y.

Y. Liu, C. Fang, G. Han, Y. Shao, Y. Huang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Ultrathin corrugated metallic strips for ultrawideband surface wave trapping at terahertz frequencies,” IEEE Photonics J. 9(1), 1–8 (2017).
[Crossref]

Huber, A.

A. Huber, N. Ocelic, D. Kazantsev, and R. Hillenbrand, “Near-field imaging of mid-infrared surface phonon polariton propagation,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87(8), 081103 (2005).
[Crossref]

Jain, P. K.

Jeong, H.

C. Lee, H. J. Choi, and H. Jeong, “Tunable metasurfaces for visible and swir applications,” Nano Convergence 7(1), 3 (2020).
[Crossref]

Jett, M.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Ji, D.

K. Liu, S. Jiang, D. Ji, X. Zeng, N. Zhang, H. Song, Y. Xu, and Q. Gan, “Super absorbing ultraviolet metasurface,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27(14), 1539–1542 (2015).
[Crossref]

Ji, J.

A. Ghanekar, J. Ji, and Y. Zheng, “High-rectification near-field thermal diode using phase change period nanostructure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 109(12), 123106 (2016).
[Crossref]

Jia, X.

X. Jia, X. Wang, C. Yuan, Q. Meng, and Z. Zhou, “Novel dynamic tuning of broadband visible metamaterial perfect absorber using graphene,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 120(3), 033101 (2016).
[Crossref]

Jiang, S.

K. Liu, S. Jiang, D. Ji, X. Zeng, N. Zhang, H. Song, Y. Xu, and Q. Gan, “Super absorbing ultraviolet metasurface,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27(14), 1539–1542 (2015).
[Crossref]

Jokerst, N. M.

T. Driscoll, S. Palit, M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, F. Keilmann, B. Chae, S. Yun, H. Kim, S. Y. Cho, N. M. Jokerst, D. R. Smith, and D. N. Basov, “Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 024101 (2008).
[Crossref]

Kaiser, S.

N. Liu, H. Guo, L. Fu, S. Kaiser, H. Schweizer, and H. Giessen, “Three-dimensional photonic metamaterials at optical frequencies,” Nat. Mater. 7(1), 31–37 (2008).
[Crossref]

Kaplan, H.

E. D. Palik, R. Kaplan, R. W. Gammon, H. Kaplan, R. F. Wallis, and J. J. Quinn, “Coupled surface magnetoplasmon-optic-phonon polariton modes on insb,” Phys. Rev. B 13(6), 2497–2506 (1976).
[Crossref]

Kaplan, R.

E. D. Palik, R. Kaplan, R. W. Gammon, H. Kaplan, R. F. Wallis, and J. J. Quinn, “Coupled surface magnetoplasmon-optic-phonon polariton modes on insb,” Phys. Rev. B 13(6), 2497–2506 (1976).
[Crossref]

Karaaslan, M.

F. Dincer, O. Akgol, M. Karaaslan, E. Unal, and C. Sabah, “Polarization angle independent perfect metamaterial absorbers for solar cell applications in the microwave, infrared, and visible regime,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. 144, 93–101 (2014).
[Crossref]

Kazantsev, D.

A. Huber, N. Ocelic, D. Kazantsev, and R. Hillenbrand, “Near-field imaging of mid-infrared surface phonon polariton propagation,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87(8), 081103 (2005).
[Crossref]

Keilmann, F.

T. Driscoll, S. Palit, M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, F. Keilmann, B. Chae, S. Yun, H. Kim, S. Y. Cho, N. M. Jokerst, D. R. Smith, and D. N. Basov, “Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 024101 (2008).
[Crossref]

R. Hillenbrand, T. Taubner, and F. Keilmann, “Phonon-enhanced light-matter interaction at the nanometre scale,” Nature 418(6894), 159–162 (2002).
[Crossref]

Kildishev, A. V.

A. V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, and V. M. Shalaev, “Planar photonics with metasurfaces,” Science 339(6125), 1232009 (2013).
[Crossref]

W. Cai, U. K. Chettiar, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, “Optical cloaking with metamaterials,” Nat. Photonics 1(4), 224–227 (2007).
[Crossref]

Kim, H.

T. Driscoll, S. Palit, M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, F. Keilmann, B. Chae, S. Yun, H. Kim, S. Y. Cho, N. M. Jokerst, D. R. Smith, and D. N. Basov, “Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 024101 (2008).
[Crossref]

Kimata, M.

S. Ogawa, K. Okada, N. Fukushima, and M. Kimata, “Wavelength selective uncooled infrared sensor by plasmonics,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 100(2), 021111 (2012).
[Crossref]

Krishna, S.

Kuester, E. F.

C. L. Holloway, E. F. Kuester, J. O. J. A. Gordon, J. Booth, and D. R. Smith, “An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces: The two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 54(2), 10–35 (2012).
[Crossref]

Lakhtakia, A.

Lechuga, L. M.

B. Sepulveda, J. B. Gonzalez-Diaz, A. Garcia-Martin, L. M. Lechuga, and G. Armelles, “Plasmon-induced magneto-optical activity in nanosized gold disks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(14), 147401 (2010).
[Crossref]

Lee, B. J.

B. J. Lee, Y. B. Chen, and Z. M. Zhang, “Transmission enhancement through nanoscale metallic slit arrays from the visible to mid-infrared,” J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 5(2), 201–213 (2008).
[Crossref]

Lee, C.

C. Lee, H. J. Choi, and H. Jeong, “Tunable metasurfaces for visible and swir applications,” Nano Convergence 7(1), 3 (2020).
[Crossref]

Li, G.

T. Cao, X. Zhang, W. Dong, L. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Zhuang, J. Deng, X. Cheng, G. Li, and R. E. Simpson, “Tuneable thermal emission using chalcogenide metasurface,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(16), 1800169 (2018).
[Crossref]

Li, K.

K. Li, X. Ma, Z. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Hu, Y. Xu, and G. Song, “Highly tunable terahertz filter with magneto-optical bragg grating formed in semiconductor-insulator-semiconductor waveguides,” AIP Adv. 3(6), 062130 (2013).
[Crossref]

Li, Q.

Y. Qu, Q. Li, K. Du, L. Cai, J. Lu, and M. Qiu, “Dynamic thermal emission control based on ultrathin plasmonic metamaterials including phase-changing material gst,” Laser Photonics Rev. 11(5), 1700091 (2017).
[Crossref]

Li, Y.

Y. Li, Y. Shen, S. Cao, X. Zhang, and Y. Meng, “Thermally triggered tunable vibration mitigation in hoberman spherical lattice metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 114(19), 191904 (2019).
[Crossref]

Liang, H. L.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Liang, Z.

P. Liu, Z. Liang, Z. Lin, Z. Xu, R. Xu, D. Yao, and Y. Lin, “Actively tunable terahertz chain-link metamaterial with bidirectional polarization-dependent characteristic,” Sci. Rep. 9(1), 9917 (2019).
[Crossref]

Lim, J.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Lin, D.

D. Lin, P. Fan, E. Hasman, and M. L. Brongersma, “Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements,” Science 345(6194), 298–302 (2014).
[Crossref]

Lin, L.

Lin, Y.

R. Xu and Y. Lin, “Tunable infrared metamaterial emitter for gas sensing application,” Nanomaterials 10(8), 1442 (2020).
[Crossref]

H. Ou, F. Lu, Z. Xu, and Y. Lin, “Terahertz metamaterial with multiple resonances for biosensing application,” Nanomaterials 10(6), 1038 (2020).
[Crossref]

P. Liu, Z. Liang, Z. Lin, Z. Xu, R. Xu, D. Yao, and Y. Lin, “Actively tunable terahertz chain-link metamaterial with bidirectional polarization-dependent characteristic,” Sci. Rep. 9(1), 9917 (2019).
[Crossref]

Z. Xu, Z. Lin, S. Cheng, and Y. Lin, “Reconfigurable and tunable terahertz wrenchshape metamaterial performing programmable characteristic,” Opt. Lett. 44(16), 3944–3947 (2019).
[Crossref]

Z. Xu and Y. Lin, “A stretchable terahertz parabolic-shaped metamaterial,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 7(19), 1900379 (2019).
[Crossref]

R. Xu, J. Luo, J. Sha, J. Zhong, Z. Xu, Y. Tong, and Y. Lin, “Stretchable ir metamaterial with ultra-narrowband perfect absorption,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 113(10), 101907 (2018).
[Crossref]

Lin, Z.

Z. Xu, Z. Lin, S. Cheng, and Y. Lin, “Reconfigurable and tunable terahertz wrenchshape metamaterial performing programmable characteristic,” Opt. Lett. 44(16), 3944–3947 (2019).
[Crossref]

P. Liu, Z. Liang, Z. Lin, Z. Xu, R. Xu, D. Yao, and Y. Lin, “Actively tunable terahertz chain-link metamaterial with bidirectional polarization-dependent characteristic,” Sci. Rep. 9(1), 9917 (2019).
[Crossref]

Lindsay, L.

