Abstract
An optical field with sub-nm confinement is essential for exploring atomic- or molecular-level light-matter interaction. While such fields demonstrated so far have typically point-like cross-sections, an optical field having a higher-dimensional cross-section may offer higher flexibility and/or efficiency in applications. Here, we propose generating a nanoscale blade-like optical field in a coupled nanofiber pair (CNP) with a 1-nm-width central slit. Based on a strong mode coupling-enabled slit waveguide mode, a sub-nm-thickness blade-like optical field can be generated with a cross-section down to at 1550 nm wavelength (i.e., a thickness of ) and a peak-to-background intensity ratio (PBR) higher than 20 dB. The slit waveguide mode of the CNP can be launched from one of the two nanofibers that are connected to a standard optical fiber via an adiabatical fiber taper, in which a fundamental waveguide mode of the fiber can be converted into a high-purity slit mode with high efficiency () within a CNP length of less than 10 μm at 1550 nm wavelength. The wavelength-dependent behaviors and group velocity dispersion in mode converting processes are also investigated, showing that such a CNP-based design is also suitable for broadband and ultrafast pulsed operation. Our results may open up new opportunities for studying light-matter interaction down to the sub-nm scale, as well as for exploring ultra-high-resolution optical technology ranging from super-resolution nanoscopy to chemical bond manipulation.
© 2023 Chinese Laser Press
1. INTRODUCTION
Due to the sub-nm feature size of typical atomic or molecular structures, the sub-nm-confined optical field is fundamentally important for exploring light-matter interaction on the bottom and pushing the limit of optical technology ranging from super-resolution nanoscopy [1–3] and molecular spectroscopy [4–6] to atom/molecule manipulation [7–9]. Current available approaches to such fields mostly rely on plasmonic field localization, by which effective field confinement down to the 1- or sub-nm (i.e., , where is the vacuum wavelength) level has been successfully realized [2,4,10–15]. However, due to the high optical loss and large wave vector of an extremely confined plasmonic mode, challenges such as thermal issues (e.g., thermal noise and damage caused by optical absorption [16,17]) and momentum mismatch between the confined and outside free-space fields [18] remain. Recently, sub-nm-confined optical fields generated in slit modes of coupled-nanowire pairs have been demonstrated [19,20]. Relying on coherently polarized bound electrons between two opposite hexagonal nanowire vertex edges, a point-like field with optical confinement down to sub-nm was obtained. While such fields have typically quasi-zero-dimensional cross-sections, an optical field having higher-dimensional cross-section is expected to offer higher flexibility and/or efficiency in some circumstances, as shown in the light sheet for far-field super-resolution optical microscopy [21,22].
In this work, we propose generating a nanoscale blade-like optical field with sub-nm thickness in a coupled nanofiber pair (CNP). Similar to that in the coupled nanowire pair [20], when two nanofibers are placed in parallel with a central slit down to the 1 nm level, a -like nano-slit waveguiding mode with an extremely confined optical field can be obtained. However, unlike a hexagonal crystalline nanowire that typically has a 1-nm-scale diameter of the corner edge, a cylindrical glass nanofiber used here has a 100-nm-scale diameter, offering the slit an additional dimension (i.e., expanding the projection of the slit from a point-like to a line-like shape in the cross-section) for confining the central field to a blade-like profile in spatial distribution of the near-field intensity.
Previously, coupled modes in a CNP with a slit size down to 1 nm level have been studied under weak coupling conditions [23–26]. However, due to the strong mode coupling feature of a CNP in such cases (e.g., both the ratio of diameter to wavelength and the slit width are small), especially that a sub-nm-confined field can be obtained only in a slit waveguiding mode generated by strong mode coupling of the waveguiding modes of individual nanofibers, weak coupling approximation is not suitable in such cases.
Here, under the strong coupling condition, we investigate the slit waveguiding mode in a CNP and demonstrate a sub-nm thickness blade-like field around the slit region for the first time. The peak-to-background intensity ratio (PBR) of the confined field, fiber coupling scheme, modal field evolution, and waveguide dispersion are also studied.
