Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Observation of incoherently coupled dark-bright vector solitons in single-mode fibers

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We report experimental observation of incoherently coupled dark-bright vector solitons in single-mode fibers. Properties of the vector solitons accord well with those predicted by the respective systems of incoherently coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations. To our knowledge, this is the first experimental observation of temporal incoherently coupled dark-bright solitons in single-mode fibers.

© 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Solitons, i.e. self-trapped nonlinear waves, have been predicted and observed in hydrodynamics [1], plasmas [2], Bose-Einstein condensates [3], biophysics [4], optics [5,6], and in other areas of physics. In nonlinear optics, the soliton formation in single-mode fibers (SMFs) has drawn great interest both due to their significance to fundamental studies and potential applications in long-haul optical communications and optical data-processing systems. The soliton formation in SMFs is described by the nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE), a paradigm model governing the nonlinear-wave propagation in a host of physical systems and giving rise to bright and dark solitons [7,8]. Bright and dark solitons of the NLSE types have been experimentally observed in SMFs [9,10], as well as in water waves [11], atomic Bose-Einstein condensates [12–17], and many other media.

Not only the scalar NLSE but also coupled NLSEs admit soliton solutions. In particular, in the framework of equations modeling the light propagation in birefringent SMFs [18] it has been shown that, due to the cross-phase-modulation (XPM) coupling, bright-bright [19], dark–dark [20], dark-bright (DB) [21–28] vector solitons can be formed. Experimental studies have indeed revealed coupled bright-bright and dark-dark vector solitons [29,30] in weakly birefringent SMFs. However, to the best of our knowledge, no incoherently coupled dark-bright vector temporal solitons have so far been observed in fibers (Matter-wave DB solitons were experimentally created in binary BECs [15–17]). In this work we report the first experimental evidence of such coupled dark-bright vector solitons in SMFs.

2. Theoretical predictions

Under incoherent coupling between two orthogonal linearly polarized modes, the light propagation in a birefringent SMF is governed by the following system of coupled NLSEs:

iubzβb2ubt2+γ(|ub|2+23|ud|2)ub=0.iudzβd2udt2+γ(|ud|2+23|ub|2)ud=0.
where ub and ud are normalized amplitudes of optical fields carrying the orthogonal linear polarizations, βb and βd are their group-velocity-dispersion (GVD) coefficients, γ is the fiber’s nonlinearity coefficient, and 2/3 is the standard value of the relative XPM strength. It was first theoretically shown by M. Lisak et al [21] that Eq. (1) admits the following coupled DB soliton solutions:
ub=Absech(Bξ)exp[i(σbzΩbt)].ud=Ad(1C2sech2Bξ)12exp[i(σdzΩdt+φd)].
where ξ=tzν, 1ν=2βbΩb=2βdΩd, Ab, Ad and v are arbitrary constants, and

B2=1α22γαβdβbAb2.
σb=γ[αAd21α22βbαβdβbAb2]+14βbν2.
σd=γ[αβb+[(α23)/2]βdαβbβdAd21α22βdαβdβbAb2]+14βdν2.
φd=N2βdAd2ξdξ(1C2sech2Bξ)12.
N2=2βd2Ad6γβdαβb(1α2)(2C2).
C2=αβbβdβbαβdAb2Ad2.

Intensity profiles of the coupled dark-bright solitons are plotted in Fig. 1. Different from their scalar counterparts, the coupled dark-bright solitons can be formed in fibers with both normal and anomalous GVD; however, GVD coefficients βd and βb of the dark and bright components should satisfy different conditions in these cases. While in the normal-GVD fiber the condition is (2/3)βdb, in the case of the anomalous GVD it is (2/3)βdb. The coupled bright and dark solitons have the same pulse width, which is mainly determined by the strength of the bright component. The darkness of the dark soliton is determined by both the background light intensity and bright-component’s strength. If multiple dark-bright solitons are formed in the same fiber, they can have different heights of the bright component and, accordingly, pulse widths.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Typical intensity profiles of the theoretically predicted coupled dark-bright solitons. (a) In the normal-GVD fiber, with βb = 0.5ps2/km, βd = 1ps2/km, Ad2 = 22.5mW, Ab2 = 2.5mW (solid lines), andAb2 = 4.9mW (dashed lines). (b) In the anomalous-GVD fiber, with βb = −1ps2/km, βd = −0.5ps2/km, Ad2 = 10mW, Ab2 = 2.5mW (solid lines), and Ab2 = 4.9mW (dashed lines).