J. D. Caldwell, L. Lindsay, V. Giannini, I. Vurgaftman, T. L. Reinecke, S. A. Maier, and O. J. Glembocki, “Low-loss, infrared and terahertz nanophotonics using surface phonon polaritons,” Nanophotonics 4(1), 44–68 (2015).
[Crossref]

Liptunga, A. I.

V. I. Pipa, A. I. Liptunga, and V. Morozhenko, “Thermal emission of one-dimensional magnetophotonic crystals,” J. Opt. 15(7), 075104 (2013).
[Crossref]

Liu, C.

Y. Qi, Y. Zhang, C. Liu, T. Zhang, B. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Deng, X. Wang, and Y. Yu, “A tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber composed of hourglass-shaped graphene arrays,” Nanomaterials 10(3), 533 (2020).
[Crossref]

Liu, J.

X. Luo, M. Zhou, J. Liu, T. Qiu, and Z. Yu, “Magneto-optical metamaterials with extraordinarily strong magneto-optical effect,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 108(13), 131104 (2016).
[Crossref]

Liu, K.

K. Liu, S. Jiang, D. Ji, X. Zeng, N. Zhang, H. Song, Y. Xu, and Q. Gan, “Super absorbing ultraviolet metasurface,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27(14), 1539–1542 (2015).
[Crossref]

Liu, N.

N. Liu, M. Mesch, T. Weiss, M. Hentschel, and H. Giessen, “Infrared perfect absorber and its application as plasmonic sensor,” Nano Lett. 10(7), 2342–2348 (2010).
[Crossref]

N. Liu, H. Guo, L. Fu, S. Kaiser, H. Schweizer, and H. Giessen, “Three-dimensional photonic metamaterials at optical frequencies,” Nat. Mater. 7(1), 31–37 (2008).
[Crossref]

Liu, P.

P. Liu, Z. Liang, Z. Lin, Z. Xu, R. Xu, D. Yao, and Y. Lin, “Actively tunable terahertz chain-link metamaterial with bidirectional polarization-dependent characteristic,” Sci. Rep. 9(1), 9917 (2019).
[Crossref]

Liu, X.

X. Liu, Y. Tian, F. Chen, A. Ghanekar, M. Antezza, and Y. Zheng, “Continuously variable emission for mechanical deformation induced radiative cooling,” Commun. Mater. 1(1), 95 (2020).
[Crossref]

Y. Tian, X. Liu, A. Ghanekar, F. Chen, A. Caratenuto, and Y. Zheng, “Blackbody-cavity ideal absorbers for solar energy harvesting,” Sci. Rep. 10(1), 20304 (2020).
[Crossref]

Liu, Y.

Y. Liu, C. Fang, G. Han, Y. Shao, Y. Huang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Ultrathin corrugated metallic strips for ultrawideband surface wave trapping at terahertz frequencies,” IEEE Photonics J. 9(1), 1–8 (2017).
[Crossref]

Lu, F.

H. Ou, F. Lu, Z. Xu, and Y. Lin, “Terahertz metamaterial with multiple resonances for biosensing application,” Nanomaterials 10(6), 1038 (2020).
[Crossref]

Lu, J.

Y. Qu, Q. Li, K. Du, L. Cai, J. Lu, and M. Qiu, “Dynamic thermal emission control based on ultrathin plasmonic metamaterials including phase-changing material gst,” Laser Photonics Rev. 11(5), 1700091 (2017).
[Crossref]

Lu, L.

T. Cao, X. Zhang, W. Dong, L. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Zhuang, J. Deng, X. Cheng, G. Li, and R. E. Simpson, “Tuneable thermal emission using chalcogenide metasurface,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(16), 1800169 (2018).
[Crossref]

Luo, H.

F. Chen, Y. Cheng, and H. Luo, “A broadband tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber based on single-layer complementary gammadion-shaped graphene,” Materials 13(4), 860 (2020).
[Crossref]

Luo, J.

R. Xu, J. Luo, J. Sha, J. Zhong, Z. Xu, Y. Tong, and Y. Lin, “Stretchable ir metamaterial with ultra-narrowband perfect absorption,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 113(10), 101907 (2018).
[Crossref]

Luo, X.

X. Luo, M. Zhou, J. Liu, T. Qiu, and Z. Yu, “Magneto-optical metamaterials with extraordinarily strong magneto-optical effect,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 108(13), 131104 (2016).
[Crossref]

Lv, P.

Z. Wang, P. Lv, M. Becton, J. Hong, L. Zhang, and X. Chen, “Mechanically tunable near-field radiative heat transfer between monolayer black phosphorus sheets,” Langmuir 36(40), 12038–12044 (2020).
[Crossref]

Ma, X.

K. Li, X. Ma, Z. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Hu, Y. Xu, and G. Song, “Highly tunable terahertz filter with magneto-optical bragg grating formed in semiconductor-insulator-semiconductor waveguides,” AIP Adv. 3(6), 062130 (2013).
[Crossref]

Maier, S. A.

J. D. Caldwell, L. Lindsay, V. Giannini, I. Vurgaftman, T. L. Reinecke, S. A. Maier, and O. J. Glembocki, “Low-loss, infrared and terahertz nanophotonics using surface phonon polaritons,” Nanophotonics 4(1), 44–68 (2015).
[Crossref]

Makarov, D.

V. V. Temnov, I. Razdolski, T. Pezeril, D. Makarov, D. Seletskiy, A. Melnikov, and K. A. Nelson, “Towards the nonlinear acousto-magnetoplasmonics,” J. Opt. 18(9), 093002 (2016).
[Crossref]

Margolis, D.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Massa, A.

G. Oliveri, D. H. Werner, and A. Massa, “Reconfigurable electromagnetics through metamaterials - a review,” Proc. IEEE 103(7), 1034–1056 (2015).
[Crossref]

Melnikov, A.

V. V. Temnov, I. Razdolski, T. Pezeril, D. Makarov, D. Seletskiy, A. Melnikov, and K. A. Nelson, “Towards the nonlinear acousto-magnetoplasmonics,” J. Opt. 18(9), 093002 (2016).
[Crossref]

Meng, Q.

X. Jia, X. Wang, C. Yuan, Q. Meng, and Z. Zhou, “Novel dynamic tuning of broadband visible metamaterial perfect absorber using graphene,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 120(3), 033101 (2016).
[Crossref]

Meng, Y.

Y. Li, Y. Shen, S. Cao, X. Zhang, and Y. Meng, “Thermally triggered tunable vibration mitigation in hoberman spherical lattice metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 114(19), 191904 (2019).
[Crossref]

Mesch, M.

N. Liu, M. Mesch, T. Weiss, M. Hentschel, and H. Giessen, “Infrared perfect absorber and its application as plasmonic sensor,” Nano Lett. 10(7), 2342–2348 (2010).
[Crossref]

Miller, D. A. B.

D. A. B. Miller, L. Zhu, and S. Fan, “Universal modal radiation laws for all thermal emitters,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114(17), 4336–4341 (2017).
[Crossref]

Millsap, D. S.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Mitchell, A.

H. Wang, V. P. Sivan, A. Mitchell, G. Rosengarten, and P. Phelan, “Highly efficient selective metamaterial absorber for high-temperature solar thermal energy harvesting,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 137, 235–242 (2015).
[Crossref]

Moncada-Villa, E.

E. Moncada-Villa and J. C. Cuevas, “Near-field radiative heat transfer between one-dimensional magnetophotonic crystals,” Phys. Rev. B 103(7), 075432 (2021).
[Crossref]

E. Moncada-Villa, V. Fernanandez-Hurtado, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, A. Garcia-Martin, and J. C. Cuevas, “Magnetic field control of near-field radiative heat transfer and the realization of highly tunable hyperbolic thermal emitters,” Phys. Rev. B 92(12), 125418 (2015).
[Crossref]

Montoya, J. A.

Morgan, K. L.

J. P. Turpin, J. A. Bossard, K. L. Morgan, D. H. Werner, and P. L. Werner, “Reconfigurable and tunable metamaterials: A review of the theory and applications,” Int. J. Antennas and Propagation 2014, 1–18 (2014).
[Crossref]

Morozhenko, V.

V. I. Pipa, A. I. Liptunga, and V. Morozhenko, “Thermal emission of one-dimensional magnetophotonic crystals,” J. Opt. 15(7), 075104 (2013).
[Crossref]

Nelson, K. A.

V. V. Temnov, I. Razdolski, T. Pezeril, D. Makarov, D. Seletskiy, A. Melnikov, and K. A. Nelson, “Towards the nonlinear acousto-magnetoplasmonics,” J. Opt. 18(9), 093002 (2016).
[Crossref]

Newquist, L. A.

Nguyen, T. H.

T. H. Nguyen, S. T. Biu, X. C. Nguyen, D. L. Vu, and X. K. Bui, “Tunable broadband-negative-permeability metamaterials by hybridization at thz frequencies,” RSC Adv. 10(47), 28343–28350 (2020).
[Crossref]

Nguyen, X. C.

