Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Effect of substitution of lutetium by gadolinium on emission characteristics of (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5: Sm3+ single crystals

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Single crystals of (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5:Sm (0.5 at%) with x = 0.19 (81% Gd3+) and x = 0.11 (89% Gd3+) belonging respectively to the C2/c and P21/c space groups were grown by the Czochralski method under nitrogen atmosphere. Detailed investigation of their spectroscopic properties were performed with the aim of understanding the effect of structural modification on emission characteristics of incorporated Sm3+ ions with a special attention directed to a laser potential associated with yellow emission line. It was inferred from low temperature optical spectra that almost all emission intensity in the host with C2/c symmetry comes from one of two available Sm3+ sites, whereas two Sm3+ sites contribute to emission in the host with P21/c symmetry. Excitation spectra of Sm3+ emission recorded in the VUV-UV region between 100 nm and 350 nm made it possible to locate the energy of CT transition at about 6.11 eV and to assess the low energy limit for the 4f5→ 4f45d1 transitions of Sm3+ to about 6.81 eV. It implies that in the two systems studied these energies are advantageously high thereby preventing the contribution of intense allowed transitions to an adverse excited state absorption of both blue pump radiation and yellow emission. Experiments of optical amplification of yellow emission were performed employing a pump-and-probe technique in order to verify this implication. It was found that for a LGSO:Sm3+ crystal having the C2/c symmetry an increase of the pump power density from 20 mJ/cm2 to 50 mJ/cm2 at a constant power probe density of 150 μW/cm2 brings about a positive gain growing from about 0.25 to 2 [cm−1]. In the same conditions a maximum gain value of 1 cm−1 was measured for LGSO:Sm3+ crystal having the P21/c symmetry. It was concluded that the former system is promising for the design of all-solid-state yellow lasers.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

The rare earth oxyorthosilicate compounds Re2SiO5 (Re3+ = Y, Gd, Lu) form hard, transparent, optically biaxial crystals. They melt congruently thereby large single crystals can be grown by the Czochralski method. These features, combined with an ability to incorporate appreciable quantities of luminescent rare earth ions have pointed at a potential of these hosts for a design of practically useful luminescent materials. In fact, crystals Gd2SiO5 (GSO), Y2SiO5 (YSO) and Lu2SiO5 (LSO) doped with Ce3+ ions have been intensively studied in the past owing to their promising scintillation properties [1]. Among them the Lu2SiO5:Ce scintillating crystal was found to be of particular interest because of its high light output (27300 photons/MeV), suitable emission wavelength (420 nm) and short decay time (~40 ns) [2]. Later on, numerous papers were devoted to spectroscopic investigation of oxyorthosilicate crystals doped with various rare earth ions, e.g. Pr3+ [3], Dy3+ [4,5], Eu3+ [6,7], Sm3+ [8], or Tm3+ [9]. When doped with ytterbium ions the LSO crystal proved to be a promising laser material emitting in near infrared [10, 11]. Unfortunately, a melting point above 2000 °C and a very high price of lutetium oxide Lu2O3 put the Lu2SiO5 host at a disadvantage of manufacturing process. On the other hand, GSO crystals show strong tendency to cleave thus posing serious problems during mechanical processing. Solid solution crystals (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5 (LGSO) have been considered aiming to overcome these drawbacks. Investigation on growth, crystal structure and scintillation characteristics of cerium-doped LGSO host has revealed that LGSO forms crystals belonging to the C2/c space group inherent to LSO for x value above 0.2 and to the P21/c space group inherent to GSO for x value below 0.2 [1214]. In a more recent paper it has been reported that the change of the LGSO symmetry occurs at 0.15 < x < 0.17 [15]. It has been ascertained also that the melting point of LGSO diminishes monotonously with decreasing Lu/Gd ratio and becomes inferiour to 1800 °C when x ≤ 0.2 [15]. Thus, the choice of the LGSO host for luminescent rare earth ions allows to drop advantageously both the crystallization temperature and the cost of chemicals, thereby making practical applications of these systems more favourable.

Interest in LGSO:Sm3+ crystals considered in the present work stems from the fact that they have an ability to convert an UV- blue emission of InGaN/GaN laser diodes into efficient visible emission distributed into green, yellow and red bands. In our opinion the spectral distribution of this emission reported in [15] is promising for application purposes, namely in the design of quasi-white light sources and possibly all-solid-state yellow laser. Systematic examination of structural peculiarities and of room temperature optical spectra of (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5:Sm3+ single crystals with 0.11 < x < 0.50 has revealed that spectroscopic features of Sm3+ change markedly when the change of Lu/Gd ratio induces the structural transition of the host [15]. Intentions of the present work are: (i) to understand the effect of structural modification mentioned above and (ii) to get a more detailed knowledge on the emission ability of materials studied. For these purposes low temperature emission spectra in the visible and excitation spectra in the VUV region and VUV-excited emission spectra were recorded and examined. Spectral features in the VUV region were investigated aiming at assessment of susceptibility of the systems under study to parasitic excited state absorption (ESA), an adverse phenomenon able to affect strongly the emission in Pr3+-doped Gd2SiO5 and Y2SiO5 crystals [3]. In the last section of the work results of experiments devoted to the evaluation of optical amplification of yellow emission in LGSO:Sm3+ crystals are presented.