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Experimental results

Although the coupled dark-bright solitons have been theoretically predicted more than two decades ago [21–27], creation of such complexes in the experiment has not been reported. One of the challenges for the experiment is how to keep the fiber’s birefringence constant over a long distance. To overcome the problem, we have adopted a novel approach: instead of letting the light propagate in a long fiber, we circulate it in an active fiber ring cavity. Theoretical studies have shown that, under suitable conditions, the average dynamics of light circulating in the ring is tantamount to that of light propagation in an endless fiber whose parameters are equal to those averaged over the ring [31]. This has an advantage that, through the cavity GVD and birefringence management, one can adjust the effective dispersion and birefringence to any set of required values corresponding to the endless fiber. Indeed, using such a technique, S. T. Cundiff et al have demonstrated phase-locked bright vector solitons [29], and we have demonstrated polarization-rotating vector solitons and higher-order polarization-locked vector solitons in the fibers [32,33].

To realize this approach, we have constructed a fiber ring laser, as schematically shown in Fig. 2. It has a ring cavity consisting of a 3m Er-doped fiber with normal GVD = 64 ps2/km, a 10.5m standard SMF (SMF-28) with anomalous GVD = −24 ps2/km, and a 9m dispersion-compensating fiber with GVD = 5 ps2/km. The fiber laser is pumped by a 1480 nm SMF Raman laser with a maximum pump power ≈2W. A polarization-independent isolator is inserted in the cavity to force the unidirectional light circulation. In addition, an intra-cavity polarization controller (PC) is used to fine-tune the linear cavity birefringence. A wavelength division multiplexer (WDM) is used to couple the pump light into the cavity. A 10% fiber coupler is used to output the light.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 A schematic of the Er-doped fiber (EDF) ring laser. SMF: Single mode fiber. DCF: Dispersion-compensating fiber. WDM: Wavelength division multiplexer. PC: Polarization controller. ISO: Isolator. OC: Output coupler. OSA: Optical spectrum analyzer.

Download Full Size | PDF

While building the fiber cavity, care has been taken to ensure that the net cavity birefringence is sufficiently small, so that the laser is simultaneously oscillating in its two orthogonal linearly polarized modes. Incoherent XPM coupling between the two lasing modes can be easily implemented in the experiment. However, limited by the maximum accessible pump power of the laser, we could not create dark-bright solitons when the net cavity GVD was too large. Instead, only the polarization domains and domain-wall solitons [34] could be observed [35]. Therefore, we have switched the laser to operate at a relatively small net averaged cavity GVD, |β2|¯<1.5ps2/km.

With the small average cavity GVD, coupled dark-bright solitons could be easily produced in the laser. Figure 3 shows a typical case of the laser emission, measured at the average cavity GVDβ2¯=0.67ps2/km. Figure 3(a) displays the polarization-resolved laser emission; Fig. 3(b) presents the corresponding polarization-resolved optical spectra. It is concluded that multiple coupled dark-bright solitons are always initially formed and randomly distributed in the cavity. However, different from the multiple scalar bright solitons, or coupled bright-bright solitons produced in mode-locked fiber lasers [36,37], which always display the same soliton pulse height and energy, different pairs of the DB solitons feature different heights of the bright component and different widths, as seen in the figure. We note that, based on the measured optical spectra of the dark and bright components, they obviously form an XPM-coupled complex.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 A typical picture of the emission of XPM-coupled dark-bright solitons, emitted by the fiber laser, in the net anomalous-cavity-GVD regime. a) Oscilloscope traces of the polarization-resolved laser emission; b) The corresponding optical spectra.

Download Full Size | PDF

The net birefringence of the cavity can be slightly changed by tuning paddles of the intracavity PC. At a fixed pump power, carefully increasing the net cavity birefringence, the number of the dark-bright solitons can be significantly reduced, making it possible to produce a single complex of the coupled dark-bright solitons. The complex circulates in the cavity for a long time, until the environmental perturbations essentially alter it, suggesting that the coupled dark-bright solitons are a stable state of the laser operation. We also operated the laser with different values of the anomalous net cavity GVD and pump strength. It is found that, the smaller the net GVD is made, the easier is establishing a robust DB vector-soliton operation regime with a smaller height of the bright component and broader width of the created complex. We note that the formation of the DB vector solitons critically depends on the net cavity birefringence strength. When the net cavity birefringence is large, the frequency offset between the interacting lasing modes also becomes large. In this case no DB vector solitons but only the scalar bright solitons can be observed. However, experimentally we could not switch a DB vector soliton state directly to a scalar soliton state by increasing the net cavity birefringence. In a previous paper we reported a phenomenon of soliton-dark pulse pair formation in a birefringent cavity fiber laser under relatively large net cavity dispersion [38], where scalar bright solitons could be formed in one or both of the orthogonally polarized lasing modes. Because under large average cavity dispersion the formed bright solitons have high peak power, through cross polarization coupling it could induce a broad dark pulse in the CW background of the orthogonal polarization mode. Comparing the DB vector solitons observed in the current paper with that result, although both phenomena are caused by the same effect of cross polarization coupling, due to that their initial conditions and cross coupling strengths are different, the final results are also very different.