T. H. Nguyen, S. T. Biu, X. C. Nguyen, D. L. Vu, and X. K. Bui, “Tunable broadband-negative-permeability metamaterials by hybridization at thz frequencies,” RSC Adv. 10(47), 28343–28350 (2020).
[Crossref]

Ocelic, N.

A. Huber, N. Ocelic, D. Kazantsev, and R. Hillenbrand, “Near-field imaging of mid-infrared surface phonon polariton propagation,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87(8), 081103 (2005).
[Crossref]

Ogawa, S.

S. Ogawa, K. Okada, N. Fukushima, and M. Kimata, “Wavelength selective uncooled infrared sensor by plasmonics,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 100(2), 021111 (2012).
[Crossref]

Oh, S. J.

J. Son, S. J. Oh, and H. Cheon, “Potential clinical applications of terahertz radiation,” J. Appl. Phys. 125(19), 190901 (2019).
[Crossref]

Okada, K.

S. Ogawa, K. Okada, N. Fukushima, and M. Kimata, “Wavelength selective uncooled infrared sensor by plasmonics,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 100(2), 021111 (2012).
[Crossref]

Oliveri, G.

G. Oliveri, D. H. Werner, and A. Massa, “Reconfigurable electromagnetics through metamaterials - a review,” Proc. IEEE 103(7), 1034–1056 (2015).
[Crossref]

Ordal, M. A.

Ou, H.

H. Ou, F. Lu, Z. Xu, and Y. Lin, “Terahertz metamaterial with multiple resonances for biosensing application,” Nanomaterials 10(6), 1038 (2020).
[Crossref]

Padilla, W. J.

Palik, E. D.

E. D. Palik, R. Kaplan, R. W. Gammon, H. Kaplan, R. F. Wallis, and J. J. Quinn, “Coupled surface magnetoplasmon-optic-phonon polariton modes on insb,” Phys. Rev. B 13(6), 2497–2506 (1976).
[Crossref]

Palit, S.

T. Driscoll, S. Palit, M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, F. Keilmann, B. Chae, S. Yun, H. Kim, S. Y. Cho, N. M. Jokerst, D. R. Smith, and D. N. Basov, “Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 024101 (2008).
[Crossref]

Paz, D. A.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Pendry, J. B.

J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig, and D. R. Smith, “Controlling electromagnetic fields,” Science 312(5781), 1780–1782 (2006).
[Crossref]

Pezeril, T.

V. V. Temnov, I. Razdolski, T. Pezeril, D. Makarov, D. Seletskiy, A. Melnikov, and K. A. Nelson, “Towards the nonlinear acousto-magnetoplasmonics,” J. Opt. 18(9), 093002 (2016).
[Crossref]

Phelan, P.

H. Wang, V. P. Sivan, A. Mitchell, G. Rosengarten, and P. Phelan, “Highly efficient selective metamaterial absorber for high-temperature solar thermal energy harvesting,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 137, 235–242 (2015).
[Crossref]

Pipa, V. I.

V. I. Pipa, A. I. Liptunga, and V. Morozhenko, “Thermal emission of one-dimensional magnetophotonic crystals,” J. Opt. 15(7), 075104 (2013).
[Crossref]

Pistora, J.

M. Foldyna, K. Postava, D. Ciprian, and J. Pistora, “Modeling of magneto-optical properties of lamellar nanogratings,” J. Alloys Compd. 434-435, 581–583 (2007).
[Crossref]

Postava, K.

M. Foldyna, K. Postava, D. Ciprian, and J. Pistora, “Modeling of magneto-optical properties of lamellar nanogratings,” J. Alloys Compd. 434-435, 581–583 (2007).
[Crossref]

Pryce, I. M.

Qazilbash, M. M.

T. Driscoll, S. Palit, M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, F. Keilmann, B. Chae, S. Yun, H. Kim, S. Y. Cho, N. M. Jokerst, D. R. Smith, and D. N. Basov, “Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 024101 (2008).
[Crossref]

Qi, Y.

Y. Qi, Y. Zhang, C. Liu, T. Zhang, B. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Deng, X. Wang, and Y. Yu, “A tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber composed of hourglass-shaped graphene arrays,” Nanomaterials 10(3), 533 (2020).
[Crossref]

Qiu, M.

Y. Qu, Q. Li, K. Du, L. Cai, J. Lu, and M. Qiu, “Dynamic thermal emission control based on ultrathin plasmonic metamaterials including phase-changing material gst,” Laser Photonics Rev. 11(5), 1700091 (2017).
[Crossref]

Qiu, T.

X. Luo, M. Zhou, J. Liu, T. Qiu, and Z. Yu, “Magneto-optical metamaterials with extraordinarily strong magneto-optical effect,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 108(13), 131104 (2016).
[Crossref]

Qiu, Z. Q.

Z. Q. Qiu and S. D. Bader, “Surface magneto-optic kerr effect,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71(3), 1243–1255 (2000).
[Crossref]

Qu, Y.

Y. Qu, Q. Li, K. Du, L. Cai, J. Lu, and M. Qiu, “Dynamic thermal emission control based on ultrathin plasmonic metamaterials including phase-changing material gst,” Laser Photonics Rev. 11(5), 1700091 (2017).
[Crossref]

Querry, M. R.

Quinn, J. J.

E. D. Palik, R. Kaplan, R. W. Gammon, H. Kaplan, R. F. Wallis, and J. J. Quinn, “Coupled surface magnetoplasmon-optic-phonon polariton modes on insb,” Phys. Rev. B 13(6), 2497–2506 (1976).
[Crossref]

Razdolski, I.

V. V. Temnov, I. Razdolski, T. Pezeril, D. Makarov, D. Seletskiy, A. Melnikov, and K. A. Nelson, “Towards the nonlinear acousto-magnetoplasmonics,” J. Opt. 18(9), 093002 (2016).
[Crossref]

Reinecke, T. L.

J. D. Caldwell, L. Lindsay, V. Giannini, I. Vurgaftman, T. L. Reinecke, S. A. Maier, and O. J. Glembocki, “Low-loss, infrared and terahertz nanophotonics using surface phonon polaritons,” Nanophotonics 4(1), 44–68 (2015).
[Crossref]

Ricci, M.

A. Ghanekar, M. Ricci, Y. Tian, O. Gregory, and Y. Zheng, “Strain-induced modulation of near-field radiative transfer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 112(24), 241104 (2018).
[Crossref]

Rosengarten, G.

H. Wang, V. P. Sivan, A. Mitchell, G. Rosengarten, and P. Phelan, “Highly efficient selective metamaterial absorber for high-temperature solar thermal energy harvesting,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 137, 235–242 (2015).
[Crossref]

Rufangura, P.

P. Rufangura and C. Sabah, “Wide-band polarization independent perfect metamaterial absorber based on concentric rings topology for solar cells application,” J. Alloys Compd. 680, 473–479 (2016).
[Crossref]

Sabah, C.

P. Rufangura and C. Sabah, “Wide-band polarization independent perfect metamaterial absorber based on concentric rings topology for solar cells application,” J. Alloys Compd. 680, 473–479 (2016).
[Crossref]

F. Dincer, O. Akgol, M. Karaaslan, E. Unal, and C. Sabah, “Polarization angle independent perfect metamaterial absorbers for solar cell applications in the microwave, infrared, and visible regime,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. 144, 93–101 (2014).
[Crossref]

Sarkar, S.

S. Sarkar, R. O. Behunin, and J. G. Gibbs, “Shape-dependent, chiro-optical response of uv-active, nanohelix metamaterials,” Nano Lett. 19(11), 8089–8096 (2019).
[Crossref]

Schurig, D.

J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig, and D. R. Smith, “Controlling electromagnetic fields,” Science 312(5781), 1780–1782 (2006).
[Crossref]

Schweizer, H.

N. Liu, H. Guo, L. Fu, S. Kaiser, H. Schweizer, and H. Giessen, “Three-dimensional photonic metamaterials at optical frequencies,” Nat. Mater. 7(1), 31–37 (2008).
[Crossref]

Seletskiy, D.

V. V. Temnov, I. Razdolski, T. Pezeril, D. Makarov, D. Seletskiy, A. Melnikov, and K. A. Nelson, “Towards the nonlinear acousto-magnetoplasmonics,” J. Opt. 18(9), 093002 (2016).
[Crossref]

Sepulveda, B.

B. Sepulveda, J. B. Gonzalez-Diaz, A. Garcia-Martin, L. M. Lechuga, and G. Armelles, “Plasmon-induced magneto-optical activity in nanosized gold disks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(14), 147401 (2010).
[Crossref]

Sha, J.

R. Xu, J. Luo, J. Sha, J. Zhong, Z. Xu, Y. Tong, and Y. Lin, “Stretchable ir metamaterial with ultra-narrowband perfect absorption,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 113(10), 101907 (2018).
[Crossref]

Shalaev, V. M.

