Abstract
The mechanism of resonant perfect optical absorbers is quantitatively revealed by the coupled mode method for the air/grating/dielectric film/air four region system. The sufficient and necessary conditions of the perfect optical absorption are derived from the interface scattering coefficients analyses. The coupling of the Fabry-Perot modes in the grating slits and non-zero order quasi waveguide modes in the dielectric film play a key role for the perfect optical absorption when the light is incident from the grating side. The analytical sufficient and necessary conditions of the perfect optical absorption provide an efficient tool towards geometry design for the perfect optical absorption at the specific wavelengths. The advantages of a widely tunable perfect optical absorption wavelength, a high Q factor and the confined energy loss on metal surfaces make the air/grating/film/air structures promising for applications in sensing, modulation and detection.
© 2016 Optical Society of America
1. Introduction
Perfect optical absorption (POA) is an efficient way to transfer optical energy to other forms of energy. Since the total absorption of polarized light was firstly demonstrated in 1976 [1, 2] by metallic gratings, it has attracted academic attention for the mechanism, device design and the wide applications such as photovoltaics, sensing, modulator, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and optical coupling [3]. The perfect optical absorbers can be classified as resonant absorption and non-resonant absorption. For the resonant absorption, the light is absorbed by interference of resonant modes. In the case of non-resonant absorption, lossy materials and gradient refractive index materials are utilized. Compared to the non-resonant absorption, the resonant absorption has advantages of high sensitivity, good tunability and ultra-thin structure design, and is promising for sensing [4, 5], filtering, modulating [6, 7], and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy [8]. The mechanism behind resonant perfect optical absorption is the phase matching of different modes, such as surface plasmon modes [9], lattice resonance modes [10], Fabry-Perot modes in slits [11, 12], cavity modes of trenches on grating surfaces [13] and quasi waveguide modes in dielectric films [14]. To physically understanding the mode interactions and their effects on optical transmission/absorption of periodical metallic structures, a thorough mode analysis for a three region system (e.g. a free-standing grating structure) by the coupled mode method was reported [11]. In addition, the coupling strength and decay rate of different modes were analyzed by transmission Fano lineshape analysis [15, 16]. Though there are many studies on resonant perfect optical absorption of grating structures, the sufficient and necessary conditions to realize the perfect optical absorption have not been discussed. The rules for the design of a perfect optical absorption structure for a specific wavelength are still not determined. This limits the practical applications of the resonant perfect optical absorber.
In this paper, we proposed a full mode analysis by the coupled mode method for the air/grating/film/air four region system, one of the promising resonant perfect optical absorber structures. The sufficient and necessary conditions for the perfect optical absorption are derived from the interface scattering coefficients analyses in the infrared wavelength region, which offer the prompt and accurate design rules for the perfect optical absorbers. The coupling of the Fabry-Perot modes in the grating slits and the quasi waveguide modes in dielectric film play a key role for the perfect optical absorption. The features of the electromagnetic field distribution and energy loss under the perfect optical absorption are studied by numerical simulations. Furthermore, we investigated the fabrication window for geometry parameters for specific POA wavelength.