2. Experimental

Single crystals of (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5:Sm (0.5 at%) with x = 0.19 (81%Gd3+) and x = 0.11 (89%Gd3+) belonging respectively to the C2/c and P21/c space groups were grown by the Czochralski method under nitrogen atmosphere. The manufacturing details have been reported elsewhere [15]. Transparent and colourless crystals with 20 mm of the diameter were grown from the 40 mm crucible. The plates with the (100) orientation were cut from crystal boules, polished and used in experiment. A strong tendency to crack parallel to the cleavage plane (100) was observed for samples cut from crystals with x = 0.11

Absorption spectra were recorded employing a Varian 5E UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer with a spectral bandwidth set to 0.5 nm. Measurement of luminescence spectra was carried out using an Optron Dong-Woo Fluorometer System containing an ozone-free Xe lamp as an excitation source. In this experiment an incident light at wavelength λexc = 405 nm was chosen by means of an excitation monochromator to match an intense absorption line of Sm3+ ions. When recording luminescence decay curves a Surelite Optical Parametric Oscillator (OPO) pumped by a third harmonic of a Nd:YAG laser was used as an excitation source. The emitted light was dispersed by a grating monochromator and detected by a photomultiplier connected to a Tektronix TDS 3052 oscilloscope. To record spectra and decay curves as a function of temperature a continuous flow liquid helium cryostat working in the 4 K – 300 K range was employed.

Measurement of excitation spectra in a vacuum-ultraviolet (VUV) region and VUV-excited emission spectra was carried out using a set-up available at the SUPERLUMI station of Synchrotronstrahlungslabor (HASYLAB) at Deutsche Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY) in Hamburg. Samples were mounted on a finger of a helium cryostat and measured at 12 K and 300 K. Excitation spectra were corrected for the incident flux of the excitation beam using the sodium salicylate as a standard. Emission spectra under the VUV excitation (λexc = 50 – 333 nm) were recorded with a CCD camera.

The optical amplification experiments were carried out in a pump and probe experimental setup, shown in [16]. The pump radiation was provided by an optical parametric oscillator (OPO) (EKSPLA, NT 342/3/UVE) tuned at 473 nm with high energy pulses between 0.01 and 0.05 [J/cm2] with duration of 10 ns. The monochromatic probe beam was obtained by dispersing the light of Oriel Xenon 400 W lamp with a monochromator Oriel 7725 1/8m, giving a signal power density of 150 μW/cm2 at 600 nm with a spectral FWHM of 4 nm. The studied samples were placed after a 1 mm diameter pinhole. The incidence of pump and probe beams were parallel and normal to the surface of the samples, which ones were cut and polished in order to have good optical faces with a similar thickness of 0.36 cm. In order to cover the whole area of the pinhole, the pump and probe were focused on pinhole area. The detection system was made with a TRIAX-180 monochromator and registered by a digital oscilloscope TEKTRONIX-2430A.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Room temperature absorption and emission spectra

When interpreting experimental results we will refer to energy level diagram of Sm3+ depicted in Fig. 1. It consists of two groups of excited levels separated by relatively large energy gap ofabout 7000 cm−1. In the low energy group there are multiplets formed by a spin-orbit splitting of 6H and 6F terms with the 6H5/2 ground state. The high energy group encompasses very closely spaced multiplets derived from the 4F, 4G, 4H, 4I, 4K, 4L, 4K, 4M quartet and 6P sextet terms with the lowest 4G5/2 metastable state. Transition between quartet and sextet terms are spin forbidden therefore intensities of absorption and emission lines related to transitions bridging multiplets belonging to different groups are weak, except for the 6H5/26P3/2, 5/2 absorption line near 405 nm.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Energy level diagram for Sm3+ ions. Right arrows indicate excitation wavelengths in VIS region, while left arrows emission transitions observed.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 2 compares survey room temperature absorption spectra recorded in the UV-visible region for (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5:Sm3+ crystals with x = 0.11 and x = 0.19. The spectra differ in the overall band intensity and in the band shape. In particular, the spectra of LGSO:Sm system with the LSO-type structure (x = 0.19) exhibit poorer line-structure than those of LGSO:Sm3+ with the GSO-type structure (x = 0.11). Nevertheless, peak values of absorption cross section for the 6H5/26P3/2, 5/2 transition around 405 nm for the two systems are high enough to assure efficient excitation of visible emission originating in the 4G5/2 level.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Comparison of survey absorption spectra recorded in the UV-visible region for (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5:Sm3+ crystals with x = 0.11 and x = 0.19

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 3 compares survey room temperature emission spectra recorded for crystals (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5:Sm3+ with x = 0.11 and x = 0.19. The spectra consist of bands related to the 4G5/26H5/2 (~570 nm), 6H7/2 (~600 nm) and 6H9/2 (~650 nm) transitions of Sm3+ ions. Again, bands for the LGSO:Sm3+ with the GSO-type structure (x = 0.11) show much more complex structure of band components. In the following we will consider origins of this phenomenon.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Comparison of emission cross sections recorded for (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5:Sm3+ crystals with x = 0.11 and x = 0.19. Values of emission cross section was obtained using Fuchtbauer – Ladenburg equation. For caclulation experimental values of branching ratios was taken.

