Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Fano zeros in photoelectron spectra of an autoionization system interacting with a neighboring atom

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Photoelectron ionization spectra of an autoionization system interacting with a neighboring two-level atom are studied using the method of canonical transformation. Conditions for the occurrence of a Fano zero are exactly derived, together with its frequency. Ionization spectra are typically composed of at most four peaks in this case. Sharp peaks occur not far from the Fano zero due to the confluence of bound-free coherences. Spectral peaks close to the Fano zero are suppressed. Also dynamical zeros appearing once per the Rabi period in conditioned photoelectron ionization spectra are observed.

©2011 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Ionization of an electron in a system with bound discrete levels has been addressed many times. In this system with autoionizing levels formed by bound states, there occurs the competition among different ionization channels. In parallel to direct ionization, also indirect ionization based on bound discrete levels exists and contributes to the ionization process. Fano [1] has shown that, under suitable conditions, completely destructive interference between the direct and indirect ionization channels may be observed for one state in the continuum of free states. The existence of such a state in a long-time photoelectron ionization spectrum is referred as the presence of a Fano zero. The interference of two ionization paths in the vicinity of the Fano zero may also lead to a strong narrowing of spectral ionization peaks (confluence of bound-free coherences, [2, 3]). In general, the long-time photoelectron ionization spectra are influenced by many effects, including spontaneous emission of radiation [46], finite pump laser bandwidth [7] or collisions [6]. Additional interferences in photoelectron ionization spectra arise for the quantum low-light pumping and originate in the discrete energy levels of quantized fields [8, 9]. The Fano spectral zeros have been experimentally studied, e.g., in [10]. Ionization systems with discrete autoionizing levels can even exhibit transparency for ultra-short pulses [11] or slow down the propagating light [12]. The observed spectral profiles are asymmetric which is useful in interpretation of experimental spectral profiles [13]. For an extended list of references, see [6, 1416]. We note that similar quantum interference effects have been observed also in semiconductor hetero-structures or photonic structures composed of waveguides and micro-resonators [17].

The photoelectron ionization spectra are considerably modified by the interaction with a neighbor system [1821]. This interaction (e.g., dipole-dipole interaction in molecular condensates [22]) leads to more complex spectral profiles in which the Fano zeros are in general absent [20]. Only for weak electric-field amplitudes, there occur minima in photoelectron ionization spectra that behave similarly as Fano zeros and we call them Fano-like zeros. On the other hand, the so-called dynamical zeros [19] are observed in the conditioned photoelectron ionization spectra depending on the quantum state of the neighbor system. However, these dynamical zeros occur only once per the Rabi period belonging to oscillations of the neighbor system. The presence of a neighbor system may also considerably increase photoionization and recombination rates [21, 23].

Here, using a suitable canonical transformation, we formulate exactly the conditions for the existence of a Fano zero in an autoionization system interacting with a neighbor two-level atom. Photoelectron ionization spectra are then studied under these special conditions that lead to two distinguished spectral features: (i) suppression of spectral peaks close to the Fano zero and (ii) strong narrowing of spectral peaks lying not far from the Fano zero and caused by the confluence of bound-free coherences.

The structure of the article is as follows. A model Hamiltonian and a suitable canonical transformation are presented in Sec. II, in which conditions for the occurrence of a Fano zero are derived. Analytical formulas for the long-time photoelectron ionization spectra are written in Sec. III. Sec. IV contains a discussion of the long-time ionization spectral profiles containing Fano zeros. Conclusions are drawn in Sec. V.

