Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Two-dimensional atom localization based on coherent field controlling in a five-level M-type atomic system

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We study two-dimensional sub-wavelength atom localization based on the microwave coupling field controlling and spontaneously generated coherence (SGC) effect. For a five-level M-type atom, introducing a microwave coupling field between two upper levels and considering the quantum interference between two transitions from two upper levels to lower levels, the analytical expression of conditional position probability (CPP) distribution is obtained using the iterative method. The influence of the detuning of a spontaneously emitted photon, Rabi frequency of the microwave field, and the SGC effect on the CPP are discussed. The two-dimensional sub-half-wavelength atom localization with high-precision and high spatial resolution is achieved by adjusting the detuning and the Rabi frequency, where the atom can be localized in a region smaller thanλ/10×λ/10. The spatial resolution is improved significantly compared with the case without the microwave field.

© 2017 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

High precision and high spatial resolution position measurement of moving atom has potential applications in neutral atom trapping [1], atom nanolithography [2], and quantum information processing [3]. Several schemes based on spontaneous emission [4–8], absorption [9–13] and gain [14] have been proposed due to the dependence of the position on the atom-field interaction. For the scheme based on spontaneous emission, when an atom passing through a standing-wave field the spontaneous emitted photon carries information about the atom’s position which is closely associated with the Rabi frequency of the standing-wave field. Therefore, information about the atom’s position can be obtained by detecting the spontaneously emitted photon.

For the multi-level atomic system driven by multi-fields, the atom localization has been studied by controlling the phase and amplitude of driving fields. To further improve the precision, atomic systems with external fields in a closed loop were proposed. Ding et al [6] explored the high-precision atom localization with a cyclic configuration via controllable spontaneous emission, and achieved sub-wavelength atom localization. Wan et al [7] proposed a new scheme for two-dimensional(2D) atom localization in a four-level atomic system with a closed loop three external fields, and obtained the sub-half-wavelength domain.

The quantum interference is a basic phenomenon for controlling spontaneous emission [15–19], the atom localization based on quantum interference effect has attracted much interest. Ghafoor and associates [18] demonstrated subwavelength atom localization via quantum interference in a three-level atomic system. For the coherently driven five-level M-type atomic system, Ding et al [20] explored the 2D atom localization. However, the localization still limited in subwavelength domain and the narrow localization peak cannot be obtained. In our paper, in order to further improve precision and spatial resolution of atom localization we try to introduce microwave coupling field between two upper levels in the M-type atomic system, and investigate the influence of coherent fields and SGC effect on atom localization. The 2D sub-half-wavelength atom localization with high-precision and high spatial resolution is obtained through adjusting the detuning and the Rabi frequency, and the atom can be localized in a region smaller thanλ/10×λ/10.

2. Theoretical model and equations

As shown in Fig. 1, we consider a system of a five-level atom interacting with three coherent fields, which resonantly couple the corresponding transitions. The upper levels|3and|4are coupled by a microwave fieldΩC, and the two upper levels decay to the lower level|0via interactions with the vacuum field modes. Γ1andΓ2are the spontaneous decay rates. The lower level|1is coupled to the excited levels|3by a 2D standing-wave fieldΩ1(x,y), and lower level|2is coupled to the excited levels|4by a coherent driving fieldΩ2.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Schematic diagrams (a) An atom moving alongzaxis and passing through the two orthogonal standing-wave fields inxyplane, (b) Coherently driven M-type five-level atomic system.