A. V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, and V. M. Shalaev, “Planar photonics with metasurfaces,” Science 339(6125), 1232009 (2013).
[Crossref]

W. Cai, U. K. Chettiar, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, “Optical cloaking with metamaterials,” Nat. Photonics 1(4), 224–227 (2007).
[Crossref]

Shao, Y.

Y. Liu, C. Fang, G. Han, Y. Shao, Y. Huang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Ultrathin corrugated metallic strips for ultrawideband surface wave trapping at terahertz frequencies,” IEEE Photonics J. 9(1), 1–8 (2017).
[Crossref]

Sharma, G.

Shen, Y.

Y. Li, Y. Shen, S. Cao, X. Zhang, and Y. Meng, “Thermally triggered tunable vibration mitigation in hoberman spherical lattice metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 114(19), 191904 (2019).
[Crossref]

Shen, Z.

Shi, Y.

Signh, G.

S. Galoda and G. Signh, “Fighting terrorism with terahertz,” IEEE Potentials 26(6), 24–29 (2007).
[Crossref]

Simpson, R. E.

T. Cao, X. Zhang, W. Dong, L. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Zhuang, J. Deng, X. Cheng, G. Li, and R. E. Simpson, “Tuneable thermal emission using chalcogenide metasurface,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(16), 1800169 (2018).
[Crossref]

Sivan, V. P.

H. Wang, V. P. Sivan, A. Mitchell, G. Rosengarten, and P. Phelan, “Highly efficient selective metamaterial absorber for high-temperature solar thermal energy harvesting,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 137, 235–242 (2015).
[Crossref]

Smith, D. R.

C. L. Holloway, E. F. Kuester, J. O. J. A. Gordon, J. Booth, and D. R. Smith, “An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces: The two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 54(2), 10–35 (2012).
[Crossref]

T. Driscoll, S. Palit, M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, F. Keilmann, B. Chae, S. Yun, H. Kim, S. Y. Cho, N. M. Jokerst, D. R. Smith, and D. N. Basov, “Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 024101 (2008).
[Crossref]

J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig, and D. R. Smith, “Controlling electromagnetic fields,” Science 312(5781), 1780–1782 (2006).
[Crossref]

Son, J.

J. Son, S. J. Oh, and H. Cheon, “Potential clinical applications of terahertz radiation,” J. Appl. Phys. 125(19), 190901 (2019).
[Crossref]

Song, G.

K. Li, X. Ma, Z. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Hu, Y. Xu, and G. Song, “Highly tunable terahertz filter with magneto-optical bragg grating formed in semiconductor-insulator-semiconductor waveguides,” AIP Adv. 3(6), 062130 (2013).
[Crossref]

Song, H.

K. Liu, S. Jiang, D. Ji, X. Zeng, N. Zhang, H. Song, Y. Xu, and Q. Gan, “Super absorbing ultraviolet metasurface,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27(14), 1539–1542 (2015).
[Crossref]

Sorio, C.

G. Bellisola and C. Sorio, “Infrared spectroscopy and microscopy in cancer research and diagnosis,” Am. J. Cancer Res. 2(1), 1–21 (2012).

Soukoulis, C. M.

C. M. Soukoulis and M. Wegener, “Optical metamaterials - more bulky and less lossy,” Science 330(6011), 1633–1634 (2010).
[Crossref]

Sriram, S.

P. Gutruf, C. Zou, W. Withayachumnankul, M. Bhaskaran, S. Sriram, and C. Fumeaux, “Mechanically tunable dielectric resonator metasurfaces at visible frequencies,” ACS Nano 10(1), 133–141 (2016).
[Crossref]

Su, X.

X. Su, C. Feng, Y. Zeng, and H. Yu, “A dual-band tunable metamaterial absorber based on pneumatic actuation mechanism,” Opt. Commun. 459, 124885 (2020).
[Crossref]

Sweatlock, L. A.

Taubner, T.

R. Hillenbrand, T. Taubner, and F. Keilmann, “Phonon-enhanced light-matter interaction at the nanometre scale,” Nature 418(6894), 159–162 (2002).
[Crossref]

Temnov, V. V.

V. V. Temnov, I. Razdolski, T. Pezeril, D. Makarov, D. Seletskiy, A. Melnikov, and K. A. Nelson, “Towards the nonlinear acousto-magnetoplasmonics,” J. Opt. 18(9), 093002 (2016).
[Crossref]

Tian, Y.

Y. Tian, X. Liu, A. Ghanekar, F. Chen, A. Caratenuto, and Y. Zheng, “Blackbody-cavity ideal absorbers for solar energy harvesting,” Sci. Rep. 10(1), 20304 (2020).
[Crossref]

X. Liu, Y. Tian, F. Chen, A. Ghanekar, M. Antezza, and Y. Zheng, “Continuously variable emission for mechanical deformation induced radiative cooling,” Commun. Mater. 1(1), 95 (2020).
[Crossref]

A. Ghanekar, M. Ricci, Y. Tian, O. Gregory, and Y. Zheng, “Strain-induced modulation of near-field radiative transfer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 112(24), 241104 (2018).
[Crossref]

Tian, Z.

Tong, Y.

R. Xu, J. Luo, J. Sha, J. Zhong, Z. Xu, Y. Tong, and Y. Lin, “Stretchable ir metamaterial with ultra-narrowband perfect absorption,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 113(10), 101907 (2018).
[Crossref]

Tonouchi, M.

M. Tonouchi, “Cutting-edge terahertz technology,” Nat. Photonics 1(2), 97–105 (2007).
[Crossref]

Turpin, J. P.

J. P. Turpin, J. A. Bossard, K. L. Morgan, D. H. Werner, and P. L. Werner, “Reconfigurable and tunable metamaterials: A review of the theory and applications,” Int. J. Antennas and Propagation 2014, 1–18 (2014).
[Crossref]

Unal, E.

F. Dincer, O. Akgol, M. Karaaslan, E. Unal, and C. Sabah, “Polarization angle independent perfect metamaterial absorbers for solar cell applications in the microwave, infrared, and visible regime,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. 144, 93–101 (2014).
[Crossref]

Vu, D. L.

T. H. Nguyen, S. T. Biu, X. C. Nguyen, D. L. Vu, and X. K. Bui, “Tunable broadband-negative-permeability metamaterials by hybridization at thz frequencies,” RSC Adv. 10(47), 28343–28350 (2020).
[Crossref]

Vurgaftman, I.

J. D. Caldwell, L. Lindsay, V. Giannini, I. Vurgaftman, T. L. Reinecke, S. A. Maier, and O. J. Glembocki, “Low-loss, infrared and terahertz nanophotonics using surface phonon polaritons,” Nanophotonics 4(1), 44–68 (2015).
[Crossref]

Walavalkar, J. M. S.

Wallis, R. F.

E. D. Palik, R. Kaplan, R. W. Gammon, H. Kaplan, R. F. Wallis, and J. J. Quinn, “Coupled surface magnetoplasmon-optic-phonon polariton modes on insb,” Phys. Rev. B 13(6), 2497–2506 (1976).
[Crossref]

Wang, H.

H. Wang, H. Wu, and Z. Shen, “Nonreciprocal optical properties of thermal radiation with sic grating magneto-optical materials,” Opt. Express 25(16), 19609–19618 (2017).
[Crossref]

Y. Liu, C. Fang, G. Han, Y. Shao, Y. Huang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Ultrathin corrugated metallic strips for ultrawideband surface wave trapping at terahertz frequencies,” IEEE Photonics J. 9(1), 1–8 (2017).
[Crossref]

H. Wang, V. P. Sivan, A. Mitchell, G. Rosengarten, and P. Phelan, “Highly efficient selective metamaterial absorber for high-temperature solar thermal energy harvesting,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 137, 235–242 (2015).
[Crossref]

Wang, J.

Wang, L.

Y. Qi, Y. Zhang, C. Liu, T. Zhang, B. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Deng, X. Wang, and Y. Yu, “A tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber composed of hourglass-shaped graphene arrays,” Nanomaterials 10(3), 533 (2020).
[Crossref]

K. Li, X. Ma, Z. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Hu, Y. Xu, and G. Song, “Highly tunable terahertz filter with magneto-optical bragg grating formed in semiconductor-insulator-semiconductor waveguides,” AIP Adv. 3(6), 062130 (2013).
[Crossref]

L. Wang and Z. M. Zhang, “Effect of magnetic polaritons on the radiative properties of double-layer nanoslit arrays,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27(12), 2595–2604 (2010).
[Crossref]

Wang, Q. J.

B. Hu, Y. Zhang, and Q. J. Wang, “Surface magneto plasmons and their applications in the infrared frequencies,” Nanomaterials 4(4), 383–396 (2015).
[Crossref]

Wang, X.