2. Metallic grating structure and methods
The air/grating/film/air four region structures can be realized by attaching a freestanding metallic grating to a dielectric film. Here we mainly consider the classical model and p-polarized incident light from the grating side, as seen in Fig. 1. In this case the surface modes can be coupled to the incident light by grating momentum compensation. The four region system is labeled from input to output as layer 1 to layer 4 as shown in Fig. 1. The permittivity of gold is taken for the grating and is modeled by the Drude model [15]: with , and . The refractive index of the dielectric film (layer 3) is taken as for example, while other regions are all air with the refractive index as . The grating geometry parameters are grating period (D), slit width (s), grating thickness (Tg) and dielectric film thickness (Td). Commercial finite differential time domain software (FDTD Solutions, Lumerical Solutions Inc.) was used to calculate the transient electric field distribution and the time averaged ohmic loss [17]. The scattering coefficients for each interface are derived by the coupled mode method [18–20] with two approximations. Firstly, the surface impedance boundary condition (SIBC) is imposed on the metallic surface, , which relates the field in the dielectric with the field in the metal at the interface and it fits well as long as the interface geometry size is much larger than the skin depth. Secondly, only the fundamental Fabry-Perot mode in the slits is considered since the wavelength of light is five times larger than the slit width, which is valid as. These two approximations make the scattering coefficients calculated analytically and apply well for the structures in the infrared incident case. The coupled mode method is a mode expansion method. To the air and film layer, the fundamental modes are plane wave modes. While, to the grating layer in the infrared region, the fundamental modes are the Fabry-Perot modes in the slits. The interface scattering coefficients of the modes are defined in Fig. 1. For example, is the effective reflection coefficient at the interface of layer 2 and layer 4, which contains the contributions of both Fabry-Perot modes in the grating slits and the waveguide modes in the film. The propagation of the Fabry-Perot modes in the slits is expressed as . The propagation of waveguide modes in the film is expressed as with a diffraction order of p. Up to 50 orders waveguide modes are calculated in the coupled mode analysis with the effective refractive index of the Fabry-Perot mode in the slit [21]. The reflection and transmission coefficients from region 1 to region 4 are expressed by the interface scattering coefficients as:
Finally, the transmittance and reflectance are calculated by and with the admittance . The absorption is defined by , where T/R is the sum of for all possible far-field components. The explicit expressions for these interface scattering coefficients are offered in the appendix.3. Results and discussions
3.1 Fundamental mode analysis
First, the fundamental mode analyses are performed from the interface scattering coefficients of the modes. As seen in Eqs. (1) and (2), the pole of transmission coefficient and reflection coefficient are directly related to the denominator . , and can be treated as the influence of air/grating lattice mode, quasi waveguide modes in the film and the Fabry-Perot modes in the grating slits. To prove this, we performed the phase dispersion of , and in Fig. 2 with D = 10 µm, s = 1 µm, Tg = 16 µm, Td = 12.5 µm. The incident light energy is scaled to grating period as 1/D and the phase is presented by the unit of . It is clearly shown that the line with is the air/grating lattice modes, the lines with are the Fabry-Perot modes in the grating slits. The lines with, are quite close with to the condition with integer n and p = + 1, −1 and −2 as shown in Fig. 3(b) thus are named as quasi waveguide modes in the film. Only three quasi waveguide lines for p = −1 are due to the film thickness Td = 12.5 µm and n3 = 1.4. More waveguide modes for p = −1 will appear with larger film thickness.
Then, the mode interactions and the corresponding effects on the absorption peaks are studied. The absorption dispersion is calculated by FDTD for the same structure in Fig. 3(a) and compared with the coupled mode dispersion analysis in Fig. 3(b). In the coupled mode dispersion plot, the black lines mark the condition with a deviation of ± 2%. The condition with a deviation of ± 2% is shown by green, blue and red lines with p = −1, + 1 and −2, respectively. The magenta lines are the input surface (grating/air) lattice modes and the cyan lines are the output surface (grating/film) lattice modes. First of all, all the absorption resonances correspond to black lines, which mean that the resonant absorption is indeed caused by the coupling of the different modes mentioned above [11], with the features of energy shifts and energy anti-crossings. Secondly, the grating/air lattice modes on the input surface reduce the absorption peaks. This is for the reason that the surface lattice modes short out the input surface and lead to high reflectance. Contrarily, the grating/film lattice modes on the output surface enhance the absorption because they can couple with the quasi waveguide modes in the film. Thirdly, the quasi waveguide modes in the dielectric film introduce new absorption resonance peaks and new energy band distortions. All the enhanced absorption lines (A > 0.5) are related with one quasi waveguide mode. Therefore, the quasi waveguide modes seem to play a dominant role for the enhanced absorption. The enhanced absorption peak wavelength are within the range from 10 µm () to 14 µm () because of the contributions of the waveguide modes.