Download Full Size | PDF

The 2D standing-wave fieldΩ1(x,y)=Ω10(sinkx+sinky)(k=2π/λ) is the superposition of two orthogonal standing-wave with the same frequency. When an atom moves along the z direction and passes through the 2D standing-wave field with a high enough velocity, the kinetic energy of the atom along the direction of the field(z direction) is very large, and can be treated as a classical case. However, the velocity of the atom along the direction of wave-vector of the standing-wave is considered very small, and the enter-of-mass position of the atom through the standing-wave does not change during the interaction time. Thus, the kinetic energy term along wave-vector direction is far less than the kinetic energy term along z direction in the Hamiltonian, and can be neglected under the Ramman-Nath approximation [21]. Applying the rotating-wave approximation the Hamiltonian for the system in the interaction picture reads(=1)

Hint=Ω1(x,y)|13|+Ω2|24|+Ωc|34|+kg3kexp(i(ωkω30)t)|30|bk+kg4kexp(i(ωkω40)t)|40|bk+H.c.
wherebkis annihilation operator forkthvacuum modes, g3kand g4kare the coupling constants between thekthmode and the corresponding atomic transitions. Here, ω30and ω40are the transitions frequencies from levels|3, |4to|0, respectively.

At any timet, the wave function of our system is

|ψ(t)=dxdyf(x,y)|x,y[a1(t)|1,0+a2(t)|2,0+a3(t)|3,0+a4(t)|4,0+kak(t)|0,1k]
where the probability amplitudeai(t)(i=1,2,3,4)represents the state of atom at timet, ak(t)is the probability amplitude that the atom is in level|0with one photon emitted spontaneously in thekthvacuum mode, andf(x,y)is the center-of-mass wave function of the atom.

The CPP distributionP(x,y;t|0,1k)is defined as the probability of finding the atom at position(x,y)in the 2D standing-wave fields, where a spontaneously emitted photon is detected at timetin the reservoir mode of wave vectork, which can be determined by taking the appropriate projection over the atom-field state|ψ(t) [4,10]

P(x,y)P(x,y;t|0,1k)=N2|f(x,y)|2|ak(t)|2
whereNis a normalization factor. Considering the steady state behavior of the atomic system, theP(x,y)can be rewritten as

P(x,y)=N2|f(x,y)|2|ak(t)|2.

Under the Raman-Nath approximation the center-of-mass wave function of the atomf(x,y)is assumed nearly constant over many wavelengths of the standing-wave fields in thexyplane, thus the CPP distributionP(x,y)is determined byak(t). It is noted that the spontaneous emission spectrumS(ωk)is proportional to|ak(t)|2. Thus, the P(x,y) can be characterized by spontaneous emission spectrum. The probability amplitudeak(t) can be found by solving the Schrodinger wave equation Eq. (1) and the wave function Eq. (2)

a˙1(t)=iΩ1(x,y)a3(t)
a˙2(t)=iΩ2a4(t)
a˙3(t)=iΩ1(x,y)a1(t)iΩca4(t)Γ12a3(t)pΓ1Γ22a4(t)eiω34t
a˙4(t)=iΩ2a2(t)iΩca3(t)Γ22a4(t)pΓ1Γ22a3(t)eiω34t
a˙k(t)=ig3kei(ωkω30)ta3(t)ig4kei(ωkω40)ta4(t)
whereΓi=2π|gik|2D(ωk)(i=1,2)are the spontaneous decay rate from the two upper levels |3and|4to the lower level|0, respectively, andD(ωk)is the density of mode at frequencyωkin the vacuum; pdenotes the alignment of the two dipole moment matrix elementpμ1C×μ2C/(|μ1C||μ2C|). When the two dipole matrix moments are orthogonalpequals to zero(p=0), which means that there is no quantum interference between the two transitions. When the dipole matrix moments are parallelpequals to one(p=1), which implies that the quantum interference is maximal. Using the Laplace transform method and consideringak(0)=0we can get
sa1(s)a1(0)=iΩ1(x,y)a3(s)
sa2(s)a2(0)=iΩ2a4(s)
sa3(s)a3(0)=iΩ1(x,y)a1(s)iΩca4(s)Γ12a3(s)pΓ1Γ22a4(siω34)
sa4(s)a4(0)=iΩ2a2(s)iΩca3(s)Γ22a4(s)pΓ1Γ22a3(s+iω34)
(s+iδk)ck(s)=ig3ka3(s+iω34/2)ig4ka4(siω34/2)
whereδk=ωkω30+ω34/2, and the population conserving change of variable has been madeck(t)=ak(t)eiδkt. From Eqs. 6(a) - 6(c) we can get
a3(s)=B(s)A(s)+C(s)A(s)a3(s+iω34)+D(s)A(s)a3(siω34)
a4(s)=F(s)E(s)+G(s)E(s)a4(s+iω34)+H(s)E(s)a4(siω34)
where