Download Full Size | PDF

3.2 Low temperature emission spectra

Figure 4 compares high-resolution emission spectra of (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5: 0.5at.% Sm3+ (x = 0.11 and 0.19) at 5 K, normalized to the strongest line at 600 nm. Samarium ions were directly excited at 405 nm, a wavelength corresponding to the most intense absorption line in the UV-blue region. Its was found that its absorption coefficient at 405 nm amounts to 2.7 cm−1 when x = 0.11 (81% of Gd3+) and to 4.2 cm−1 when x = 0.19 (89% of Gd3+). A narrow and intense lineat around 600 nm dominates the spectra however spectral positions, intensities and numbers of remaining lines are not the same. To account for experimental data we recall information regarding local surrounding of rare earth ions for the C2/c and P21/c symmetries encountered in LGSO host. The nearest environment of Lu3+ ions in the LSO structure and Gd3+ ions in GSO structure are presented in Fig. 5.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 High-resolution emission spectra of (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5:Sm3+ crystals with different content of Gd3+ ions. Spectra were obtained at 5 K under the direct excitation of Sm3+ ions with 405 nm wavelength and normalized to the strongest line at about 600 nm. The asterisks indicate the 0-0 lines of the 4G5/26H5/2 transition.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 Polyhedrons of Lu1 and Lu2 in Lu2SiO5 structure (right picture) and of Gd1 and Gd2 in Gd2SiO5 structure (left picture). Interatomic distances are in angstrom (Å).

Download Full Size | PDF

In both structures there are two kind of oxygen ions: O1 - O4 connected with Si4+ and non-silicon bonded oxygen O5. The Lu2SiO5 crystal structure contains eight formula units (C2/c space group, Z = 8, 64 atoms including 16 atoms of Lu3+) in monoclinic unit cell and is created by (SiO4) and (OLu4) tetrahedra. The (OLu4) tetrahedra form chains running along c axis and interconnected by isolated (SiO4) tetrahedra what makes the structure more rigid than that of GSO [17]. Two crystallographically different lutetium ions have oxygen coordination number CN of 7 (Lu1, LuO7 polyhedra, average Lu-O distance of 2.32 Å) and of 6 (Lu2, LuO6 polyhedra, average Lu-O distance of 2.23 Å) and both are located in lattice positions with the C1 point symmetry. The monoclinic unit cell of Gd2SiO5 (P21/c space group, Z = 4) is two times smaller than that of LSO and contains 32 atoms including 8 atoms of Gd3+. In this structure the (OGd4) tetrahedra do not form chains but a two-dimensional network parallel to the (100) plane into which the (SiO4) tetrahedra are packed [17]. The crystal cleavage along the (100) plane is a consequence of relatively weak bonding between layers. Gd3+ ions occupy both (GdO9) nine-vertex coordination polyhedra (Gd1, average Gd-O distance of 2.49 Å) and (GdO7) seven-vertex coordination polyhedra (Gd2, average Gd-O distance of 2.39 Å) in which Gd3+ ions residue in sites with C1 local symmetry. A quantitative studies of dopant distribution between available polyhedra are extremely rare and limited only to LSO and LGSO crystals in which large Ce3+ ions (1.01 Å) substitute small Lu3+ ions (0.86 Å) in their lattice positions. It has been found that Ce3+ ions (0.25 at%) in Lu2SiO5 crystal occupy both Lu1 and Lu2 sites with the Ce3+ distribution as 95% to LuO7 polyhedra (Ce1) and 5% to LuO6 (Ce2) polyhedra [18] or 80% to Ce1 and 20% to Ce2 sites [19]. It was demonstrated by Sidletskiy et. al [13,14] that in Ce:(LuxGd1-x)2SiO5 with different degree of cation substitution, Lu3+ ions favour the LnO6 sixfold polyhedra whereas Gd3+ ions preferably occupy LnO7 sevenfold ones as long as the C2/c lattice symmetry is protected. However, when the symmetry of LGSO changes to P21/c, the Lu3+ ions occupy sites coordinated by seven oxygens (LnO7) whereas the Gd3+ are located in sites with nine-oxygen coordination. In accordance with [13,14], Gd3+ ions in the LGSO structure must tend to replace Lu3+ ions in Lu1 sites where the average Lu-O distance of 2.32 Å is larger than that of 2.23 Å for Lu2 site.