2. System Hamiltonian and its Canonical Transformation

We consider the simplest possible Hamiltonian that describes an atom with only one autoionizing level. Its interaction with a neighbor two-level atom leads to energy transfer caused, e.g., by the dipole-dipole interaction (for the scheme, see Fig. 1). The autoionization atom b in a stationary optical field is described by the Hamiltonian Ĥ b ( = 1 is assumed, [24]):

H^b=Eb|1bb1|+dEE|EE|+dE(V|Eb1|+H.c.)+[μbαLexp(iELt)|1bb0|+H.c.]+dE[μαLexp(iELt)|Eb0|+H.c.].
Symbols occurring in Eq. (1) are explained in the caption to Fig. 1. The interacting electric field with the amplitude αL oscillates at the frequency EL. The symbol H.c. replaces the Hermitian conjugate term. We assume that the interacting electric field is tuned far above the ionization threshold and so the threshold effects are neglected. This allows us to extend the integration over energies from minus to plus infinity.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Scheme of the autoionization system b interacting with a two-level atom a. The excited state of atom a with energy Ea is denoted as |1〉a. The excited bound [free] state of atom b with energy Eb [E] is named |1〉b [|E〉]. Symbols μa, μb, and μ refer to the dipole moments between the ground states |0〉a and |0〉b and the corresponding excited states; αL is the electric-field amplitude, V stands for the Coulomb configurational coupling between the states |1〉b and |E〉. Energy transfer (dipole-dipole interaction) between states |1〉a and |E〉 (|1〉b) is quantified by J (Jab). Double arrows indicate the participation of both electrons at atoms a and b in the interaction.

Download Full Size | PDF

The Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian Ĥ a describes a neighbor two-level atom a in a stationary optical field (for the symbols, see the caption to Fig. 1):

H^a=Ea|1aa1|+[μaαLexp(iELt)|1aa0|+H.c.].
We assume that the ground states of atoms a and b have the same energy that is set to zero.

The dipole-dipole interaction [22] between the two-level atom a and the autoionization atom b is characterized by the Hamiltonian Ĥ trans:

H^trans=(Jab|1bb0||0aa1|+H.c.)+dE(J|Eb0||0aa1|+H.c.).
In this interaction, one electron moves from its excited state into its ground state leaving the energy for the excitation of the other electron from its ground state into its own excited state. This interaction is characterized by two constants, Jab and J.

We need to construct a suitable canonical transformation of the overall Hamiltonian Ĥ = Ĥ a + Ĥ b + Ĥ trans that reveals a state |EF〉 in the free-state continuum that cannot be ionized. Such a state exists due to the possibility of mutual cancellation of several competing ionization paths. We will see later that a suitable canonical transformation may be constructed in the same way as it was originally done by Fano [1]. Fano considered an autoionization atom with one discrete excited level and found eigenstates that diagonalize the Coulomb configurational interaction between the discrete excited level and the continuum of free states. The dipole moment of optical interaction in the transformed basis then revealed a state in the continuum that cannot be ionized. We only apply this approach to the autoionization atom b. Subsequently, this transformation reveals additional constraints to the dipole-dipole interaction between the atoms a and b that preserve a Fano zero.

Following the work by Fano [1], we look for states |E) that are eigenstates of the following Hamiltonian Ĥ diag:

H^diag=Eb|1bb1|+dEE|EE|+dE(V|Eb1|+H.c.);
E means the energy of state |E).

These eigenstates |E) can be written as a linear superposition of the original states |1〉b and |E′〉,

|E)=b(E)|1b+dEβ(E,E)|E,
where b(E) and β (E, E′) are coefficients. These coefficients have to be such that the stationary Schrödinger equation Ĥ diag|E) = E|E) is fulfilled. This gives a system of algebraic equations for the coefficients b(E) and β (E, E′):
Ebb(E)+dEV*(E)β(E,E)=Eb(E),V(E)b(E)+Eβ(E,E)=Eβ(E,E).
The second equation in Eq. (6) can be solved in the form
β(E,E)=V(E)b(E)EE+iɛ+F(E)δ(EE),
where ɛ > 0 and the limit ɛ → 0 is assumed. The coefficient F(E) has to be determined such that the norm of state |E) equals one. The symbol δ stands for the Dirac δ-function. The substitution of the solution in Eq. (7) into the first equation in Eq. (6) provides the coefficients b(E):
b(E)=V*(E)F(E)EE˜b+iγb.
In deriving Eq. (8), we have assumed a flat spectral dependence of V with a typical value V (E 0) and defined γb = π|V(E 0)|2. The renormalized energy b has been introduced in Eq. (8), b = Eb + 𝒫dE′|V (E′)|2/(EE′), 𝒫 denotes the principal value. The normalization condition (E|E) = 1 can be written as |b(E)|2 + ∫ dE′|β (E, E′)|2 = 1 and gives F(E) = 1. The solution of Eq. (6) can be finally written as:
b(E)=V*(E)Eb+iγb,β(E,E)=V(E)b(E)EE+iɛ+δ(EE).
We note that the eigenstates |E) in Eq. (4) are complete, i.e. |1〉b = ∫ dEb *(E′)|E′) and |E〉 = ∫ dEβ* (E′, E)|E′).