2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. Configuration of the CNP
The configuration of the CNP and the waveguiding nano-slit mode are schematically illustrated in Fig. 1(a). The CNP is formed by placing a pair of nanofibers closely in parallel. One end of the CNP having a flat end face is used as the output face, and the other end with one nanofiber connecting to a standard fiber (through a fiber taper) serves as the input port. The light input from the standard fiber is adiabatically transmitted through the fiber taper, coupled into the CNP waveguide, and finally converted into a -like nano-silt mode as a result of strong mode coupling between fundamental modes of the two individual nanofibers (i.e., modes). Relying on the coupled oscillation of polarized bound electrons around both sides of the slit, the nano-slit mode can provide a blade-like optical field with a high PBR in the cross-section of the CNP [Fig. 1(b)].
Practically, benefitting from sub-nanometer roughness of a glass nanofiber surface [27,28] that is similar to that of melt formed glass surface [29,30], when two nanofibers are assembled in close contact in parallel, the CNP can naturally form a central slit in width. Meanwhile, material-rich nanofibers with high refractive indices and negligible absorption loss, such as glass nanofiber from near- to mid-infrared bands and glass nanofiber from ultraviolet to near-infrared bands, can be used to support the nano-slit mode in a wide spectral range. Also, it is worth mentioning that, in recent years, high-quality nanofibers have been reported for ultra-low-loss [31–33] and high-power optical waveguiding [34], making it possible to generate nanoscale blade-like optical fields with high peak power.
B. Nanoscale Blade-Like Optical Fields in Waveguiding Nano-Slit Modes
Generally, we use commercial software of Maxwell’s equations solver (Lumerical FDTD and COMSOL) to simulate mode evolutions in the CNP in three dimensions. Here, to obtain the spatial distribution of the nano-slit modes at the output end of the CNP with high precision, we mesh the area around the nano-slit with a minimum size of 0.01 nm. To avoid an intolerable amount of computation in the 3D simulation, we used a 2D-COMSOL simulation to calculate the field distribution in an glass CNP with wavelength ()-dependent refractive index () of the glass shown in Fig. 6 (Appendix A). As a more precise approximation, we assume a V-shaped linearly changing index profile across the slit (Fig. 7 in Appendix A), while providing typical results calculated with a step-index profile for reference (Figs. 7 and 8 in Appendix A).
For an individual nanofiber, the fundamental mode is an mode. When the two nanofibers are placed in parallel and close contact, strong mode coupling occurs. Since the diameter of the nanofibers discussed here is relatively small, we plot only the lowest four eigenmodes. The spatial distribution of normalized electric field vectors and surface polarized bound charge density of the four lowest modes in an CNP with a nanofiber diameter () of 200 nm and a slit width () of 1 nm at 640 nm wavelength are shown in Figs. 2(a)–2(d). It is worth noting that the field intensity confinement and intensity within the slit in -like mode are much higher than those in other modes (here are -, -, and -like modes), which can be attributed to the high polarized charge density with opposite signs gathered at a separation of only 1 nm [Fig. 2(a2)]. For comparison, the separations between oppositely polarized charges are much larger in the other three modes.
Benefitting from the broadband transparency of glass (from 570 nm to 5 μm, shown in Fig. 6), the nano-slit mode in an glass CNP can be obtained within a broad spectral range. Figures 2(e)–2(g) show -dependent effective refractive index () of the four lowest modes in the CNP at visible (640 nm), near-infrared (1550 nm), and mid-infrared (4.5 μm) wavelength. Due to the different cutoff diameter of each mode, it is possible to support -like mode only and eliminate all other modes by selecting a proper . However, in experiment, the inaccuracy in diameter measurement [35] and the varying refractive index of the material under different waveguiding power and temperature [36,37] make it difficult to precisely determine the cutoff diameter, although choosing a larger is easier for micromanipulation in experiment. Fortunately, the polarizations of the - and -like modes are almost orthogonal, making it possible to selectively launch the -like mode by controlling the polarization of the input fiber mode. Therefore, in the following text, we consider the CNP that supports the lowest two modes only (i.e., - and -like modes) and selectively launch the -like mode by selecting the polarization of the input mode.