The 4G5/26H5/2 emission spectrum in LGSO containing 81 at% of Gd3+ is dominated by a strong and narrow line at 17794 cm−1 (562 nm). We assign this line to the transition between the lowest Stark’s components of the initial and terminal level (0-0 line, denoted by asterisks in Fig. 4). Very weak emission that originates in the second samarium site contributes to this spectrum because a number of experimentally observed lines is larger than that expected for one site (four instead of three) but its identification is impossible. However, when the gadolinium content in the LGSO lattice reaches 89 at% or more, the luminescence from two non-equivalent Sm3+ sites is clearly seen in spectra; the number of lines is close to that predicted for two sites. Moreover, a careful examination of the 6H5/24G5/2 absorption and emission spectra at 5 K made it possible to identify unambiguously the lines at 17706 cm−1 (565 nm) and 17572 cm−1 (569 nm) as 0-0 transitions of Sm3+ ions residing in two sites in the GSO host [8] and in LGSO having the GSO-type symmetry. These findings are corroborated by changes in Gd3+ absorption spectra of the 8S7/26P3/2, 6P5/2 and 6P7/2 transitions at 5 K, presented in Fig. 6.The impact of the increasing Gd3+ content manifests in the change of number of optical lines, their energetic positions and their mutual intensity relationship. Ionic radii of Gd3+ (0.94 Å) and Sm3+ (0.96 Å) are similar. Therefore, one can expect that both Gd3+ and Sm3+ ions will tend to occupy the same site polyhedra in the LGSO matrix.

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 Optical lines of the 8S7/26PJ absorption bands of Gd3+ ions in LGSO lattice with the C2/c (x = 0.19) and P21/c structures (x = 0.11). T = 5 K.

Download Full Size | PDF

Results presented above corroborate the diversity of distribution of rare earth ions in multi-fold polyhedra of LGSO lattice. However, a kinetics study of the Sm3+ emission in the 5 – 300 K temperature range indicates that the symmetry difference associated with non-equivalent Sm3+ sites in LGSO lattices affects weakly rates of transitions originating in the 4G5/2 metastable state. In fact, luminescence decay curves recorded for the two systems follow a single exponential time-dependence with lifetime values ranging from about 1.91 ms at 5 K to about 1.80 ms at 300 K. It may be interesting to notice that room temperature radiative and experimental lifetimes of 1.78 ms and 1.74 ms, respectively were reported for Gd2SiO5:Sm crystal [8].

3.3. VUV excitation spectra and VUV –excited emission spectra

Figure 7 compares excitation spectra of the LGSO:Sm systems studied monitoring the 610 nm emission (4G5/26H7/2) from Sm3+ ions. Broad bands with maxima at around 200 nm were attributed to the transfer of electron from the valence band VB of the LGSO host to trivalent Sm ion (CT transition). In consequence, a Sm2+ ions is created and the energy of the CT transition approximately gives the energy gap between the top of VB and the 4f6 ground state of Sm2+ ion. The data obtained at 12 K lead to the value of 6.11 eV for (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5:Sm that is somewhat lower than 6.95 eV reported for Lu2Si2O7 [18] and 7.35 eV reported for LiYP4O12 [19] but close to 5.59 eV and 6.2 eV determined for CaSO4 and Ln2(SO4)3 and collected by Dorenbos in [20]. It is worth to mention that optical bandgaps for both crystals are similar and equal ~6.1 eV (210 nm) [4, 21]. Structural transformation of LGSO from the LSO-type to GSO-type structure affects short-wavelength side of LGSO:Sm spectra. Wide-ranging CT band of (Lu0.19Gd0.81)2SiO5:Sm3+ includes a sub-structure at around 9,6 eV that turns into well-defined CT band and high-energetic structure of lattice when the content of Gd3+ ions increases to 89%, corroborating changes in the host ordering.

 figure: Fig. 7

Fig. 7 Excitation spectra of (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5:Sm3+ crystals with x = 0.11 and x = 0.19 excited by synchrotron radiation at 12 K (dotted lines) and 300 K (solid lines) registered under monitoring samarium luminescence at 610 nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

The 4f5→ 4f45d1 transitions of Sm3+ do not clearly become apparent in the VUV excitation spectra of LGSO:Sm. Even though systematic studies on the 5d samarium states are quite scarce and limited only to a few fluoride compounds, the position of the allowed 5d state in LGSO:Sm may be estimated based on the knowledge of the 2F5/2→5d absorption energy in Ce3+ -doped LSO and GSO [1]. Taking into account that the first 4f5→ 4f45d1 transition of Sm3+ is predicted to have ca 3.22 eV higher energy than that of Ce3+ [20], the energy of the lowest 5d samarium state in LSO and GSO were estimated, to find a correlation between synchrotron excitation spectra (12 K) and a potential energetic position of 5d state in studied Sm:LGSO systems. The results are presented in Table 1.Connecting multi-site structure of LGSO (two Lu3+ and two Gd3+ sites in LSO and GSO, respectively) with the sensitivity of 4fn→ 4fn-15d1 to local environment, we assigned an optical structure in the 6.28 – 6.78 eV range to the interconfigurational excitation to the first and second component of the 5d state.

Tables Icon

Table 1. Spectral position and energy of the lowest 5d-state of Ce3+ and Sm3+ in Lu2SiO5 (LSO) and Gd2SiO5 (GSO) and (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5 (LGSO) hosts.

