9. After Review


Characteristics of a Re-review

\u003Cp\u003EYou may be asked to review a revised manuscript.  If so, the practical steps you will engage in are similar to those you carry out when reviewing an original submission.  Some differences are:\u003C/p\u003E \u003Cul\u003E \u003Cli\u003EYou will have access to previous reports from other reviewers, as well as the authors’ response to reviewer comments, in Prism.\u003C/li\u003E \u003Cli\u003EYour comments should focus on whether appropriate changes have been made in response to your original comments, not new concerns, unless they are vitally important (such as ethical concerns).\u003C/li\u003E \u003Cli\u003EWhile most original submissions have at least two reviewers, sometimes you may be the only person re-reviewing the manuscript.   You may therefore also comment on any other reports, and the authors’ responses to them.\u003C/li\u003E \u003C/ul\u003E