3.2 Perfect optical absorption conditions
As marked by yellow circles for the POA (Abs > 95%) in Fig. 3(a), the perfect optical absorption is realized in the structure with D = 10 µm, s = 1 µm, Tg = 16 µm, Td = 12.5 µm under the normal incident wavelength 13.796 µm. However, the yellow circles only cover parts of the mode lines. Therefore, the sufficient and necessary conditions for perfect optical absorption for the four region system need to be studied. As shown in Fig. 4(a), the transmittance/reflectance spectra, which are calculated by the coupled mode analysis, match well with the spectra calculated by FDTD with the same structure used in Fig. 3. It means that the coupled mode analysis is accurate enough for the study of the perfect optical absorption conditions.
As shown in Fig. 4(a), the perfect optical absorption at 13.796 µm is companied with zero transmittance and zero reflectance. Consequently, we analyzed the components for both and for the reasons of the zeros. The related key coefficients are, and. We plotted the phase spectra of and as shown in Fig. 4(b). Considering is mainly contributed by the quasi waveguide modes in the film, we also added the phase spectra of (p = ± 1) in Fig. 4(b). First, we can see the perfect matching between and the reflectance valleys marked as the pink triangles in Fig. 4(a) and Fig. 4(b). Hence, is the first necessary condition for the perfect optical absorption and it means that the perfect phase matching in the grating slits and in the film. Next, the two enhanced absorption peaks with roughly A > 0.5 are located at the wavelength with the condition marked as the blue squares in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b). This means that the film perfectly blocks the transmitted energy and causes both the minimum of and the enhanced absorption peak. Besides, a close relationship is found between and as shown in Fig. 4(b). Thus, the quasi waveguide modes (p =± 1) in the film is the main reason to block the transmitted energy because of the total internal reflection at the film/air interface for p =± 1 order waveguide modes. The small deviation between and is due to the small contributions of the grating/film lattice modes. The quasi waveguide modes is dominant to the enhanced absorption peaks, however, the precise necessary condition for the perfect optical absorption is . The last necessary condition for the perfect optical absorption is the destructive interference of the reflectance, i.e. because only p = 0 order is the propagation diffraction order in our case (), which determines the perfect optical absorption peak at 13.796 µm.
The sufficiency of the three perfect optical absorption conditions for the four region system is verified by the predictions of the perfect optical absorption structures and the related wavelength. For this purpose, a geometry parameters scan for the perfect optical absorption under normal incidence is performed by FDTD and by using the three perfect optical absorption conditions separately with D = 10 µm and s = 1 µm. The search range is 0~20 µm for both Tg and Td with step size 0.1 µm, 10~20 µm for incident wavelength with step size 0.01 µm. The cases with Abs > 99% are plotted as blue lines and dots in Fig. 5 calculated by FDTD with the corresponding absorption wavelength, grating thickness and film thickness. For prediction of the three conditions, the deviation standard 2% is chosen for all three conditions, and . The results of the prediction of the three conditions give the same plots in Fig. 5. So the sufficiency of the three perfect optical absorption conditions is verified for the four region system under normal incidence. For the oblique incident case, the coupled mode method is still accurate as long as the grazing incidence is excluded.