There is no doubt that sharp and well-defined lines at around 250, 275 and 310 nm correspond to Gd3+ transitions within 4f7 ground electronic configuration, in particular to the 8S7/26PJ, 6IJ, 6DJ transitions. Their presence in the excitation spectra of Sm3+ emission at 610 nm points out an efficient energy transfer from Gd3+ to Sm3+ ions.

Comparable intensities of the CT and 6IJ8S7/2 transitions in the VUV-UV excitation spectra of Sm3+ emission imply that an energy transfer from these bands should bring forth an efficient long-wavelength luminescence. Figure 8 shows luminescence spectra of LGSO:Sm containing 81 and 89 at% of Gd3+ acquired at 12 K under the synchrotron radiation excitation and related to the 4G5/26H5/2 (~570 nm), 6H7/2 (~600 nm), 6H9/2 (~650 nm), and 6H11/2 (~706 nm). The spectra are representative for excitations in the 40-110 nm (host), 170-200 nm (4f5d, CT bands) and 240-313 nm (Gd3+ lines) ranges on the one hand, and for the crystals with the same type-structure on the other. Although the CCD camera employed gives a slight instrumental broadening it can be seen easily that the spectra of LGSO:Sm3+ with the LSO-type structure exhibit poorer line-structure than those of LGSO:Sm3+ with the GSO-type structure. The excitation wavelength has no effect on the line positions and intensities within the LSO-type host. Small differences between emission spectra of (Lu0.11Gd0.89)2SiO5: Sm sample, taken under 112 – 196 and 277-312 [nm] excitations, could be found however. Excitation in 112 – 196 nm is conneted with broad and intense bands realted to intervalence and CT transitions. Excitation in 277 and 312 nm is related with energy transfer from Gd3+ to Sm3+. From observed differences emerge, that gadolinium ions preferentially transfer energy to samarium ion occupying one site, when energy transfer to Sm3+ located in second site is scarce.

 figure: Fig. 8

Fig. 8 Emission spectra of Sm3+ in the LGSO crystals having the LSO- and GSO-type symmetry (x = 0.19 and 0.11, respectively) registered at 12 K under different wavelengths of synchrotron radiation.

Download Full Size | PDF

Results presented and discussed in this section justify conclusions regarding possible impact of an adverse phenomenon of excited state absorption on emission efficiency in LGSO:Sm3+ optically pumped at wavelengths above 400 nm. Unsuccessful attempts to achieve the optical amplification of visible emission in praseodymium-doped GSO and YSO hosts, reported in the past, have been attributed to strong ESA transitions from the metastable 3P0 level to 4f15d1 states of Pr3+ [3]. In this phenomenon the most relevant channels are ESA of pump radiation and ESA at wavelengths of emitted light. For a pump radiation at 405 nm the ESA from the 4G5/2 metastable level of Sm3+ located near 17700 cm−1 in LGSO is able to feed states having energies ca 42340 cm−1. It can be seen in Fig. 7 that this value is lower than the onset of the CT band for the systems under study. For an emitted light around 600 nm the ESA is able to feed excited Sm3+ states having energies ca 34300 cm−1. Intensities of transitions within the 4f5 configuration of Sm3+ are predicted to be markedly smaller than those of CT or 4f-5d transitions, however. Accordingly, we suppose that in contrast to Pr3+ ions the ESA in samarium doped LGSO host is not crucial.

3.4. Optical amplification

Optical amplification experiments were performed to verify the supposition forwarded in previous section. The emission spectra obtained in the Sm3+ doped crystals have several emission bands in the visible region as can be seen in Fig. 3 These spectra have been obtained in the sample conditions (for comparison purposes) and all the bands can be clearly identified with transitions from the 4G5/2 level of Sm3+ ions.

In the emission spectra shown in Fig. 3 it is interesting to note the intense emissions about 600 nm obtained in the two doped crystals. This emission band corresponding to the 4G5/26H7/2 transition could be interesting for optical applications because exciting to upper levels to the 4G5/2 level could be possible to obtain a laser system of four levels with an emission about 600 nm.

As was explained in the experimental section, an experiment setup of pump and probe has been made in order to characterize the possible optical amplification abput 600 nm in these crystals. The optical gain, using a stimulation probe about 600 nm, can be obtained evaluating the signal enhancement (SE) when the probe beam passes through the crystal. Therefore, it is defined by [16, 22]:

SE=IppIpIprobe

where Ipp is the intensity detected about 600 nm in the direction of the probe beam coming out from the sample when it is irradiated simultaneously with the pump (about 473 nm) and the probe (about 600 nm) beams, Ip is the spontaneous emission intensity at the same wavelength when the probe is blocked before the sample, and Iprobe is the intensity of the probe beam. The intensity of the probe beam through a material decreases according to the exponential law:

Iprobe=I0eαL

where I0 is the probe intensity in the entrance of the crystal, α is the absorption coefficient at this wavelength and L is its length.