Figures 3(a)–3(c) show the field intensity distribution of a typical -like mode in an glass CNP with and at 1550 nm wavelength, in which a nanoscale blade-like optical field is clearly seen. In the central slit, the dominant peak offers an extremely tight field confinement of 0.28 nm ( axis) and 38.3 nm ( axis) in the full width at half-maximum (FWHM), with a peak intensity much higher () than the average intensity of the whole mode field. Besides the central dominant peak, there are two side peaks in the background field due to the dielectric noncontinuity at the edge of the CNP. For reference, Fig. 3(d) shows the two side peaks (peak2), which are 18.5 dB lower in intensity compared with the central peak (peak1). It is worth mentioning that, unlike the plasmon mode that can wholly break the diffraction limit, the -like mode here as a whole is diffraction limited with an effective mode area of about [, ]. Despite its ultra-strong field intensity, the central peak contains only a very small fraction of the total mode power, agreeing well with the low momentum mismatch between the confined field and the free space. As shown in Figs. 3(e) and 3(f), the central peak region of the -like mode accounts for 0.036% of the effective mode area and confines 0.88% of the total power. In addition, we have also calculated the dependence of fractional power confined in the central peak on and [Fig. 3(g)], showing that the fraction of the power confined in the central peak increases with and .
To investigate the behavior of PBR that is critical for practical applications (e.g., a large PBR is desired to obtain a high signal-to-noise ratio), we calculated the dependence of the PBR and FWHM of the dominant peak on and (normalized diameter) in an glass CNP. Figure 4(a) gives -dependent PBR with at 1550 nm wavelength. It shows that, when increases from 1 to 40 nm, the PBR decreases monotonously from 23.8 dB to 15.9 dB, while the FWHM increases monotonously from 0.28 nm (in axis) and 38.3 nm (in axis) to 39.4 nm (in axis) and 119.9 nm (in axis). Figures 4(b) and 4(c) show -dependent PBRs and FWHMs with typical values for visible () and near-infrared () bands, respectively. The results show that, within the two calculated spectral ranges, when increases, the PBRs decrease slightly and the FWHMs in axis decrease evidently, while that in the axis keeps almost a constant (e.g., 0.28 nm with ). The large difference in FWHM and its dependence in the and axes offers an opportunity to generate a nanoscale blade-like field with different geometries. For example, with a similar of about 0.19 and , a blade-like field launched by 1550 nm wavelength light with has a axis width (38.3 nm) twice that of the field launched by 640 nm wavelength light with [Fig. 4(d)], while the axis thicknesses at (i.e., the minimum thickness), 0.25 nm and 0.28 nm for 640- and 1550-nm-wavelength light are very close.
C. Mode Evolution and Dispersion of Nano-Slit Modes in CNPs
As illustrated in Fig. 1(a), to simplify the launching structure, we propose using a nanofiber with one side connected to a standard fiber via a fiber taper (i.e., the nanofiber is naturally tapered down from the standard fiber). To obtain a high coupling and converting efficiency, we propose a waveguiding launching scheme including an adiabatic mode transition and side coupling with a matched effective refractive index (). Figure 5(a) gives a typical example of such a launching structure for 1550-nm-wavelength light with . The input mode from a single-mode fiber (i.e., mode) with horizontal polarization is first converted into the nanofiber mode (i.e., mode) via a fiber taper with a tapering angle of (to ensure an adiabatical mode transition [38]) and then evanescently coupled into the CNP when it reaches the overlapping area. As of an individual nanofiber is evidently smaller than that of the CNP, to match the in the evanescent coupling process, the overlapping of the second nanofiber starts from the taper region of the launching fiber [a 2-μm-length taper is long enough for ensuring an intersection point between of the launching fiber taper and the CNP, as shown in Fig. 5(b)]. Owing to the small diameter of the nanofiber, the slight bending of the second nanofiber can be realized by either elastic [39] or plastic [27] bending.