The Hamiltonian Ĥ b introduced in Eq. (1) attains the following form in the basis spanned by the states |0〉b and |E):

H^b=dEE|E)(E|+dE[μ¯(E)αLexp(iELt)|E)b0|+H.c.].
The dipole moment μ¯ in the transformed basis is determined along the formula
μ¯(E)=μbb*(E)+dEμ(E)β*(E,E).
Substituting the solution in Eq. (9) into Eq. (11), the dipole moment μ ̄ takes the form:
μ¯(E)=μɛ(E)+qbɛ(E)+i;
ɛ(E) = (Eb)/γb, qb = μb/(πμV*), and i stands for the imaginary unit.

Also the Hamiltonian Ĥ trans of the dipole-dipole interaction in Eq. (3) has to be transformed:

H^trans=dE[J¯(E)|E)b0||0aa1|+H.c.].
The coupling constant in the transformed basis reads:
J¯(E)=Jabb*(E)+dEJ(E)β*(E,E)=Jɛ(E)+qtransɛ(E)+i;
q trans = Jab/(πJV *).

The dipole moment μ¯ derived in Eq. (12) equals zero if ɛ (E) = –qb. Similarly, the coupling constant of dipole-dipole interaction vanishes if ɛ (E) = –q trans. Provided that both the conditions are fulfilled, the state |EF) inside the continuum cannot be ionized. The reason is that all four possible ionization paths mutually cancel. Such a state then forms a Fano zero found only for qb = q trans, i.e.,

μb/μ=Jab/J.
The corresponding frequency EF is determined as
EF=E˜bγbqb.

The above derivation of conditions for the existence of a Fano zero can be interpreted as follows. The ionized free state |EF) can be reached after the absorption of a photon either at atom a or atom b. If a photon at atom a is absorbed, there exist two ionization paths, both coming through the excited state |1〉a. The subsequent dipole-dipole interaction leads either directly to the state |EF) or excites the state |1〉b. Then the state |EF) is reached due to the Coulomb configurational interaction (V). Under the conditions written in Eq. (16), the two ionization paths mutually cancel. Similarly, if a photon is absorbed at atom b, two ionization paths compete. The first path describes the direct ionization, whereas the second one relies on the presence of the autoionizing level |1〉b. Also in this case, the condition in Eq. (16) guarantees a completely destructive interference of both paths.

On assuming resonant pumping of atom a, this picture of competing ionization paths can even be rigorously formulated. The transformed coupling energies μ ̄(E) αL and (E) given in Eqs. (11) and (14) can be written in the form:

μ¯(E)αL=(E|H^2|0bexp(iELt)=1EE˜biγb(μαL,V,EE˜b)(0μbαLμαL),J¯(E)=a0|(E|H^2|0b|1a=1EE˜biγb(μαL,V,EE˜b)(0JabJ).
The right-hand-sides of Eq. (17) represent the elements of the squared overall Hamiltonian Ĥ mentioned bellow Eq. (3) between the states |0〉b and |E). In case of the dipole-dipole interaction, this element is conditioned by the transition of atom a from the state |1〉a into the state |0〉a. The above discussed four ionization paths can easily be recognized in the formulas in Eq. (17). The second power of the overall Hamiltonian Ĥ reflects the fact that two elementary interactions are needed to ionize the atom b.