When the crystal is affected by both pump and the probe beams then Ipp can be expressed in the following form:

Ipp=Ip+I0e(gα)L

Where g is the gain due to the stimulated emission of the sample at the probe wavelength. At 600 nm the crystals are highly transparent and the value for α is negligible (see absorption spectra shown Fig. 9). Therefore, by introducing the Eqs. (2) and (3) into (1), the following expression for the gain is obtained:

 figure: Fig. 9

Fig. 9 Emission spectra of the 4G5/26H7/2 transition of Sm3+ in (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5 (x = 0.19) crystal having the LSO-type of symmetry. The red line describes emission of the crystal under pump excitation (Epump) at 473 nm. Black line is emission spectrum of probe (Eprobe). The blue describes its emission under pump excitation at 473 nm and probe at 600 nm after substraction of black line (Epump + probe – Eprobe). The differecnce between blue and red spectra shows signal enchancement.

Download Full Size | PDF

SE=egL

The values for Ipp, Ip and Iprobe can be obtained as function of the time after pulsed excitation at 473 nm and detecting at 600 nm. In these experiments the probe has been tuned at 600 nm. Therefore, it is possible to obtain the optical gain as function of the time and using the Eq. (4). The results are shown in Fig. 10for two different pump intensities. As can be seen, immediately after the excitation pulse the optical gain is much higher due to there is a maximum in population of the excited level (4G5/2). When this level starts to depopulate the gain also decreases.

 figure: Fig. 10

Fig. 10 Temporal dependence of the gain obtained for Sm3+ in (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5 (x = 0.19) after pulsed excitation at 473 nm and detecting at 596 nm. The red (dotted) curve was obtained with a pump energy density of 50 mJ/cm2 and the blue (solid) curve with 20 mJ/cm2

Download Full Size | PDF

In Fig. 11 are shown the values obtained for the gain values at short times as function of the pump power density at 473 nm. As can be seen in the sample (Lu0.19Gd0.81)2SiO5 are obtained better results respect to the (Lu0.11Gd0.89)2SiO5 crystal. Both samples have similar lifetimes for the 4G5/2 level (about 1.8 ms). But, as can be seen in Fig. 3, the intensity of the emission at 600 nm is higher for the (Lu0.19Gd0.81)2SiO5 sample. This sharpness at 600 nm for the sample (Lu0.19Gd0.81)2SiO5 respect to the (Lu0.11Gd0.89)2SiO5 could explain the better results obtained of the optical gain at 600 nm in Fig. 11.

 figure: Fig. 11

Fig. 11 Optical gain as a function of the pump energy density from 20 mJ/cm2 to 50 mJ/cm2 with a probe density of 150 μW/cm2. The continuous lines are guide for the eye.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusions

Single crystals of (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5:Sm3+ (LGSO:Sm) with x = 0.11 and x = 0.19 and Sm3+ concentration of 0.5 at% were grown by the Czochralski technique at temperatures lower than that of the Lu2SiO5 host (below 1780 °C against 2050 °C). XRD examination revealed that the structure of the LGSO:Sm is consistent with the P21/c space group for x = 0.11 and with the C2/c space group for x = 0.19. Based on low temperature emission spectra it was concluded that as the (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5:Sm3+ crystal keeps the C2/c symmetry of LSO lattice, almost all emission intensity comes from samarium ions located in (LuO7) polyhedra. The determined energy of the 4G5/2(0) → 4H5/2(0) transition of Sm3+ in this site position is 17790 cm−1. Intensity of emission coming from a second type of Sm3+ sites (LuO6 polyhedra) was extremely low. In LGSO:Sm crystals having the P21/c space group two available Sm3+ sites contribute to emission. The low temperature lines at 17706 and 17572 cm−1 were attributed to 4G5/2(0) → 6H5/2(0) transitions of Sm3+ ions located in two non-equivalent sites. In spite of the fact that Sm3+ ions are located in non-equivalent lattice positions of two different structures of LGSO lattice, luminescence decays exhibit single exponential character with similar time constants implying that differences in local symmetry of Sm3+ ions weakly affect rates of transitions originating from the 4G5/2 luminescence state.

Excitation spectra of Sm3+ emission recorded in the VUV-UV region between 100 nm and 350 nm made it possible to locate the energy of CT transition at about 6.11 eV and to assess the low energy limit for the 4f5→ 4f45d1 transitions of Sm3+ to about 6.81 eV. It was concluded that in the two systems studied these energies are advantageously high thereby preventing the contribution of intense allowed transitions to an adverse excited state absorption of both blue pump radiation and yellow emission. Experiments of optical amplification of yellow emission, performed employing a pump-and-probe technique corroborated this conclusion. It was found that for a LGSO:Sm3+ crystal having the C2/c symmetry an increase of the pump power density from 20 mJ/cm2 to 50 mJ/cm2 at a constant power probe density of 150 μW/cm2 brings about a positive gain growing from about 0.25 to 2 [cm−1]. In the same conditions a maximum gain value of 1 cm−1 was measured for LGSO:Sm3+ crystal having the P21/c symmetry. It was concluded that the former system is promising for the design of all-solid-state yellow lasers.