Y. Qi, Y. Zhang, C. Liu, T. Zhang, B. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Deng, X. Wang, and Y. Yu, “A tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber composed of hourglass-shaped graphene arrays,” Nanomaterials 10(3), 533 (2020).
[Crossref]

X. Jia, X. Wang, C. Yuan, Q. Meng, and Z. Zhou, “Novel dynamic tuning of broadband visible metamaterial perfect absorber using graphene,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 120(3), 033101 (2016).
[Crossref]

Wang, Y.

Y. Liu, C. Fang, G. Han, Y. Shao, Y. Huang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Ultrathin corrugated metallic strips for ultrawideband surface wave trapping at terahertz frequencies,” IEEE Photonics J. 9(1), 1–8 (2017).
[Crossref]

Wang, Z.

Z. Wang, P. Lv, M. Becton, J. Hong, L. Zhang, and X. Chen, “Mechanically tunable near-field radiative heat transfer between monolayer black phosphorus sheets,” Langmuir 36(40), 12038–12044 (2020).
[Crossref]

Wegener, M.

C. M. Soukoulis and M. Wegener, “Optical metamaterials - more bulky and less lossy,” Science 330(6011), 1633–1634 (2010).
[Crossref]

Weiss, T.

N. Liu, M. Mesch, T. Weiss, M. Hentschel, and H. Giessen, “Infrared perfect absorber and its application as plasmonic sensor,” Nano Lett. 10(7), 2342–2348 (2010).
[Crossref]

Werner, D. H.

G. Oliveri, D. H. Werner, and A. Massa, “Reconfigurable electromagnetics through metamaterials - a review,” Proc. IEEE 103(7), 1034–1056 (2015).
[Crossref]

J. P. Turpin, J. A. Bossard, K. L. Morgan, D. H. Werner, and P. L. Werner, “Reconfigurable and tunable metamaterials: A review of the theory and applications,” Int. J. Antennas and Propagation 2014, 1–18 (2014).
[Crossref]

Werner, P. L.

J. P. Turpin, J. A. Bossard, K. L. Morgan, D. H. Werner, and P. L. Werner, “Reconfigurable and tunable metamaterials: A review of the theory and applications,” Int. J. Antennas and Propagation 2014, 1–18 (2014).
[Crossref]

Whelan, H. T.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Withayachumnankul, W.

P. Gutruf, C. Zou, W. Withayachumnankul, M. Bhaskaran, S. Sriram, and C. Fumeaux, “Mechanically tunable dielectric resonator metasurfaces at visible frequencies,” ACS Nano 10(1), 133–141 (2016).
[Crossref]

Wong-Riley, M. T. T.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Wu, H.

Wu, X.

Z. M. Zhang, X. Wu, and C. Fu, “Validity of kirchhoff’s law for semitransparent films made of anisotropic materials,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 245, 106904 (2020).
[Crossref]

Xie, L.

W. Xu, L. Xie, and Y. Ying, “Mechanisms and applications of terahertz metamaterial sensing: a review,” Nanoscale 9(37), 13864–13878 (2017).
[Crossref]

Xu, R.

R. Xu and Y. Lin, “Tunable infrared metamaterial emitter for gas sensing application,” Nanomaterials 10(8), 1442 (2020).
[Crossref]

P. Liu, Z. Liang, Z. Lin, Z. Xu, R. Xu, D. Yao, and Y. Lin, “Actively tunable terahertz chain-link metamaterial with bidirectional polarization-dependent characteristic,” Sci. Rep. 9(1), 9917 (2019).
[Crossref]

R. Xu, J. Luo, J. Sha, J. Zhong, Z. Xu, Y. Tong, and Y. Lin, “Stretchable ir metamaterial with ultra-narrowband perfect absorption,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 113(10), 101907 (2018).
[Crossref]

Xu, W.

W. Xu, L. Xie, and Y. Ying, “Mechanisms and applications of terahertz metamaterial sensing: a review,” Nanoscale 9(37), 13864–13878 (2017).
[Crossref]

Xu, Y.

K. Liu, S. Jiang, D. Ji, X. Zeng, N. Zhang, H. Song, Y. Xu, and Q. Gan, “Super absorbing ultraviolet metasurface,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27(14), 1539–1542 (2015).
[Crossref]

K. Li, X. Ma, Z. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Hu, Y. Xu, and G. Song, “Highly tunable terahertz filter with magneto-optical bragg grating formed in semiconductor-insulator-semiconductor waveguides,” AIP Adv. 3(6), 062130 (2013).
[Crossref]

Xu, Z.

H. Ou, F. Lu, Z. Xu, and Y. Lin, “Terahertz metamaterial with multiple resonances for biosensing application,” Nanomaterials 10(6), 1038 (2020).
[Crossref]

P. Liu, Z. Liang, Z. Lin, Z. Xu, R. Xu, D. Yao, and Y. Lin, “Actively tunable terahertz chain-link metamaterial with bidirectional polarization-dependent characteristic,” Sci. Rep. 9(1), 9917 (2019).
[Crossref]

Z. Xu, Z. Lin, S. Cheng, and Y. Lin, “Reconfigurable and tunable terahertz wrenchshape metamaterial performing programmable characteristic,” Opt. Lett. 44(16), 3944–3947 (2019).
[Crossref]

Z. Xu and Y. Lin, “A stretchable terahertz parabolic-shaped metamaterial,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 7(19), 1900379 (2019).
[Crossref]

R. Xu, J. Luo, J. Sha, J. Zhong, Z. Xu, Y. Tong, and Y. Lin, “Stretchable ir metamaterial with ultra-narrowband perfect absorption,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 113(10), 101907 (2018).
[Crossref]

Yao, D.

P. Liu, Z. Liang, Z. Lin, Z. Xu, R. Xu, D. Yao, and Y. Lin, “Actively tunable terahertz chain-link metamaterial with bidirectional polarization-dependent characteristic,” Sci. Rep. 9(1), 9917 (2019).
[Crossref]

Yeager, R. L.

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Ying, Y.

W. Xu, L. Xie, and Y. Ying, “Mechanisms and applications of terahertz metamaterial sensing: a review,” Nanoscale 9(37), 13864–13878 (2017).
[Crossref]

Yu, H.

X. Su, C. Feng, Y. Zeng, and H. Yu, “A dual-band tunable metamaterial absorber based on pneumatic actuation mechanism,” Opt. Commun. 459, 124885 (2020).
[Crossref]

Yu, Y.

Y. Qi, Y. Zhang, C. Liu, T. Zhang, B. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Deng, X. Wang, and Y. Yu, “A tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber composed of hourglass-shaped graphene arrays,” Nanomaterials 10(3), 533 (2020).
[Crossref]

Yu, Z.

X. Luo, M. Zhou, J. Liu, T. Qiu, and Z. Yu, “Magneto-optical metamaterials with extraordinarily strong magneto-optical effect,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 108(13), 131104 (2016).
[Crossref]

Yuan, C.

X. Jia, X. Wang, C. Yuan, Q. Meng, and Z. Zhou, “Novel dynamic tuning of broadband visible metamaterial perfect absorber using graphene,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 120(3), 033101 (2016).
[Crossref]

Yun, S.

T. Driscoll, S. Palit, M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, F. Keilmann, B. Chae, S. Yun, H. Kim, S. Y. Cho, N. M. Jokerst, D. R. Smith, and D. N. Basov, “Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 024101 (2008).
[Crossref]

Zeng, X.

K. Liu, S. Jiang, D. Ji, X. Zeng, N. Zhang, H. Song, Y. Xu, and Q. Gan, “Super absorbing ultraviolet metasurface,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27(14), 1539–1542 (2015).
[Crossref]

Zeng, Y.

X. Su, C. Feng, Y. Zeng, and H. Yu, “A dual-band tunable metamaterial absorber based on pneumatic actuation mechanism,” Opt. Commun. 459, 124885 (2020).
[Crossref]

Zhang, B.

Y. Qi, Y. Zhang, C. Liu, T. Zhang, B. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Deng, X. Wang, and Y. Yu, “A tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber composed of hourglass-shaped graphene arrays,” Nanomaterials 10(3), 533 (2020).
[Crossref]

Zhang, C.

Y. Liu, C. Fang, G. Han, Y. Shao, Y. Huang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Ultrathin corrugated metallic strips for ultrawideband surface wave trapping at terahertz frequencies,” IEEE Photonics J. 9(1), 1–8 (2017).
[Crossref]

Zhang, L.

Z. Wang, P. Lv, M. Becton, J. Hong, L. Zhang, and X. Chen, “Mechanically tunable near-field radiative heat transfer between monolayer black phosphorus sheets,” Langmuir 36(40), 12038–12044 (2020).
[Crossref]

Zhang, N.

K. Liu, S. Jiang, D. Ji, X. Zeng, N. Zhang, H. Song, Y. Xu, and Q. Gan, “Super absorbing ultraviolet metasurface,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27(14), 1539–1542 (2015).
[Crossref]

Zhang, T.