3. Long-Time Photoelectron Ionization Spectra

The photoelectron ionization spectra can be obtained after the solution of dynamics of the composed system described by the overall Hamiltonian Ĥ [20]. The long-time photoelectron ionization spectrum I lt can be conveniently written as a sum of two ionization spectra, I0lt and I1lt, conditioned by the presence of neighbor atom a in the states |0〉a and |1〉a:

Ilt(E)=I0lt(E)+I1lt(E).
The long-time amplitude conditional ionization spectra d0lt and d1lt belonging to the atom a in the ground state |0〉a and in the excited state |1〉a, respectively, can be expressed as a sum of eight Lorentzian curves:
djlt(E,t)=k=12l=14Aj,lξkEΛlξkexp[i(ξkE)t],j=0,1.
Symbols ξ 1 and ξ 2 denote the frequencies of oscillations of the two-level atom a. Their difference ξ 1ξ 2 gives a Rabi frequency δξ, δξ=(EaEL)2+4|μaαL|2. The coefficients Λl determine the positions of poles of the Lorentzian curves with the weights Aj,lξk in the plane of complex frequency E. A detailed analysis in [20] has shown that the conditional intensity ionization spectra I0lt and I1lt can be written, in general, in a specific form ( Ijlt=|djlt|2):
I0lt(E,t)=I0st(E)+Iosc(E)cos[δξt+φ(E)],I1lt(E,t)=I1st(E)Iosc(E)cos[δξt+φ(E)].
In Eq. (20), I0st and I1st represent the steady-state intensities whereas I osc means the magnitude of intensity oscillations between the spectra I0lt and I1lt at the Rabi frequency δξ. The symbol φ denotes the frequency-dependent phase shift of these oscillations.

According to the formulas in Eq. (20), the long-time ionization spectrum I lt does not depend on time. On the other hand, the conditional long-time ionization spectra I0lt and I1lt exhibit harmonic oscillations. They can be observed using time-resolved spectroscopy [24] with the required resolution depending on the strength of electric-field amplitude. An example of these ionization spectra is shown in Fig. 2. As a Fano zero appears in the spectra shown in Fig. 2 close to the peaks, the effect of confluence of bound-free coherences [2, 14] leading to very narrow and high spectral peaks is observed.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Long-time intensity photoelectron ionization spectrum I lt (solid curve), steady-state intensities I0st (solid curve with ○) and I1st (solid curve with *), and magnitude I osc of intensity oscillations (solid curve with ▵). A Fano zero is located at (EDEb)/Γ = −0.5; qa = μa/(πμJ *), γa = π|J|2, qb = μb/(πμV*), γb = π|V|2, q trans = Jab/(πJV *), Ω=4πΓ(Q+i)μαL, Γ = γa + γb, Q = (γaqa + γbqb)/Γ. Spectra are normalized such that ∫ dEI lt(E) = 1; qa = qb = q trans = 1, γa = γb = 1, Ω = 8, Ea = Eb = EL = 1.

Download Full Size | PDF

Fano and dynamical zeros belong to important characteristics of these spectra. Whereas the frequency EF of a Fano zero obeys the equation

Ilt(EF)=0,
the frequency ED of a dynamical zero [19] is determined from the requirement
Ijst(ED)=Iosc(ED),j=0,1,
and occurs only once per the Rabi period 2π/δξ.

4. Typical Shapes and Features of Long-Time Photoelectron Ionization Spectra

We discuss the behavior of long-time photoelectron ionization spectra I lt under the condition written in Eq. (15), i.e., when a Fano zero at the frequency given in Eq. (16) occurs. In this distinguished regime, there occur suppression of ionization around the Fano zero as well as strong narrowing of spectral peaks located not far from the Fano zero. As we want to emphasize the effects coming from the competition of the inter (V) and intra (J, Jab) electron interactions at the atom b, we first consider the regime of γaγb. At the end of Sec. IV, we comment the case γaγb appropriate for molecular condensates. We divide the discussion into two parts depending on the mutual strength of stationary optical interactions at the atoms a and b.