A(s)=s(s+Γ12)+Ω12(x,y)+s2Ωc2s(s+Γ2/2)+Ω22p2Γ1Γ2s(siω34)/4(siω34)(siω34+Γ2/2)+Ω22
B(s)=sa3(0)iΩ1(x,y)a1(0)iΩcs2a4(0)iΩ2sa2(0)s(s+Γ2/2)+Ω22+pΓ1Γ22s[iΩ2a2(0)(siω34)a4(0)](siω34)(siω34+Γ2/2)+Ω22
C(s)=ips2ΩcΓ1Γ2/2s(s+Γ2/2)+Ω22
D(s)=pΓ1Γ22iΩcs(siω34)(siω34)(siω34+Γ2/2)+Ω22
E(s)=s(s+Γ22)+Ω22+s2Ωc2s(s+Γ1/2)+Ω12(x,y)p2Γ1Γ2s(s+iω34)/4(s+iω34)(s+iω34+Γ1/2)+Ω12(x,y)
F(s)=iΩ2a2(0)+sa4(0)iΩcs2a3(0)iΩ1(x,y)sa1(0)s(s+Γ1/2)+Ω12(x,y)+pΓ1Γ22s[iΩ1(x,y)a1(0)(s+iω34)a3(0)](s+iω34)(s+iω34+Γ1/2)+Ω12(x,y)
G(s)=ipΓ1Γ2Ωcs(s+iω34)/2(s+iω34)(s+iω34+Γ1/2)+Ω12(x,y)
H(s)=ips2ΩcΓ1Γ2/2s(s+Γ1/2)+Ω12(x,y)

From Eq. (7) we can’t get analytical expression ofa3(s)anda4(s), here, settinga30(s)=B(s)/A(s)anda40(s)=F(s)/E(s), where thea30(s)anda40(s)represent the zero-order approximation ofa3(s)anda4(s). Using the iterative method [22,23] once in Eq. (7) we obtain

a31(s)=a30+C(s)A(s)a30(s+iω34)+D(s)A(s)a30(siω34)
a41(s)=a40+G(s)E(s)a40(s+iω34)+H(s)E(s)a40(siω34)
where thea31(s)anda41(s)denote the first-order approximation ofa3(s)anda4(s). Using final-value theorem, theck(t)in the long-time limit can be expressed as
ck(t)=limsiδk(s+iδk)ck(s)=ig3ka31(iδk+iω34/2)ig4ka41(iδkiω34/2)
The spontaneous emission spectrum is given byS(δk)|ck(t)|2=|ak(t)|2. Substituting Eq. (9) into the Eq. (4) we can get the CPP distribution.

3. Results and discussion

Since the frequency of spontaneously emitted photon depends on the position-dependent Rabi frequencyΩ1(x,y), in principle the 2D position information of the atom passing through the orthogonal standing-wave can be extracted via frequency measurement of the emitted photons. The probable positions of the atom are then given by those values of(x,y), where the CPPP(x,y)exhibits its maxima. From Eq. (9) we find that the CPP depends not only on the frequency of spontaneously emitted photon and the parameters of the laser fields, but also on the quantum interference effects. Firstly, we discuss the CPP distribution without the consideration of quantum interference(p=0). All the parameters are scaled byΓ, andΓis an arbitrary constant.