Y. Qi, Y. Zhang, C. Liu, T. Zhang, B. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Deng, X. Wang, and Y. Yu, “A tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber composed of hourglass-shaped graphene arrays,” Nanomaterials 10(3), 533 (2020).
[Crossref]

Zhang, X.

Y. Li, Y. Shen, S. Cao, X. Zhang, and Y. Meng, “Thermally triggered tunable vibration mitigation in hoberman spherical lattice metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 114(19), 191904 (2019).
[Crossref]

T. Cao, X. Zhang, W. Dong, L. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Zhuang, J. Deng, X. Cheng, G. Li, and R. E. Simpson, “Tuneable thermal emission using chalcogenide metasurface,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(16), 1800169 (2018).
[Crossref]

Zhang, Y.

Y. Qi, Y. Zhang, C. Liu, T. Zhang, B. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Deng, X. Wang, and Y. Yu, “A tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber composed of hourglass-shaped graphene arrays,” Nanomaterials 10(3), 533 (2020).
[Crossref]

B. Hu, Y. Zhang, and Q. J. Wang, “Surface magneto plasmons and their applications in the infrared frequencies,” Nanomaterials 4(4), 383–396 (2015).
[Crossref]

Zhang, Z.

K. Li, X. Ma, Z. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Hu, Y. Xu, and G. Song, “Highly tunable terahertz filter with magneto-optical bragg grating formed in semiconductor-insulator-semiconductor waveguides,” AIP Adv. 3(6), 062130 (2013).
[Crossref]

Zhang, Z. M.

Z. M. Zhang, X. Wu, and C. Fu, “Validity of kirchhoff’s law for semitransparent films made of anisotropic materials,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 245, 106904 (2020).
[Crossref]

L. Wang and Z. M. Zhang, “Effect of magnetic polaritons on the radiative properties of double-layer nanoslit arrays,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27(12), 2595–2604 (2010).
[Crossref]

B. J. Lee, Y. B. Chen, and Z. M. Zhang, “Transmission enhancement through nanoscale metallic slit arrays from the visible to mid-infrared,” J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 5(2), 201–213 (2008).
[Crossref]

Z. M. Zhang, “Rigorous coupled-wave analysis (rcwa),” http://zhang-nano.gatech.edu/Rad_Pro.htm . Accessed: 2021-03-15.

Zhao, B.

Zhao, N.

Zhao, Z.

Zheng, Y.

Y. Tian, X. Liu, A. Ghanekar, F. Chen, A. Caratenuto, and Y. Zheng, “Blackbody-cavity ideal absorbers for solar energy harvesting,” Sci. Rep. 10(1), 20304 (2020).
[Crossref]

X. Liu, Y. Tian, F. Chen, A. Ghanekar, M. Antezza, and Y. Zheng, “Continuously variable emission for mechanical deformation induced radiative cooling,” Commun. Mater. 1(1), 95 (2020).
[Crossref]

A. Ghanekar, M. Ricci, Y. Tian, O. Gregory, and Y. Zheng, “Strain-induced modulation of near-field radiative transfer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 112(24), 241104 (2018).
[Crossref]

A. Ghanekar, J. Ji, and Y. Zheng, “High-rectification near-field thermal diode using phase change period nanostructure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 109(12), 123106 (2016).
[Crossref]

A. Ghanekar, L. Lin, and Y. Zheng, “Novel and efficient mie-metamaterial thermal emitter for thermophotovoltaic systems,” Opt. Express 24(10), A868 (2016).
[Crossref]

Zhong, J.

R. Xu, J. Luo, J. Sha, J. Zhong, Z. Xu, Y. Tong, and Y. Lin, “Stretchable ir metamaterial with ultra-narrowband perfect absorption,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 113(10), 101907 (2018).
[Crossref]

Zhong, S.

S. Zhong, “Progress in terahertz nondestructive testing: A review,” Front. Mech. Eng. 14(3), 273–281 (2019).
[Crossref]

Zhou, M.

X. Luo, M. Zhou, J. Liu, T. Qiu, and Z. Yu, “Magneto-optical metamaterials with extraordinarily strong magneto-optical effect,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 108(13), 131104 (2016).
[Crossref]

Zhou, X.

T. Cao, X. Zhang, W. Dong, L. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Zhuang, J. Deng, X. Cheng, G. Li, and R. E. Simpson, “Tuneable thermal emission using chalcogenide metasurface,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(16), 1800169 (2018).
[Crossref]

Zhou, Z.

X. Jia, X. Wang, C. Yuan, Q. Meng, and Z. Zhou, “Novel dynamic tuning of broadband visible metamaterial perfect absorber using graphene,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 120(3), 033101 (2016).
[Crossref]

Zhu, L.

D. A. B. Miller, L. Zhu, and S. Fan, “Universal modal radiation laws for all thermal emitters,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114(17), 4336–4341 (2017).
[Crossref]

L. Zhu and S. Fan, “Near-complete violation of detailed balance in thermal radiation,” Phys. Rev. B 90(22), 220301 (2014).
[Crossref]

Zhuang, X.

T. Cao, X. Zhang, W. Dong, L. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Zhuang, J. Deng, X. Cheng, G. Li, and R. E. Simpson, “Tuneable thermal emission using chalcogenide metasurface,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(16), 1800169 (2018).
[Crossref]

Zou, C.

P. Gutruf, C. Zou, W. Withayachumnankul, M. Bhaskaran, S. Sriram, and C. Fumeaux, “Mechanically tunable dielectric resonator metasurfaces at visible frequencies,” ACS Nano 10(1), 133–141 (2016).
[Crossref]

ACS Nano (1)

P. Gutruf, C. Zou, W. Withayachumnankul, M. Bhaskaran, S. Sriram, and C. Fumeaux, “Mechanically tunable dielectric resonator metasurfaces at visible frequencies,” ACS Nano 10(1), 133–141 (2016).
[Crossref]

Adv. Opt. Mater. (3)

G. Armelles, A. Cebollada, A. Garcia-Martin, and M. U. Gonzalez, “Magnetoplasmonics: Combining magnetic and plasmonic functionalities,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 1(1), 10–35 (2013).
[Crossref]

Z. Xu and Y. Lin, “A stretchable terahertz parabolic-shaped metamaterial,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 7(19), 1900379 (2019).
[Crossref]

T. Cao, X. Zhang, W. Dong, L. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Zhuang, J. Deng, X. Cheng, G. Li, and R. E. Simpson, “Tuneable thermal emission using chalcogenide metasurface,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(16), 1800169 (2018).
[Crossref]

AIP Adv. (1)

K. Li, X. Ma, Z. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Hu, Y. Xu, and G. Song, “Highly tunable terahertz filter with magneto-optical bragg grating formed in semiconductor-insulator-semiconductor waveguides,” AIP Adv. 3(6), 062130 (2013).
[Crossref]

Am. J. Cancer Res. (1)

G. Bellisola and C. Sorio, “Infrared spectroscopy and microscopy in cancer research and diagnosis,” Am. J. Cancer Res. 2(1), 1–21 (2012).

Appl. Opt. (2)

Appl. Phys. Lett. (9)

X. Luo, M. Zhou, J. Liu, T. Qiu, and Z. Yu, “Magneto-optical metamaterials with extraordinarily strong magneto-optical effect,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 108(13), 131104 (2016).
[Crossref]

Y. Li, Y. Shen, S. Cao, X. Zhang, and Y. Meng, “Thermally triggered tunable vibration mitigation in hoberman spherical lattice metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 114(19), 191904 (2019).
[Crossref]

X. Jia, X. Wang, C. Yuan, Q. Meng, and Z. Zhou, “Novel dynamic tuning of broadband visible metamaterial perfect absorber using graphene,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 120(3), 033101 (2016).
[Crossref]

T. Driscoll, S. Palit, M. M. Qazilbash, M. Brehm, F. Keilmann, B. Chae, S. Yun, H. Kim, S. Y. Cho, N. M. Jokerst, D. R. Smith, and D. N. Basov, “Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 024101 (2008).
[Crossref]

R. Xu, J. Luo, J. Sha, J. Zhong, Z. Xu, Y. Tong, and Y. Lin, “Stretchable ir metamaterial with ultra-narrowband perfect absorption,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 113(10), 101907 (2018).
[Crossref]

S. Ogawa, K. Okada, N. Fukushima, and M. Kimata, “Wavelength selective uncooled infrared sensor by plasmonics,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 100(2), 021111 (2012).
[Crossref]

A. Ghanekar, J. Ji, and Y. Zheng, “High-rectification near-field thermal diode using phase change period nanostructure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 109(12), 123106 (2016).
[Crossref]

A. Ghanekar, M. Ricci, Y. Tian, O. Gregory, and Y. Zheng, “Strain-induced modulation of near-field radiative transfer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 112(24), 241104 (2018).
[Crossref]

A. Huber, N. Ocelic, D. Kazantsev, and R. Hillenbrand, “Near-field imaging of mid-infrared surface phonon polariton propagation,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87(8), 081103 (2005).
[Crossref]