The light coupled into the CNP will evolve into -like nano-slit mode while propagating along the CNP. Our calculation shows that, after waveguiding through the propagation area ( in length) in CNP, the mode is output from the end of the CNP as a high-purity nano-slit mode. Owing to a tapering profile and thus a wide-range of the input fiber taper, the waveguiding scheme can be operated within a broad spectral range. For example, within about 800 nm bandwidth (from 1016 to 1870 nm wavelength), the mode purity of the nano-slit mode is higher than 90%, with a maximum of 98.3%. From 1.1 μm to 1.8 μm wavelength, the coupling efficiency of the excited nano-slit mode is higher than 90%, with a maximum efficiency approaching 98.1%, as shown in Fig. 5(c). The slight impurity may come from the forward scattering fields (due to the breakage of the symmetry of the waveguiding structure) and/or a very weak -like mode (due to the non-strictly orthogonal polarization with TE-polarized mode) that may be excited during the mode coupling and evolution processes.
Also, we investigated the group velocity () and dispersion of the -like mode around 1550 nm wavelength, as shown in Fig. 5(d). Due to the relatively small nanofiber diameter (i.e., ), the increasing wavelength leads to the increasing fractional power in the air and thus increasing with negative dispersion. Although the dispersion of the nano-slit mode is orders of magnitude larger than those of conventional waveguides (e.g., at 1320 nm for single-mode fiber [40,41]), the short length of the CNP used for in-coupling and mode evolution (e.g., ) makes ultrafast pulsed operation possible. For example, after waveguiding through a 10-μm-length CNP (, ), a 100 fs pulse with a central wavelength of 1550 nm and a bandwidth of 30 nm will be broadened in pulse width.
3. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, we propose a blade-like field with sub-nanometer thickness in a waveguiding CNP. Compared with other ultra-tightly confined optical fields, such a field significantly expands its width while maintaining an extreme optical confinement in the thickness direction (i.e., , with an aspect ratio ). Using a fiber taper-assisted launching scheme, the waveguiding mode from a single-mode optical fiber can be coupled into the CNP and converted into a high-purity (up to 98.3%) -like nano-slit mode with high efficiency (up to 98.1%), within a propagation length less than 10 μm at 1550 nm wavelength. In the same CNP, the -like nano-slit mode can be operated within a broad spectral range with relatively low group velocity dispersion, making it possible for ultrafast pulsed operation. Moreover, by using nanofibers with other materials (e.g., silica with lower surface roughness and shorter operation wavelength), the nano-slit can be operated with tighter confinement (see Fig. 9 in Appendix B) and/or at shorter wavelength (e.g., ultraviolet spectral range). For reference, using a CNP consisting of two 50-nm-diameter silica nanofibers, it is possible to obtain an optical confinement down to 0.15 nm at 200 nm wavelength (see Fig. 9). In addition, as the CNP reported here is a fully dielectric structure, typical issues (e.g., fluorescence quenching [42,43], Ohmic heating [17], and electron tunneling [44]) that exist in plasmonic structures will be alleviated or avoided in this case. Considering its flexibility in field generation and manipulation, such a nanoscale “optical blade” may find applications in atomic-level light-matter interaction and ultra-high-resolution optical technologies ranging from optical spectroscopy and super-resolution optical nanoscopy to chemical bond manipulation.
APPENDIX A: NUMERICAL CALCULATION
Since the CNP demonstrated here is an all-dielectric structure, its optical response can be studied using classical electromagnetic theory down to sub-nm scale [45]. Here we use commercial software of Maxwell’s equations solver (Lumerical FDTD and COMSOL) to simulate mode evolutions and nano-slit modes in the CNP. Typically, the interface between the nanofiber and the air exhibits 1-nm-level surface roughness on the side edge, forming a gradual transition of the refractive index from the glass material to the air. To simulate the nano-slit mode with enough precision, we discretize the area near the slit into triangle meshes with a minimum element size of 0.01 nm and use a linearly changing index profile from of the bulk material (e.g., or shown in Fig. 6) to the of the environment (e.g., ), as shown in Fig. 7(a). For comparison, we also simulate the nano-slit mode in the CNP using a step changing index profile of the interface between the nanofiber and the air [as shown in Fig. 7(b)].