The sufficiency and necessary conditions of the perfect optical absorption for the four region system provide an efficient tool to understand and design the perfect optical absorber structures. For the incident light near the air/grating lattice mode, the contribution of the grating/film lattice modes can be neglected, so we can simplify the perfect optical absorption conditions to and, therefore the analytical conditions are:
Equations (3) and (4) offer the key clues to understand the geometry dependence of the perfect optical absorption in Fig. 5. Firstly, the POA wavelength scales linearly with the grating period which is a typical feature for lattice modes resonance, as see in Eq. (4). Next, the linear dependence of the POA wavelength on grating thickness is a direct consequence of the Fabry-Perot modes in the slits as the air/grating lattice contribution is a small constant in Eq. (3). When the POA wavelength is close to (air/grating lattice mode), one feature in Fig. 5(d) is the POA wavelength changes quasi-linearly with Td. Other features in Fig. 5(d) are the periodical emergence of the perfect optical absorption for equal Td intervals with and the POA wavelength range within 10 µm () and 14 µm (). When the POA wavelength is close to , the contribution of grating/film lattice modes cannot be neglected, which causes the saturation behavior of the POA wavelength with increasing Td.As a complementary part, we also studied the four region case with light incident from the film side. The absorption and mode dispersions for these structures are plotted in Fig. 6 with the same structure as in Fig. 3. It is interesting to see that the absorption spectra are so different but the fundamental modes are the same. This difference is due to the different role of grating surface lattice modes at the input or output side. The input surface lattice modes short out the surface and reduce the incident coupling thus reduce the absorption which is similar with the study that corrugation at input surface determine the transmission spectra [22]. The output surface lattice modes enhance both the transmission and the absorption [23, 24]. When the film is at the input side shown as in Fig. 6, it is like the asymmetric dielectric/grating/air system, which only has the perfect optical absorption at oblique incidence. The perfect optical absorption conditions for the four region system with light incident from the film side are , , and , and are different from the conditions with light incident from the grating side [25,26]. The perfect optical absorption cases indicated by the yellow open circles in Fig. 6(a) are fewer than in Fig. 3(a). Therefore, for the prominent enhanced optical absorption it is better to illuminate the air/grating/film/air four region system from the grating side.
3.3 Perfect optical absorption field and loss analyses
The electric field amplitude distributions and energy loss distributions are calculated by FDTD for the perfect optical absorption of the four region system. Two geometries are studied and are named as the thin case and the thick case which compared grating/film thickness with the incident wavelength. The geometry parameters of the thin case are D = 10 µm, s = 1 µm, Tg = 1 µm, and Td = 0.5 µm, so the total thickness is less than a fifth of the POA wavelength 10.145 µm. Even though the film thickness is only 1/20 of the incident wavelength, the perfect optical absorption peak is dominated by the quasi waveguide modes from the mode dispersion analysis. The instantaneous electric field distribution for the thin case is shown in Fig. 7(a), where the color represents intensity and the arrows represent the direction. Strong surface electric field enhancement is observed, with the asymmetric charge distributions on the top and bottom surface. The interesting point is that the strongest electric field enhancement as large as 16 is observed at the film surface rather than at the grating surface. This is promising for surface enhanced fluorescence substrates. The distribution of the ohmic loss as shown in Fig. 7(b) is purely on the grating surface, where most of the energy is absorbed within a 100 nm depth. This is smaller than the penetration depth of 200 nm of the incident light (nm = 13.4 + 54.8i @10.156 µm). The shallow absorption depth along with the high Q factors ~200 estimated from the absorption spectrum indicate a long lifetime resonance in this system. The ultra thin resonant perfect optical absorber is quite promising for enhanced light-matter interaction and hot electron genaration.
The geometry parameters for the thick case are D = 10 µm, s = 1 µm, Tg = 16 µm, and Td = 12.5 µm. The instantaneous electric field distribution for the thick case is given in Fig. 8 for two enhanced optical absorption wavelengths 10.47 µm and 13.796 µm. Clear quasi waveguide mode patterns are seen for the two wavelengths with different node numbers. The charge distribution is symmetric on the top and bottom grating surfaces for the 10.47 µm wavelength and is asymmetric for the 13.796 µm wavelength. The electric fields are distributed mainly in the slits and at the grating/film interface for the POA wavelength 13.796 µm, which is consistent with the energy loss distrubutions.