We first consider comparable strengths of optical interactions at the atoms a and b, i.e. qaqb. The long-time ionization spectrum I lt is typically composed of two distinguished peaks with the center frequencies mutually shifted by the Rabi frequency δξ. This means that only one complex frequency Λl out of four occurring in Eq. (19) is located close to the real axis and determines the shape of spectrum I lt [see Fig. 3(a)]. Both the peaks move towards the lower frequencies E as the optical-interaction parameter Ω increases ( Ω=4πΓ(Q+i)μαL, for details, see the caption to Fig. 2). We note that parameter Ω is linearly proportional to the electric-field amplitude αL as well as the optical dipole moment μ related to direct ionization of atom b. A peak disappears due to the destructive interference of ionization paths when it moves through the area around the Fano zero [see curves for Ω = 2 and 6 in Fig. 3(a)]. In this case, one peak dominates in the ionization spectra I lt. In the long-time ionization spectra I lt, there also occurs one Fano-like zero (observed only for weak electric-field amplitudes) with the frequency EF–l = Eaγa qa [20]. The frequencies ED of dynamical zeros depending on the optical-interaction parameter Ω are shown in Fig. 4. The frequencies ED coincide for the conditional spectra I0lt and I1lt for resonant pumping of atom a. They typically occur in pairs, the annihilation and creation of a pair of frequencies is shown in Fig. 4(a). We note that the frequency ED of one dynamical zero coincides with the frequency EF–l of the Fano-like zero in the limit Ω → 0.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Long-time photoelectron ionization spectra I lt for (a) qa = qb = 1 and (b) qa = 100, qb = 1 for different values of optical-interaction parameter Ω: Ω = 0.5 (solid curve with ○), Ω = 1 (solid curve), Ω = 2 (solid curve with *), Ω = 4 (solid curve with ▵), and Ω = 6 (solid curve with ♦). The Fano zero occurs at (EFEb)/Γ = −0.5; q trans = 1, γa = γb = 1, Ea = Eb = EL = 1.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Normalized frequencies (EDEb)/Γ of dynamical zeros as they depend on optical-interaction parameter Ω for resonant pumping of atom a; values of parameters are given in the caption to Fig. 3.

Download Full Size | PDF

If optical interaction of the neighbor atom a dominates that of the autoionization system b (qaqb), two pairs of peaks build up the long-time ionization spectrum I lt [see Fig. 3(b)]. Peaks belonging to one pair are mutually shifted by the Rabi frequency δξ and represent the Autler-Townes doublets. Two peaks at the outer edges belonging to different pairs stick out as the optical-interaction parameter Ω increases; the one at the left-hand side moves towards lower frequencies, whereas the peak at the right-hand side shifts towards higher frequencies. On the other hand, the remaining two peaks in the middle approach each other and merge together for larger values of the optical-interaction parameter Ω. As a consequence, the ionization spectrum I lt consists of only three peaks for larger values of the optical-interaction parameter Ω. The spectral widths of all peaks increase with the increasing value of parameter Ω. The frequencies ED of dynamical zeros as functions of parameter Ω are depicted in Fig. 4(b) in this case. We note that one dynamical zero that coincides with the Fano-like zero for Ω → 0 [(EDEb)/Γ = −50] is not displayed in Fig. 4(b).

Considering molecular condensates as potential candidates for the observation of the described effects, the strengths of dipole-dipole interaction and Coulomb configuration interaction dictate the regime characterized by γaγb. If comparable values of the dipole moments of molecules a and b are considered, we arrive at the inequality qaqb. Under these conditions, the influence of the neighbor molecule a is observed only for smaller values of the optical-interaction parameter Ω such that the strengths of the dipole-dipole interaction and the optical dipole interaction at molecule a are comparable. This leads to the long-time photoelectron ionization spectra composed of three peaks located in the near vicinity of the frequency Eb (see Fig. 5). These peaks are suppressed for larger values of the optical-interaction parameter Ω that give an asymmetric spectral peak typical for the Fano model. As the values of optical-interaction parameter Ω increase, the asymmetric peak moves towards the lower frequencies crossing the frequency of Fano zero. There occurs a strong narrowing of the spectral peak in the vicinity of the Fano zero caused by the confluence of bound-free coherences [2] (see Fig. 5).