To check if the coupled DB solitons could also be formed in the regime of normal net cavity GVD, we operated the laser at β2¯=0.67ps2/km, selecting this GVD value by cutting away a piece (0.22m) of the SMF. A typical state of the polarization-resolved laser emissions in this case is shown in Fig. 4. Coupled DB solitons with the same features as those seen in Fig. 3 are observed, the measured profiles of the DB solitons hardly showing any obvious difference. The result clearly implies that the formation of the coupled DB solitons is independent on the sign of the net cavity GVD.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 The same as in Fig. 3, but for the net normal-cavity-GVD regime.

Download Full Size | PDF

We note that XPM-coupled bright-bright solitons were previously observed in mode-locked fiber lasers [39]. In that case, bright solitons with slightly different group velocities can trap each other through dynamically shifting their central wavelengths. We have found that a similar mechanism applies to the formation of the XPM-coupled dark-bright solitons, in spite of the fact that, without the XPM coupling, a dark (bright) soliton cannot exist in the fiber with anomalous (normal) GVD. It was observed in the experiment that, whenever the dark-bright soliton complexes are formed, a portion of the polarization-resolved spectra in each component dynamically shifts away from their original positions, making the measured spectra in each polarization component asymmetric, as seen in Figs. 3(b) and 4(b). The formation and robust propagation of dark-bright complexes is made possible through this dynamical self-adjustment mechanism. To check the relative intensity of the dark and bright components in each complex, we also measured the total laser output, comparing it in real time with the polarization-resolved laser emissions. It was thus observed that, in the regime with the net anomalous cavity GVD, the total laser emission is a pulse chain identical to the bright-soliton train, while in case of the normal GVD it is a dark-pulse chain identical to the dark-soliton train. This experimental result agrees well with the theoretical prediction, corroborating that the observed complexes are XPM-coupled dark-bright solitons theoretically derived from the XPM-coupled NLSE system.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, we have produced the first experimental observation of XPM-coupled dark-bright vector solitons in SMFs. Features of the observed complexes agree well with those of the dark-bright vector solitons predicted by the XPM-coupled NLSE system. Thus, the results provide the first experimental evidence of the incoherently coupled temporal dark-bright solitons, in accordance with the prediction of the NLSE model. Given that the coupled NLSEs adequately model a variety of physical systems, we expect that the dark-bright vector solitons can be experimentally created in those systems too, under appropriate conditions.

Funding

Ministery of Education (MOE), Singapore (2018-T1-001-145); Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD); National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (61575089).

References

1. J. L. Hammack and H. Segur, “The Korteweg-de Vries equation and water waves. Part 2: Comparison with experiments,” J. Fluid Mech. 65(2), 289–314 (1974). [CrossRef]  

2. R. Heidemann, S. Zhdanov, R. Sütterlin, H. M. Thomas, and G. E. Morfill, “Dissipative dark soliton in a complex plasma,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(13), 135002 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. K. E. Strecker, G. B. Partridge, A. G. Truscott, and R. G. Hulet, “Bright matter wave solitons in Bose–Einstein condensates,” New J. Phys. 5, 73 (2003). [CrossRef]  

4. L. V. Yakushevich, A. V. Savin, and L. I. Manevitch, “Nonlinear dynamics of topological solitons in DNA,” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 66, 016614 (2002). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. G. I. Stegeman and M. Segev, “Optical spatial solitons and their interactions: universality and diversity,” Science 286(5444), 1518–1523 (1999). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. Y. S. Kivshar and G. P. Agrawal, Optical Solitons: From Fibers to Photonic Crystals (Academic, 2003).