3.4 Fabrication window for perfect optical absorber
The coupled mode method provides a prompt and accurate tool for perfect optical absorber design at specific wavelength. By the coupled mode method we offered the fabrication windows for ultra thin perfect optical absorbers at the 9 µm wavelength under the normal incidence. The basic geometry parameters are D = 8.85 µm, s = 0.761 µm, Tg = 1 µm and Td = 0.5 µm. As shown in Fig. 9 the fabrication windows for the perfect optical absorption at the 9 µm wavelength are within D = 8.8~8.85 µm, s = 0.5~0.9 µm, Tg = 0.7~1.1 µm and Td = 0.3~0.5 µm. The period is the most critical parameter with relatively low fabrication tolerance for the specific POA wavelength. Once the period is chosen, the other parameters should be fabricated with ~50 nm tolerance. The surface roughness should also be optimized otherwise it would jeopardize the perfect optical absorption by additional light scattering. The influence of the refractive index of the film can be fully adjusted by the film thickness owing to the quasi waveguide behavior. The grating structures can be fabricated by the core-shell structure process method [15] and then attached with a thin film such as silicon nitride. Therefore, the dielectric film supporting metallic grating structures are practical for the perfect optical absorber in the infrared wavelength.
4. Conclusion
The mechanism of resonant perfect optical absorption in the air/grating/film/air four region system is analyzed by the coupled mode method in the infrared wavelength incidence and sub-wavelength slits conditions. The contributions of fundamental modes (surface lattice modes, Fabry-Perot modes in slits and quasi waveguide modes in films) to the absorption are revealed by the phase analyses of the interface scattering coefficients and propagation coefficients. The perfect phase matching between the Fabry-Perot modes in the slits and quasi waveguide modes in the dielectric film have been found to play a key role for the perfect optical absorption for the four region system. The sufficient and necessary conditions for the perfect optical absorption in the four region system under normal incidence from the grating side are provided as three equations: , , and . These equations are prompt and accurate tools for the perfect optical absorber design for specific wavelength. The features of enormous electric field enhancement on the surface of dielectric film, total energy loss within the grating surface and high Q factors (long lifetime) for the perfect optical absorption were demonstrated. Benefitting from the prompt and accurate coupled mode calculations, the fabrication windows for the geometry parameters in the four region system for a specific POA wavelength are provided. The realizability of the dielectric film supporting metallic sub-wavelength grating structures and the advantages of wide-range wavelength tunability and high Q factors under the perfect optical absorption make these structures promising for wide applications in sensing, modulation, surface enhanced spectroscopy and hot electron based applications.
Appendix
By defining a horizontal wave vector with an incident angle and diffraction order p, the vertical wave vector in layer l is . The metal surface impedance is . Introducing , and admittances as for layer l and for layer 2. The propagation is in the slit and in layer 3 with diffraction order p. The effective refractive index of the Fabry-Perot mode in the slit is [21]. Defining:
And
So we have the transmittance and reflectance coefficient for each interface, derived by following the method in ref [11].
The reflection and transmission coefficient from region 1 to region 4 are:
Finally, the transmittance and reflectance are calculated by
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2015CB932400); National Natural Science Foundation of China (11404247, 11134013, 11227407).
References and links
1. D. Maystre and R. Petit, “Brewster incidence for metallic gratings,” Opt. Commun. 17(2), 196–200 (1976). [CrossRef]
2. M. C. Hutley and D. Maystre, “The total absorption of light by a diffraction grating,” Opt. Commun. 19(3), 431–436 (1976). [CrossRef]
3. Y. Cui, Y. He, Y. Jin, F. Ding, L. Yang, Y. Ye, S. Zhong, Y. Lin, and S. He, “Plasmonic and metamaterial structures as electromagnetic absorbers,” Laser Photonics Rev. 8(4), 495–520 (2014). [CrossRef]