Considering the system is initially in the superposition of state|1and|2thata1(0)=a2(0)=2/2. The CPP distribution is plot in Fig. 2 forδk=3.2Γandδk=3.53Γ, respectively. In the case ofδk=3.2Γ, the CPP displays two crater-like patterns in quadrant I and III as shown in Fig. 2(a). Whenδkis increased fromδk=3.2Γtoδk=3.53Γ, the atom is localized mainly in quadrant III and the CPP distribution shows a broad localization peak in Fig. 2(b). In this case we just get sub-wavelength atom localization with a low spatial resolution. In order to describe clearly the localization properties we give the three-dimensional(3D) plot of CPP as shown in Figs. 2(c) and 2(d), which correspond the Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), respectively.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 The conditional position probability distribution versus the position(x,y)for different values of the detuning of spontaneously emitted photon whenp=0anda1(0)=a2(0)=2/2. (a) δk=3.2Γ, (b) δk=3.53Γ, (c) three-dimensional plot associated with (a), (d) three-dimensional plot associated with (b), other parameters areω34=2Γ,Γ1=Γ2=Γ,Ω10=2Γ,Ω2=4Γ,Ωc=Γ.

Download Full Size | PDF

As shown in Fig. 2, we can’t get the narrow localization peak whenp=0. Therefore, we will discuss the CPP considering the quantum interference between the two decay channels. Whenp=1, the CPP distribution as a function ofxandywith four different detuning of the spontaneous emitted photon is shown in Fig. 3. Under the condition ofδk=2.0Γ, the CPP distributes in quadrants I and III but mainly in quadrants I, where two broad spark-like patterns can be found. When the detuning is tuned toδk=1.5Γandδk=1.9Γ, the maxima of the CPP distribution in Figs. 3(b) and 3(c) are situated in the quadrants I and III with a crater-like pattern, respectively. As the detuning is increased to an appropriate value (δk=3.96Γ), we obtain a narrow localization peak in quadrants III, which implies the spatial resolution is improved significantly. However, there is a very weak localization peak in quadrant I, therefore, we still can’t get the sub-half-wavelength atom localization.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 The conditional position probability distribution versus the position(x,y)for different values of the detuning of spontaneously emitted photon whenp=1anda1(0)=a2(0)=2/2. (a)δk=2.0Γ, (b)δk=1.5Γ, (c)δk=1.9Γ, (d)δk=3.96Γ, other parameters areω34=2Γ,Γ1=Γ2=Γ,Ω10=Γ,Ω2=4Γ,Ωc=Γ.

Download Full Size | PDF

To further improve the precision and spatial resolution of atom localization, we will explore the dependence of the CPP distribution on the Rabi frequencyΩcof microwave field. In order to compare the results under different microwave fields, the CPP forΩc=Γ is given once again in Fig. 4(a). When the coupling between the two upper levels is Ωc=Γ, as plotted in Fig. 4(a), the CPP distributes in quadrant I and III but mainly in quadrant III. As the intensity of coupling field is decreased, for instance, Ωcis varied fromΩc=ΓtoΩc=0.5Γ, the atom is localized in quadrant III and a ultra-narrow localization peak was found as shown in Fig. 4(b), which means that the precision and the spatial resolution is improved significantly. The Figs. 4(c) and 4(d) are the 3D plot of CPP associated with Figs. 4(a) and 4(b), respectively. In Fig. 4(d), we can see a single ultra-narrow localization peak. From Fig. 4, we find that through introducing coupling field between two upper levels and considering the SGC effect in the atomic system, the spatial resolution of the atom localization is improved significantly compared with the results in Ref [20]. We can concluded that the ultra-high precision and spatial resolution of atom localization can be achieved by choosing the appropriate detecting frequency and intensity of microwave coupling field. In addition, when the system is initially in the superposition of state|3and|4(a3(0)=a4(0)=2/2), only the sub-wavelength atom localization with broad localization peak can be achieved at specific detuning. Therefore, we only give the results when the system is initially in the superposition of state|1and|2.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 The influence of microwave coupling field on the conditional position probability distribution versus the position(x,y) p=1anda1(0)=a2(0)=2/2. (a) Ωc=Γ,δk=3.96Γ, (b) Ωc=0.5Γ,δk=1.99Γ, (c) three-dimension plot associated with (a), (d) three-dimension plot associated with (b), other parameters areω34=2Γ,Γ1=Γ2=Γ,Ω10=Γ,Ω2=4Γ.