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 Long-time photoelectron ionization spectra I lt for different values of optical-interaction parameter Ω: (a) Ω = 5 × 10−4 (solid curve) and Ω = 3 × 10−2 (solid curve with *, only the central part is shown) and (b) Ω = 1 (solid curve with *), Ω = 2.5 (solid curve) and Ω = 4 (solid curve with ▵). The Fano zero occurs at (EFEb)/Γ ≈ −1; qa = 100, γa = 1 × 10−4, qb = γb = 1, q trans = 1, Ea = Eb = EL = 1.

Download Full Size | PDF

5. Conclusions

A Fano zero in the long-time photoelectron ionization spectrum of an autoionization system interacting with a neighbor system has been revealed under special conditions that relate to the strengths of optical dipole and dipole-dipole interactions. Depending on the strength of optical dipole interaction of the neighbor atom, the ionization spectra are composed of one or two pairs of Autler-Townes peaks mutually shifted by the Rabi frequency of the neighbor atom. However, the number of peaks may be reduced for stronger optical interaction either because of the destructive interference in the area around the Fano zero or due to the merging of two peaks together. Moreover, dynamical zeros have been observed in the long-time conditional photoelectron ionization spectra.

Acknowledgments

Support by the projects 1M06002, COST OC 09026, and Operational Program Research and Development for Innovations - European Social Fund (project CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0058) of the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic as well as the project IAA100100713 of GA AV ČR is acknowledged.

References and links

1. U. Fano, “Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts,” Phys. Rev. 124, 1866–1878 (1961). [CrossRef]  

2. K. Rzażewski and J. H. Eberly, “Confluence of bound-free coherences in laser-induced autoionization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 408–412 (1981). [CrossRef]  

3. P. Lambropoulos and P. Zoller, “Autoionizing states in strong laser fields,” Phys. Rev. A 24, 379–397 (1981). [CrossRef]  

4. M. Lewenstein, J. W. Haus, and K. Rzażewski, “Photon spectrum in laser-induced autoionization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 417–420 (1983). [CrossRef]  

5. J. W. Haus, M. Lewenstein, and K. Rzażewski, “Laser-induced autoionization in the presence of radiative damping and transverse relaxation,” Phys. Rev. A 28, 2269–2281 (1983). [CrossRef]  

6. G. S. Agarwal, S. L. Haan, and J. Cooper, “Radiative decay of autoionizing states in laser fields. I. general theory,” Phys. Rev. A 29, 2552–2565 (1984). [CrossRef]  

7. K. Rzażewski and J. H. Eberly, “Photoexcitation of an autoionizing resonance in the presence of off-diagonal relaxation,” Phys. Rev. A 27, 2026–2042 (1983). [CrossRef]  

8. W. Leoński and V. Bužek, “Quantum laser field effect on the photoelectron spectrum for auto-ionizing systems,” J. Mod. Opt. 37, 1923–1934 (1990). [CrossRef]  

9. W. Leoński, “Squeezed-state effect on bound-continuum transitions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 10, 244–252 (1993). [CrossRef]  

10. L. Journel, B. Rouvellou, D. Cubaynes, J. M. Bizau, F. J. Willeumier, M. Richter, P. Sladeczek, K.-H. Selbman, P. Zimmerman, and H. Bergerow, “First observation of a Fano profile following one step autoionization into a double photoionization continuum,” J. Physique IV 3, 217–226 (1993).