4. A. Tittl, P. Mai, R. Taubert, D. Dregely, N. Liu, and H. Giessen, “Palladium-based plasmonic perfect absorber in the visible wavelength range and its application to hydrogen sensing,” Nano Lett. 11(10), 4366–4369 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. N. Liu, M. Mesch, T. Weiss, M. Hentschel, and H. Giessen, “Infrared perfect absorber and its application as plasmonic sensor,” Nano Lett. 10(7), 2342–2348 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Y. Yao, R. Shankar, M. A. Kats, Y. Song, J. Kong, M. Loncar, and F. Capasso, “Electrically tunable metasurface perfect absorbers for ultrathin mid-infrared optical modulators,” Nano Lett. 14(11), 6526–6532 (2014). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Y. Chen, X. Li, X. Luo, S. A. Maier, and M. Hong, “Tunable near-infrared plasmonic perfect absorber based on phase-change materials,” Photonics Res. 3(3), 54–57 (2015). [CrossRef]
8. P. Mandal, “Plasmonic perfect absorber for refractive index sensing and SERS,” Plasmonics 11(1), 223–229 (2016). [CrossRef]
9. W. C. Tan, J. R. Sambles, and T. W. Preist, “Double-period zero-order metal gratings as effective selective absorbers,” Phys. Rev. B 61(19), 13177–13182 (2000). [CrossRef]
10. F. J. García de Abajo, “Colloquium: Light scattering by particle and hole arrays,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 79(4), 1267–1290 (2007). [CrossRef]
11. F. J. Garcia-Vidal, L. Martin-Moreno, T. W. Ebbesen, and L. Kuipers, “Light passing through subwavelength apertures,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82(1), 729–787 (2010). [CrossRef]
12. J. A. Porto, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and J. B. Pendry, “Transmission resonances on metallic gratings with very narrow slits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83(14), 2845–2848 (1999). [CrossRef]
13. H. Gao, C. Gu, Z. Y. Zheng, S. J. Chen, and H. Y. Hao, “Nearly perfect absorption in a single-layer metallic grating with rectangular grooves on its front surface,” Appl. Phys. B 117(3), 875–883 (2014). [CrossRef]
14. R. L. Chern, Y. T. Chen, and H. Y. Lin, “Anomalous optical absorption in metallic gratings with subwavelength slits,” Opt. Express 18(19), 19510–19521 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. S. Collin, G. Vincent, R. Haïdar, N. Bardou, S. Rommeluère, and J. L. Pelouard, “Nearly perfect Fano transmission resonances through nanoslits drilled in a metallic membrane,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(2), 027401 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. J. W. Yoon, M. J. Jung, S. H. Song, and R. Magnusson, “Analytic theory of the resonance properties of metallic nanoslit arrays,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 48(7), 852–861 (2012). [CrossRef]
17. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon, 2005).
18. P. Sheng, R. S. Stepleman, and P. N. Sanda, “Exact eigenfunctions for square-wave gratings: Application to diffraction and surface-plasmon calculations,” Phys. Rev. B 26(6), 2907–2916 (1982). [CrossRef]
19. J. T. Shen and P. M. Platzman, “Properties of a one-dimensional metallophotonic crystal,” Phys. Rev. B 70(3), 035101 (2004). [CrossRef]
20. F. J. Garcia-Vidal and L. Martin-Moreno, “Transmission and focusing of light in one-dimensional periodically nanostructured metals,” Phys. Rev. B 66(15), 155412 (2002). [CrossRef]
21. A. Rahman, K. Vasilev, and P. Majewski, “Analytical solution of the fundamental waveguide mode of one-dimensional transmission grating for TM polarization,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28(12), 2919–2924 (2011). [CrossRef]
22. F. J. García-Vidal, H. J. Lezec, T. W. Ebbesen, and L. Martín-Moreno, “Multiple paths to enhance optical transmission through a single subwavelength slit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(21), 213901 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. H. J. Lezec, A. Degiron, E. Devaux, R. A. Linke, L. Martin-Moreno, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Beaming light from a subwavelength aperture,” Science 297(5582), 820–822 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. L. Martín-Moreno, F. J. García-Vidal, H. J. Lezec, A. Degiron, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Theory of highly directional emission from a single subwavelength aperture surrounded by surface corrugations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(16), 167401 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. J. Nie, H. Li, and W. Liu, “Perfect anomalous absorption of TM polarized light in metallic grating situated in asymmetric surroundings,” IEEE Photonics J. 6(6), 4802008 (2014). [CrossRef]
26. I. S. Spevak, A. Y. Nikitin, E. V. Bezuglyi, A. Levchenko, and A. V. Kats, “Resonantly suppressed transmission and anomalously enhanced light absorption in periodically modulated ultrathin metal films,” Phys. Rev. B 79(16), 161406 (2009). [CrossRef]