Acknowledgments

The work is supported by National Science Centre of Poland (NCN) within a project Number DEC-2011/01/B/ST7/06166.

Authors thank Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of Spain (MINECO) within The National Program of Materials (MAT2010-21270-C04-02/-03/-04), The Consolider Ingenio 2010 Program (MALTA CSD207-0045, www.malta-consolider.com) the EU-FEDER for their financial support and ACIISI of Gobierno de Canarias for the project ID20100152

References and links

1. H. Suzuki, T. A. Tombrello, C. L. Melcher, and J. S. Schweitzer, “UV and gamma-ray excited luminescence of cerium-doped rare earth oxyorthosilicates,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 320(1-2), 263–272 (1992). [CrossRef]  

2. C. L. Melcher and J. S. Schweitzer, “A promising new scintillator: cerium-doped lutetium oxyorthosilicate,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 314(1), 212–214 (1992). [CrossRef]  

3. N. V. Kuleshov, V. G. Shcherbitsky, A. A. Lagatsky, V. P. Mikhailov, B. I. Minkov, T. Danger, T. Sandrock, and G. Huber, “Spectroscopy, excited-state absorption and stimulated emission in Pr3+-doped Gd2SiO5 and Y2SiO5 crystals,” J. Lumin. 71(1), 27–35 (1997). [CrossRef]  

4. G. Dominiak-Dzik, W. Ryba-Romanowski, R. Lisiecki, P. Solarz, and M. Berkowski, “Dy-doped Lu2SiO5 single crystal: spectroscopic characteristics and luminescence dynamics,” Appl. Phys. B 99(1-2), 285–297 (2010). [CrossRef]  

5. R. Lisiecki, G. Dominiak-Dzik, P. Solarz, W. Ryba-Romanowski, M. Berkowski, and M. Głowacki, “Optical spectra and luminescence dynamics of the Dy-doped Gd2SiO5 single crystal,” Appl. Phys. B 98(2-3), 337–346 (2010). [CrossRef]  

6. A. S. S. de Camargo, M. R. Davolos, and L. A. O. Nunes, “Spectroscopic characteristics of Er3+ in the two crystallographic sites of Gd2SiO5,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14(12), 3353–3363 (2002). [CrossRef]  

7. Y. Chen, B. Liu, Ch. Shi, M. Kirm, M. True, S. Vielhauer, and G. Zimmerer, “Luminescent properties of Gd2SiO5 powder doped with Eu3+ under VUV–UV excitation,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 17(7), 1217–1224 (2005). [CrossRef]  

8. A. Strzęp, R. Lisiecki, P. Solarz, G. Dominiak-Dzik, W. Ryba-Romanowski, and M. Berkowski, “Optical spectra and excited state relaxation dynamics of Sm3+ in Gd2SiO5 single crystal,” Appl. Phys. B 106(1), 85–93 (2012). [CrossRef]  

9. C. Li, R. Moncorge, J. C. Souriau, C. Borel, and Ch. Wyon, “Efficient 2.05 μm room temperature Y2SiO5:Tm3+ cw laser,” Opt. Commun. 101(5-6), 356–360 (1993). [CrossRef]  

10. C. Yan, G. Zhao, L. Su, X. Xu, L. Hang, and J. Xu, “„Growth and spectroscopic characteristics of Yb:GSO single crystal,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 18(4), 1325–1333 (2006). [CrossRef]  

11. M. Jacquemet, C. Jacquemet, N. Janel, F. Druon, F. Balembois, P. Georges, J. Petit, B. Viana, D. Vivien, and B. Ferrand, “Efficient laser action of Yb:LSO and Yb:YSO oxyorthosilicates crystals under high-power diode-pumping,” Appl. Phys. B 80(2), 171–176 (2005). [CrossRef]  

12. G. B. Loutts, A. I. Zagumennyi, S. V. Lavrishchev, Yu. D. Zavartsev, and P. A. Studenikin, “„Czochralski growth and characterization of (Lu1−xGdx)2SiO5 single crystals for scintillators,” J. Cryst. Growth 174(1-4), 331–336 (1997). [CrossRef]  

13. O. Sidletskiy, V. G. Bondar, B. V. Grynyov, D. A. Kurtsev, V. N. Baumer, K. N. Belikov, Z. V. Shtitelman, S. A. Tkachenko, O. V. Zelenskaya, N. G. Starzhinsky, and V. A. Tarasov, “Growth of LGSO: Ce crystals by the Czochralski method,” Crystallogr. Rep. 54(7), 1256–1260 (2009). [CrossRef]  

14. O. Sidletskiy, V. Bondar, B. Grinyov, D. Kurtsev, V. Baumer, K. Belikov, K. Katrunov, N. Starzhinsky, O. Tarasenko, V. Tarasov, and O. Zelenskaya, “Impact of Lu/Gd ratio and activator concentration on structure and scintillation properties of LGSO:Ce crystals,” J. Cryst. Growth 312(4), 601–606 (2010). [CrossRef]  