7. C. Sulem and P. L. Sulem, The Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation (Springer-Verlag, 1999).

8. T. Dauxois and M. Peyrard, Physics of Solitons (Cambridge University, 2006).

9. L. F. Mollenauer, R. H. Stolen, and J. P. Gordon, “Experimental observation of picosecond pulse narrowing and solitons in optical fibers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 45(13), 1095–1098 (1980). [CrossRef]  

10. P. Emplit, J. P. Hamaide, F. Reynaud, C. Forehly, and A. Barthelemy, “Picosecond steps and dark pulses through nonlinear single mode fibers,” Opt. Commun. 62(6), 374–379 (1987). [CrossRef]  

11. A. Chabchoub, O. Klimmoun, H. Branger, N. Hoffmann, D. Proment, M. Onorato, and N. Akhmediev, “Experimental observation of dark solitons on water surface,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 124101 (2013).

12. K. E. Strecker, G. B. Partridge, A. G. Truscott, and R. G. Hulet, “Formation and propagation of matter-wave soliton trains,” Nature 417(6885), 150–153 (2002). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. L. Khaykovich, F. Schreck, G. Ferrari, T. Bourdel, J. Cubizolles, L. D. Carr, Y. Castin, and C. Salomon, “Formation of a matter-wave bright soliton,” Science 296(5571), 1290–1293 (2002). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. S. Burger, K. Bongs, S. Dettmer, W. Ertmer, K. Sengstock, A. Sanpera, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and M. Lewenstein, “Dark solitons in Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83(25), 5198–5201 (1999). [CrossRef]  

15. C. Becker, S. Stellmer, P. Soltan-Panahi, S. Doerschier, M. Baumert, E. M. Richter, J. Kronjaeger, K. Bongs, and K. Sengstock, “Oscillations and interactions of dark and dark-bright solitons in Bose-Einstein condensates,” Nat. Phys. 4(6), 496–501 (2008). [CrossRef]  

16. C. Hamner, J. J. Chang, P. Engels, and M. A. Hoefer, “Generation of dark-bright soliton trains in superfluid-superfluid counterflow,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106(6), 065302 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. T. Busch and J. R. Anglin, “Dark-bright solitons in inhomogeneous Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(1), 010401 (2001). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. C. R. Menyuk, “Nonlinear pulse propagation in birefringent optical fibers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23(2), 174–176 (1987). [CrossRef]  

19. B. A. Malomed, “Bound solitons in coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations,” Phys. Rev. A 45(12), R8321–R8323 (1992). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

20. Y. S. Kivshar and S. K. Turitsyn, “Vector dark solitons,” Opt. Lett. 18(5), 337–339 (1993). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

21. M. Lisak, A. Hook, and D. Anderson, “Symbiotic solitary-wave pairs sustained by cross-phase modulation in optical fibers,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 7(5), 810–814 (1990). [CrossRef]  

22. A. V. Buryak, Y. S. Kivshar, and D. F. Parker, “Coupling between dark and bright solitons,” Phys. Lett. A 215(1-2), 57–62 (1996). [CrossRef]  

23. V. V. Afanasyev, Y. S. Kivshar, V. V. Konotop, and V. N. Serkin, “Dynamics of coupled dark and bright optical solitons,” Opt. Lett. 14(15), 805–807 (1989). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

24. Y. S. Kivshar, D. Anderson, A. Hook, M. Lisak, A. A. Afanasjev, and V. N. Serkin, “Symbiotic optical solitons and modulational instability,” Phys. Scr. 44(2), 195–202 (1991). [CrossRef]  

25. S. Trillo, S. Wabnitz, E. M. Wright, and G. I. Stegeman, “Optical solitary waves induced by cross-phase modulation,” Opt. Lett. 13(10), 871–873 (1988). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

26. V. V. Afanasjev, E. M. Dianov, A. M. Prokhorov, and V. N. Serkin, “Nonlinear pairing of light and dark optical solitons,” JETP Lett. 48, 638–642 (1988).

27. V. V. Afanasjev, E. M. Dianov, and V. N. Serkin, “Nonlinear pairing of short bright and dark soliton pulses by phase cross modulation,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 25(12), 2656–2664 (1989). [CrossRef]  

28. D. N. Christodoulides, “Black and white vector solitons in weakly birefringent optical fibers,” Phys. Lett. 132(8-9), 451–452 (1988). [CrossRef]  

29. S. T. Cundiff, B. C. Collings, N. N. Akhmediev, J. M. Soto-Crespo, K. Bergman, and W. H. Knox, “Observation of polarization-locked Vector solitons in an optical fiber,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82(20), 3988–3991 (1999). [CrossRef]  

30. G. D. Shao, J. Guo, X. Hu, Y. F. Song, L. M. Zhao, and D. Y. Tang, “Vector dark solitons in a single mode fiber laser,” Laser Phys. Lett. (to be published).