It shows that the PBRs in the CNP with the same and obtained by the two models are almost the same, while the field confinement obtained by the linear approximation model is better than that obtained by the step approximation model [as shown in Figs. 8(a) and 8(b)]. For the CNP with 1 nm slit width, there is a difference between the two field intensity distributions in the CNP calculated by two models: one is the linear index profile, and the other one is the step index profile [as shown in Figs. 8(c) and 8(d)].
To compare the intensity of central peak with that of the surrounding field, we introduced the peak-to-background ratio, which is defined as , where is the peak index (e.g., represents the central peak), is the field intensity of the central peak, is the field intensity of the second-highest peak (i.e., the highest side peak), and is the averaged field intensity over the mode area, defined as , where represents the effective mode area and defined as the area of a region that satisfies the following:
APPENDIX B: THE WAVEGUIDING NANO-SLIT MODE IN THE CNP
Benefitting from the atom-level roughness of nanofibers ( [27]), the CNP can form a narrower slit in the center. In such a case, we investigate the -like mode of CNP with at 200 nm wavelength (). Here, we select the CNP with that only supports the lowest two modes: -like mode and -like mode [Fig. 9(d)]. In the numerical simulation, we also use a linearly changing index profile around the 0.25-nm-thickness transitional region on the nanofiber surface (Appendix A). Figures 9(a)–9(c) give the calculated field intensity distribution of the -like mode on the end face plane of the CNP, which offers a peak field intensity around the central slit about 15.2 dB higher than the background, with an optical field confinement of 0.15 nm ( axis) and 15.3 nm ( axis) in FWHM of the field intensity [as shown in Fig. 9(e)]. Within of the total mode area, the ultra-confined central peak of the -like waveguiding mode in the nanofiber pair concentrates 1.1% of the total mode power [as shown in Figs. 9(f) and 9(g)].
Funding
New Cornerstone Science Foundation (NCI202216); National Natural Science Foundation of China (62175213, 92150302); Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LR21F050002); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2023QZJH27); National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB2200404).
Disclosures
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
1. C. Chen, N. Hayazawa, and S. Kawata, “A 1.7 nm resolution chemical analysis of carbon nanotubes by tip-enhanced Raman imaging in the ambient,” Nat. Commun. 5, 3312 (2014). [CrossRef]
2. J. F. Schultz, L. F. Li, S. Mahapatra, et al., “Defining multiple configurations of Rubrene on a Ag(100) surface with 5 Å spatial resolution via ultrahigh vacuum tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy,” J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 2420–2426 (2020). [CrossRef]
3. J. Y. Xu, X. Zhu, S. J. Tan, et al., “Determining structural and chemical heterogeneities of surface species at the single-bond limit,” Science 371, 818–822 (2021). [CrossRef]
4. R. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z. C. Dong, et al., “Chemical mapping of a single molecule by plasmon-enhanced Raman scattering,” Nature 498, 82–86 (2013). [CrossRef]
5. Y. Zhang, B. Yang, A. Ghafoor, et al., “Visually constructing the chemical structure of a single molecule by scanning Raman picoscopy,” Natl. Sci. Rev. 6, 1169–1175 (2019). [CrossRef]
6. B. Yang, G. Chen, A. Ghafoor, et al., “Sub-nanometre resolution in single-molecule photoluminescence imaging,” Nat. Photonics 14, 693–699 (2020). [CrossRef]