Download Full Size | PDF

Finally, we discuss the real atomic system that could be used for possible experiment realization. The cold atom 87Rb (D2 line) can be as a possible candidate, so that levels|0,|1,|2,|3and|4corresponds to states5S1/2|F=1,m=0,5S1/2|F=2,m=+2,5S1/2|F=2,m=-2,5P3/2|F=2,m=+1, and5P3/2|F=2,m=-1, respectively. The two upper states decay with ratesΓ1=Γ2=Γ=6MHz.

Last but not the least, for 2D atom localization based on spontaneous emission controlling, when the SGC effect and multi-coherent fields are introduced, we can get the high-resolution and precision atom localization by adjusting detecting frequency and intensity of external fields. As we know that the CPP is proportional to the spontaneous emission spectrum, therefore, the spontaneous emission properties of atomic system determine the localization properties. Based on the coherent control of spontaneous emission, the spectral line elimination and ultra-narrow spectral line can be achieved. The ultra-narrow spectral line results in the ultra-narrow localization peak in CPP distribution. That is why we can get the high-resolution and precision atom localization through controlling atomic spontaneous emission.

4. Summary

In summary, we have studied 2D sub-half-wavelength atom localization based on coherent fields controlling and SGC effect. The analytical expression of CPP was obtained by using iterative method whenp=1. We found that the microwave coupling field between two upper levels and the SGC affect the atom localization significantly. Whenp=1, compared with the case without coupling field, the spatial resolution of the 2D atom localization is improved remarkably. By properly adjusting the detuning and the Rabi frequency, the atom can be localized in a region smaller thanλ/10×λ/10and the probability of the finding the atom at a particular position can reach 100%. Our work greatly improved the previous results that the atom is confined inλ/2×λ/2region.

As a concluding remark, we mention that the experimental realization of our proposed scheme. The main challenge for realizing SGC effect is to have both near-degenerate atomic levels and non-orthogonal dipole moments, a condition rather difficult to find in real systems. To the best of our knowledge, there are two ways of observing the SGC effects. One is embedding the atom in anisotropy vacuum or coupling the atom with cavity fields [24,25]. The other way is simulating the SGC in the dressed-state picture [17,26–28]. In several coherently driven atomic systems, the rigorous condition for SGC can be achieved in the dressed-state picture. In these schemes, SGC effect with maximal quantum interference exists between the dressed states and the lower state, but does not need the rigorous atomic conditions. For the detection of spontaneously emitted photon we can achieve the measurement using the 4π detectors [29]. However, it is not necessary to measure the position of each atom, it is sufficient to select those atoms whose spontaneous emitted radiation has indeed been detected by the detector.

Funding

Program for Innovation Research of Science in Harbin Institute of Technology and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (PIRS OF HIT 201615).

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Dr. Jinwei Gao and Bing Zhang for helpful advices and valuable comments.

References and links

1. W. D. Phillips, “Nobel lecture: Laser cooling and trapping of neutral atoms,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 721–741 (1998).

2. K. S. Johnson, J. H. Thywissen, N. H. Dekker, K. K. Berggren, A. P. Chu, R. Younkin, and M. Prentiss, “Localization of metastable atom beams with optical standing waves: nanolithography at the Heisenberg limit,” Science 280(5369), 1583–1586 (1998). [PubMed]  

3. J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, “Quantum computations with cold trapped ions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 74(20), 4091–4094 (1995). [PubMed]  

4. F. Ghafoor, S. Qamar, and M. S. Zubairy, “Atom localization via phase and amplitude control of the driving field,” Phys. Rev. A 65, 043819 (2002).

5. Z. Wang, B. Yu, J. Zhu, Z. Cao, S. Zhen, X. Wu, and F. Xu, “Atom localization via controlled spontaneous emission in a five-level atomic system,” Ann. Phys. 327, 1132–1145 (2012).