Commun. Mater. (1)

X. Liu, Y. Tian, F. Chen, A. Ghanekar, M. Antezza, and Y. Zheng, “Continuously variable emission for mechanical deformation induced radiative cooling,” Commun. Mater. 1(1), 95 (2020).
[Crossref]

Front. Mech. Eng. (1)

S. Zhong, “Progress in terahertz nondestructive testing: A review,” Front. Mech. Eng. 14(3), 273–281 (2019).
[Crossref]

IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. (1)

C. L. Holloway, E. F. Kuester, J. O. J. A. Gordon, J. Booth, and D. R. Smith, “An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces: The two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 54(2), 10–35 (2012).
[Crossref]

IEEE Photonics J. (1)

Y. Liu, C. Fang, G. Han, Y. Shao, Y. Huang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Ultrathin corrugated metallic strips for ultrawideband surface wave trapping at terahertz frequencies,” IEEE Photonics J. 9(1), 1–8 (2017).
[Crossref]

IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. (2)

K. Liu, S. Jiang, D. Ji, X. Zeng, N. Zhang, H. Song, Y. Xu, and Q. Gan, “Super absorbing ultraviolet metasurface,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27(14), 1539–1542 (2015).
[Crossref]

M. A. Baqir and P. K. Choudhury, “Hyperbolic metamaterial-based uv absorber,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 29(18), 1548–1551 (2017).
[Crossref]

IEEE Potentials (1)

S. Galoda and G. Signh, “Fighting terrorism with terahertz,” IEEE Potentials 26(6), 24–29 (2007).
[Crossref]

Int. J. Antennas and Propagation (1)

J. P. Turpin, J. A. Bossard, K. L. Morgan, D. H. Werner, and P. L. Werner, “Reconfigurable and tunable metamaterials: A review of the theory and applications,” Int. J. Antennas and Propagation 2014, 1–18 (2014).
[Crossref]

J. Alloys Compd. (2)

P. Rufangura and C. Sabah, “Wide-band polarization independent perfect metamaterial absorber based on concentric rings topology for solar cells application,” J. Alloys Compd. 680, 473–479 (2016).
[Crossref]

M. Foldyna, K. Postava, D. Ciprian, and J. Pistora, “Modeling of magneto-optical properties of lamellar nanogratings,” J. Alloys Compd. 434-435, 581–583 (2007).
[Crossref]

J. Appl. Phys. (1)

J. Son, S. J. Oh, and H. Cheon, “Potential clinical applications of terahertz radiation,” J. Appl. Phys. 125(19), 190901 (2019).
[Crossref]

J. Chem. Educ. (1)

D. W. Ball, “Wien’s displacement law as a function of frequency,” J. Chem. Educ. 90(9), 1250–1252 (2013).
[Crossref]

J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. (1)

B. J. Lee, Y. B. Chen, and Z. M. Zhang, “Transmission enhancement through nanoscale metallic slit arrays from the visible to mid-infrared,” J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 5(2), 201–213 (2008).
[Crossref]

J. Opt. (2)

V. V. Temnov, I. Razdolski, T. Pezeril, D. Makarov, D. Seletskiy, A. Melnikov, and K. A. Nelson, “Towards the nonlinear acousto-magnetoplasmonics,” J. Opt. 18(9), 093002 (2016).
[Crossref]

V. I. Pipa, A. I. Liptunga, and V. Morozhenko, “Thermal emission of one-dimensional magnetophotonic crystals,” J. Opt. 15(7), 075104 (2013).
[Crossref]

J. Opt. Soc. Am. B (1)

J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer (1)

Z. M. Zhang, X. Wu, and C. Fu, “Validity of kirchhoff’s law for semitransparent films made of anisotropic materials,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 245, 106904 (2020).
[Crossref]

Langmuir (1)

Z. Wang, P. Lv, M. Becton, J. Hong, L. Zhang, and X. Chen, “Mechanically tunable near-field radiative heat transfer between monolayer black phosphorus sheets,” Langmuir 36(40), 12038–12044 (2020).
[Crossref]

Laser Photonics Rev. (1)

Y. Qu, Q. Li, K. Du, L. Cai, J. Lu, and M. Qiu, “Dynamic thermal emission control based on ultrathin plasmonic metamaterials including phase-changing material gst,” Laser Photonics Rev. 11(5), 1700091 (2017).
[Crossref]

Materials (1)

F. Chen, Y. Cheng, and H. Luo, “A broadband tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber based on single-layer complementary gammadion-shaped graphene,” Materials 13(4), 860 (2020).
[Crossref]

Nano Convergence (1)

C. Lee, H. J. Choi, and H. Jeong, “Tunable metasurfaces for visible and swir applications,” Nano Convergence 7(1), 3 (2020).
[Crossref]

Nano Lett. (2)

N. Liu, M. Mesch, T. Weiss, M. Hentschel, and H. Giessen, “Infrared perfect absorber and its application as plasmonic sensor,” Nano Lett. 10(7), 2342–2348 (2010).
[Crossref]

S. Sarkar, R. O. Behunin, and J. G. Gibbs, “Shape-dependent, chiro-optical response of uv-active, nanohelix metamaterials,” Nano Lett. 19(11), 8089–8096 (2019).
[Crossref]

Nanomaterials (4)

R. Xu and Y. Lin, “Tunable infrared metamaterial emitter for gas sensing application,” Nanomaterials 10(8), 1442 (2020).
[Crossref]

H. Ou, F. Lu, Z. Xu, and Y. Lin, “Terahertz metamaterial with multiple resonances for biosensing application,” Nanomaterials 10(6), 1038 (2020).
[Crossref]

B. Hu, Y. Zhang, and Q. J. Wang, “Surface magneto plasmons and their applications in the infrared frequencies,” Nanomaterials 4(4), 383–396 (2015).
[Crossref]

Y. Qi, Y. Zhang, C. Liu, T. Zhang, B. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Deng, X. Wang, and Y. Yu, “A tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber composed of hourglass-shaped graphene arrays,” Nanomaterials 10(3), 533 (2020).
[Crossref]

Nanophotonics (1)

J. D. Caldwell, L. Lindsay, V. Giannini, I. Vurgaftman, T. L. Reinecke, S. A. Maier, and O. J. Glembocki, “Low-loss, infrared and terahertz nanophotonics using surface phonon polaritons,” Nanophotonics 4(1), 44–68 (2015).
[Crossref]

Nanoscale (1)

W. Xu, L. Xie, and Y. Ying, “Mechanisms and applications of terahertz metamaterial sensing: a review,” Nanoscale 9(37), 13864–13878 (2017).
[Crossref]

Nat. Mater. (1)

N. Liu, H. Guo, L. Fu, S. Kaiser, H. Schweizer, and H. Giessen, “Three-dimensional photonic metamaterials at optical frequencies,” Nat. Mater. 7(1), 31–37 (2008).
[Crossref]

Nat. Photonics (2)

W. Cai, U. K. Chettiar, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, “Optical cloaking with metamaterials,” Nat. Photonics 1(4), 224–227 (2007).
[Crossref]

M. Tonouchi, “Cutting-edge terahertz technology,” Nat. Photonics 1(2), 97–105 (2007).
[Crossref]

Nature (2)

R. Hillenbrand, T. Taubner, and F. Keilmann, “Phonon-enhanced light-matter interaction at the nanometre scale,” Nature 418(6894), 159–162 (2002).
[Crossref]

W. L. Barnes, A. Dereux, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Surface plasmon subwavelength optics,” Nature 424(6950), 824–830 (2003).
[Crossref]

Opt. Commun. (1)

X. Su, C. Feng, Y. Zeng, and H. Yu, “A dual-band tunable metamaterial absorber based on pneumatic actuation mechanism,” Opt. Commun. 459, 124885 (2020).
[Crossref]

Opt. Express (4)

Opt. Lett. (2)

Photomed. Laser Surg. (1)

K. D. Desmet, D. A. Paz, J. J. Corry, J. T. Eells, M. T. T. Wong-Riley, M. M. Henry, E. V. Buchmann, M. P. Connelly, J. V. Dovi, H. L. Liang, D. S. Henshel, R. L. Yeager, D. S. Millsap, J. Lim, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D. Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, “Clinical and experimental applications of nir-led photobiomodulation,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 24(2), 121–128 (2006).
[Crossref]

Phys. Rev. A (1)

S. A. H. Gangaraj, G. W. Hanson, and M. Antezza, “Robust entanglement with three-dimensional nonreciprocal photonic topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. A 95(6), 063807 (2017).
[Crossref]

Phys. Rev. B (4)

L. Zhu and S. Fan, “Near-complete violation of detailed balance in thermal radiation,” Phys. Rev. B 90(22), 220301 (2014).
[Crossref]

E. Moncada-Villa, V. Fernanandez-Hurtado, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, A. Garcia-Martin, and J. C. Cuevas, “Magnetic field control of near-field radiative heat transfer and the realization of highly tunable hyperbolic thermal emitters,” Phys. Rev. B 92(12), 125418 (2015).
[Crossref]