7. R. A. Jensen, I. C. Huang, O. Chen, et al., “Optical trapping and two-photon excitation of colloidal quantum dots using bowtie apertures,” ACS Photon. 3, 423–427 (2016). [CrossRef]
8. A. N. Koya, J. Cunha, T. L. Guo, et al., “Novel plasmonic nanocavities for optical trapping-assisted biosensing applications,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 8, 1901481 (2020). [CrossRef]
9. C. Zhan, G. Wang, J. Yi, et al., “Single-molecule plasmonic optical trapping,” Matter 3, 1350–1360 (2020). [CrossRef]
10. X. Zhang, R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, et al., “A hybrid plasmonic waveguide for subwavelength confinement and long-range propagation,” Nat. Photonics 2, 496–500 (2008). [CrossRef]
11. R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, et al., “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature 461, 629–632 (2009). [CrossRef]
12. S. Jiang, Y. Zhang, R. Zhang, et al., “Distinguishing adjacent molecules on a surface using plasmon-enhanced Raman scattering,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 865–869 (2015). [CrossRef]
13. F. Benz, M. K. Schmidt, A. Dreismann, et al., “Single-molecule optomechanics in ‘picocavities’,” Science 354, 726–729 (2016). [CrossRef]
14. N. Chiang, X. Chen, G. Goubert, et al., “Conformational contrast of surface-mediated molecular switches yields angstrom-scale spatial resolution in ultrahigh vacuum tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy,” Nano Lett. 16, 7774–7778 (2016). [CrossRef]
15. M. H. Liao, S. Jiang, C. R. Hu, et al., “Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopic imaging of individual carbon nanotubes with subnanometer resolution,” Nano Lett. 16, 4040–4046 (2016). [CrossRef]
16. F. Wang and Y. R. Shen, “General properties of local plasmons in metal nanostructures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 206806 (2006). [CrossRef]
17. H. Wu, Y. X. Gao, P. Z. Xu, et al., “Plasmonic nanolasers: pursuing extreme lasing conditions on nanoscale,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 7, 1900334 (2019). [CrossRef]
18. H. Zhu, X. Yin, L. Chen, et al., “Directional beaming of light from a subwavelength metal slit with phase-gradient metasurfaces,” Sci. Rep. 7, 12098 (2017). [CrossRef]
19. L. Yang, Z. K. Zhou, H. Wu, et al., “Generating a sub-nm-confined optical field in a nano-slit waveguiding mode,” Adv. Photon. 5, 046003 (2023). [CrossRef]
20. H. Wu, L. Yang, P. Z. Xu, et al., “Photonic nanolaser with extreme optical field confinement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 013902 (2022). [CrossRef]
21. Y. S. Hu, M. Zimmerley, Y. Li, et al., “Single-molecule super-resolution light-sheet microscopy,” ChemPhysChem 15, 577–586 (2014). [CrossRef]
22. Y. X. Zhao, M. Zhang, W. T. Zhang, et al., “Isotropic super-resolution light-sheet microscopy of dynamic intracellular structures at subsecond timescales,” Nat. Methods 19, 359–369 (2022). [CrossRef]
23. W. Wijngaard, “Guided normal modes of two parallel circular dielectric rods,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 63, 944–950 (1973). [CrossRef]
24. C. S. Chang and H. C. Chang, “Vector normal modes on two-core optical fibers. I. The normal mode solutions,” J. Lightwave Technol. 15, 1213–1224 (1997). [CrossRef]
25. F. L. Kien, L. Ruks, S. N. Chormaic, et al., “Spatial distributions of the fields in guided normal modes of two coupled parallel optical nanofibers,” New J. Phys. 23, 043006 (2021). [CrossRef]
26. F. L. Kien, S. N. Chormaic, and T. Busch, “Optical force between two coupled identical parallel optical nanofibers,” Phys. Rev. A 105, 063517 (2022). [CrossRef]
27. L. M. Tong, J. Y. Lou, Z. Z. Ye, et al., “Self-modulated taper drawing of silica nanowires,” Nanotechnology 16, 1445–1448 (2005). [CrossRef]