11. E. Paspalakis, N. J. Kylstra, and P. L. Knight, “Propagation dynamics in an autoionization medium,” Phys. Rev. A 60, 642–647 (1999). [CrossRef]  

12. A. Raczyński, M. Rzepecka, J. Zaremba, and S. Zielińska-Kaniasty, “Electromagnetically induced transparency and light slowdown for Λ-like systems with a structured continuum,” Opt. Commun. 266, 552–557 (2006). [CrossRef]  

13. P. Durand, I. Paidarová, and F. X. Gadéa, “Theory of Fano profiles,” J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34, 1953–1966 (2001). [CrossRef]  

14. W. Leoński, R. Tanaś, and S. Kielich, “Laser-induced autoionization from a double Fano system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 72–77 (1987). [CrossRef]  

15. W. Leoński and R. Tanaś, “Dc-field effects on the photoelectron spectrum from a system with two autoionising levels,” J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 21, 2835–2844 (1988). [CrossRef]  

16. W. Leoński, R. Tanaś, and S. Kielich, “Effect of dc field coupling on the photoelectron spectrum from double auto-ionising levels,” J. Phys. D 21, S125–S127 (1988). [CrossRef]  

17. A. E. Miroshnichenko, S. Flach, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Fano resonances in nanoscale structures,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2257–2298 (2010). [CrossRef]  

18. A. Lukš, V. Peřinová, J. Peřina Jr., J. Křepelka, and W. Leoński, “Photoelectron spectra for an atom with one autoionizing level that interacts with a neighbor,” in “Wave and Quantum Aspects of Contemporary Optics: Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 7746,” J. Müllerová, D. Senderáková, and S. Jurecka, eds. (SPIE, Bellingham, 2010), p. 77460W.

19. J. Peřina Jr., A. Lukš, W. Leoński, and V. Peřinová, “Photoionization electron spectra in a system interacting with a neighboring atom,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 053416 (2011). [CrossRef]  

20. J. Peřina Jr., A. Lukš, W. Leoński, and V. Peřinová, “Photoelectron spectra in an autoionization system interacting with a neighboring atom,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 053430 (2011). [CrossRef]  

21. B. Najjari, A. B. Voitkiv, and C. Müller, “Two-center resonant photoionization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 153002 (2010). [CrossRef]  

22. E. A. Silinsh and V. Čápek, Organic Molecular Crystals: Interaction, Localization and Transport Phenomena (Oxford University Press/American Institute of Physics, 1994).

23. A. B. Voitkiv and B. Najjari, “Two-center dielectronic recombination and resonant photoionization,” Phys. Rev. A 82, 052708 (2010). [CrossRef]  

24. P. Meystre and P. Sargent III, Elements of Quantum Optics (Springer, 2007). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Scheme of the autoionization system b interacting with a two-level atom a. The excited state of atom a with energy Ea is denoted as |1〉 a . The excited bound [free] state of atom b with energy Eb [E] is named |1〉 b [|E〉]. Symbols μa , μb , and μ refer to the dipole moments between the ground states |0〉 a and |0〉 b and the corresponding excited states; αL is the electric-field amplitude, V stands for the Coulomb configurational coupling between the states |1〉 b and |E〉. Energy transfer (dipole-dipole interaction) between states |1〉 a and |E〉 (|1〉 b ) is quantified by J (Jab ). Double arrows indicate the participation of both electrons at atoms a and b in the interaction.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Long-time intensity photoelectron ionization spectrum I lt (solid curve), steady-state intensities I 0 st (solid curve with ○) and I 1 st (solid curve with *), and magnitude I osc of intensity oscillations (solid curve with ▵). A Fano zero is located at (ED Eb )/Γ = −0.5; qa = μa /(πμJ *), γa = π|J|2, qb = μb /(πμV* ), γb = π|V|2, q trans = Jab /(πJV *), Ω = 4 π Γ ( Q + i ) μ α L , Γ = γa + γb , Q = (γaqa + γbqb )/Γ. Spectra are normalized such that ∫ dEI lt(E) = 1; qa = qb = q trans = 1, γa = γb = 1, Ω = 8, Ea = Eb = EL = 1.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Long-time photoelectron ionization spectra I lt for (a) qa = qb = 1 and (b) qa = 100, qb = 1 for different values of optical-interaction parameter Ω: Ω = 0.5 (solid curve with ○), Ω = 1 (solid curve), Ω = 2 (solid curve with *), Ω = 4 (solid curve with ▵), and Ω = 6 (solid curve with ♦). The Fano zero occurs at (EF Eb )/Γ = −0.5; q trans = 1, γa = γb = 1, Ea = Eb = EL = 1.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Normalized frequencies (ED Eb )/Γ of dynamical zeros as they depend on optical-interaction parameter Ω for resonant pumping of atom a; values of parameters are given in the caption to Fig. 3.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Long-time photoelectron ionization spectra I lt for different values of optical-interaction parameter Ω: (a) Ω = 5 × 10−4 (solid curve) and Ω = 3 × 10−2 (solid curve with *, only the central part is shown) and (b) Ω = 1 (solid curve with *), Ω = 2.5 (solid curve) and Ω = 4 (solid curve with ▵). The Fano zero occurs at (EF Eb )/Γ ≈ −1; qa = 100, γa = 1 × 10−4, qb = γb = 1, q trans = 1, Ea = Eb = EL = 1.

