Open Access
Add to BibSonomy
Abstract
We correct two mistakes in [Opt. Mater. Express 12, 2772 (2022) [CrossRef] ]. These corrections have no influence on the conclusions of the original paper.
© 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement
Errata
- • This erratum corrects the value of $n_{\perp }$ presented in Table 1 of [1]. The optimization procedure led to $n_{\perp } = 2.82$ (i.e. $\epsilon _{\perp } = 7.98$) and not to $\epsilon _{\perp } = 2.82$.
- • The color scale for the experimental reflectivity (Fig. 1(b)) was incorrect and there was a mistake for the energy values on the y-axis. It is now replaced by the following version :
Fig. 1. Reflectivity maps of a 17-nm-thick layer of TDBC on a 50-nm-thick layer of silver: (a) Structure of the sample illuminated from glass in Kretschmann geometry, leading to a surface plasmon excitation (b) Experimental data, (c) Simulated reflectivity map for an anisotropic model of TDBC permittivity and (d) Simulated reflectivity map for an isotropic model of TDBC permittivity. Simulation realized with a Brendel Bormann model, after optimization on photoluminescence. All data gathered in Table 1.
Funding
H2020 European Research Council (Marie Sklodowska-Curie 754387); Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE24-0046, ANR-18-CE30-0014); Labex (ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL*, ANR-10-LABX-24).
Disclosures
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data Availability
Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.
References
1. E. Bailly, K. Chevrier, C. Perez de la Vega, J.-P. Hugonin, Y. De Wilde, V. Krachmalnicoff, B. Vest, and J.-J. Greffet, “Method to measure the refractive index for photoluminescence modelling,” Opt. Mater. Express 12(7), 2772–2781 (2022). [CrossRef]