6. C. Ding, J. Li, R. Yu, X. Hao, and Y. Wu, “High-precision atom localization via controllable spontaneous emission in a cycle-configuration atomic system,” Opt. Express 20(7), 7870–7885 (2012). [PubMed]  

7. R. G. Wan and T. Y. Zhang, “Two-dimensional sub-half-wavelength atom localization via controlled spontaneous emission,” Opt. Express 19(25), 25823–25832 (2011). [PubMed]  

8. S. Qamar, S. Y. Zhu, and M. S. Zubairy, “Atom localization via resonance fluorescence,” Phys. Rev. A 61, 063806 (2000).

9. M. Sahrai, H. Tajalli, K. T. Kapale, and M. S. Zubairy, “Subwavelength atom localization via amplitude and phase control of the absorption spectrum,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 013820 (2005).

10. E. Paspalakis and P. L. Knight, “Localizing an atom via quantum interference,” Phys. Rev. A 63, 065802 (2001).

11. C. Ding, J. Li, X. Yang, D. Zhang, and H. Xiong, “Proposal for efficient two-dimensional atom localization using probe absorption in a microwave-driven four-level atomic system,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 043840 (2011).

12. R. G. Wan, T. Y. Zhang, and J. Kou, “Two-dimensional sub-half-wavelength atom localization via phase control of absorption and gain,” Phys. Rev. A 87, 043816 (2013).

13. Rahmatullah andS. Qamar, “Two-dimensional atom localization via probe-absorption spectrum,” Phys. Rev. A 88, 013846 (2013).

14. S. Qamar, A. Mehmood, and S. Qamar, “Subwavelength atom localization via coherent manipulation of the Raman gain process,” Phys. Rev. A 79, 033848 (2009).

15. S. Y. Zhu and M. O. Scully, “Spectral Line Elimination and Spontaneous Emission Cancellation via Quantum Interference,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 76(3), 388–391 (1996). [PubMed]  

16. E. Paspalakis and P. L. Knight, “Phase Control of Spontaneous Emission,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 293–296 (1998).

17. J. H. Wu, A. J. Li, Y. Ding, Y. C. Zhao, and J. Y. Gao, “Control of spontaneous emission from a coherently driven four-level atom,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 023802 (2005).

18. F. Ghafoor, “Subwavelength atom localization via quantum coherence in a three-level atomic system,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 063849 (2011).

19. X. Q. Jiang, B. Zhang, Z. W. Lu, and X. D. Sun, “Coupled field induced conversion between destructive and constructive quantum interference,” Ann. Phys. 375, 233–238 (2016).

20. C. Ding, J. Li, Z. Zhan, and X. Yang, “Two-dimensional atom localization via spontaneous emission in a coherently driven five-level M-type atomic system,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 063834 (2011).

21. P. Meystre and M. Sargent III, Elements of Quantum Optics, 3rd ed. (Springer-Verlag, 1999).

22. S. C. Cheng, J. N. Wu, T. J. Yang, and W. F. Hsieh, “Effect of atomic position on the spontaneous emission of a three-level atom in a coherent photonic-band-gap reservoir,” Phys. Rev. A 79, 013801 (2009).

23. X. Q. Jiang, B. Zhang, Z. W. Lu, and X. D. Sun, “Control of spontaneous emission from a microwave-field-coupled three-level Λ-type atom in photonic crystals,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 053823 (2011).

24. A. K. Patnaik and G. S. Agarwal, “Cavity-induced coherence effects in spontaneous emissions from preselection of polarization,” Phys. Rev. A 59, 3015–3020 (1999).

25. G. S. Agarwal, “Anisotropic vacuum-induced interference in decay channels,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 84(24), 5500–5503 (2000). [PubMed]  

26. C. L. Wang, A. J. Li, X. Y. Zhou, Z. H. Kang, J. Yun, and J. Y. Gao, “Investigation of spontaneously generated coherence in dressed states of 85Rb atoms,” Opt. Lett. 33(7), 687–689 (2008). [PubMed]  

27. Z. Ficek and S. Swain, “Simulating quantum interference in a three-level system with perpendicular transition dipole moments,” Phys. Rev. A 69, 023401 (2004).

28. A. J. Li, X. L. Song, X. G. Wei, L. Wang, and J. Y. Gao, “Effects of spontaneously generated coherence in a microwave-driven four-level atomic system,” Phys. Rev. A 77(5), 053806 (2008).

29. R. E. Grove, F. Y. Wu, and S. Ezekiel, “Measurement of the spectrum of resonance fluorescence from a two-level atom in an intense monochromatic field,” Phys. Rev. A 15, 227–233 (1977).

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Schematic diagrams (a) An atom moving alongzaxis and passing through the two orthogonal standing-wave fields in xyplane, (b) Coherently driven M-type five-level atomic system.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 The conditional position probability distribution versus the position (x,y)for different values of the detuning of spontaneously emitted photon when p=0and a 1 (0)= a 2 (0)= 2 /2. (a) δ k =3.2Γ, (b) δ k =3.53Γ, (c) three-dimensional plot associated with (a), (d) three-dimensional plot associated with (b), other parameters are ω 34 =2Γ, Γ 1 = Γ 2 =Γ, Ω 10 =2Γ, Ω 2 =4Γ, Ω c =Γ.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 The conditional position probability distribution versus the position (x,y)for different values of the detuning of spontaneously emitted photon when p=1and a 1 (0)= a 2 (0)= 2 /2. (a) δ k =2.0Γ, (b) δ k =1.5Γ, (c) δ k =1.9Γ, (d) δ k =3.96Γ, other parameters are ω 34 =2Γ, Γ 1 = Γ 2 =Γ, Ω 10 =Γ, Ω 2 =4Γ, Ω c =Γ.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 The influence of microwave coupling field on the conditional position probability distribution versus the position (x,y) p=1and a 1 (0)= a 2 (0)= 2 /2. (a) Ω c =Γ, δ k =3.96Γ, (b) Ω c =0.5Γ, δ k =1.99Γ, (c) three-dimension plot associated with (a), (d) three-dimension plot associated with (b), other parameters are ω 34 =2Γ, Γ 1 = Γ 2 =Γ, Ω 10 =Γ, Ω 2 =4Γ.