E. Moncada-Villa and J. C. Cuevas, “Near-field radiative heat transfer between one-dimensional magnetophotonic crystals,” Phys. Rev. B 103(7), 075432 (2021).
[Crossref]

E. D. Palik, R. Kaplan, R. W. Gammon, H. Kaplan, R. F. Wallis, and J. J. Quinn, “Coupled surface magnetoplasmon-optic-phonon polariton modes on insb,” Phys. Rev. B 13(6), 2497–2506 (1976).
[Crossref]

Phys. Rev. Lett. (2)

B. Sepulveda, J. B. Gonzalez-Diaz, A. Garcia-Martin, L. M. Lechuga, and G. Armelles, “Plasmon-induced magneto-optical activity in nanosized gold disks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(14), 147401 (2010).
[Crossref]

P. Doyeux, S. A. H. Gangaraj, G. W. Hanson, and M. Antezza, “Giant interatomic energy-transport amplification with nonreciprocal photonic topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(17), 173901 (2017).
[Crossref]

Proc. IEEE (1)

G. Oliveri, D. H. Werner, and A. Massa, “Reconfigurable electromagnetics through metamaterials - a review,” Proc. IEEE 103(7), 1034–1056 (2015).
[Crossref]

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. (1)

D. A. B. Miller, L. Zhu, and S. Fan, “Universal modal radiation laws for all thermal emitters,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114(17), 4336–4341 (2017).
[Crossref]

Prog. Electromagn. Res. (1)

F. Dincer, O. Akgol, M. Karaaslan, E. Unal, and C. Sabah, “Polarization angle independent perfect metamaterial absorbers for solar cell applications in the microwave, infrared, and visible regime,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. 144, 93–101 (2014).
[Crossref]

Rev. Sci. Instrum. (1)

Z. Q. Qiu and S. D. Bader, “Surface magneto-optic kerr effect,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71(3), 1243–1255 (2000).
[Crossref]

RSC Adv. (1)

T. H. Nguyen, S. T. Biu, X. C. Nguyen, D. L. Vu, and X. K. Bui, “Tunable broadband-negative-permeability metamaterials by hybridization at thz frequencies,” RSC Adv. 10(47), 28343–28350 (2020).
[Crossref]

Sci. Rep. (2)

Y. Tian, X. Liu, A. Ghanekar, F. Chen, A. Caratenuto, and Y. Zheng, “Blackbody-cavity ideal absorbers for solar energy harvesting,” Sci. Rep. 10(1), 20304 (2020).
[Crossref]

P. Liu, Z. Liang, Z. Lin, Z. Xu, R. Xu, D. Yao, and Y. Lin, “Actively tunable terahertz chain-link metamaterial with bidirectional polarization-dependent characteristic,” Sci. Rep. 9(1), 9917 (2019).
[Crossref]

Science (4)

J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig, and D. R. Smith, “Controlling electromagnetic fields,” Science 312(5781), 1780–1782 (2006).
[Crossref]

D. Lin, P. Fan, E. Hasman, and M. L. Brongersma, “Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements,” Science 345(6194), 298–302 (2014).
[Crossref]

C. M. Soukoulis and M. Wegener, “Optical metamaterials - more bulky and less lossy,” Science 330(6011), 1633–1634 (2010).
[Crossref]

A. V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, and V. M. Shalaev, “Planar photonics with metasurfaces,” Science 339(6125), 1232009 (2013).
[Crossref]

Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells (1)

H. Wang, V. P. Sivan, A. Mitchell, G. Rosengarten, and P. Phelan, “Highly efficient selective metamaterial absorber for high-temperature solar thermal energy harvesting,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 137, 235–242 (2015).
[Crossref]

Vib. Spectrosc. (1)

A. P. Ayala, “Polymorphism in drugs investigated by low wavenumber raman scattering,” Vib. Spectrosc. 45(2), 112–116 (2007).
[Crossref]

Other (3)

A Practical Schottky Mixer for 5 THz (Part II) (Seventh International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology, Charlottesville, 1996).

E. M. Carapezza, ed., Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 9456 (SPIE, Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 2015).

Z. M. Zhang, “Rigorous coupled-wave analysis (rcwa),” http://zhang-nano.gatech.edu/Rad_Pro.htm . Accessed: 2021-03-15.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (7)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic of InSb grating on W thin film in the presence of an applied magnetic field. (b) Real and (c) imaginary components of the magnetic field-induced refractive index $\varepsilon _{1}(H)$ for an InSb grating with $t_g = 7.5\mu$m, $\Lambda = 2\mu$m, and $\phi = 0.05$.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. TE (a) and TM (c) emissivities of InSb thin film and grating structures; TE (b) and TM (d) emissivities of InSb-W thin film and grating structures. All gratings have $\Lambda =2{\mu }m$ and $\phi =0.05$. For (b) and (d), $t_2$ = 10 ${\mu }m$. EMT results are plotted using various lines, and associated RCWA results are plotted using markers, showing agreement between the two methods.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Square of field magnitude for 3 $\mu$m InSb thin films with and without a 10 $\mu$m W substrate. (a) TE and (c) TM field contours for InSb thin film. (b) TE and (d) TM field contours for InSb thin film with W substrate. Fields are evaluated at their strongest resonant frequency to illustrate the effect of the W substrate.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. (a) TE and (d) TM emissivities of InSb-W grating structures of varying grating thickness $t_g$, with $\Lambda$ $=2$ $\mu$m and $\phi$ $=0.5$. (b) TE and (e) TM emissivities of InSb-W grating structures of varying grating period $\Lambda$, with $t_g$ $=7.5$ $\mu$m and $\phi$ $=0.5$. (c) TE and (f) TM emissivities of InSb-W grating structures of varying grating fill factor $\phi$, with $t_g$ $=7.5$ $\mu$m and $\Lambda$ $=2$ $\mu$m. For all cases, $t_2$ $=10$ $\mu$m. EMT results are plotted using various lines, and associated RCWA results are plotted using markers, showing agreement between the two methods.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Square of field magnitude for InSb grating structures of varying $t_g$ on 10 $\mu$m W substrates. TE field contours at 72 $\mu$m with (a) $t_g$ = 2.5 $\mu$m and (b) $t_g$ = 7.5 $\mu$m. TM field contours at 44 $\mu$m with (c) $t_g$ = 2.5 $\mu$m and (d) $t_g$ = 7.5 $\mu$m. The fill factor $\phi$ is equal to 0.50 for all cases.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Difference in square of field magnitude between InSb grating structures of $\phi$ = 0.50 and $\phi$ = 0.05. (a) Difference in TE field contours at 44 $\mu$m. (b) Difference in TM field contours at 44 $\mu$m. Grating thickness $t_g$ is equal to 7.5 $\mu$m, and the W substrate is 10 $\mu$m for both cases. (c) Schematic depicting the section of structure at the InSb-W interface that is analyzed.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. (a) TE and (b) TM emissivities of InSb-W grating structure, with $t_g=7.5$ ${\mu }m$, $\Lambda$ $=2$ $\mu$m, $\phi$ $=0.05$ and $t_2=10$ ${\mu }m$ under external magnetic fields of varying magnitudes. Field-induced curves in (a) are color-filled to highlight the broadband red or blue emissivity shifts brought on by the magnetic field. Arrows denote the direction of the dominant resonance shift from the original narrowband peak to longer (red) or shorter (blue) wavelengths. EMT results are plotted using various lines, and associated RCWA results are plotted using markers, showing agreement between the two methods.

Equations (7)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

ε T E , 2 = ε T E , 0 [ 1 + π 2 3 ( Λ λ ) 2 ϕ 2 ( 1 ϕ ) 2 ( ε A ε B ) 2 ε T E , 0 ]
ε T M , 2 = ε T M , 0 [ 1 + π 2 3 ( Λ λ ) 2 ϕ 2 ( 1 ϕ ) 2 ( ε A ε B ) 2 ε T E , 0 ( ε T M , 0 ε A ε B ) 2 ] ,
ε = ε ( 1 + ω L 2 ω T 2 ω T 2 ω 2 j Γ ω ω p 2 ω ( ω + j γ ) )
ε ^ ( H ) = ( ε 1 ( H ) j ε 2 ( H ) 0 j ε 2 ( H ) ε 1 ( H ) 0 0 0 ε 3 )
ε 1 ( H ) = ε ( 1 + ω L 2 ω T 2 ω T 2 ω 2 j Γ ω + ω p 2 ( ω + j γ ) ω [ ω c ( ω + j γ ) 2 ] ) ,
ε 2 ( H ) = ε ω p 2 ω c ω [ ( ω + j γ ) 2 ω c 2 ] ,
ε 3 = ε ( 1 + ω L 2 ω T 2 ω T 2 ω 2 j Γ ω ω p 2 ω ( ω + j γ ) ) .

Metrics

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2022 | Optica Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved