Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Controllable optoelectric composite logic gates based on the polarization switching in an optically injected VCSEL

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Based on the polarization switching mechanism in an optically injected vertical cavity surface emitting laser (VCSEL), and the new electro-optic modulation theory, we propose a novel approach to implement optoelectric logic gates. Here, the two linearly polarized lights from the output of the laser are considered as two logic outputs. Under the electro-optic modulation, one of the logic outputs is the NOT operation with the other one. With the same logic input signal, we perform various digital signal processing (AND, OR, XNOR, NAND, NOR and XOR) in the optical domain, controlling the logic operation of the applied electric field between the two logic input signals. On this basis, the logic operation of half-adder is further implemented.

© 2015 Optical Society of America

Corrections

Dongzhou Zhong, Yongqiang Ji, and Wei Luo, "Controllable optoelectric composite logic gates based on the polarization switching in an optically injected VCSEL: erratum," Opt. Express 23, 31295-31295 (2015)
https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-23-24-31295

1. Introduction

Vertical-cavity surface-emitting semiconductor lasers (VCSELs), as special type of semiconductor lasers, have many advantages compared to edge-emitting semiconductor lasers, such as low cost in fabrication, low threshold current, compact size, circular output-beam profile and wafer-scale integration [1]. They have attracted some attentions to be applied in optical signal processing, optical buffer memories and optical interconnections. However, because of their circular transverse geometry, VCSELs can emit two linear-polarization (LP) lights (with the polarization direction along one of two orthogonal directions associated with crystalline or stress orientations, referred to x and y). And the polarization switching (PS) and the polarization bistability often occur when they are subjected to current or external light injection [2–10]. These phenomena are often considered as a drawback, degrading the laser performance. At present, they can also be generalized to apply some areas of great concern, such as polarization switch, polarization multiplexing and demultiplexing and optical logic gates devices [11–17]. It is a very attractive scheme that optical logic devices are designed by means of the PS of an optically injected VCSEL.

According to a few of recent studies, based on the PS in an optically injected VCSEL, there are several typical schemes for implementing different types of optoelectric logic gates and all-optical ones. For example, some logic gates, such as OR, NOR, and NAND, can be obtained by the interplay of the PS, the aperiodic current modulation and the spontaneous emission noise in an optically injected VCSEL [14]. Besides, the logical OR and AND can be implemented, using the interplay of the PS and the external light injection [15]. At last, the logical OR and AND can be performed, based on the interplay of the PS and the center frequency detuning between the master VCSEL and the slave one [16]. However, in these above-mentioned schemes, the PS is very sensitive to the injection current, optical injection strength and the center frequency detuning [6–10]. The slight perturbations of these parameters can induce the change of the polarization state. As a result, the output logic state will be varied. Therefore, these logic gates have poor stability. To achieve stability of these basic logic gates, the numerical values for the parameters of the laser need to be strictly limited in a small range [2–10]. In addition, only some basic logic gates can be implemented.

In our previous work [17], we proposed a novel scheme to control the PS in an optically injected VCSEL by electro-optic (EO) modulation, in which, with the increase of the applied electric field, the PS of the slave VCSEL with parallel optical injection (POI) appears periodic oscillation. The PS can be stably controlled when the applied electric field is fixed at a certain value. The results presented in our previous work will help to obtain different types of logic gates, which may be stably controlled by EO modulation. In this paper, we explore the implementation of some logic operations, such as AND, NAND, OR, NOR, XOR, XNOR and half-adder, using the PS of the optically injected VCSEL and the new EO modulation theory [18].

2. Theory and model

So far, the technology of the VCSEL with 850 nm tends to mature, its response frequency can be greater than 40GHz, and its transmission rate has reached 10Gb/s. On the other hand, the modulation frequency of EO modulator based LiNbO3 crystal can reach 40GHz [19]. Therefore, the EO modulation speed of periodically poled LiNbO3 (PPLN) can match the responce time of the VCSEL. Based on the above-mentioned consideration and the PS in an optically injected VCSEL, we present a scheme of optoelectric composite logic gate, shown in Fig. 1. Here, the M-VCSEL is master VCSEL; the S-VCSEL is slave VCSEL. The M-VCSEL and the S-VCSEL have both operating wavelength of 850nm and a threshold current of 6.8 mA. They are driven with a low noise current source (Tektronix LDC202 200mA), and temperature controlled within 0.01 °C. The optical isolator 1 (IS1) ensures that the light from the output of M-VCSEL propagates unidirectionally to the polarization beam-splitter 1 (PBS1). The IS2 and the IS3 are used to avoid the light from the PBS2 to feed back into PPLN. The IS4 ensures that the light from the PBS3 is avoided to feed back into the S-VCSEL. An optical variable attenuator (VA) is placed in the left-side of the S-VCSEL to control optical injection strength. The applied electric filed E0 is along the x-direction of the crystal coordinate system. Suppose that the light from the M-VCSEL propagates along the y-direction in the periodically poled LiNbO3 (PPLN) crystal, the polar angle θ = π/2 and the azimuth angle φ = π/2. So for a uniaxial crystal PPLN, the unit vector of o-light and e-light a = (1, 0, 0) and b = (0,0,1). This means that the o-light and the e-light are along the x-direction and the z-direction in the PPLN crystal, respectively. With a fixed injection current, the M-VCSEL emits the x-LP and the y-LP components, which are separated by the PBS1. The x-LP from the PBS1 is considered as the original input of the o-light in the crystal because that the x-LP component is along the polarized direction of the o-light. The y-LP from the PBS1 is considered as the original input of the e-light when it is aligned with the poarized direction of the e-light (z-direction) by the Faraday rotator 1 (FR1) and the half wave plate1 (HWP1). Under the effect of an applied electric field E0, the two LP components are subject to EO amplitude modulation in the PPLN crystal. The output o-light from the PPLN, as the x-LP component, is parallel injected into the S-VCSEL by the mirror 2 and PBS2. The output e-light, as the y-LP component, is parallel injected into the S-VCSEL by the PBS2 when its polarized direction is aligned with the y-LP by the HWP2 and the FR2. The output x-LP and y-LP components from the S-VCSEL with POI are considered as the logic outputs Y1 and Y2, respectively.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of optoelectric composite logic gate based the VCSEL subjected to external optical injection, where M-VCSEL, master VCSEL; S-VCSEL, slave VCSEL; IS, isolator; PPLN, periodically poled LiNbO3; μM and μS, the normalized injection current of the M-VCSEL and the S-VCSEL, respectively; PBS, polarization beam-splitter; POI, parallel optical injection; TEF, transverse electric field; HWP, half wave plate; FR, Faraday rotator; M, the mirror; VA, the variable attenutor. The applied electric field E0 is digital square wave; A1 and A2, logic input signals; Y1 and Y2, logic output signals.

Download Full Size | PDF

Based on the spin flip model of VCSEL presented by Miguel [20], the rate equations of the M-VCSEL are modified as

ddt(EMx(t)EMy(t))=k(1+ia)[NM(t)1](EMx(t)E(t)My)±ik(1+ia)nM(t)(EMy(t)EMx(t))(γa+iγp)(EMx(t)EMy(t))+([βsp(NM(t)+nM(t))/2]1/2i[βsp(NM(t)+nM(t))/2]1/2)ξ1+([βsp(NM(t)nM(t))/2]1/2i[βsp(NM(t)nM(t))/2]1/2)ξ2,
dNM(t)dt=γe{NM(t)μM+NM(t)(|EMx(t)|2+|EMy(t)|2)+in(t)M[EMy(t)EMx*(t)EMx(t)EMy*]},
dnM(t)dt=γsnM(t)γe{nM(t)(|EMx(t)|2+|EMy(t)|2)+iNM(t)[EMy(t)EMx*(t)EMx(t)EMy*(t)]},
where the subscript M refers to the M-VCSEL, and the subscript x and y represent the x-LP and y-LP components, respectively; E is the complex amplitude of the light field; N is the total carrier concentration; n is the difference in concentration between carriers with spin-up and spin-down; k = 1/(2τp), τp is the carrier photon lifetime; γe is the nonradiative carrier relaxation rate; a is the line-width enhancement factor; γs is the spin relaxation; γa and γp are the dichroism and birefringence, respectively; μM = (Γg/k) [IM /(2ee)-N0] (μM is the normalized injection current which equals to 1 at the lasing threshold current), Γ is the field confinement factor to the active region, g is the differential material gain, e is the electron charge, V is the volume of the active region, IM is the injection current, N0 is one half of the transparency carrier density (i.e., the transparency carrier density per spin orientation); βsp is the spontaneous emission rate; ξ1 and ξ2 are, respectively, two independent complex Gaussian white noise events with zero mean and 1 variance.

From Fig. 1, it is known that the x-LP component is along the direction of the o-light from the PPLN crystal, and the y-LP component is aligned with the direction of the e-light by the FR1 and HWP1. Based on these conditions, the x-LP and y-LP components are considered as the original inputs of the o-light and e-light, respectively. So we have

Ux,y(0,tτ)=ω0VSATLνcn1,2EMx,My(tτ),
where Ux and Uy mean the complex amplitude of the o-light and e-light, respectively; ħ is Planck constant; SA is the effective area of light spot; V is the volume of the active layer of the VCSEL; υC is the light velocity in vacuum. TL = 2ngυC /Lv denotes the round trip time in the laser cavity, Lv is the length of laser cavity, ng is the effective refractive index of the laser active layer; ω0 is the central frequency of the laser pulse emitted from the M-VCSEL; n1 and n2 are the undisturbed refractive indexes of the x-LP and the y-LP, respectively; τis the delay of the light propagating from the M-VCSEL to the S-VCSEL. Because of phase mismatch and the weak second-order nonlinear effects, the wave-coupling equations of linear EO effect for two LP components in the PPLN crystal are described as [21]
dUx(t,x)dx=id(x)1Uy(t,x)exp(iΔkx)id2(x)Ux(t,x),
dUy(t,x)dx=id(x)3Ux(t,x)exp(iΔkx)id4(x)Uy(t,x),
here
d1=k02n1n2reff1E0f1,
d2=k02n1reff2E0f0,
d3=k02n1n2reff1E0f1,
d4=k02n2reff3E0f0,
and the effective EO coefficients
reff1=j,k,l(εjjεkk)ajrjklbkcl,
reff2=j,k,l(εjjεkk)ajrjklakcl,
reff2=j,k,l(εjjεkk)bjrjklbkcl,
where {j, k, l} = {1, 2, 3}(the same as below); εjj = njj2 and εkk = nkk2 denote the diagonalized electric permittivity tensor elements; rjkl is the EO tensor elements; a and b are the unit vector of the x-LP and the y-LP, respectively; c is the unit vector of the applied electric field. a = (sinφ, -cosφ, 0) and b = (-cosθ cosφ, -cosθsinφ,sinθ) in a uniaxial crystal PPLN. Here, θ and φ are the polar angle and the azimuth angle, respectively. c = (0,1,0) when the applied electric field E0 is along the direction of the z-axis in the crystal; f1 = [1-cos(2πD) + isin(2πD)]/(iπ) is the first-order positive Fourier coefficient; f0 = 2D-1 is the zero-order Fourier coefficient; f-1 = [1-cos(−2πD) + isin(−2πD)]/(-) denotes the first-order negative Fourier coefficient; D is the duty ratio; + is the length of the positive domain; 1 is the length of the negative domains; Δk = kx-ky + K1, where K1 = 2π/Λ is the first order reciprocal lattice vector, Λ is the poled period of crystal, kx = 2πn1υC /ω0 and ky = 2πn2υC /ω0 denote the wave vector of the x-LP and y-LP at ω0, respectively; k0 is the wave vector of light in vacuum. Considering K1 closes to the wave vector mismatch, kx-ky, and neglecting those components that make little contributions to EO effect because of phase mismatch, we derive the analytical solutions of Eqs. (5) and (6) as follows
ux,y(tτ,L)=ρx,y(tτ,L)exp(iβ0L)exp[iϕx,y(tτ,L)],
where
ρx,y(tτ,L)={ux,y2(tτ,0)cos2(νL)+[γux,y(tτ,0)d1,3uy,x(tτ,0)ν]2sin2(νL)}1/2,
ϕx,y(tτ,L)=tan1[±γux,y(tτ,0)d1,3uy,x(tτ,0)νux,y(tτ,0)tan(νL)],
and

β0=Δkd2d42,
ν=(Δk+d2d4)2+4d1d32,
γ=d4d2Δk2.

When the two LP components subjected to EO modulation are injected into the S-VCSEL, we have

EPx,Py=SATLυCn1,2ω0Vux,y(tτ,L),
where Epx and Epy, respectively, denote the amplitude of the x-LP and the y-LP that are subjected to EO modulation. In this case, the rate equations of S-VCSEL subjected to parallel optical injection are [2,7–10]
ddt(ESx(t)ESy(t))=k(1+ia)[NS(t)1](ESx(t)E(t)Sy)±ik(1+ia)nS(t)(ESy(t)ESx(t))(γa+iγp)(ESx(t)ESy(t))+([βSp(NS(t)+nS(t))/2]1/2i[βsp(NS(t)+nS(t))/2]1/2)ξ1+([βSp(NS(t)nS(t))/2]1/2i[βsp(NS(t)nS(t))/2]1/2)ξ2+kinj[EPx(tτ)EPy(tτ)]exp(iω0τ+iΔωt)
dNS(t)dt=γe{NS(t)μS+NS(t)(|ESx(t)|2+|ESy(t)|2)+in(t)S[ESy(t)ESx*(t)ESx(t)ESy*]},
dnS(t)dt=γsnS(t)γe{nS(t)(|ESx(t)|2+|ESy(t)|2)+iNS(t)[ESy(t)EMx*(t)ESx(t)ESy*(t)]},
where the subscript S refers to the S-VCSEL; Δω is the center frequency detuning between M-VCSEL and S-VCSEL; kinj is the injection strength of the light, which is determined from the ratio of the injection power and the output power of the M-VCSEL; μs = (Γg/k) [IS /(2ee)-N0] is the normalized injection current, IS is the injection current.

3. Results and discussions

First, we numerically calculate the Eqs. (1)-(3) and (21)-(23), using the four-order Rung-Kutta method. The numerical values in calculation are given in Table1, where n1 and n2 are from the Shellmeier refractive formula of the PPLN crystal [22]. The spontaneous emission noise terms in Eqs. (1) and (20) are ignored in the following calculation, owing to the slight influence on the PS of VCSEL [23]. According to the related reports [14–17], the PS or logic output states of an optically injected VCSEL depends on some key parameters, such as the injection current of the M-VCSEL and the S-VCSEL, μM and μS, as well as optical injection strength kinj. As presented in [17], for any injection current μM of the M-VCSEL, with the increase of the applied electric field, the polarization of the S-VCSEL with POI oscillates periodically when μS = 1.2 and kinj = 10ns−1 (the same below). And the S-VCSEL may emit any polarization light if the applied electric field is fixed at a certain value. These results presented in [17] can help to realize various types of controllable optoelectric logic gates. On this basis, we suppose that the injection current μM equals to the sum of two square waves, μM = μ1(t) + μ2(t), that encode the two logic inputs. They are named as A1 and A2, respectively. Since the logic inputs can be either 0 or 1, there exist four distinct input sets: (0, 0), (0, 1), (1, 0), (1, 1). The logic input sets (0, 1) and (1, 0) yield the same μM value. Therefore, the four distinct logic sets is reduced to three μM values. Here, it should be more convenient that the parameters, such as the mean value μ0, and the modulation amplitude Δμ, are introduced in this paper. So, instead of the four logic inputs, three injection current values, such as μM1 = μ0μ, μM2 = μ0 and μM3 = μ0 + Δμ, are considered as logic inputs. Besides, the x-LP and the y-LP from the S-VCSEL output are set as two logic outputs, Y1 and Y2. With only the x-LP component emitted from the S-VCSEL, Y1 = 1 and Y2 = 0; If the output of the S-VCSEL is only the y-LP component, Y1 = 0 and Y2 = 1. In this case, it is possible that some logic gates, such as AND, NAND, OR, NOR, XNOR, XOR and so on, are implemented. For this purpose, in the following we will elaborate the implementation scheme and logical operation method of the above-mentioned logic gates.

Tables Icon

Table 1. Numerical values for optoelectric logic gates design

Figure 2 shows the logic operations of some optoelectric composite logic gates, such as AND, NAND, OR, NOR, XNOR and XOR, when Δμ = 0.066, μ0 = 1.114, μS = 1.2 and kinj = 10ns−1. Here, E0 = 0kV/mm and E0 = 1.326kV/mm are used to control logic gates; (A1,A2) = (0,0) when μM (μ0-Δμ) = 1.048 [see Fig. 2(a)]; if μM = μ0, (A1,A2) = (0,1) or (1,0); while μM (μ0 + Δμ) = 1.18, (A1,A2) = (1,1). Besides, the logic symbol of the E0 is defined as E˜0.We suppose that E˜0 = 0 when E0 = 0kV/mm, and E˜0 = 1 if E0 = 1.326kV/mm. It is found from Fig. 2 that various digital signal processing, such as AND, NAND, OR, NOR, XNOR and XOR, are performed, using different logic operations of the applied electric field between the logic inputs A1 and A2. In the following, we take logical AND and NAND as an example to elaborate their logic operations.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Time traces of the two logic inputs, the injection current, the applied electric field, the output x-LP and y-LP, and the logic outputs of AND, NAND, OR, NOR, XNOR and XOR operations when μS = 1.2 and kinj = 10ns-1. Here, (a): time traces of the injection currents and its associated logic inputs; (b): AND and NAND operations; (c): OR and NOR operations; (d) XNOR and XOR operations.

Download Full Size | PDF

Firstly, we set E˜0 = A1·A2 for logic AND and NAND operations [see Fig. 2(a) and (b)]. When (A1, A2) = (0, 0) and E˜0 = 0, Y1 = 0 and Y2 = 1, owing to the case that the S-VCSEL outputs the y-LP component. If (A1, A2) = (1, 1) and E˜0 = 1, Y1 = 1 and Y2 = 0 because that the output is the x-LP component. For (A1, A2) = (0, 1) or (1, 0) and E˜0 = 0, Y1 = 0 and Y2 = 1 in the case of the output that is the y-LP component. So we obtain Y1 = A1·A2, Y2 = A1A2¯. This means that the logic operations AND and NAND have been realized. As shown from Fig. 2(c) and (d), considering E˜0 = A1 + A2, we obtain logic operations OR and NOR [see Fig. 2(c)]. Besides, logic operations XNOR and XOR are implemented when E˜0=A1A2¯[see Fig. 2(d)]. For above-mentioned logic gates, Tables 2–4 give the relationship between the logic inputs, the injection current, the applied electric field, the expected laser polarization and its associated logical outputs. From these tables, one sees that various logic operations, such as AND, NAND, OR, NOR, XNOR and XOR, can be performed by controlling the logical operations of the applied electric field between the two logic inputs.

Tables Icon

Table 2. Relationship between the logic inputs, the injection current, the external applied electric field, the output polarization and the logic outputs for AND and NAND operations

Tables Icon

Table 3. Relationship between the logic inputs, the injection current, the external applied electric field, the output polarization and the logic output for OR and NOR operations

Tables Icon

Table 4. Relationship between the two logic inputs, the injection current, the external applied electric field, the output polarization and the logic output for XNOR and XOR operations

To implement half-adder, we further present its schematic diagram, displayed in Fig. 3. Here, two slave VCSELs have the same injection current μs, and are subjected to the same optical injection. And μS = 1.2 and kinj = 10ns−1. In additional, two master VCSELs have the same injection current μM. The output x-LP component from the S-VCSEL1 is considered as the Carry (C) for half-adder; the output y-LP component from the S-VCSEL2 is assumed as the Sum (S) for half-adder; E˜01 is the logic of the electric field applied on the PPLN1 crystal, E˜02 denotes the logic of that applied on the PPLN2 crystal. Figure 4 displays the time traces of the logic inputs, the injection current μM, the applied electric field, the output polarization and the logic outputs of Carry and Sum for half-adder operation. Table 5 further shows the relationship between the logic inputs, the injection current, the external applied electric field, the output polarization and its associated logic output for the half-adder operation. From Fig. 4 and Table 5, it is found that, when E˜01 = A1⋅A2, the Carry output is the AND operation (A1⋅A2) [see Fig. 4 (b)]. If E˜02=A1A2¯, the Sum is the XOR operation between A1 and A2. That is to say, S = A1A2, C = A1·A2. This means that the logic operation of the half-adder can be implemented by controlling the logic operation of the applied electric field.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Schematic diagram of the implementation scheme for logic half-adder operation Here, the upper system is used to realize Carry operation; the lower one is applied to implement Sum operation. The S-VCSEL1 and the S-VCSEL2 have the same injection current μs, and are subjected to the same optical injection. all parameters here are the same as that in Fig. 1; C represents the Carry output for half-adder, and S denotes the Sum output for half-adder; μM = μ1 + μ2.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 The logic operation half-adder, time traces of the logic inputs, the injection currents, the applied electric field, the output polarization and the logic outputs of Carry and Sum for half-adder operation when μS = 1.2 and kinj = 10ns−1. Here, (a) the temporal waveforms of the injection current; (b) the output of Carry (C) and Sum (S) for half-adder. Here, ES1x, and E˜01, the amplitude of the x-LP from the S-VCSEL1 and its associated logic, respectively; ES2y and E˜02, the amplitude of the y-LP from the S-VCSEL2 and its associated logic, respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

Tables Icon

Table 5. Relationship between the logic inputs, the injection current, the external applied electric field, the output polarization and the logic output for the half-adder operation

4. Conclusions

In the external optically injected system composed of master VCSEL and slave one, we put forward a novel implementation scheme for optoelectric logic operations, using the PS law of slave VCSEL and new EO modulation theory. In this scheme, the x-LP and y-LP components from the slave VCSEL output are considered as two logic outputs, which satisfy logic non operation. When the logic of the electric field applied on PPLN crystal is set as the AND, OR and XNOR operations between the two logic input signals, the output x-LP component, as one logic output, is the AND, OR and XNOR operations, respectively. The logic operations NAND, NOR and XOR are obtained from the other logic output (the output y-LP component). Based on the schemes of the logical AND and XOR, we further perform the half-adder operation. These results have potential applications in controllable optical logic gates with multifunction.

Acnowledgments

This work is supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grants No. 61475120.

References and links

1. F. Koyama, “Recent advances of VCSEL Photonics,” J. Lightwave Technol. 24(12), 4502–4513 (2006). [CrossRef]  

2. S. F. Liu, G. Xia, J. G. Xia, and Z. M. Wu, “Improving chaotic carrier fundamental frequency in VCSELs with optical feedback by strong light injection,” Wuli Xuebao 57(3), 1502–1505 (2008).

3. Y. H. Hong, J. Paul, and P. S. Spencer, “The effects of polarization resolved optical feedback on the relative intensity noise and polarization stability of vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 24(8), 3210–3216 (2006). [CrossRef]  

4. M. A. Arteaga, H. J. Unold, M. Ostermann, R. Michalzik, H. Thienpont, and K. Panajotov, “Investigation of polarization properties of VCSELs subject to optical feedback from an extermely short external cavity-partII:Experiments,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 42(2), 102–107 (2006). [CrossRef]  

5. V. M. Deshmukh, S. H. Lee, D. W. Kim, K. H. Kim, and M. H. Lee, “Experimental and numerical analysis on temporal dynamics of polarization switching in an injection-locked 1.55-μm wavelength VCSEL,” Opt. Express 19(18), 16934–16949 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. J. Liu, Z. M. Wu, and G. Q. Xia, “Dual-channel chaos synchronization and communication based on unidirectionally coupled VCSELs with polarization-rotated optical feedback and polarization-rotated optical injection,” Opt. Express 17(15), 12619–12626 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. D. Z. Zhong, G. Q. Xia, F. Wang, and Z. M. Wu, “Vectorial chaotic synchronization characteristics of unidrectionally coupled and injected vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers based on feedback,” Acta Physica Sinica 65(6), 3279–3292 (2007).(In Chinese)

8. D. Z. Zhong and Z. M. Wu, “Complete chaotic synchronization mechanism of polarization mode of VCSEL with anisotropic optical feedback,” Opt. Commun. 282(8), 1631–1639 (2009). [CrossRef]  

9. D. Z. Zhong, G. Q. Xia, Z.-M. Wu, and X.-H. Jia, “Complete chaotic synchronization characteristics of the linear-polarization mode of vertical-cavity surface-emitting semiconductor lasers with isotropic optical feedback,” Opt. Commun. 281(6), 1698–1709 (2008). [CrossRef]  

10. D. Z. Zhong and Z. M. Wu, “Manipulation of the vector chaotic polarization of VCSEL output with external optical feedback by electro-optic modulation,” Wuli Xuebao 61(3), 154–163 (2012).

11. T. Katayama, T. Ooi, and H. Kawaguchi, “Experimental demonstration of multi-bit optical buffer memory using 1.55-µm polarization bistable vertical cavity surface emitting lasers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 45(11), 1495–1504 (2009). [CrossRef]  

12. P. Guo, W. Yang, D. Parekh, C. J. Chang-Hasnain, A. Xu, and Z. Chen, “Experimental and theoretical study of wide hysteresis cycles in 1550 nm VCSELs under optical injection,” Opt. Express 21(3), 3125–3132 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. Y. Li, Z. M. Wu, Z. Q. Zhong, X. J. Yang, S. Mao, and G. Q. Xia, “Time-delay signature of chaos in 1550 nm VCSELs with variable-polarization FBG feedback,” Opt. Express 22(16), 19610–19620 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. J. Zamora-Munt and C. Masoller, “Numerical implementation of a VCSEL-based stochastic logic gate via polarization bistability,” Opt. Express 18(16), 16418–16429 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. S. Perrone, R. Vilaseca, and C. Masoller, “Stochastic logic gate that exploits noise and polarization bistability in an optically injected VCSEL,” Opt. Express 20(20), 22692–22699 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. M. F. Salvide, C. Masoller, and M. S. Torre, “All-optical stochastic logic gate based on a vcsel with tunable optical injection,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 49(10), 886–893 (2013). [CrossRef]  

17. D. Z. Zhong, Y. Q. Ji, T. Deng, and K. L. Zhou, “Manipulation of the polarization switching and the nonlinear dynamic behaviors of the vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser subject to optical injection by EO modulation,” Acta Physica Sinica 64(11), 134–147 (2015).

18. W. L. She and W. K. Lee, “Wave coupling theory of linear electrooptic effect,” Opt. Commun. 195(1–4), 303–311 (2001). [CrossRef]  

19. T. Kawanishi, T. Sakamoto, and M. Izutsu, “High-speed control of lightwave amplitude, phase, and frequency by use of electrooptic effect,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 13(1), 79–91 (2007). [CrossRef]  

20. M. San Miguel, Q. Feng, and J. V. Moloney, “Light-polarization dynamics in surface-emitting semiconductor lasers,” Phys. Rev. A 52(2), 1728–1739 (1995). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

21. G. Zheng, H. Wang, and W. She, “Wave coupling theory of quasi-phase-Matched linear electro-optic effect,” Opt. Express 14(12), 5535–5540 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

22. M. V. Hobden and J. Warner, “The temperature dependence of the refractive indices of pure lithium niobate,” Phys. Lett. 22(3), 243–244 (1966). [CrossRef]  

23. R. Vicente, J. Mulet, C. R. Mirasso, and M. Sciamanna, “Polarization switching dynamics and bistability in mutually coupled vertical cavity surface emitting lasers,” Semiconductor Lasers and Lasers Dynamics II, Proc. SPIE 6184, 6184413 (2006). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of optoelectric composite logic gate based the VCSEL subjected to external optical injection, where M-VCSEL, master VCSEL; S-VCSEL, slave VCSEL; IS, isolator; PPLN, periodically poled LiNbO3; μM and μS, the normalized injection current of the M-VCSEL and the S-VCSEL, respectively; PBS, polarization beam-splitter; POI, parallel optical injection; TEF, transverse electric field; HWP, half wave plate; FR, Faraday rotator; M, the mirror; VA, the variable attenutor. The applied electric field E0 is digital square wave; A1 and A2, logic input signals; Y1 and Y2, logic output signals.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Time traces of the two logic inputs, the injection current, the applied electric field, the output x-LP and y-LP, and the logic outputs of AND, NAND, OR, NOR, XNOR and XOR operations when μS = 1.2 and kinj = 10ns-1. Here, (a): time traces of the injection currents and its associated logic inputs; (b): AND and NAND operations; (c): OR and NOR operations; (d) XNOR and XOR operations.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Schematic diagram of the implementation scheme for logic half-adder operation Here, the upper system is used to realize Carry operation; the lower one is applied to implement Sum operation. The S-VCSEL1 and the S-VCSEL2 have the same injection current μs, and are subjected to the same optical injection. all parameters here are the same as that in Fig. 1; C represents the Carry output for half-adder, and S denotes the Sum output for half-adder; μM = μ1 + μ2.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 The logic operation half-adder, time traces of the logic inputs, the injection currents, the applied electric field, the output polarization and the logic outputs of Carry and Sum for half-adder operation when μS = 1.2 and kinj = 10ns−1. Here, (a) the temporal waveforms of the injection current; (b) the output of Carry (C) and Sum (S) for half-adder. Here, ES1x, and E ˜ 01 , the amplitude of the x-LP from the S-VCSEL1 and its associated logic, respectively; ES2y and E ˜ 02 , the amplitude of the y-LP from the S-VCSEL2 and its associated logic, respectively.

Tables (5)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Numerical values for optoelectric logic gates design

Tables Icon

Table 2 Relationship between the logic inputs, the injection current, the external applied electric field, the output polarization and the logic outputs for AND and NAND operations

Tables Icon

Table 3 Relationship between the logic inputs, the injection current, the external applied electric field, the output polarization and the logic output for OR and NOR operations

Tables Icon

Table 4 Relationship between the two logic inputs, the injection current, the external applied electric field, the output polarization and the logic output for XNOR and XOR operations

Tables Icon

Table 5 Relationship between the logic inputs, the injection current, the external applied electric field, the output polarization and the logic output for the half-adder operation

Equations (23)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

d dt ( E Mx (t) E My (t) )=k(1+ia)[ N M (t)1]( E Mx (t) E (t) My )±ik(1+ia) n M (t)( E My (t) E Mx (t) ) ( γ a +i γ p )( E Mx (t) E My (t) )+( [ β sp ( N M (t)+ n M (t))/2 ] 1/2 i [ β sp ( N M (t)+ n M (t))/2] 1/2 ) ξ 1 +( [ β sp ( N M (t) n M (t))/2 ] 1/2 i [ β sp ( N M (t) n M (t))/2 ] 1/2 ) ξ 2 ,
d N M (t) dt = γ e { N M (t) μ M + N M (t)(| E Mx (t) | 2 +| E My (t) | 2 )+in (t) M [ E My (t) E Mx * (t) E Mx (t) E My * ]},
d n M (t) dt = γ s n M (t) γ e { n M (t)(| E Mx (t) | 2 +| E My (t) | 2 )+i N M (t)[ E My (t) E Mx * (t) E Mx (t) E My * (t)]},
U x,y (0,tτ)= ω 0 V S A T L ν c n 1,2 E Mx,My (tτ),
d U x (t,x) dx =id (x) 1 U y (t,x)exp(iΔkx)i d 2 (x) U x (t,x),
d U y (t,x) dx =id (x) 3 U x (t,x)exp(iΔkx)i d 4 (x) U y (t,x),
d 1 = k 0 2 n 1 n 2 r eff1 E 0 f 1 ,
d 2 = k 0 2 n 1 r eff2 E 0 f 0 ,
d 3 = k 0 2 n 1 n 2 r eff1 E 0 f 1 ,
d 4 = k 0 2 n 2 r eff3 E 0 f 0 ,
r eff1 = j,k,l ( ε jj ε kk ) a j r jkl b k c l ,
r eff2 = j,k,l ( ε jj ε kk ) a j r jkl a k c l ,
r eff2 = j,k,l ( ε jj ε kk ) b j r jkl b k c l ,
u x,y (tτ,L)= ρ x,y (tτ,L)exp(i β 0 L)exp[i ϕ x,y (tτ,L)],
ρ x,y (tτ,L)= { u x,y 2 (tτ,0) cos 2 (νL)+ [ γ u x,y (tτ,0) d 1,3 u y,x (tτ,0) ν ] 2 sin 2 (νL) } 1/2 ,
ϕ x,y (tτ,L)= tan 1 [ ±γ u x,y (tτ,0) d 1,3 u y,x (tτ,0) ν u x,y (tτ,0) tan(νL) ],
β 0 = Δk d 2 d 4 2 ,
ν= (Δk+ d 2 d 4 ) 2 +4 d 1 d 3 2 ,
γ= d 4 d 2 Δk 2 .
E Px,Py = S A T L υ C n 1,2 ω 0 V u x,y (tτ,L),
d dt ( E Sx (t) E Sy (t) )=k(1+ia)[ N S (t)1]( E Sx (t) E (t) Sy )±ik(1+ia) n S (t)( E Sy (t) E Sx (t) )( γ a +i γ p )( E Sx (t) E Sy (t) ) +( [ β Sp ( N S (t)+ n S (t))/2 ] 1/2 i [ β sp ( N S (t)+ n S (t))/2] 1/2 ) ξ 1 +( [ β Sp ( N S (t) n S (t))/2 ] 1/2 i [ β sp ( N S (t) n S (t))/2 ] 1/2 ) ξ 2 + k inj [ E Px (tτ) E Py (tτ) ]exp(i ω 0 τ+iΔωt)
d N S (t) dt = γ e { N S (t) μ S + N S (t)(| E Sx (t) | 2 +| E Sy (t) | 2 )+in (t) S [ E Sy (t) E Sx * (t) E Sx (t) E Sy * ]},
d n S (t) dt = γ s n S (t) γ e { n S (t)(| E Sx (t) | 2 +| E Sy (t) | 2 )+i N S (t)[ E Sy (t) E Mx * (t) E Sx (t) E Sy * (t)]},
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.