Equations (27)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

H int = Ω 1 (x,y)|13|+ Ω 2 |24|+ Ω c |34| + k g 3k exp(i( ω k ω 30 )t)|30| b k + k g 4k exp(i( ω k ω 40 )t)|40| b k +H.c.
| ψ(t)= dxdyf(x,y) | x,y [ a 1 (t)| 1,0+ a 2 (t)| 2,0+ a 3 (t)| 3,0+ a 4 (t)| 4,0+ k a k (t)| 0, 1 k ]
P( x,y )P( x,y;t| 0, 1 k )= N 2 | f(x,y) | 2 | a k (t) | 2
P ( x , y ) = N 2 | f ( x , y ) | 2 | a k ( t ) | 2 .
a ˙ 1 (t)=i Ω 1 (x,y) a 3 (t)
a ˙ 2 (t)=i Ω 2 a 4 (t)
a ˙ 3 (t)=i Ω 1 (x,y) a 1 (t)i Ω c a 4 (t) Γ 1 2 a 3 (t)p Γ 1 Γ 2 2 a 4 (t) e i ω 34 t
a ˙ 4 (t)=i Ω 2 a 2 (t)i Ω c a 3 (t) Γ 2 2 a 4 (t)p Γ 1 Γ 2 2 a 3 (t) e i ω 34 t
a ˙ k (t)=i g 3k e i( ω k ω 30 )t a 3 (t)i g 4k e i( ω k ω 40 )t a 4 (t)
s a 1 (s) a 1 (0)=i Ω 1 (x,y) a 3 (s)
s a 2 (s) a 2 (0)=i Ω 2 a 4 (s)
s a 3 (s) a 3 (0)=i Ω 1 (x,y) a 1 (s)i Ω c a 4 (s) Γ 1 2 a 3 (s)p Γ 1 Γ 2 2 a 4 (si ω 34 )
s a 4 (s) a 4 (0)=i Ω 2 a 2 (s)i Ω c a 3 (s) Γ 2 2 a 4 (s)p Γ 1 Γ 2 2 a 3 (s+i ω 34 )
(s+i δ k ) c k (s)=i g 3k a 3 (s+i ω 34 /2)i g 4k a 4 (si ω 34 /2)
a 3 (s)= B(s) A(s) + C(s) A(s) a 3 (s+i ω 34 )+ D(s) A(s) a 3 (si ω 34 )
a 4 (s)= F(s) E(s) + G(s) E(s) a 4 (s+i ω 34 )+ H(s) E(s) a 4 (si ω 34 )
A ( s ) = s ( s + Γ 1 2 ) + Ω 1 2 ( x , y ) + s 2 Ω c 2 s ( s + Γ 2 / 2 ) + Ω 2 2 p 2 Γ 1 Γ 2 s ( s i ω 34 ) / 4 ( s i ω 34 ) ( s i ω 34 + Γ 2 / 2 ) + Ω 2 2
B ( s ) = s a 3 ( 0 ) i Ω 1 ( x , y ) a 1 ( 0 ) i Ω c s 2 a 4 ( 0 ) i Ω 2 s a 2 ( 0 ) s ( s + Γ 2 / 2 ) + Ω 2 2 + p Γ 1 Γ 2 2 s [ i Ω 2 a 2 ( 0 ) ( s i ω 34 ) a 4 ( 0 ) ] ( s i ω 34 ) ( s i ω 34 + Γ 2 / 2 ) + Ω 2 2
C ( s ) = i p s 2 Ω c Γ 1 Γ 2 / 2 s ( s + Γ 2 / 2 ) + Ω 2 2
D ( s ) = p Γ 1 Γ 2 2 i Ω c s ( s i ω 34 ) ( s i ω 34 ) ( s i ω 34 + Γ 2 / 2 ) + Ω 2 2
E ( s ) = s ( s + Γ 2 2 ) + Ω 2 2 + s 2 Ω c 2 s ( s + Γ 1 / 2 ) + Ω 1 2 ( x , y ) p 2 Γ 1 Γ 2 s ( s + i ω 34 ) / 4 ( s + i ω 34 ) ( s + i ω 34 + Γ 1 / 2 ) + Ω 1 2 ( x , y )
F ( s ) = i Ω 2 a 2 ( 0 ) + s a 4 ( 0 ) i Ω c s 2 a 3 ( 0 ) i Ω 1 ( x , y ) s a 1 ( 0 ) s ( s + Γ 1 / 2 ) + Ω 1 2 ( x , y ) + p Γ 1 Γ 2 2 s [ i Ω 1 ( x , y ) a 1 ( 0 ) ( s + i ω 34 ) a 3 ( 0 ) ] ( s + i ω 34 ) ( s + i ω 34 + Γ 1 / 2 ) + Ω 1 2 ( x , y )
G ( s ) = i p Γ 1 Γ 2 Ω c s ( s + i ω 34 ) / 2 ( s + i ω 34 ) ( s + i ω 34 + Γ 1 / 2 ) + Ω 1 2 ( x , y )
H ( s ) = i p s 2 Ω c Γ 1 Γ 2 / 2 s ( s + Γ 1 / 2 ) + Ω 1 2 ( x , y )
a 31 (s)= a 30 + C(s) A(s) a 30 (s+i ω 34 )+ D(s) A(s) a 30 (si ω 34 )
a 41 (s)= a 40 + G(s) E(s) a 40 (s+i ω 34 )+ H(s) E(s) a 40 (si ω 34 )
c k (t)= lim si δ k (s+i δ k ) c k (s) =i g 3k a 31 (i δ k +i ω 34 /2)i g 4k a 41 (i δ k i ω 34 /2)
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.