15. M. Głowacki, G. Dominiak-Dzik, W. Ryba-Romanowski, R. Lisiecki, A. Strzęp, T. Runka, M. Drozdowski, V. Domukhovski, R. Diduszko, and M. Berkowski, “Growth conditions, structure, Raman characterization and optical properties of Sm-doped (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5 single crystals grown by the Czochralski method,” J. Solid State Chem. 186, 268–277 (2012). [CrossRef]  

16. P. Haro-Gonzales, I. R. Martin, F. Lahoz, S. Gonzales-Perez, E. Cavalli, and N. E. Capuj, “Optical amplification in Er3+-doped transparent Ba2NaNb5O15 single crystal at 850 nm,” J. Appl. Phys. 106(11), 113108 (2009). [CrossRef]  

17. J. Felsche, “The crystal chemistry of the rare-earth silicates,” Structure and Bonding 13, 99–197 (1973). [CrossRef]  

18. L. Pidol, B. Viana, A. Galtayries, and P. Dorenbos, “Energy levels of lanthanide ions in a Lu2Si2O7 host,” Phys. Rev. B 72(12), 125110 (2005). [CrossRef]  

19. P. Dorenbos, T. Shalapska, G. Stryganyuk, A. Gektin, and A. Voloshinovskii, “Spectroscopy and energy level location of the trivalent lanthanides in LiYP4O12,” J. Lumin. 131(4), 633–639 (2011). [CrossRef]  

20. P. Dorenbos, “Systematic behaviour in trivalent lanthanide charge transfer energies,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 15(49), 8417–8434 (2003). [CrossRef]  

21. K. Mori, M. Nakayama, and H. Nishimura, “Role of the core excitons formed by 4f-4f transitions of Gd3+ on Ce3+ scintillation in Gd2SiO5,” Phys. Rev. B 67(16), 165206 (2003). [CrossRef]  

22. D. Navarro-Urrios, M. Melchiorri, N. Daldosso, L. Pavesi, C. García, P. Pellegrino, B. Garrido, G. Pucker, F. Gourbilleau, and R. Rizk, “Optical losses and gain in silicon-rich silica waveguides containing Er ions,” J. Lumin. 121(2), 249–255 (2006). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (11)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Energy level diagram for Sm3+ ions. Right arrows indicate excitation wavelengths in VIS region, while left arrows emission transitions observed.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Comparison of survey absorption spectra recorded in the UV-visible region for (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5:Sm3+ crystals with x = 0.11 and x = 0.19
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Comparison of emission cross sections recorded for (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5:Sm3+ crystals with x = 0.11 and x = 0.19. Values of emission cross section was obtained using Fuchtbauer – Ladenburg equation. For caclulation experimental values of branching ratios was taken.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 High-resolution emission spectra of (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5:Sm3+ crystals with different content of Gd3+ ions. Spectra were obtained at 5 K under the direct excitation of Sm3+ ions with 405 nm wavelength and normalized to the strongest line at about 600 nm. The asterisks indicate the 0-0 lines of the 4G5/26H5/2 transition.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Polyhedrons of Lu1 and Lu2 in Lu2SiO5 structure (right picture) and of Gd1 and Gd2 in Gd2SiO5 structure (left picture). Interatomic distances are in angstrom (Å).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Optical lines of the 8S7/26PJ absorption bands of Gd3+ ions in LGSO lattice with the C2/c (x = 0.19) and P21/c structures (x = 0.11). T = 5 K.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Excitation spectra of (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5:Sm3+ crystals with x = 0.11 and x = 0.19 excited by synchrotron radiation at 12 K (dotted lines) and 300 K (solid lines) registered under monitoring samarium luminescence at 610 nm.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8 Emission spectra of Sm3+ in the LGSO crystals having the LSO- and GSO-type symmetry (x = 0.19 and 0.11, respectively) registered at 12 K under different wavelengths of synchrotron radiation.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9 Emission spectra of the 4G5/26H7/2 transition of Sm3+ in (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5 (x = 0.19) crystal having the LSO-type of symmetry. The red line describes emission of the crystal under pump excitation (Epump) at 473 nm. Black line is emission spectrum of probe (Eprobe). The blue describes its emission under pump excitation at 473 nm and probe at 600 nm after substraction of black line (Epump + probe – Eprobe). The differecnce between blue and red spectra shows signal enchancement.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10 Temporal dependence of the gain obtained for Sm3+ in (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5 (x = 0.19) after pulsed excitation at 473 nm and detecting at 596 nm. The red (dotted) curve was obtained with a pump energy density of 50 mJ/cm2 and the blue (solid) curve with 20 mJ/cm2
Fig. 11
Fig. 11 Optical gain as a function of the pump energy density from 20 mJ/cm2 to 50 mJ/cm2 with a probe density of 150 μW/cm2. The continuous lines are guide for the eye.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Spectral position and energy of the lowest 5d-state of Ce3+ and Sm3+ in Lu2SiO5 (LSO) and Gd2SiO5 (GSO) and (LuxGd1-x)2SiO5 (LGSO) hosts.

Equations (4)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

SE= I pp I p I probe
I probe = I 0 e αL
I pp = I p + I 0 e (gα)L
SE= e gL
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.