Equations (22)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

H ^ b = E b | 1 b b 1 | + d E E | E E | + d E ( V | E b 1 | + H . c . ) + [ μ b α L exp ( i E L t ) | 1 b b 0 | + H . c . ] + d E [ μ α L exp ( i E L t ) | E b 0 | + H . c . ] .
H ^ a = E a | 1 a a 1 | + [ μ a α L exp ( i E L t ) | 1 a a 0 | + H . c . ] .
H ^ trans = ( J a b | 1 b b 0 | | 0 a a 1 | + H . c . ) + d E ( J | E b 0 | | 0 a a 1 | + H . c . ) .
H ^ diag = E b | 1 b b 1 | + d E E | E E | + d E ( V | E b 1 | + H . c . ) ;
| E ) = b ( E ) | 1 b + d E β ( E , E ) | E ,
E b b ( E ) + d E V * ( E ) β ( E , E ) = E b ( E ) , V ( E ) b ( E ) + E β ( E , E ) = E β ( E , E ) .
β ( E , E ) = V ( E ) b ( E ) E E + i ɛ + F ( E ) δ ( E E ) ,
b ( E ) = V * ( E ) F ( E ) E E ˜ b + i γ b .
b ( E ) = V * ( E ) E b + i γ b , β ( E , E ) = V ( E ) b ( E ) E E + i ɛ + δ ( E E ) .
H ^ b = d E E | E ) ( E | + d E [ μ ¯ ( E ) α L exp ( i E L t ) | E ) b 0 | + H . c . ] .
μ ¯ ( E ) = μ b b * ( E ) + d E μ ( E ) β * ( E , E ) .
μ ¯ ( E ) = μ ɛ ( E ) + q b ɛ ( E ) + i ;
H ^ trans = d E [ J ¯ ( E ) | E ) b 0 | | 0 a a 1 | + H . c . ] .
J ¯ ( E ) = J a b b * ( E ) + d E J ( E ) β * ( E , E ) = J ɛ ( E ) + q trans ɛ ( E ) + i ;
μ b / μ = J a b / J .
E F = E ˜ b γ b q b .
μ ¯ ( E ) α L = ( E | H ^ 2 | 0 b exp ( i E L t ) = 1 E E ˜ b i γ b ( μ α L , V , E E ˜ b ) ( 0 μ b α L μ α L ) , J ¯ ( E ) = a 0 | ( E | H ^ 2 | 0 b | 1 a = 1 E E ˜ b i γ b ( μ α L , V , E E ˜ b ) ( 0 J a b J ) .
I lt ( E ) = I 0 lt ( E ) + I 1 lt ( E ) .
d j lt ( E , t ) = k = 1 2 l = 1 4 A j , l ξ k E Λ l ξ k exp [ i ( ξ k E ) t ] , j = 0 , 1 .
I 0 lt ( E , t ) = I 0 st ( E ) + I osc ( E ) cos [ δ ξ t + φ ( E ) ] , I 1 lt ( E , t ) = I 1 st ( E ) I osc ( E ) cos [ δ ξ t + φ ( E ) ] .
I lt ( E F ) = 0 ,
I j st ( E D ) = I osc ( E D ) , j = 0 , 1 ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.