31. D. Y. Tang, J. Guo, Y. F. Song, G. D. Shao, L. M. Zhao, and D. Y. Shen, “Temporal cavity soliton formation in an anomalous dispersion cavity fiber laser,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 31(12), 3050–3056 (2014). [CrossRef]  

32. D. Y. Tang, H. Zhang, L. M. Zhao, and X. Wu, “Observation of high-order polarization-locked vector solitons in a fiber laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(15), 153904 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

33. L. M. Zhao, D. Y. Tang, H. Zhang, and X. Wu, “Polarization rotation locking of vector solitons in a fiber ring laser,” Opt. Express 16(14), 10053–10058 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

34. B. A. Malomed, “Optical domain walls,” Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids, Relat. Interdiscip. Top. 50(2), 1565–1571 (1994). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

35. D. Y. Tang, Y. F. Song, J. Guo, Y. J. Xiang, and D. Y. Shen, “Polarization domain formation and domain dynamics in a quasi-isotropic cavity fiber laser,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 20(5), 0901309 (2014). [CrossRef]  

36. A. B. Grudinin, D. J. Richardson, and D. N. Payne, “Energy quantization in figure eight fiber laser,” Electron. Lett. 28(1), 67–68 (1992). [CrossRef]  

37. D. Y. Tang, L. M. Zhao, B. Zhao, and A. Q. Liu, “Mechanism of multisoliton formation and soliton energy quantization in passively mode-locked fiber lasers,” Phys. Rev. A 72(4), 043816 (2005). [CrossRef]  

38. G. Shao, Y. Song, L. Zhao, D. Shen, and D. Tang, “Soliton-dark pulse pair formation in birefringent cavity fiber lasers through cross phase coupling,” Opt. Express 23(20), 26252–26258 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

39. L. M. Zhao, D. Y. Tang, H. Zhang, X. Wu, and N. Xiang, “Soliton trapping in fiber lasers,” Opt. Express 16(13), 9528–9533 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Typical intensity profiles of the theoretically predicted coupled dark-bright solitons. (a) In the normal-GVD fiber, with βb = 0.5ps2/km, βd = 1ps2/km, A d 2 = 22.5mW, A b 2 = 2.5mW (solid lines), and A b 2 = 4.9mW (dashed lines). (b) In the anomalous-GVD fiber, with βb = −1ps2/km, βd = −0.5ps2/km, A d 2 = 10mW, A b 2 = 2.5mW (solid lines), and A b 2 = 4.9mW (dashed lines).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 A schematic of the Er-doped fiber (EDF) ring laser. SMF: Single mode fiber. DCF: Dispersion-compensating fiber. WDM: Wavelength division multiplexer. PC: Polarization controller. ISO: Isolator. OC: Output coupler. OSA: Optical spectrum analyzer.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 A typical picture of the emission of XPM-coupled dark-bright solitons, emitted by the fiber laser, in the net anomalous-cavity-GVD regime. a) Oscilloscope traces of the polarization-resolved laser emission; b) The corresponding optical spectra.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 The same as in Fig. 3, but for the net normal-cavity-GVD regime.

Equations (8)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

i u b z β b 2 u b t 2 +γ( | u b | 2 + 2 3 | u d | 2 ) u b =0. i u d z β d 2 u d t 2 +γ( | u d | 2 + 2 3 | u b | 2 ) u d =0.
u b = A b sech( Bξ )exp[ i( σ b z Ω b t ) ]. u d = A d ( 1 C 2 sech 2 Bξ ) 1 2 exp[ i( σ d z Ω d t+ φ d ) ].
B 2 = 1 α 2 2 γ α β d β b A b 2 .
σ b =γ[ α A d 2 1 α 2 2 β b α β d β b A b 2 ]+ 1 4 β b ν 2 .
σ d =γ[ α β b +[ ( α 2 3 )/2 ] β d α β b β d A d 2 1 α 2 2 β d α β d β b A b 2 ]+ 1 4 β d ν 2 .
φ d = N 2 β d A d 2 ξ dξ ( 1 C 2 sech 2 Bξ ) 1 2 .
N 2 = 2 β d 2 A d 6 γ β d α β b ( 1 α 2 )( 2 C 2 ).
C 2 = α β b β d β b α β d A b 2 A d 2 .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.