28. L. M. Tong, L. L. Hu, J. J. Zhang, et al., “Photonic nanowires directly drawn from bulk glasses,” Opt. Express 14, 82–87 (2006). [CrossRef]
29. J. Jackle and K. Kawasaki, “Intrinsic roughness of glass surfaces,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 7, 4351–4358 (1995). [CrossRef]
30. E. Radlein and G. H. Frischat, “Atomic force microscopy as a tool to correlate nanostructure to properties of glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 222, 69–82 (1997). [CrossRef]
31. J. E. Hoffman, S. Ravets, J. A. Grover, et al., “Ultrahigh transmission optical nanofibers,” AIP Adv. 4, 067124 (2014). [CrossRef]
32. R. Nagai and T. Aoki, “Ultra-low-loss tapered optical fibers with minimal lengths,” Opt. Express 22, 28427–28436 (2014). [CrossRef]
33. N. Yao, S. Y. Linghu, Y. X. Xu, et al., “Ultra-long subwavelength micro/nanofibers with low loss,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 32, 1069–1072 (2020). [CrossRef]
34. J. B. Zhang, Y. Kang, X. Guo, et al., “High-power continuous-wave optical waveguiding in a silica micro/nanofibre,” Light Sci. Appl. 12, 89 (2023). [CrossRef]
35. F. Salvat-Pujol and J. S. Villarrubia, “Conventional vs. model-based measurement of patterned line widths from scanning electron microscopy profiles,” Ultramicroscopy 206, 112819 (2019). [CrossRef]
36. T. Nakai, N. Norimatsu, Y. Noda, et al., “Changes in refractive index of fluoride glass fibers during fiber fabrication processes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 203–205 (1990). [CrossRef]
37. H. Kakiuchida, K. Saito, and A. J. Ikushima, “Refractive index, density and polarizability of silica glass with various fictive temperatures,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43, L743–L745 (2004). [CrossRef]
38. T. G. Tiecke, K. P. Nayak, J. D. Thompson, et al., “Efficient fiber-optical interface for nanophotonic devices,” Optica 2, 70–75 (2015). [CrossRef]
39. E. P. S. Tan and C. T. Lim, “Mechanical characterization of nanofibers-a review,” Compos. Sci. Technol. 66, 1102–1111 (2006). [CrossRef]
40. M. Asobe, T. Kanamori, and K. Kubodera, “Applications of highly nonlinear chalcogenide glass-fibers in ultrafast all-optical switches,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 29, 2325–2333 (1993). [CrossRef]
41. Z. R. Li, C. F. Yao, Z. X. Jia, et al., “Broadband supercontinuum generation from 600 to 5400 nm in a tapered fluorotellurite fiber pumped by a 2010 nm femtosecond fiber laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 091103 (2019). [CrossRef]
42. P. Anger, P. Bharadwaj, and L. Novotny, “Enhancement and quenching of single-molecule fluorescence,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 113002 (2006). [CrossRef]
43. S. Kühn, U. Håkanson, L. Rogobete, et al., “Enhancement of single-molecule fluorescence using a gold nanoparticle as an optical nanoantenna,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 017402 (2006). [CrossRef]
44. B. N. J. Persson and A. Baratoff, “Inelastic electron tunneling from a metal tip: the contribution from resonant processes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 339–342 (1987). [CrossRef]
45. Y. Yang, D. Zhu, W. Yan, et al., “A general theoretical and experimental framework for nanoscale electromagnetism,” Nature 576, 248–252 (2019). [CrossRef]
46. L. Baschir, C. Opran, D. Savastru, et al., “Ellipsometric investigations of a-As2S3 thin films obtained by RF magnetron sputtering,” Chalcogenide Lett. 15, 199–205 (2018).
47. W. S. Rodney, I. H. Malitson, and T. A. King, “Refractive index of arsenic trisulfide,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 48, 633–636 (1958). [CrossRef]
48. L. V. R. Marcos, J. I. Larruquert, J. A. Mendez, et al., “Self-consistent optical constants of SiO2 and Ta2O5 films,” Opt. Mater. Express 6, 3622–3637 (2016). [CrossRef]